[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:19 PM:
仲有,suns d人都唔差,未至於垃圾!!
咁耐有咩班霸只係一個人帶住成堆唔掂ga?? 至少都2,3個la
lakers而家都係,odom都唔係差 [/quote]
所以咪話拿殊要有咁好既隊友先有咁既成績同表現囉。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:24 PM:
人地邊忽似垃圾啊...........
你無... [/quote]
我話垃圾只係比喻，太陽班波梗係唔係垃圾啦。仲好勁添！！！
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:24 PM:
人地邊忽似垃圾啊...........
你無... [/quote]
所以話打波唔係打一個
kobe冇左odom,都爭好遠la
mvp都要有人輔助,我睇咁耐,都未見過一隊真正強隊只係靠一人之力打得好好
除非果個人極全面,得分係佢,板又係佢,助攻又係佢,做晒人地要做ge野
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:24 PM:
人地邊忽似垃圾啊...........
你無... [/quote]
T湯馬士？？仲有個D字頭都幾好架wor。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:20 PM:
我認為只係戰術問題
lakers用到適... [/quote]
i agree with you~
我覺得suns 始終相信佢地一直打ge戰術係work ge,
始終堅持打法...........不過無乜變通之下俾高深莫測ge 禪師 諗到破敵之計~:good:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:26 PM:
所以咪話拿殊要有咁好既隊友先有咁既成績同表現囉。 [/quote]
咁個個球員都係ga la...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:26 PM:
所以咪話拿殊要有咁好既隊友先有咁既成績同表現囉。 [/quote]
咁即係你覺得係隊友令到nash勁,
唔係nash 令到隊友勁?
根本成隊完全打一個ge話,表現同成績唔會好
因為其他隊淨係mark佢就得
即使表現好,但球隊成績一定唔會好
好似當年t-mac,係得分王ar,咁又點,magic包尾
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:30 PM:
咁即係你覺得係隊友令到nash勁,
唔係nash 令到隊友勁? [/quote]
呢樣野相輔相成ga
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:20 PM:
我認為只係戰術問題
lakers用到適... [/quote]
Playoff點同呢？？係兩個世界黎架。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:33 PM:
呢樣野相輔相成ga [/quote]
同意，但始終覺得拿殊末去太陽前冇咁既數據，但太陽d人冇拿殊前都一樣有咁好既數據，只係加左拿殊後如虎添翼姐。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:33 PM:
Playoff點同呢？？係兩個世界黎架。 [/quote]
咁呢個咪就係教練問題,唔關球員事
lakers之前同而家打法都唔同la~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:28 PM:
所以話打波唔係打一個
kobe冇左odo... [/quote]
其實我一直都想講拿殊唔係d人講到咁神，有佢就能令隊友打到120%實力，反而傑特先有呢種能力。拿殊在冇左內線既保護下一樣唔能夠令隊友變強，令比爾呢d球員變強的是太陽的內線。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:34 PM:
同意，但始終覺得拿殊末去太陽前冇咁既數據，但太陽d人冇拿殊前都一樣有咁好既數據，只係加左拿殊後如虎添翼姐。 [/quote]
部份la~~ 有d球員就好左
好似上年q-rich,jj
今年ge bell,james jones
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:32 PM:
根本成隊完全打一個ge話,表現同成績唔會好
因為其他隊淨係mark佢就得
即使表現好,但球隊成績一定唔會好
好似當年t-mac,係得分王ar,咁又點,magic包尾 [/quote]
係lo ..............
kg又係一個好例子.............
nash 值得我欣賞ge 地方係可以帶動成隊打出好表現,
不過而家礙於身高方面差太遠了..........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:36 PM:
部份la~~ 有d球員就好左
好似上年q-rich,jj
今年ge bell,james jones [/quote]
比爾、鐘斯、李察遜都係要靠太陽既內線吸引力，雖然今無冇a米，但仲有個升級版馬里安和D字頭，所以太陽d三分可以保持，射手起手都易好多。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]kgkgkg212121[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:32 PM:
根本成隊完全打一個ge話,表現同成績唔會好
因為其他隊淨係mark佢就得
即使表現好,但球隊成績一定唔會好
好似當年t-mac,係得分王ar,咁又點,magic包尾 [/quote]
一個勁既PG係可以令隊友變強，但太陽唔係因為拿殊先令球員變強，反而係因為內線先令外圍三分佬變強。當然，拿殊放棄得分為先的想法係值得一讚。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:36 PM:
其實我一直都想講拿殊唔係d人講到... [/quote]
咁我都唔覺佢咁神
不過唔係全部靠內線,今年冇左咁多內線,bell同james jones都打得好
佢地都有early offense同快攻3分,呢2樣都唔使靠底
同埋,佢地真係傳得好快,好易拉散有open look,冇底都得
我之前打青苗,地區果時,咁o岩我果隊又係冇高佬
就靠3分同快攻,只要你傳得快,冇高佬o係入面,外面果d都好易有open look
[quote]Originally posted by [i]Kian76[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:40 PM:
一個勁既PG係可以令隊友變強，但... [/quote]
marion ge打法,唔係企定o係底到爆果d...
一係射外圍,一係剷籃同快攻
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-5-1 06:37 PM:
係lo ..............
kg又係一個好例子.............
nash 值得我欣賞ge 地方係可以帶動成隊打出好表現,
不過而家礙於身高方面差太遠了.......... [/quote]
仲要太陽其實內線防守本身唔算太差，但拿殊俾人話過就過，成日俾多個人走左入去頂位，仲點防守？？