娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
L+H)QL P 4f'?i.Iu0`)k^

a4{+N el y6z5n *_6I GQT`
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:y},WSfZ9}
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
Q]d\N5jH;S H6|m:vJ\8x-kre+S
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
7hm oX.x1~N:Ef z I'm nobody.w @@ Yv l6N%N&V/h
Dva%P,@G#sn0L

+p-llisd$M1bQ 不過段片又真係好誇張,n)N F0R] ?3v
尤其最尾一腳,1CmxbpP E\
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
F+W:z.@5zo 若我唔回應幾句,M#G bD0w:r![w
個心真係有D唔安樂...
l8A7Z'A4F
0BjXtM%\ j [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:
NukD&Sl 7a)e#f[#C{ [d4c
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
%M8` cNHZ
~m9FoY7X/d#S 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)9X2V&mE4H)l+q J
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)"g FdL {#?9z
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
(w.tGxF"C 第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)3J!wPBct ly{

3V4| I%fTc8R-M+U
Nn6X"eCp4hJ;` 身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
H|5~HGB :T'[[!W ?C f6d \
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
[:m5eI/uy:J        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote] qlE.F,F!E^o g
7SO(VGw l/I-l
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:;PF&q}x.b \
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
JXS1Az&Ffn\ ?3uy:iB j
Y,S9]S]$N C6F|
既然唔知頭唔知露,\2y0M }7Ry B
一開口就話個... [/quote]sET~+Q5N`O4y
'vB;@2Op&f

A @#Oh+N Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
$aL/F2H%I0Cx
iy\-XX#y+r you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
H1j-vI Dw#JQB2}6[
&G.r%uyO`u2V (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
uL$w*wwLzFB8]
)[1\ccG3@)|1? however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....H}w4F*c5@
D~8^:@? hHg
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,D"}%t ^]q-Kp
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??1Q?)WFB:[| uh'y DP7k
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ?? Z+c*A@ PZ[
至於你問有咩正當理由,
-X\?z D;BN 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
km.YN.|F8}q
'fq!f&l/q:L:U A what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
1h6W2uc zy(X JR
*o6ky#@2j x ______________________________
c!gY8^I^j IP$Sp0~3\2Y(En Bw
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
)o R?f#B)G/z 因為男人生下來比較強壯?
@!Rt%dl4S%Mi 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
LLo0T?\i T s 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?Uf/qY]r,m,d
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:Olz-E8Iq.B
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
*u1Z1S$lP.C+Y 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,'I2Z` S8g4\Tc"TmF
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
!l4[Cs.P#f 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
AiNd6U8V 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
'st&y*bDC.X 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
#lQde/I;r
5R$x:M`d"@a vC2~;^jM
我想講嘅,
AO&O1q {0hK3l I 只係我地根本唔知咩事,u0Y rPr| XZ
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
c s:E3UG @)bQ'v 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
V9H,M*iX3R6~V @ IF7e7A{"bkI/V
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
Z~D3^*wgmr
Q*?X`S'Ca that means you still don't understand what other people are saying Sx;@c&L)t8I)Y
+p!tP@Z o6M \S&k
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
#A+e6T"_ ~:}P(l
euGSgjdz the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:GEjvE&A
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote])[5vk/b S-L+PR

2Xl6|R tq K2{/m2gn%~
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first? c)zC7w.sh/K

B @ X R0H:N)?dv do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????EQQ y^ H
R+Ii"i;l4B
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
U#y!J5A.Vc {4N
Y$lD:i/aMo5n/e 6TdQmG/O+~o a
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!nO$e/w&q^/C#Ku

Fo3vOcJf$Vi 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,x[;Uq.C W
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.k{[Ax*y:i4Y"|ld

9c@*M {@\ 首先: BELIBALA
G5[)_Uc7y #9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD. g-jSF}8F^T
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
}S V7\\w4d #18, OK:)
.R j;c0edq #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:)sQ1{Yy7P(MDi _u
ps. 有進步 good!:good:;b"QJ`%G [ N6{V

!d3LH4@P infjlam2Y+f6my2o0N m
#30 good point, :good:
0c#}R2]6z1~ @'y {M@ #34 GOOD POINT:good::wNq+{ `
#63, 講得好!:t2L'l)R5e@
9n6xcvj:p o+@5U:n\l
Jen01,
E)Xa pY
3u9w9v+|8z'XO-e0g #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.2TC-c?Kb|~
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!y)Ea O}&UZ3y:u1L
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
euS.J-{ q Ri 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?I.RNdV VbX
7Du2XOWs&[R8{
SLWONG3,&AyVU\0?.MJ q$v
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]N'y u)S\J~_
有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:0oI~&w!D_i1?C
i9U t#^.Y+z^.fP
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......x+C"r8Jb/R
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你. K~2{Ko
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
!WE0\ D1o jDS0Uo 0[ oD&]c%Mu!M5M]
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,#l!XJ;~:I Cf:u
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,No%tC1x9J
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
/O7e)~-Hl3| 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
nO'v3y0Jy 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀:Ct[BC?[3WEg3_&i

4t0a$l |HH;s8]Z [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,]B)hJ!j8E(G/bND
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]@N,qkn'a
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:$ah7VT1[7f,F B7P7j

f/hh&S+b&j"Pjf9n jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****9L;vqKLD
8m1O!t3B)XJ7I
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
q*e%h-w:RD[
cs-ATdK@ 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
uq!s [_k sDE?:G;l8Vlv _
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??og{o\ E N
.c#| H9Pb
你意思話我知, s%ra*}}(G}f(Z$E

,Wu6P(N0NI*K.W#D2p 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
5f$x4n c ~6F&Gdn
le'x$n,u"i[8d/VA 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例6`u}]M EVbAA
"MvFo} gl8n6l
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   "H2f)I9SJ$z!ov
#M%s^2T}-i9z
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護kf:Mly1er.s6J
Z-q'PJP
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:e6T%~'V#[$Xj

Ah;bWd3|
$o$a,nTd8E 既然唔知頭唔知露,8ZWv0w!`0H"{%Fq0q
一開口就話個... [/quote]
8Tg*UAn 見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
}D }qc `(O Pcq? S x
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
ir@9s|(q6l{ ,r#Wp;z3X$~'r H
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯'bOq'nPvWo V g;`

L-AjA(X){~y 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
`Sbf2g@&u^
4L"m&k+POtv Q 如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
$M qla~"f6G
/M}&XR+V k+i 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能%cw$we]]vz

)h;KP,^qu/] 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力i by"]$Ya*PZ

e'S+S(J&k7xNp:q 我問你,  
;f-M!tp%_$x P$uU(ZM
"_WP,M#CF"Wx)E5ci 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??Z1n2_p2@QC

wY7dG2f 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
1@G;a4zIQ EAg)^oZ)K p U
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話u)a ?6bs3W
.i9[1J o%j
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢F/Q D)Rb f6iP-m(\T O

q)~$q Q,Ht?h 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
^:v/v.N1[b0Ev2eZ
Q\Du9am ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰?&N8t'Yk8G(Ml*C[,W

P%a _Qh&[4v7\ J 我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
.N v {*UH9qW hhG*D,|#_
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
WgFoQ:U1I
gAx7L@ H 我比多個例子你啦
Bc `n P8h )id;~7P ~7^hQ~
係香港  s*@?1h|
l0]qQ7B@L$JJd
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上nu c@4WQ1TV

9h1WY'R.bU7Td 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
]E4o.kKK F@9mZ ;`$V d6Bl1Zz
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
"T!\i [!sN,@'p
SSVs/y(yr7L.h 你點理解??
n-{8Y3K8`q^
/k0c[6S~2e3` 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....,EJ wT q l-ia!S!n^
r5c t3d6d_7D X
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
9W5s5S*I;U [28/05 星期三 00:30] !pZ4G,k7wP^ ~F
{ w3K|/`#Ej1k

l\ Qm u5di 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。(qD-_'jp_d{ gk
f1S4d5Ql&VHo
事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。jS B$x H3]Ay;b"h

:XzI p Lwk [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.