**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.-C+e-\)k'f
} Ag
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?
/E4H [7^x
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]
_6v8t,zXc
see #22 Thus K.dx(^t9mnw
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
,^+`#~ Ue J5Z;y
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.9SKP%[#k(m/M8j
bY
? GJ#f&fZ
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
k {E+}nG
a+hxCz&p/I-P
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
Z7F N i%d:{(r] D
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote];H&xcw1H ?n!a sI
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
#j[f5YIP
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]VI d z.L p
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:1E&Y _*h mU5[
:Hz/E2P YL4u/D U7d
g(PV V6N IB/E,Z$I7B"|.j
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote] P:] mUwsS7A:T \
a@
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:%K0r*H(@a6S$nHO
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............%z `O i {
t2z p
係咪如此? [/quote]*p)`b1}8A8h6y o's
T:k$Y1F3xH9CY
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫..._*E
b e&[q
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
l8SA-NChd&h[8m V3c
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...B$k{!]+wby/`
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,GAn
}r E;n
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
[q+}-q5g
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~2S D7f-_#?.G\FB
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............m_5O4@"[A ol!y
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:.L E/cdU3c$m R
呢個網係講有關三國正史~U a\)~ X|
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~8@-w*Ny;I
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]&~.e*Ke D ho A M
正史中張松只有110cm?:o/R)Oq*G6@#A1DQ*lm
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
@ B&a b4R/v
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?e9D
WJ(hVg(g,C
E~W~Tv!P|~
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度;K]/N9@3X(TO8n
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂;o3v
c:SKK,G
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......9oqn)Y wD p F*I y
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
K%lxV`!Q \
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P