娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
+I8bZ wKLw)P0S'x [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人j I0KTqK3i{
,Z P5ttu
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
n6Lt:JioA
Z l]BG[Z 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
@A A@]$f
V(xnP%F Z8?~ 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.9E'J}[G]Ax
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
NT xY] NecXyI`&m
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
Mz.Z!^,m#Qf s(g~vG
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! 6Sv2aO}a K

2S/Eo'm/W7kM+Q9K)} H 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
~&I#HRhi"w}}
\,`)D8Z5^ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
`!R d3R"\
,aHk:oB-n6M 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; Y*p}};k:j Q

tR+B ^XN 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,6q1U6d4Puv&I_

}){ edK.G"Gd$_A 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
Rd'`[f9q
5T)]6I)h ]Bz2`LM 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
/?i z!`8VV4Nq `&H#x9u$dq'iE:b
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
U9g4L&` M *a\]!MIpkR(d
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
.Or;p8vIg&~KiB :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
.]7[0t`%T'ke;v U1j,Zu_ japan has been very influential nowadays.
Kv9r6p.n although i hate japaneses, but in UN,.B6p2X1H]n
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]s D3\qK%n-J v

X[w9BA_Q4_ 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?Q1g,jC;oRsk%QOI
3w&eaK8_+isC/[
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
.IV:g4U?#R shall we be more reasonable?
.S_8bE&LV5t Z7w japan has been very influential nowadays.
9eNcOg:U:k although i hate japaneses, but in UN,?5b!zY7`5qZcG
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]g;|z-h} LPW(Z8y
9Sq:g&y ` Zt)V

UG4c1^#` 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
{*mm)j.QR9S i 日本係好強我絕對認同*w X].I*A
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
lI)bsPbfO | 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,9c,w3I{,k&ujb

n'Bsjec'd 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
iWa$@ W/o$v]a.B*W
mQ2l,QV1?hAs?J!C 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),`o!_ I2M
"D}X6f{1]cct!?
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:e%}Y hN Z z
7hJeaO1`C B7B$~!P:n
$L5E"GRcik
IBAYsS uF&Ac
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...HQ_(uEi
日本係好強我絕對認同
6|n g&v?7oS3_ 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
G P{F(Ml5y&Z!r 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
([xZn~0O)kf-TqU
W.G!E {G!} A
4n/vu,vtL ,i-|:i"IO'J

7^x`] K_!M{ i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
2J u/W,EM*}z in the next 50 years, japan will decline.A/{0`2p-`]9E0Wcp@
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries |j)b S*R.X2y
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:HhI1H"J1x?*j0z
0bxC/M3u|{ZKs
f&~ u's:M;j5U.T~R

l%rHbc0a&rM Y%fmv)t:C,jE2I

V}e&B:@ {U]
1f4R&\)t_0b{ j;I in the next 50 years, japan will decline.{c4` k/J"eP Y)`
[/quote]
rt3R {U Ku.y\"w #Rx1R4F;G9T;\1z4i'jo,V
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
1qc#] K/d\G.G^ FW7cq6@t
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:~A-X1je\4~D2Ga
[size=6]講到強,&Cn MW|n&N
;x!^0T[r T Q@JG
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),V*k3C c{5pDa
zf0tZ5n
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
;p:f.tKOM|)r-z4~| ]U Lv _1RA+c
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
8q|1F.GjFmi2@WB 4qU'd^mG'n2u*n$e
e)c3}"l:M
the bro knows quite much of history. Ct*W4z rY H
]p4F}*E
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.!wjJ8P%\}0e%i!Ut[.g

)Gq5@s%A u Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
y-m8l[{(h
m,G:MAuJ China has a right of veto否決權.
2Z(F/e;X:Tw@ If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,9Zrq*n,a3f&E$[Oz
the issue will au---atically be bannedKa9E*l2Xr lq_ A
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
4K8a,PH;~} O e7x
0rA)[T J0b Mh A#C
+k2`7FU4c0h 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
[tj6~0O(x#l)X2L? a 6MNVBD'M-D R
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]0W `,MtjyBe;n9l

3^ n1w o4Y5R5l.K-@1c Kg;A1];vR)^d
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.{q%g2B u:~ V1M*L

K(g/])_mu6L#\Q4H{ One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首siO#@3Q A%il

v)h g(Q7bQ6E Z7QY why it is called "Brick"|8h7y0~r&x_1l0z0B
:q{6d#H5jA
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China f~-d9id^

;t$Ywd*B !]1OR'ze*ejW5~h

8?v b%N,u^ PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.