娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
,~.h Tj'P
wT"O!]3e aO{ #|vm+u%\
]~1bN.t$maL
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
EwGZYj#e/C#M 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote] N}_oc }

|3_.J![xP BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
#H[l/u7D I'm nobody.
5b7ww&_t$w 6F&S9D|)`@b.mH~

O#Q\6~)e-m.O,\-q]B+R 不過段片又真係好誇張,
U5d]'v4A B 尤其最尾一腳,th8z#](\
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),{#UTYk[S
若我唔回應幾句,
joNg;c3q }i*` 個心真係有D唔安樂...U'chj.M;d

;X*x8?J$f)G"l e9e [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:3a\|dfb

+X$aeI^;I#O/M,p$C 香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
j-q3qNNv B'W2CW8_
Y7b \Fq mm%MYo-k 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)7y ax+q#u&N;bp&|t?
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)8|.M$q ?r8IP&b4k
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年) U WZ.l_ Jk.pt
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)
F1aVKJz
dKL_!M.{ ?/x;[g.EH
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
.P ` K9N^` BKT
z`7[n9U5m p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,n:o f xax
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
Mp8f\)I:O~9x/Ob
/kO3O!fd@;L&b 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:~ BF/SmcRd
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
Aw$XO!|Y\
/Sp l^ d:P'@,p
kV!v6u u] 既然唔知頭唔知露,8jM!E|m#U%y
一開口就話個... [/quote]
f9dY:G&J_
't;a-S$m'g
-R bg4P0@Gd.w-i Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
*^xL&fxg,ch
4TB:s-QW _%_r you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....[!@zrT#\,\H
{jj2\M ?-yL&U&o
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
s?#@9T;U"Kz _)i
;qac)j]V4NxH however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....:T5lV [0J k8w#M?
%v0?sb;|R#XWu|
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,$[ ?q6u6N
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??/v)lCEVR
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
v|-J9jv 至於你問有咩正當理由, r$f x:A?7SQ^
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"9P5Q:s:AYV

8U3H{sD UdM$rZ what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
"mZ0UD.B2} 9tM3nHW
______________________________
/WZvs#s'`|P,|
OOvR?%hj well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
/EQw)K#hLE'S 因為男人生下來比較強壯?j!A.D1a7A-Y
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
!IoR"N fk.Rgc/u 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
?6w#J3?.n:\C9D.us` 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
'd cg*P2an|AE 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,+C+Q#Ez]9I&i\
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,1EB*c6G%b6Pml
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
Co ? @3c4}[*G @f 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
v5Dg@3Iyu"M Y!A 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
1W*{&kdu]:u4] 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:/h\S9W p5h%Z/N @!w1}

k Z!L/oY}G :PE N&O*V0TI |
我想講嘅,
;TO9aaL&}4UI 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
(?_Z2J _^] 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
/t*ovsU(axR 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??4w7{T J3xE
][N a-Og m*N
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote];fc(@SQ1o
Om3vj[*\:w?
that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
y"z:WKT3K*d)J j9bq4?Rx
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
U0qi|a"i
b-J m Q'EU(JH8T the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
} No _1v*J w$y^ 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
'x2{:h;z,e6D-g 2s5x~v]OX,b a

-MZ U6r^ then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
2n+[2ktY qm%R
"^Su,W ]2l'}Q_ do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
1} ]W ^7r6Ir4l
*g-EQ#KD~li1Z if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
yeCqw5xzc
)MVL-P6a A0stm-T ;j m3VP;z k&c1]
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!Eq^)or6P

O0~#}Ns 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,s.eFI s W t`"W
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
j'Jb+r5?n` 0A N*GHNw f
首先: BELIBALA.bQdWD_W+c9M
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.fI`\Y5M$jH w1vb
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.8eaj3X5W
#18, OK:)w+h#vh5X.p:V
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
*W3["k~$}#|Q&R a6qC ps. 有進步 good!:good:9nk b"Hc4`?7t
u)t.QI0Q9] iA
infjlam
w+?9}^6n srf #30 good point, :good:
d*u RO#xi #34 GOOD POINT:good: v$QW[zXv9KUq
#63, 講得好!
I k9M O V Ky)|F)E 'e^n%m[g-W g!u U
Jen01,
8rI8P-U9yI
l-F riAg,gb #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.~d?*YM3x
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮! a2Beg {*V
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!" h? EV$T[
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
vj-[GKJv.k?
&ragh` g_B4g{S SLWONG3,
/aUS[*c(i@/l b4Hv #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]*p'nYs2cW.V
有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:X oE.q$?(Cc

LV-O*D"y"Y n jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......3X#qB Oj$Y1Tzy
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
n N8k9R5[nNCC 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"~7r l.N4^/A2Hh6z
&_SU&utj#z _
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
c/@B];V 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
k ~lo_4Jd.vD 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
(Ux7z0F*]%m}/Rv 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
kgBv2KA~ 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀 Nud3K NO*Xz!a

R[)n+eCk [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
G8f"W;me*\z        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
N1`.x!I-R&zpC 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:6QC|2^c*\v(|
m\W#L y.Y.L"I O
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
6P#Hi!U.N1k R6Y.B*C$k6K (U E.`D5t1w lyoO
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^C3M2QOF&xG

D2G~7XH]F#X9D 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
l+Tl ~(AfOOv@
S1j Er `:n.^-?h 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??+}$e*K]!tv1w

r%_;C,iT'uLL 你意思話我知,
l \*e {)eo]7k8h
'e)B!O:L*NvO 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
q)K3?j? ywv.j +nE(uE L*h*a(n
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
8{F2Aec2wh$F7K
Ck0BPz0vO5g$m 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
3xYM N VoR o*pWE*I!t
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
cK3u&D;y-f^ Wt1q)M"_1T lRZ3]
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
K N@fU A*a8W
K Th{/`2I+}(E ~Dz)T\h
既然唔知頭唔知露,
M @:M$Y^#tF 一開口就話個... [/quote]6~R?'KB1}
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
A.@6`!VD0l,G
E'F*B@K 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,G8u!^-` Iux-z

_W,Tu,k`r 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
F-x2Eo*G z#hW d!ND5Z u U
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
J D"``7{i _1v R!a ^4h]"I7_ xqQ~
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??tVZ&Va po+m

!`Z3G8F9d(Hl db^7M 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能3T(]n.YA#}
r?*z&E.wlNX
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力
5Q jT^i/x $^(k[ i(@X!A3\1t?^x
我問你,  
6jZ,j0Nt h*pB]R 2].Fs4\*G9]p5@
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
u5A"DoCI'M x wM-Cj(_*Zv
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以.u9a,e H0bM{

/f;TOGL6];a|:jA#@] 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
$Iz.A| QN +lCeTXg-M ]D9f p,r7m7P
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢L3x Ox.`@:S
yHt!|-`XCJ
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)?'|]cg-Op$o

8@-q-M~-PA:q o ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰#k7hl8a?0XjG
k#Ve$d w
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
#N@KPN;p"VE
T!`!l'L#uT` [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可k8x P xC
$v2s9F+Z]eZe3dPi
我比多個例子你啦
4b(e o%mU0z W:A I| KOb3vwH}il
係香港  Z]3g~IU

ZtAB V/J6A 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
r&be Ix9DOad (IlD3@Z
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
oU$IzUB d4n
~YW8Rct!D Z 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪"K:wy1rg9J9Z;rz$a WM
#RX@f6J7~'y
你點理解??1E.lAh$T[2m n

)^ {X!~ rtYQ 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....(ZR,g(_]8I{ g
z%MpZv
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
^'k3z8bMy*f [28/05 星期三 00:30]
5sXPX`:K
3w5vR8{IV"s/N\-u3e1@
#M%b&h/iY1JkYC _ 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
$c7Zdl"E"?4DA-oCF
!HYl3q6s%U 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。J x|UJNS
TgG5N^
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.