娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
S(z&mE9R1~4bW
'Oj8a+P u;oBr[5Q3A#DeY but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
&R6ugR.T7S
:Zch0Cb*g HU But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
*Vc#jn$K7fZ-w0H
/[3twnE,g{Y [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
`9KO*U9j/jv0i@ 8pj9QLukA2[2~
aO/Gr n
why?t-e o)r0o:?{Ig8E

8O X#P l;nG;UC%|F 其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]
:Y X`ni7N PL.H W0K:r]D5x i![W"?
see #22 Thus?:M-?&z jOFys
"K-B vR0g3{8A;W1w
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->Wr/E Ue
%@)~C-S(^ ZJe
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
4}-i {K5z*S L 7[~vR0Y1v/D
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
8~6}8w/O,p b
-mt:r([ [ Ht{Y 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.1FIR9Xm f)pM+d

rvk@`]8LL [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:b+_"^;JR4o
_-K@y6\
!y2}-Nh+n7E
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
eq"Q+Z bL#S 2v?lj y
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:.sVX&c}!lUI

s#dJ$Os?
XL#UcX,^p 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]
`N6Hm:Y yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
"T:aV6Y;I6R X vf6Lp0gl M p\ z
Z6q6oC+N1_'E sz
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
yZV!r5y:`~S5U Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32::o,p$y"_7l(_e
I3MW#~9l
Pf,I/L6t)U
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]8[a(fN _"]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........m8vbP@-t$}3d1VI*_
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
p/Ik0f*f*U{"N)cN#S9L2o oN^Xg'ZtY
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:0Ch:T^n_g!d
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁......... wdIGcXWFBQ
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
.DK b*T:]#L{6C_
7xn&\`iG 係咪如此? [/quote]+l W+y]r dMl

a-]0Qak:Vv:X d H&v sW
A Rmsj1TX;Q
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
$J\(J,u*P p\@"_/z 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
]$[C B~4]0R
v]7~,Y\ +c!Dk:Y6i8Gd)?

9tc U(D'Lp 7Y)nfQ)~\)`7s9\-{#n
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...9x"i#N-G!vtl;Q
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote].FO4{i2P7M7n d
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
y7k8LWA`+D$ac 唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........| gAf)qK Q,n2o.M

A+[6`.{'a k(eEF 三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
)`"Fh,_0?rBoL j 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~w3?q;T?g6B
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
)f^o&yR-p 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
zeL/s1H 佢勁係勁在治國能力............Dq JZ.T;Yk
P PJ0M'P#i
係咪如此? [/quote]_g'h CL C*X$lH/T6x
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也3a9]"sAU^
沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:*H+i.S j.?]$f
呢個網係講有關三國正史~YrRF5SP/A
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
H_6r9k-]T [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]NZ5|#MbR
正史中張松只有110cm?:o|#R2m!h#b n2z3NE*q
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
Z6e7vH4GuD |? 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
fmGqh {P9bN7a @^
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?7t+W%y"Y&e.@Sn/H D
EA4ij:N
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
(F)Z:YN1zc|W!G
d/h(@lZx&O@1^ 有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂$tYA?9gV | A8g!V
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......wk?#eBVc4d_
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......7}'WJe y9c
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
T {,Oy3]1IMh 諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!J,h a'B'O[2KW8@;A"u7s9@
ZZ0{Z4nH,Ld
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的e*~8~6YoT#r9y

3YbK;auM+X Qg%{'^#@ 我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.