娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:
*\%z|LU MO,`g(b
/`d w.ik{e but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]w1IF]'_R0S

*D8~? _*Ky h!K0c(Xmh&{Y But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.$` ~ Vnu0Z Sv n

^Tn9lKm [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
)W+xkKg.h)]d*C"| O)e h b)yX"g
EY-S fJ"q
why?5V*e N%m&d

} H+E6Q"k} Y.YqF 其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]
.x/uTMv,_
o}T&rh)I$K see #22 Thus
v2mx#a s1S5y8N ,~4i2JKliE{\t
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
;_7RcP[9Yu R5[/A+y o9b%D3r
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
3@(U7@Z4f`Z,J }6e
5YA KZ*x"J#| d 政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
!QF` ZZ'H)QM Ik'F'^4|J6x
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
`/Xz7hR*x
,~I Uk*ycc%` [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:/R&s\)B%Kt
S Fhw#@

-e3]D,n4o [ 他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]nTbo{(nUoB-r _
5i7m6?N4^0F~,R M$X
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:9R BC'oc8VA:Fh

U&x4i^L)U
-g/UOm2YvIcxC C 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]k2\-w%zde/fp)pbc
yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:~-w3?7}2iw x9k1pa9[

gy)O-G,\+L d5A7npOt
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote] K!I3Jz t.mN"D
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
#VU+d]9{a0P Mui
ba)y0w+?|
`7g(g'Z3O#rB but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]}e*k4?;H.t-d
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........b P~5fV
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
^Bi"B4J4ZAn$u] Ca0d+wWG1n
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:wlWc.VR"u
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........,l({h.p8xKN3GB
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
7\q2l bN P \:|Y x)vzL&O] R
係咪如此? [/quote]
5[yS7al&{ !F0S1@s Y4b#R

d8?qi0L fBs e
3vL2e7gU k{X 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
9B4U8[nC'e,_BB a6l6zP 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
*@f&\,W\*ftI^ g k,Y2\'B(Bq d-R.n

z"a/g [^5e*d
l2h"f Sz Y+iY Sor_E;jW
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...*V$\pO wnP6\q
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
@^!s4_OMW0J 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,-f,J_ \VN)lI*V H
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
!F%lQ d#q(D 1]f_%jGPAxh%w
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
&z y3r(T9z ] 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
6k4g)i1B+K;_ [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
0@'dN&wb#_*~ 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........*cQ#EC7~%p
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
X`2}7NK/Mp!HIoF{7i kTu!O/Ta3d
係咪如此? [/quote].a4CJ!{v'k:Au
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
S&{(Weq5G z!] 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
eY0| d^ Jz 呢個網係講有關三國正史~
;?%Dp1Ab@ P(I-r 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
HQ7r&L3N2M#S-d$S se [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
^{:nQ+NqF"H 正史中張松只有110cm?:o1d'n'r2@hk4[ k
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
,fch`\uZ ~h 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
hk-d+P3m+CFm M0p9M)|.{.o8^?
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
7IA3B"M4f%h9]5t Gb4c0`p_0B,hh%B]
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
Rvth(`:P
F5nm-Wg"z%w 有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
2z@C#H z1O 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
Hs;G baO&b,s9u 司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
U[(aUnr5`d 陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
SsIS(C*c 諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!,Uw-NSWW2g

Z2cQ!}-{ ]~ WTj;fd 講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
-?#om#O;C9eZ I\ .a$YmV7Lj0c
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.