娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
4N@^B Q,J} [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
/x;Pq6NU
`.`\lb{ 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
1s6JD GH*?R1Brh Y`FBY zY1_$d S
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
5E`US2cD7|
Y `NGM;G,q 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.2\| ^IxH8g
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
{B m BR B
)Q-m6I0mk|l-C:[P"r%i 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
Mw1BK@ g |V Vt rKK
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
'V f:|:_1c fN:\o
CJ&Y E&J'R?^ 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
;pE.Y#k6xC I B)O-_
L9f H(u i/@-_ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
N&CG(zy{ L[Mt i
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
U I X5Rl*QS d9KA%j.m
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
/~ FQ6c`3s3_(wt
b;Mv!~Z:k}!~ E 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
"AU)l4k+ZZK#t a
-cG @[-l0?6}%[1u 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
4wIk8wU%P9{B U"S4e )`%Q,@"}8[TBNo
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
'Q|${Z:QX!j
`,Y(]e*u:V"G;p 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
IWSm:O6r!pVx I :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
g\4@ |4AHaR;oT E japan has been very influential nowadays.&ln\{$Kx|
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,w(q#Ddo4R
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
Z.dI1qF`
y4oAd&lH&zZ 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
#F.geU6F
RP|U L-o m8` 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
z6B*y$`#Dtc@ shall we be more reasonable?
e%Z ~d0ODv5L japan has been very influential nowadays.7lIQ%N T1s6q.m
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
.A&p;Ny]*g:N japan should occupy a place. [/quote]C"OGFO-t

2i7XzD5a{ | )eEd DUj9J
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...G/EW?/o,f6[f-f
日本係好強我絕對認同
O#pZJ~(eQ0[n 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家... KN%phy9d4d
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
3NJ(E|Lo
w0MeouY c)D1F)g 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),Q a hC1M
Z(Q$D q w;]m!c0\.b
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
,J E8bJ6HP)J #q:zxV'`3sb
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
!a{s wXX8}y6m @!@&s-C)W$U`
hj\a"d vw*gM

aMr P#{-t b-n 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單... @4Y!g?(F
日本係好強我絕對認同
-},oY}%Tiu k4` 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
B:O Lw u*}l]F:f 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
1| {`-R"g c7H {wOrI

2sK*YX8gk0qJ
D+sZ&m^
r c'g Q`wp i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.mat@e ~
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
K0z Y$s |!iu9[P3L a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries Y0NSrk]I
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
A _8L{w&g3u T1lv3|n*^

VI@o o[ 5Y Io:rv]F
%p1?fU&@x-W|

4z\:Oe0|`/n /{JmUQ\
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
n_hb2o [/quote],W0x1R7^r
3S6hq!M1XTA
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
@gii"Y1Qb
W3P qvyE$EF,\0sH 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
8j [ g+\5S |*u1{ [size=6]講到強,}G6E,}4@5}A'` e*}

G`]{1W)t 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
itmR)]'T] [9e:g4R9m
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
{q8K!BZ9uQ
u2Xe$``~ 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
M$DlRf%R5TU7~ -I{$\$} u%C._C p
{3@dd*Q{&w/Fg
the bro knows quite much of history.j"AIIY$`9Fv
)Ms2n C G7c
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
f(|?*vY[,f1PH^E (El3_R'hr
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
zz8iq @3be9y oqd | oa_
China has a right of veto否決權.
*|:ApvA+q If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,%L%PS I [j
the issue will au---atically be banned9P(e'_a'@%m
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:x&|6HBt1z4y&a/Y)CmX

3h*Ic7J:y/RO
W8Nh KI'W 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
K&rPOj0P|C Ac
7Q1ap7uY3|{r 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]E0Y I3?U7oB0C fl_

/K?g"WLf
R%yRNnT/a_ 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
k%@})u&ijwV ,}R6F$h,H#S
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首sK-T*TKFA(d,QF
#v(Q7w.g5`j
why it is called "Brick"f g3cfC)k'n
?Jy C"r2T(vG
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
:_oPHb+aGH4q
*_0Z%o c)?WN9e
x0OrbXV1j Q+c{u"l(U u1N
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.