娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:7XpU8dX `tv,B

%` @s6n"V0s*x|i
dmy3A};P a.K&AT3j:y
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:3wkT%Za^t3gw$Wi
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
_4CA sm[ jfE9Tw[ p
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss: ?]6I ZW
I'm nobody.@-wr$BzU/Fe,i
]I-\.M]jj{

*@"J)J2L0z-l N7lE 不過段片又真係好誇張,_li&N%y5F
尤其最尾一腳,
V%x d1V x jW|(N 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),,^Q c?[ ]4t
若我唔回應幾句,
M)n;A3{z1^-i 個心真係有D唔安樂...
iE dJT'V)nY+["c
&n~U)V2C7m [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:7hnbE;Sc

Da h z \nl0fI,fM 香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
Ag?/v Z4V1`n
7D9}z}3}$@Gqk 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)3u&Z,UU0^F x!Wb
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)hQyRDa"Va
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)#sa!o:h2d|vNJ
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)UC4CddK3XFt3~

HE/i8{l Oq6\n ]V e)lQv]
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
/f tRSj1Z
,h#Z8bT?!\ p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
(qZ\y)E&X,^        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]H,z:RVR]$C:I

,{ q.KFB$Q[1C 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:DctFb4o
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
)w|0e!e/u,Z ]s {)B;k Z8H)`
V5q2G9gPG `3I&c'@
既然唔知頭唔知露,
j^ KFvJm\+y 一開口就話個... [/quote]4L3Bs e!X BB
'K0A})O2~K.t
%o:[ IYf:U
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
0k#_ tNZSV+K#Z !Uo!\q `
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
2i4g }Vl4h
n7R*amB;~r)x (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)+F)H%]o3Fv!Th0J%M
B UW;A4?L%u(D8p
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything......@${#WP[

l7e!JjT!QP,KZ2W5} "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
u.k|bB.D4o%Ps 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??"c.n!c"\[ ?
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
$K;k Yuz |#vM 至於你問有咩正當理由,
O[6W9N5L*q 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"7z'tP%u(q5C
.{;dE1L ]VMqc8a
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
#W7Vvz3xq\
%Ih`-["]8I \ ______________________________
D2R9HMMEXN.V $n8]"gQ-iC @(sQ
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
Q!Q/?%K,Svs!n 因為男人生下來比較強壯?
q0CV2oZ/\[ 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
is&U Bu 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?'Qv8{6_B!F
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
DA7o:V&mL _ 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
,Ri { iIt'_ 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,U$P9f.}+Y+~1^"b
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
+K,vFLj$z B 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
u6cC?:NS)i,Uz[/k 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:)pYH6d'G2Z7L}
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:Q E"C%u"?

k-e3];El{Bu 6c ?Jp|j
我想講嘅,
6^6c;R?&j}QD 只係我地根本唔知咩事,P j)u!Y)N
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
esm`*R+u"_ 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
&d v(Wn+HCh
0zj ? Y/W7M p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
2p[f9SH)b
D+iS)zk4Zm)ulf that means you still don't understand what other people are sayingd}5x-_"K6T"t1g
$ybr7I [4Ag
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....N oQfHDU h{
2kIC)I/D'dH
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
xg|d I sKj|@N6J 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]1~WmJgsK
ef5i`#I

\.j%P9F:G0iib:T then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?x"} t'v;G-N @kj
X0c(TAa'jP
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????D?NBE^(IGAk+Ij
M&\]{/e*y
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????&[8PZ1l5mH6Jm

k6Y+X.K6{z g^"X G.i@m
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
}5y;o+Am F8h6vE${ ?H
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
(\ c?!i&J${ 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.0S~TcQc D

*lp:ma0W4q/V3J 首先: BELIBALA`4Q+AA+K(Dr
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
,tZ,u1dfx #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
q zG/s1^6u1j r-t;z #18, OK:)/NyZ.EqIJ S&RT2p/f
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
+PPcz$G*A5K+@ ps. 有進步 good!:good:EH7x o!P.T5N#ijC
\N'Y\ \-PIt
infjlam
A;H"U&g!y} #30 good point, :good:ye,A2e5J{h0DU9u
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
)g$Tv#qqr:i #63, 講得好!
!bT5}pU.GU k5M)t
A,E?1mh Jen01,J]%?TK bx
8T4x0A)UVd
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.6X2`5N(cj,Y
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
g"R5p6T9ItF 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
b3hnX&Oc$Q 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?$E,N\@8?Tk

7S[M;ldn9dU"W SLWONG3,
b3D)S)@Z #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
#\.A*d_5m|n 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
;rf0Hn~bq
W ?|["~!U)Q7?u jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
E1YAbMW 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
N J sSt4O"|1C 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
mfUV!_I4u#^
z1J q`&BSK:a.u [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,S\T"{Z i
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢, y'W7n2zkV!n3Va
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
XK&X DkW;B/W 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]#J-D&N/]6w8yBO1N
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
r*p!T-Q}$\_h2|N
tF.R;c(FgZ&s-}&@*{ [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
ey@y*d        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]i'u9\&^!?f(i;M
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
;voRsad(z$Tz
]:G4ov:Je jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****'J%cU#N}Wy

7yA~9QBJ'H$s:o:i [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^(Z jiR-]
XD3h0O.uK
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時(e/R9PM-m xDn
V}"uwX+{^#L2e*ZO
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??3]dO:^1w9P3l,X^

B3VT4Pa't 你意思話我知,
(T:f/ez!Jt
-_ BBbSh,fCU 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯Sx%d1e C"}0b8ib
(E0bXCn&g@
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例s&O k9VM"X_r

F,Rrt'@#z8^ `GN;zp 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   8CSV A8@!P
0R0^` g]RW*f(~
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
8~@$_X6u;AI 2T }L T1}?
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:.SDM5ce&fTZ

}%\yK,H 0UtGRs Y5qK%h
既然唔知頭唔知露,
H\Aj-H["J?q 一開口就話個... [/quote]*_.zac So#M9^t-x$x
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰m(G \$?jk!d"o

UXm1K/L4i G3\? 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,!z"Nw%D7N-N-Ocb'@
'X`.C%HKNB7}
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
%CIM,Bm)^9N SX$T+@xPQ
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??%Np&D+DL.{!?Mz
Y7iv.R B/SO4pd[
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??v0@ [7_#b2nw!zT

+J!k(b*}5m xZ 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
H/J-M)YdSo-y
k?wK]7~ r:U 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力0y`$i6V%B _:Rt

NwQPn$p.s 我問你,  ,E5U'_ ev&dneQx+I

!hC-_&n"lX*E}&v;Zc 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
1R(D[*\;UZ+q `1c$OD;Q4i'Y-@3T
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
zyPh e&N3K"O kZT -wIP X,Xgq1gl
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
I#@ JS!w$yd!Y
M0d5E3h g6KL)m B 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
1rG*Z/E(e{ \[ F B2`j A
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
x"gr2gS f qUq;qi
j#sIEl1J}-Q])LP ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰 \2M:^W*S(k*fqq
3J8K!lJL"]4v G2t E
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲y ys eMf6x9O

r"VZf1J;vL [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可)| S.jc\e

8KZ-J9C N1l*` 我比多個例子你啦
]e+y;Kt C&J Vq}
Yem d)h%Aij 係香港  
'p6AK_/Zi4P _ I cs @w;v"l
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
#};g.AQ,d7Kk^
vV+x)X? 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
H-lJmu n!m!iwF;y$E`Y {m
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
D4W-Nb(F] P4~O9d:M [6f
你點理解??
WZ-Po0Y yp8R pb\/?2Y
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
$]Oy(\2\dxmD +?9g+d9y P+Ss3_#g&d
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
5DpEA4[!Mh%?;~s#d#{ [28/05 星期三 00:30]
HT.Bjat
o3xt[ Q;F9lP
B/@)T.@#tCd 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。&^ _2l)~ Y+{
|n'Jg+X O5Us%c.n
事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。
Fd1w5KyU*KY
h!B0kN9O [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.