娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
%DrMc+yCcj
#CPlZW6k~s,r:Z but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]%_2DG`N8B2p

m.M_A"] But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
rg0j(l[d n 5Oo6X;D_+h/e.Ch
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:X Sc+h(Z!_

3z^5uV.RQ\a$n
:U)Z%\^.] why?
u/@n+R2IE %~~ jxbrk:m
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]
/{#G t#t'm Oa
Hdm9| y*T9rO see #22 ThusGR tDa;j
@']C%R7lc@QAQbJc
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->QEN0scVJ1ET3Mho
2k*RS].q!E/t.ep
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維S!j3m2ls\
2Q-M&JnN7U
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.$ti.r/U D6QWV!}H

It J+v lL+st 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.!fK+Z*y^O$gl6xZC
u1L9Qe)sR
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:~ d1QF J]Ae/K&uW

-_qX+cKX3T *W+aH1e%T
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
D,`]2s9Ce-X7qHW #}*{ri$Z8V]
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
'u"c!MV"K&g3x
?#wz[SqTiR
+N7g#M,x&JOG i g 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]
2C1X,a(i5s Y yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:?9{%G%V'G9P
w}:sVc!E5f
BS ?D;b
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
F2S)@xxK Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
]c9X*ve?_"U*{ 7x1G;h.[!?7Q!t
K PTy5U.te z
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]$}^_g ] h
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
H-dTS-jK1yx 佢勁係勁在治國能力............{#\9iW[t8h!mF q
/A#Cl9k6J wY:O6N
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
4?u1[r$jw\"M 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........t5g ~-IK+j6Cn
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
_ a {\g)o AyL1Vm+u
係咪如此? [/quote]
E[!}9m.h0m\{6I 7WqT"F`)bC&n
8[8_Cb!Z'W:u*L.M
3Bn5GK.P VR8Z
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...M:L AA[$w A*Uo
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
,c6zL"^%Moq*Q
*|L|FUN 1kA:R(LH v
6vwN2d'`G
-Ooat9q(}
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫... WV5D V/VD O.Pxzh
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote] dL"a)\v2V'P;Z
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,]5F5Fl \W {od
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........J8@/LJ#^4a+B&H
X,F"WCr
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~ n(N3?Nsi
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
6Fp;{$? LdTw [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
?X q/e+n`/^(Z_ z%F*M 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
DPW2Yy(x1ap9|%\Z 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
8Kc2f4{-K1w%x2c}
:b#`fdb6@ 係咪如此? [/quote]/r}'? Fb~n~-t#Y
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
I!@`@7f[ ka 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM: n,^r5_"?!\1^9])L w0u:f
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
^A5K@,V%LG 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~7B^,jj[/w G.i
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
%eyP:I1L 正史中張松只有110cm?:oi6{N1^!r
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得? z L {;j X#|m9~JF c
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
,k.~ XA'mYU
T/F&?~+rO8p`O(P 諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?XU+Rf]`xL:f

[z:hv-O0Q$p&x 相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
'T\b;O_ CQ'M#w
C&fM&S x1SeP 有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
0q+H"ZXuY 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......6TY#f%K%Rs T I
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋.......^yTv%WsE
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......:Xbx@z
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
.`/smS,Z{ 7Z[!Bcvr/u,X
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的c:U?6B fD)x7F#X}
_.RR w(w#B
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.