**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:0t:[
gQt3~pI _ d
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
D7|`
~P:M4K0N
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:1MGyw#d)Og/J
X/L0M;^*J gZ hRt3Z
why?
WW'm:_A
@
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]'D q%cl J{
W
see #22 Thus!P.D+\ l hJ3y
$A[K5Cc+w4S T L!F
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->VW.a n;A8w"z BO e/^
l6o'Q/R3S!O@L)_ T? n
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.{5A {,i ||h
-vgW2I"wM`-S'^$~M
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.;o0q0ZU#r V R4r
L&CI T/jv0j2h/@:r*C
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
3R2zCK lA
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]3S.N&D i#E7P!Y
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58: zp;_C{
3B9Czs6B
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote] J}.B1lj
cZ {
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]1B@ U0^9s J
y
n XuS
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
o(N0D a c$ccIb
#`g kF{+FH l
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]{L4a.u(|,_1R`9T
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............1|9U&Adn
B@;R(?
iv+i!?.@8u;B!`
係咪如此? [/quote]*r+QqO8Ct
s:m }+^[ W*sX.V
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
B1M-D,@[!r&gnoj
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:h f)t
r'~4k
cI%e@Y;\!j\ |
$Q Q%q,ovd
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]9l z+V6U o ~
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
orYNQ*CkE)]c
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:^5FBF[ P B2M4L)_LX
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........5mN}*l0Q K{g|
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此? [/quote]H `8\d+F O-q8jCT
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM: z;^
|
j!D
呢個網係講有關三國正史~i$J J I;IC,?
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~ c)z*vc+[z#pq
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o%j$uHk&Sx!f-^E Y
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
$@#H5]1r(KPt |"t;p
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?!d1S9lXV o:s
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度9Q3U G:syWD%I
kW4XOtx7i
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......%I~9C H.`v
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!,SWD Z ]0[{%Z0NJ
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的wQ}nx)pxsg!q
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P