娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]Y uf Z? xS_x
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人cI:Iw^jnOE

}Gk&G2XBg^ 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國\ p G"|r&x

o qe9Eg 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
F"[ k)hp6o1B
1UGCL*[ 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.hF hW D!w!a[
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
+W @ Ps[r&W
A(d|9~Zhl 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, F vUoYI
kD9FyZ
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
VkHF%p?cV3W0]e:m p2tJk M(j
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 yV~~-e9XL b
fi(?`` D R
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
r4`#B;S b/A/Q M
{zwo1]\1g#p N%LD4^ 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; d0ObSyjs$N'G
V ]N!bd)^%C XE
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
-~)v1@7My-w2C#D
W#E(nt4UB~UH$[ 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? :kW8^'gU(c

[2`Az4z&M\ 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
6t Ntbt2?d-\
Rd es;Mkt;j [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦z*T&{@ lM:q
+ZR"fP+z"_
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!#QN;T[;Y~7yJ
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
8l7zN`vk8z,Y} japan has been very influential nowadays.
G*MH&t&\ r{G"[!j although i hate japaneses, but in UN,(TdhF*c T.|7C`
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]?Xhen;R
rJN$r$o;`Z]a%x*s-M
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?0_.ll v[l:`:v&i

-ta"qu{z%A 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
/A!p)PzM shall we be more reasonable?
4q2f)rdB japan has been very influential nowadays..kqb4ae
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,6] ^RVA,O ~\(Ml/v#F
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
CW.XW zK:L(}R F Z J ^ zVa4T[0n

"X,i7Il6T J 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
(S Fw6hNExs3l 日本係好強我絕對認同
Ig;VGN(p#? 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
0@Ys-w@'W/d ^2Qy5M 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,dt;L)hz1^
.V9C"SVBw |#z
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),+B~ p3`:R*|b
ZcT!|7m/Rq6huQ
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
R9kU1rf o q'l7IkV}7h
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
YglXpp/Fv
s.OU9NMsQ.|
f;qZZ2T$yB|J
*W x\0w {] s 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
xd(bP:dfR3@ 日本係好強我絕對認同
i;E/?o"Y#X 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
8F:|7x.fS.\t0W v Rs 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
pYGg p-?;ht
`.\.f:w&rxS -L:HO!BQ2g7] G!E

B0C\o-[2P w
J+R.cQ0VOnF9ci i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
%]R+I y]6T in the next 50 years, japan will decline.c9U`!jZ-j%gb
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
1l'ZjmM Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:0\B5v/t!o.ud
u*UtQ |
4GZT\9R!x!T
N"[BA?Z

7USq*N(M y_/wE&r"`:d
.tp2}jS/?g f#zj%Y 2xR$]+u)zi#q%i h
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
'i Z7T.Y i~ [/quote]
DM| ? S.z/J r/] bx7R+S;ICH
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@$uD,kBOXlw$ZTo
mnX3B#?n
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
fob0v,n e x[ [size=6]講到強,
4C] Q GUa
rS!T m| 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
({6KN I:P/V$F,s 5y&FF ERvj ie
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身), g3s b BRrl$B8Ij+m
Fn n2M%Q:`"y
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
` ^kJp.Q |2@,t?Y q5]

mT^*M[}b#f the bro knows quite much of history.9GL)wgUwGqH7S7M7?

_QM|H UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
n p7g{:e)q8f M&yRX'I6q9tF
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.lV+}-I}

(Y/C&R5Ltj)|\ [uhd China has a right of veto否決權.
"C3pN:H&g If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,}m.[P)Y;`/x Z;x.y
the issue will au---atically be banned5c t8U _n$~}`t@:G
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:#R"lsJ| q q(q
kHu C&z F

ZZw^1?V 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
r0x/x^4Y0ejz n%A @"D{] Uw$U!Y(`
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]/N[;|5r`uC

KtEt.]YvtQ
%s*|z5xU(jm9J;y 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
(M@$~tGa0d u 7w!|H{|V,V
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
5_yL5DS*E .z*kZD3] |
why it is called "Brick"3R6sr4L\`
a3xr^ {m(rd;dm2`
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and Chinax:IB2\?Y `"G-^

+{2f7s)BI
#XVAf%~X T
,@L6z[g#D];J+T,f PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.