infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
UHq9~.{7Aka(yX
9G"x\8{dH3ABN
'a\6IMR#P'S|
Hboysz Z
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
'M@#q3K[YO
@%FeT
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
5o8s6`8r(j'l
y
H z?JJ$uVi
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
!m!P-w9sv(y
I'm nobody.
,a#{H?-y{1m7Sp
HFc;Qr
+gLz.jG
不過段片又真係好誇張,
.z3ZE
Ga8HX6c
尤其最尾一腳,
\C0B0h2K2F8GqmT2Q
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
`|6N YerK#r
若我唔回應幾句,
laDL8g(`y\#}we8r
個心真係有D唔安樂...
gO3DBBSR
%H2A"\#TdnO n
O
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]
jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM
jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:
8~4lj N,w
8zZgZ:b]w
香港法例第212章 侵害人身罪條例
i3^T
X(t@)q
s*Ns6}:wM,ZF
WtD4q
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
1Z[([]"\e
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
6ebpY)N
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
6s7F
S
~,wxQ5of
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)
u.h
KS!y{ k
s0|(f#g2E;EhU
H4?S%rM
N1hAbXA8tr
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...
belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
C,t!FD{)` ]%RA8|
PCNx)jkLbQ
p.s. infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
9a7J)`;QJ
p4t
但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
;f!i+{-@ _+K{0JL9`
0n*p'_XA0ydO
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
+EX0u-H7U
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊
slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
S
c$s~-v bc%kB
A1`Zkg@D.e
^?v*h
R'M*v
既然唔知頭唔知露,
N.Vn
[&D%g)[b6|&y
一開口就話個... [/quote]
%Jj;f ?jWnuv
4cMWo&SZ
TQU?k
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
%mA*|A6Phok o
6Du7dD5E
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
n7[ u\wD v
"K9gR7^(U.{
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
cJ~XlR&U[9{7]R
6ej
xoa#m:S
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
h.DY:a]7U4@ S
zl#}+yb
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
!yqP8S
nM
n'nSh!Z
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
$Y9Z`.[ ne
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
S5mQ6zYm6J
至於你問有咩正當理由,
#[-pEw/N8B#R
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
4R;UX9RAk2b"u(h
)nO#j,S rIh
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
"^3t
b\3P"H
e@D |VGK"E
______________________________
9V1{~uV
%r(Ns I'{x&v
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl. If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....
jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
WK,Y~lLH
因為男人生下來比較強壯?
4T[@z2ue(G"ai
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
TZ B{3{7`
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
S6^,Y,E'f8X
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
n5Ob2vI S.`
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
vpmv!Zu$~/D
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
8z`6}u{S!xqn1|
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
lxo8si,y&[i
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
+S s^|*{@|1P
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
{0ni1G
x*WI EE
N
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:
jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
AGA0A]-K
(~'K7]1o9{7N7J9W*z
z$Cu#jJ
我想講嘅,
l*O_U6hs3u6|
t;g
只係我地根本唔知咩事,
2VqC`zeI X/r"T
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
h+k7TaN"k/o
咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
v6hKp/x$|,T
x%\ da$m
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
H2Yy~!N"w
cd^_*X WS
that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
fDLw2`x0hu)@ Q
Lu:[2[?C/~0Cv
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
V't8A#xs,`M!i%V4D
3JFp&|#C6k
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]
slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
y5d,N;Y%vI.}
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
PG"o*q6@
lsY"r7o ^L%gA
K,S
;aA7Pc!t_gv
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
]P h$Bx _qCg.vw2K
J
Y&^n.].cs ZP
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
:v
xPp7u
EG'p
h+m!b x
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
NC0QGd9U(oP
L2|8@x&p
F ^;r3C"z;kH6L+]
oh god!!! what are people thinking with their brain
hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM
嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
i8soZ R
@XC2qY%[J
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
$s/[
WbTXf}(C
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
Ya5w T7kM%G$\.y3~-B@R6v
+X\6Jps8v
首先: BELIBALA
P.[/b
],Sx
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
b/p'D_k~(_
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
N\|+x2Nqv,`
#18, OK:)
\pE9@mi&W
y
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
k{{XJkp#q
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
d'~&^+G'p%]DA9a
4@
M,E_}
infjlam
+F
^LfGf3X.R
#30 good point, :good:
0g,A2T'wK
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
R-ICBO
#63, 講得好!
2iIU^8cOR
7d _,]~1U;Swd v vy
Jen01,
'S{Z/RW
s$_
d}Q"Nf
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
0`w+|-?y)HW
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
u]+k
{0A~
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
*HoM-LP7AB-m
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
Z2w8l!D Daw
.bVs1ql^?Oe _@#_/`
SLWONG3,
g`2l4Yn4pA
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!! what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
s
r5Mq"C bO,n5^RV!p
有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
Sy;w-G5^,\.g2z
efJh[3T
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
Tb#bc9\_5Y
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
9s+f;V.m:E7G9K
j
b/kR
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
Q[0^9C!`&s#_'s8vL
(b
q DN#kGT:~F#H3Q
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
&yvi_@U
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
\@-f]yO[xZT'Ta
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
EJ,z.wB cz9T
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
m&g8l8Zd9EN
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
.J,G${&HQ(c4{| b
!F%y4eRq
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
P1[#|/s#S
|a
但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
$Y0a[f'Q8[/CD^F
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
eqL#o T1Bs9|
9P lV/E%ZV
m
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)
jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM
**** Hidden Message *****5@q,_|{,zC
3wIl+z0q5d$f+L { N
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]
QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM
好好笑^^
&w}x2iz.M
hx'{L:^/a)X3t'q
我問番你, 沒有男女平等的時候, 即以前封建時
1|V `
j.rhG
Ie
S
k$?/Fd*R3v x'G5O
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??
MA F%@}7a
w,B5r*[{
)RO8u5c4CU^v
你意思話我知,
![q0Fr@%f%i`F3hL&v
&G*f(oK-n:l
而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
9a8l d(|!`_ A
/[C1YB+lE7zz
Vq
第2, 單單係香港, 就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
a8x&O*~M
-Y_ \"eHw$p
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,
%|)G9q*w$^
@4_&[w
O
NpW s
係法律下, 女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
*osSo p6G.o
A!dnR,_v!o2F%_+fO
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證 相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩
小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
&RD`L-a-h
\,~
E~%w\1ry T&E
%n[6vC x[,^
既然唔知頭唔知露,
^` f`+nJ
一開口就話個... [/quote]
S}#Nu-MF-o
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
!^#r1^(o+u;D
OR
|0w0O!C
我覺得好好笑, 你咁既思維...,,,
;m T`"D(tU
+C/\
Pt.C&Q9?
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路 所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
.t2x-`$j]
$NKQr-ct|
但如果真係個女仔錯, 係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
UK#`4V{0_+S
.[1q1eoS [
如果個女仔錯, 個男人可以打死佢??
A5h3oBijA
6|4j-aU3@d'j^/^Y3?
以片所示, 佢使用武力既程度非常高, 絕對有危及性命可能
4MvA#M!?
k})Fmp0s
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力
(f"\rh'~ac