娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:U Hq9~.{7Aka(yX

9G"x\8{d H3ABN 'a\6IMR#P'S|
HboyszZ
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
'M@#q3K[YO @%F eT 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
5o8s6`8r(j'l y H z?JJ$uV i
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
!m!P-w9s v(y I'm nobody.,a#{H?-y{1m7Sp
H Fc;Qr

+gLz.jG 不過段片又真係好誇張,.z3Z E Ga8HX6c
尤其最尾一腳,
\C0B0h2K2F8GqmT2Q 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
`|6N YerK#r 若我唔回應幾句,
laDL8g(` y\#} we8r 個心真係有D唔安樂...
gO3DBBSR
%H2A"\#TdnO n O [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:
8~4lj N,w 8zZgZ:b]w
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
i3^T X(t@)q s*Ns6}:wM,ZF WtD4q
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
1Z[([]"\ e 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
6ebpY)N 第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)6s7F S ~,wxQ5of
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年) u.h KS!y{k
s0|(f#g2E;EhU H4?S%rM
N1hAbXA8t r
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:C,t!F D{)`]%RA8|
PCNx)jkLbQ
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
9a7J)`;QJ p4t        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
;f!i+{-@ _+K{0JL9` 0n*p'_XA0ydO
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
+EX0u-H7U 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM: S c$s~-vbc%kB
A1`Zkg@D.e
^?v*h R'M*v
既然唔知頭唔知露,
N.Vn [&D%g)[b6|&y 一開口就話個... [/quote]%J j;f ?jWnuv

4cM Wo&SZ TQ U?k
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
%mA*|A6Phok o
6Du7dD5E you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
n7[u\wDv
"K9gR7^(U.{ (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)cJ~XlR&U[9{7]R
6ej xoa#m:S
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....h.DY:a]7U4@S
zl#}+yb
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,!y qP8S nM n'nSh!Z
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??$Y9Z`.[ne
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??S5mQ6zYm6J
至於你問有咩正當理由,
#[-pEw/N8B#R 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
4R;UX9RA k2b"u(h
)nO#j,SrI h what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man...."^3t b\3P"H
e@D |VG K"E
______________________________
9V1{~uV %r(Ns I'{x&v
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩WK,Y~lLH
因為男人生下來比較強壯?
4T[@ z2ue(G"ai 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
TZB{3{7` 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
S6^,Y,E'f8X 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
n5O b2v I S.` 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,vpmv!Zu$~/D
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
8z`6}u{S!xqn1| 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
lxo8si,y&[ i 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,+S s^|*{@|1P
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
{0ni1G x*WI EE N 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:AGA0A]-K
(~'K7]1o9{7N7J9W*z

z$Cu#jJ 我想講嘅,
l*O_U6hs3u6| t;g 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
2VqC `zeIX/r"T 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
h+k7TaN"k/o 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
v6hKp/x$|,T x%\ da$m
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]H2Yy~!N"w

cd^_*XWS that means you still don't understand what other people are saying fDLw2`x0hu)@ Q

Lu:[2[?C/~0Cv no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
V't8A#xs,`M!i%V4D
3JFp&|#C6k the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:y5d,N;Y%vI.}
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote] PG"o*q6@
lsY"r7o^L%gA K,S

;aA7Pc!t_gv then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
]P h$Bx_qCg.vw2K J
Y&^n.].cs ZP do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????:v xPp7u

EG'p h+m!b x if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that???? NC0QGd9U(oP

L2|8@x&p
F ^;r3C"z;k H6L+] oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!i8soZ R
@XC2qY%[J
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,$s/[ WbTXf}(C
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
Ya5wT7kM%G$\.y3~-B@R6v
+X\6Jps8v 首先: BELIBALAP.[/b ],Sx
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
b/p'D_k~(_ #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
N \|+x2Nqv,` #18, OK:)
\pE9@mi&W y #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:k {{X Jkp#q
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
d'~&^+G'p%]DA9a
4@ M,E_} infjlam+F ^LfGf3X.R
#30 good point, :good:
0g,A2T'wK #34 GOOD POINT:good:R-ICBO
#63, 講得好!2iIU^8cOR
7d _,]~1U;Swd v vy
Jen01,'S{ Z/RW s$_

d}Q"Nf #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.0`w+|-? y)H W
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
u]+k {0A~ 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"*HoM-LP7AB-m
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?Z2w8l!D Daw
.bVs1ql^?Oe _@#_/`
SLWONG3,g`2l4Yn4pA
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
s r5Mq"C bO,n5^RV!p 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
S y;w-G5^,\.g2z
efJh[3T jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......Tb#bc9\_5Y
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.9s+f;V.m:E7G9K j b/kR
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
Q[0^9C!`&s#_'s8vL (b q DN#kG T:~F#H3Q
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,&yvi_@U
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
\@-f]yO[xZT'Ta 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,EJ,z.wBcz9T
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
m&g8l8Z d9EN 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
.J,G${&HQ(c4{|b
!F%y4eRq [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,P1[#|/s#S |a
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
$Y0a [f'Q8[/CD^F 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:eqL#o T1Bs9|
9PlV/E%ZV m
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****5@q,_|{,zC
3wIl+z0q5d$f+L {N
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
&w}x2iz.M
hx'{L:^/a)X3t'q 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時1|V` j.rhG Ie S

k$?/Fd*R3v x'G5O 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??MAF%@}7a w,B5r*[{

)RO8u5c4CU^v 你意思話我知, ![q0Fr@%f%i`F3hL&v
&G*f(oK-n:l
而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
9a8ld(|!`_ A
/[C1YB+lE7zz Vq 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
a8x&O*~M -Y_ \"eH w$p
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
%|)G9q*w$^ @4_&[w O NpWs
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
*osSo p6G.o
A!dnR,_v!o2F%_+fO 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:&RD`L-a-h \,~
E~%w\1ry T&E

%n [6vC x[,^ 既然唔知頭唔知露,
^`f`+nJ 一開口就話個... [/quote]S}#Nu-MF-o
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰!^#r1^(o+u;D
OR |0w0O!C
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,;m T `"D(t U
+C/\ Pt.C&Q9?
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯.t2x-`$j]
$N KQr-ct|
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
UK#`4V{0_+S .[1q1eoS[
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
A5h3oBijA 6|4j-aU3@d'j^/^ Y3?
以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
4M vA#M!?
k})Fmp0s 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力(f"\rh'~ ac
s(}7[+uRy?
我問你,  7{!Z]fS't"k8I0H

{MrNK:~f 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
Vw(]EqYA
#~s{8]HS.^ 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以"?ZJ3vy*]/f

OXdg(X,I t6mw 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話d"j P(N _au
@1O+K/e:~B
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
0U6b/ut&v3h t}*[(M!e PdW0J'cD
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)eMzN.`'t dV
(~SD*KZi
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰WJ!blu)E*d y{6z
j){Ejx)k!VY
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
Nr_ C&j5E0lRdYp
q r!E9Fj:L qO-M3K [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可(`9n6O5sf.m

+P5\d4RoV-Lr~ 我比多個例子你啦
fQb4]u,EQ E^h
)i `Y#X3]G\F)R 係香港  8M_4_ ?4yY)P

loJ!pH;G1t 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
&Js;O/kb!d5s1tm9w 4IFF$t|Q!y8F
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
TC/| LGr}9^ `c y2^:|)Al.S
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪]e&z"\:]'c|
d7l0tD-V?+hk*l {
你點理解??.r^.WM"C(`
c.`5z'GS!sbu
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
e5m8ppf
3N1AB'|!G7L oeF1u    四川官員就毆打義工道歉\)@2juQ(g3E
[28/05 星期三 00:30] 'hS6v#e i1R0?h6F IW

6XG Be{6`;b+c .g%\#ob)im
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
gI;ugb3A"l H.^L
L#V Rk[F9V"f 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。 c e:k-w's-X(N+Z
$v,mzh{P
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.