娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
Zy_a R?O %ckX+?;O&o3QL`

B [+Ntg^ d^ #q$T9x6pLm"T
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
xH sK;D"];_ 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]d8Do [%n2[)i

mh3bO]*`A? BOYDWAN版主，Jen01，我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:r\(t/T A)wZ1k
I'm nobody.
}%D2j`pYcv
%`+IN,ZS2N~
G V2L g8B6bm 不過段片又真係好誇張，
Iv0r,CZ 尤其最尾一腳， mb9G&`4Zr-P'dt!wq
踢到個女o既坐低（內傷都似:noway:），V![z`
CD,O
若我唔回應幾句，d/h;G?5UKt i!}lx
個心真係有D唔安樂...
*d+CZu!m
&rkb gIA[ j [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01，呢個唔止係道理，仲係香港法例：-_1`AI(^(K}^r
4J4q6A4t1h&u+j+t5Ow(K
香港法例第２１２章  侵害人身罪條例6y:c!B)AWm#f M&Z

~N%FC4yKN 第１７條：意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人（可處終身監禁）JX1J{([+P*cQ
第１９條：傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害（可處判監禁３年）0X["a@4k,h
第３９條：襲擊致造成身體傷害（可處判監禁３年）
iyzj'_P"j({%w]0a 第４０條：普通襲擊（可處判監禁１年）Ek-t*Du+qhPf)y V
1LptDy!Kb3^O
A6{qn;j2jT
T8ML
身為文明人，是非對錯，自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
a"i7{n;vdtLk2j&v
W%j}(P!C)AoE1mj p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
&VAI.L6N*F+\z        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
@? NBS
Sh'b@2g0X9l8J 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:&xQ*b3s9h
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
H Dtl+W+| H.Z
i;r2R6M9jw;] O%v {gh!h;O
M ?
既然唔知頭唔知露,
"]0x0C7LFb/o)d-n 一開口就話個... [/quote]"ol$xA!A`GBp
#dJ p#Y0Nc|1lx

S4w/Y9@K&KPq@ Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....ZF5S4{$fv` B&~
(Q1S"y1UO
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
XhzK;IY
DK9n1~A6w (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
0Fo!Zzr3s*G+a+h6[ x6^%?d%[:ebwg
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....mAR7o+T)Oy

Lje8I@!j`o "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
L N*tT(c6X1A 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
8g,c6cvT3A$Q L 當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??l T(wc`e'C#R(~
至於你問有咩正當理由,
-j*{q4Yry9mW-e$O 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"H _ S0O'k

y {Vy.c&}.az4P what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....ce_d6C*qymCi
3m$YSa5Zp
______________________________2qY1v|-T,Wq i&At
BY
X1i-NP
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
{9S`\*B+t'RL 因為男人生下來比較強壯?p? { BBV&x,T4U
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
BAm8gjc-j 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
A1ntE.Q]SWZ%Z8L 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:9Zr9H\l6d[
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
7jq U'Yom"H;Is 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,X)M~j^6n#fZ+? K
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
{+{p8}Lg#U 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,"ObR/{l6BG
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:0@ O A]b?Lx
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:{T @d'fv5f

&cG`/f9R!w `-x-A%F6W x
我想講嘅,
3A['|t
V"ZA*l/[ 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
p9ic;Bu;I 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
W? NoHR.ox(z7N S
X 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
/tQr/iq%Ou(R$h 2j+E"R/}TYm
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]-d*\y1aj:R(l&W?0U

vmC"^RTsl that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
VgGu` m v
\ A1N"UZ}
l.Y9zE S no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
j o&d%n E;uA
4~9wD.Ev"Q
O:P the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:F M't r/k+eT'[
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
GMh'c$s/`
+q@C;\T J_2]d
"|1Kg+C5l#m+v J then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
j:P
f}5C!aT })t"I6cU6o
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
#m4RZD0p#n/V9xo
,f6uSiz7t
F if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
p9yO-`SU
+b F(u:T0M0m6f6|a{ EQ?{p)[ It
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!(^oz B7eA-U3b%Z*F,U
PEf's V
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
9ZVg/Q/G*Ev 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
7d`5zW#}^0r-S,{
&s"S:] U$POM:W.j 首先: BELIBALA_ }&q5rm"si7z
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.CMJT4I MQ8j
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
V+Gi6vW'CJ #18, OK:)
vxu{"R*o #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:@%A/grSIA"i
ps. 有進步 good!:good:2HBV:c~n)M

;[0}9S Tf&Gt
ck infjlam+V!v m!n2V2zP8[
#30 good point, :good:
-z9L \+g7qE #34 GOOD POINT:good:b&AV u8~J
#63, 講得好!
!?)z8e7T5R-Q"\
8o\v4?,O#P$Bg r Jen01,

{1WwW.ty
T3AU:s+kN!UG ] #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
z;H"frY2E5~ 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!*fEkh8i
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"1z\*V4Iz
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?3G+f^V2G+A
a
7b0k_H0Au5X
SLWONG3,B~9j%Il3|4P nY
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
%u#ezho
s 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
cq{O0cY`#\ 9TV_;`k8f*Q"b'ME
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
W&o9}3DP2f2X 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.}} pg"w'v-E
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"MlPPA(z h*? rA&nZ

nZDd#u4g*H{ [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
%Q%P0EK0}0A+GX 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
b6dv{I] 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,R}-~
P]
M.@r
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]1N;CCr+j8b&N
G
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
D1~*b't'Sn7V 3y-hM4nC0^_6p
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
:N
s|b O        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
?x.h~-Dq 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
z8O\&Vn0c"t8a ~
.ILn T5{ jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****8Xr5L%x} PP
j&W&C

d{-O&U v v$A"E [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^L2S i9q@/KhM(k1\

{E0xW FF,[6c MX&h 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
'H(OW%JS"X0o"t9t0^ 4O/V*Uv{5N1Z
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??H*J)O!S y4l0a1b

;y5p
[,UR
{,A-{ 你意思話我知,
t3nb o(o K ^1FX,X
,i I$vJ1tc
而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
3GrK d(g
Q1sy'O/|M U3R 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例5y
b%c6w0Q|e7uS
hb}9v"B2Z
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
LO8^T#w "G@Q9F+^%c
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
9e*[.?B
{nv:m
^ _zW+Z%y 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:4F8l C(C8z5b-[7]
9{&ez'~7^Vl

ty-lP N 既然唔知頭唔知露,
"sgR/`0WV9[$XE 一開口就話個... [/quote]
I)o1{d7? 見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
MZ HP.` Rrr
.H:a7w:n(r!Z4T9RZ 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
_j^2Yb8^ a^0[6l)y7n._.y3U#G
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
_M*z/|W A's,rbG;dB
^;]5@8x'Ho;r 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??A7[UA6A1i3C
N3CP1])d
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
R9g`*UGg'{M
u|x7K
T8dW2c5Mi1h 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
sRavL
[
H.l*o$MPV fY;p 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力"K:A&F p(T
5s0Za~Z1w
我問你,  
*^D5vC&yw.I
x7] @;Yj,G_:IS8{sg$^
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
{)y jacfB
Vd g'O qSyINC4N 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
X(k?$m$x/Aj.n+~J
6Yjo_5{sG6} 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
'|t7I3e9s RMuL"C
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
!pG8DiJ(Q\
.E4DG;[bdWY-~ 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
&c|T2k1j4n z x!l;_6|
2~je
i k3Ts"at ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰oO6A4cqqI(J eI+s

-EK&O8pu 我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲$z&K[DN$o+w.Xo*OJ
"b)M];B r
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可G!Z!r8x/F}-Z

T/gW+f}X!h+JN3? 我比多個例子你啦
1A'tV)j5m
2di$VMH 係香港  
]f9aL`0Hvk 1Y;cB [Z
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
a?8} d0Hf z&S U?"z8YOX De5Xq
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為G?h*F$Z8s
3TN/q.guK @$Pf
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
`n%D's/D U}ABM(h
你點理解??.gA/^,|2rLfCL{
,ny(^#D5ci
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....[!n!VbxU#NwoSH$y
/K8AtT4yx~q#[%I0q*b
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉4m0|XM0i`lB P
[28/05 星期三 00:30]
+l.~r`;ho3r
Lyl%UsP
0v)I.Z:~%z(Bq_3p 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新，就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉，並停職接受調查。hH7FIiTg"v

cR9tR
f!P.}^3E 事發在上星期三，張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時，被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部，於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後，引起網民強烈批評。;MYH Nt~mD
-O)ssx@:fP
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

查看完整版本: 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人