娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]IxG-[$_6e/s5kg
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
Oc8c0GU
l8j_^9~ z 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
}+y0d#a-|"r{N#K1I.q 3g {"C%C m
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
P8?r^4K sJ&l.U'k C
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.EPR7Ly.s_ ]8D4A
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
L8JQC I`9k*o
W3U| Kg u W\ 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
LN A af'[R P|y'T.Z^i|
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
|3G0Ph w
UrYAX 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
:PpvP~)M4h CW+VWLf|
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
t:V beC h:c \'u)gf ?^^
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; 7[(e+K9J,Z Y+H

onD LaE 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
9IN ^$M oew9{ f
}X(|b(C(m'jRg 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
)o KX!W-_ Q'{+y"[e Zn#`4Er5tR)@
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size] n*wk;zv)kS!g

Sm U!Sy R#K5w^| [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦a!cmN;M^E'EY%\7?
;iH)V%rf
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!*[#d V1W`XzrkK
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
t7Z6Q:I7q_,L@ japan has been very influential nowadays.5J k _+Jh*Cs
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,*@QV8Fv!LU4`[N
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]m0J(JWiS

~`#D(L XI7?Z9a 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?2ouF@Kj f:B;P _

CPze'O:V{Y7P 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
;iT&o8V w wD shall we be more reasonable?$J-{"D9zI
japan has been very influential nowadays.0CwV xW!f o:kj3C
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,m.SMu@6`
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
,Qd#J1v7e)ak1U `)\-vY3SuM

gz/VIN2v&P 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
*Y Fb,ag 日本係好強我絕對認同I7L!~'g;^%C8o&M7_ G
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
]$Fi|*DV|,Q9G 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
x Ff"y"~/W .Vl$Yi8X8Y
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
1D0\ B@,b(O V?Y ?X
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),%vD.k6Y'g#Y
4v3oC~yX
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
O[!R)jF@+B:P cF)q%W t$D(~#_
%[]2S5_C'^

'\ q$V _+m3o%a8? 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單... djY~"QR8ID B
日本係好強我絕對認同
"VvJ*j/} f-Ny:n 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...] \E{_b;Wg
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
JSK/~+F:KN
0?/s-y2}-h3W:~ HV
mHUJ#CB
Mz(P2{ Z %HA"|p1nHW
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only..}-f,K0T5]?2Rq
in the next 50 years, japan will decline. kXS6k.jy
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries 9H/ow#]EmM
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:Yl7vDC7W^E2EG
I?/v)|n4f9G

]#?s-FSR0R%m
a)a.QV6\']/g)gE
N;PF C#C~4t;|)o
sDA{0V;BT6e uG[Z(U [tq.F
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
atZ3Gt&B [/quote]
X9O2G3z:f` J5x`(O*T0a
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@G/v8`/U _^J
j Z FU9?x B
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
.l%o8S4Dm&R3P3\ [size=6]講到強,"g;\KQkF

9~&w7y8`Q{ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),Cb0p*R!K&^

Y FN O6_w M 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),;~7mbwd@2b:?

z o qt3T 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote] r(Y?-S7z_ Yr8qJ
y jp2x O:i E+~ D
] U[(n uA\I,{
the bro knows quite much of history.v\,s.D;u

E)`k%I:B ^Eo UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
J,Dy1L*k bik4V&O*O
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.2W%M3L8Qn6_ ^M"|`
O:Ap+_C6i
China has a right of veto否決權.Y2P)r!OY@CC`
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,TL R'n#s#O \6c!i
the issue will au---atically be banned+bZ1|2zx^
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
Q8`!q$F_?9r E
}n;W9z2x j5~e*KX'g4xt9M7_f
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@4Tg.Zw8R.x

l/j v%Wj 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
~1G/c\c'R~ _ 1NMe-qu qHu)m X

h0a U*D XG 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.Q4}6w2|$~tH

m.@!S|_2ZXMz One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
)i0f AWsU}3@ 9];K l m;r@2q
why it is called "Brick" g)L:maO8Nr
7\[ sE/w%}
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
-m-Z;o GR:x
X pw,qNZ
^s9{ nL#^] ? $q._-D8aU q5o'~ny
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.