娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

rayyipas 發表於 2006-5-8 11:53 AM

[加分題]各位同意做了壞事的人會有報應的嗎?

純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的d)Wx"|1j ]TH,SW
7zC[&R b9[OXyl0p
[[i] Last edited by 月月鳥 on 2006-5-10 at 09:11 PM [/i]]

chansuper123 發表於 2006-5-8 12:36 PM

No, Absolute No

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 12:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]rayyipas[/i] at 2006-5-8 11:53:9o"};cVO^4a6U U*O#V
純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的 [/quote] q`Po*K YWE
海潚兩公婆已經話了你知!遲來早來問題而已!:D

chanhoyingap 發表於 2006-5-8 02:16 PM

無得咁講 } i6DLm l\!k
無論你做左好事定壞事
cJ ^C!k/tEl 都有好同唔好事發生

155220 發表於 2006-5-8 02:20 PM

坦白講,小弟覺得唔會,不過如果人人都覺得會的話,就不會有人再去做壞事,世界也會變得美麗

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 03:07 PM

好簡單,@H["c'`M(|`
\!Jls~
你幫助人,人地就自然內心會感激你,覺得你份人好。呢種已經是最起碼的好報。
Sam jur'F 掉轉,你害人,你心裡自然有種犯罪感,久而久之,你起碼都唔會敢話自己是好人。 被人害過的人又會恨你。呢種已經是起碼的報應。
j"oc K Uk8M$Fw+W 0um"wtC,s
咁仲有疑問?

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 04:28 PM

其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容易攪亂. rT4lr%V8~

gn:[HI%|^,m,{.n 現實中, 報應未必出現, 又或者同所犯罪唔多相稱; 更再者是犯錯重有好報, 受害者得唔到公道重要喺追究過程中衰多d.
0g&i!Vkl8Y
S/VsLQN 我係同意做了壞事的人應該得到報應. 現實中, 只要極惡極小心, 報應絕對唔會出現.

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 06:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 16:28:
B Us j"c,zL-p 其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容... [/quote]
~0_%S%V0zH 不過如果用佛教道理去睇就好公平。 因為佛法是通過去現在未來三世。 所以就可以解釋了點解有人好運有人唔好!$o(G,].yR
就拿海潚夫婦來講,他們一定是過去救過人,所以海潚都死不去。 這是善果。
2OB Y;A!x.r 但騙財就一定有惡果,所以被人告!
}%\4?*bwK3[.u0pp ?@9p 因果非常公平!

everybody 發表於 2006-5-8 06:21 PM

我淨係知做好事會早死...p ?o/@ H#mu7D
你睇下三國誌就知嫁la...

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 11:59 PM

機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的意志. 但我只是凡人一個. 沒有宗教信養. 不信前生後世. 只在乎活在今下. 睇來我短短幾十年都睇唔住, 莫講睇住下世前生果幾十年. 更或根本就沒前生後世?
AS dnP {4mP 拿海潚夫婦來講, 我覺得佢唔夠小心同冷靜, 自己身有屎,死唔去,重咁揚. 唉! 我睇怕重有d同呢兩公婆一樣的人捉唔到, 真係等下世啦! 報唔報等d有下世的人去證實啦.
(gb*X^9B 既然我唔信前生後世, 呢d人只要小心d, 對我來講就無一定無報應. 對機密兄就或者係解釋成報應未到啦.U Ql(A%u0O
歷史話比我知, 報應係唔會發生喺d有權勢, 夠惡又小心的人. 呢個係現實. 但為求個心好過d, 信有下世都無妨.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 12:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 23:59:f;S[(gp/R7G YaT
機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的... [/quote]
"H"VE.[8}?P0Z t-CJ 當你唔信有前世今生。ME4c5Sv;a0S"? o'br

1U;S8?lvG4e c 就拿做完壞事要好小心來說:
PT${n;H rpH k C%ZId
1. 無做壞事就心靈自在,海潚過後喜歡點都得,上電視點講都得,大事宣揚兼慶祝都得;
"G9S0q&t2J0JG}
'x,K#b LD 2. 做完壞事就成日怕穿煲,做小船頭怕鬼船尾怕賊,做事畏首畏尾。每件事都要諗過會不會穿煲被人捉。 死唔去又上唔得電視。 F0o{hu&F

U0H'P{U!i)~7d{ 咁,你話呢種不是報應之一嘛!:D 起碼相對無做壞事的人來說,他們就肯定無咁自在囉!係咪?:kiss:

ThomasKoon 發表於 2006-5-9 12:42 AM

我係覺得會有﹐不過唔係必然...

打狗棒 發表於 2006-5-9 12:59 AM

我覺得不會, 因為全世界99%的有錢人都是或多或少的曾做過壞事........:haha:

slwong3 發表於 2006-5-9 06:35 AM

I think it doesn't matter at all.
\2n6ml{&uZz -\!\BQ? BWa%y [+}
If a person has done a bad thing on you, even he is going to get his 報應 in the future.  It still won't affect you.
Gx\d [lst Ex. A person cut your finger before and eventually got into jail.  Maybe going into jail is his 報應, but it still wouldn't help you grow back your finger.(KJ^*~KH2_oJv,|5[d
z Zp9hAg)X}
The only thing is that when you see that person got into jail, you might feel better inside of you.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 02:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]slwong3[/i] at 2006-5-9 06:35:'^Drj9T N(uFZl
I think it doesn't matter at all.
yc r5RX-}/lU ... [/quote]
OIZ`N5M4@ According to the rule of 'Cause' & 'result', you had cut the guy's finger before.  Thus you will be cut by him in this time.  However, he cut your finger is a sin, he is jailed.

anttiniemi2000 發表於 2006-5-10 05:00 PM

yes there will be, but you don't know it had happened actually.
p#Z/M{'L{'H*M1g@M for example, you stole $100 from somebody, u maynot have to give it back to that person.  however one day, you will lose something worthes $100.

hold_find 發表於 2006-5-10 09:35 PM

一定會有.s%L$pv)Sz+O6p/L
總有一日,做壞事的人會因自己做的壞是有報應
TB z!K3LoO&jt 最簡單,你害了一個人,總有一日,他/他的家人會「報仇」
7vEJ3v;z ^L'z;[ Fr(nF 就算佢地原諒你,你都會一生唔安樂,不停問自己「點解我要害佢(原本的人)?」,這也是纏擾你一生的報應(如果你冇改過,你就唔會咁諗,但他/他的家人亦唔會原諒你,就會回到第一個情況)

76 發表於 2006-5-10 10:04 PM

做壞事不會有報應除非犯左法....` f'~(A#u uG)J9C

oN"W/kp{ZJ CF 做壞事有報應lei個諗法..好多時都係小學教育...religion 用lei 教育之用....lei 句說話只係一個手段

Jk 發表於 2006-5-11 04:36 AM

雖然我絕對同意做了壞事的人係應該會有報應,不過應該還應該,實際上做了壞事的人未必一定會得到報應,我認為兩者並無關連!Y4A5F7gtg3G,{T
G\&kUpBj6M
壞事---'h_hV:J
淨係hk班"有錢佬"都唔方做得少啦~~
;QM9H{YHA)L
3l;U8C N:lv/_ [[i] Last edited by Jk on 2006-5-11 at 04:42 AM [/i]]

pangpang2066 發表於 2006-5-11 04:55 PM

我覺得最多係自己唔開心(通常人都唔會) 同 得罪人q W3v!C9aZq0k&aT7J6C
如果得罪人之後,俾人報復 都可以叫報應既......

頁: [1] 2 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.