娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url] E2Bm `+_1|Ju
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人PW-w4NDJ6p
j)Oy7?x/Z T"_
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國*J1S#q:~#U

`8RZ)A&Y x)sv;zp 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子U7B#D1}*J;c#r ]
?4_3xl(w7[8B
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
o2MpV{S!O.Z yh 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
h#xgC&H D,g
2_T9P,RN9F 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
j})l;}'jei
1Po!G9u7Q 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
|x ME X.P
H9?fvj!| fL 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
6v%ZK{(^#B c mY;N\G:buR#}
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
} jJQVW.G2}
9XnR2\ F$l3H-ZI 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
[-~(z3F&e!g&_x]
c|#\'J-\lJM%R%g/O 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
&\Z3h9Qqp.h
m4iBk{(u 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
y Z5mA`
-I1sQP4}3T 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
:D9vQ}1Ha'i'UlE O(V(zeR%i
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦i;r3}/]4}4b

1Ok]0GSaN2{ 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
s/B?%B/{{M)J :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
_&B1vn1o0x;Gc/D japan has been very influential nowadays.a Q]Ge.Hu
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
8a9ZzD ]4^ japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
^NG&eqx2[5X
6q fZ&\m.d7qOW3X1jh 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
/]LOVm
#Z^1~:qib 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:B4_ b%EeBM\x
shall we be more reasonable?*~%tF7yZ#}
japan has been very influential nowadays.qR8L.v}%a B6e{7]
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,/L0Ch+Rc4C1TGi
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]4d l ~,QMuD

hsNVm$f Z6U I5y*lc[nckD
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
e1c"RLi*b m0@[ 日本係好強我絕對認同v-U@c8a%WC` N3j-R
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...Y4{dRW ?{1X e u
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,$_&M0C&ee awj_
ggJ_Ln\9H
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
h[#vzH;M lKF|bgo w
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),|x-PlH"M KaU

*i"}y2SF@*A 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:,tk0b:q/z@

8BU/`+VY)@s
mDIo+f8J 7K/}s^P0Yl#u
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
A j/?Eu C/h%A 日本係好強我絕對認同
b6j#kS}Vm 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...R1~&Q5m#Zm~
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]H]1SM#L.H t
F5LYQJ6t \ C
N#g/]Ot E
5d6N%dky+e.D+D
l,lGC.\.^
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
U`n,B[#LW![[ in the next 50 years, japan will decline.)@:Y t Z#@MtL#q4HG/? V
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries ^${4g#b5X-d
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
W5r$L }y
Z+J3smF Y(B#B
%K6D(R]8I
?TM ]7A'@u+}_ ZPl9Lq1Ph

w.CYo @%ap
X i;bxq7p in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
5[e?Y K2N }w [/quote]m)XP-AnF1y"NW
uC+?n&j+CI FT
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
o&@zb1a}e i#s ;B0Q#xs_;@
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
{;`:]wr [size=6]講到強,XR H,Lj"J&JF
OA w1Q q^M2l%m
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),-?'M`i"bQ6c
[C2U#nQ_8|$`b*c
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),v ]/t s3[#N p

M%Cw:F O;Z4b A)hi 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]6b k e v1D
jsa5M#\8\7Z z

d eo1k`2fZ$i0S the bro knows quite much of history.3A)jI\g:s9vP5O.?

L.o0d"uV_E2i UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.fB?7X2Je9EO

oxPF/`_3} Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.+u6l8W4kq

&O}2U9JlVoz` China has a right of veto否決權.
J0G3w5h5E1a.h If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object, }hM9}1B nE
the issue will au---atically be banned
x Ycg2||bt4_/D Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
P N%n8f/h7ZTz'V su6@B ZW
1Yz4ty9ps
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
g]S0li k
_|&^k6ftns 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
}!V5x[3k-{Dr
Fa,Ag)k0Z )E3~ e.S-tD1a_ejE
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.+A6{ tX/_$\/Z}

i+U"k qX$}XhX.{'q One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首sw3s@N.la

v4r4R N(j,c+P why it is called "Brick"-lQ*vd ?"@K#j1]s
+\V`|,[L
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
aEhne
]b\a(F(I
1Fw bz_M&L E,gg {M p4q8rG(s
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.