問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ?
版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.L;}y Z5[2F fL V
樓主[b]不[/b]鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為. 完全沒看過 :cry: if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man [color=Red][size=6]抗議!A3I}-F%a F
.M"jO!sp;v
只許 [b]谷德超[/b] 商場 買 翻版鹹碟
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照7swW#Kzd
o7`"j_/T9nQ
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法![/size][/color]
[[i] Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM [/i]] [color=Red][b]What is the definition of "原圖" ? :confused:[/b][/color]"AN2^S4}E"f
U[G"hb ]gW
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,
and "[b]I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD[/b]"..../s dn?&`z#^X@
s4|8p0uA$k
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....:) I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ~9@w9GX2bq;^`6~
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.A.OnS,|)K
Well, just my personal comments.
Hv a nice day. **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** 未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= = 我完全沒看過...7W1@Xg.}:K
你信唔信ar?:kicking: 暫時都未睇過 ><! 看過少少...... 秘密~唔話你知><
頁:
[1]