娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
L0G f r)H [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
)]eq]8lE ^N/@C;qI l A
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
vIjK)HH5D /T;O0Z_:h-ac h
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
n/yN2H D'i/~
d9plDH:o*N5LW8J 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
6~ p2Vhr&p/R8O#P 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! `!I(q.U:T'uG

S?1_K v c 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, aP+ks8w1gJ['k
+HP(X?]ex }
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
'v@!U+Zr9|zP/e ?A%b,zX-s
7r9P.kLM w#Xd 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 g {,^t&Oe)yb
u*J;g"}-V4K
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, ;sD*O"psAy g

bCi+f|q 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
*om2apO
aMyY)c{[ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
AspZX"U n6p/?v
`ZE4Yy"W 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
b/GD%V`
#G*F X Efz7V(? N 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
8YfE-H^ w[ KZ
4x ~2z$mm(q [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦)Kf.{o5Wwy*g#\

PRx0G[ oJ B}@\ 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!/P6i1~-M,LE {uv+s
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
,]T%wU&f)uEd5M2? U5}e japan has been very influential nowadays.4i/bxJ @4G~e
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
jakT(`E japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
5^(~ q*_{!xfg EMi%f'|*y7j`;u4DY
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
\b4d B/gT
J(mN fpy6B 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:GCHUOR3Se-a
shall we be more reasonable?,R3Ttj"sF3M9z&Wfv
japan has been very influential nowadays.
dXY5y,mcl although i hate japaneses, but in UN,@VU ]#wu Xf-D
japan should occupy a place. [/quote] cGT v T4YM
0_O+I.t Y |0BP8z m

s{3n{|K M5fEo)R 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...zxf(wY_3L
日本係好強我絕對認同
G)f([-l3~ _*O7|eX 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...0|.lqHY!C,^
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
v)N@/Sx 3H5y {m1[V
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),Ul5LG$T:J7x,] O

e.J6^*}|H 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),Y4B?'j X+SA?
;w._s Or
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:1ut k pv8EJ
3yk s"];Q9n P
b)m\HB(zP(r

v{3{ y!B G#L 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
o.M4m9aM+I/d 日本係好強我絕對認同4LxWsK:xX&]
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
T1zm4CU;c i^Wv 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
ZF0Ak4kVs
"g+\W2_V6mH(G 2oq"yS"b;P9BQ"?9u

,h'nv"^ H~ mT!qb v]E6hF(ml
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
CU$QEU in the next 50 years, japan will decline.6azXkE@ Wa
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
(c/d M)\`&EP!h Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
)K"Cr_g0lo 2m9F@j(z ~&D#G$M!R
9Dmk&g @[ s

Fe oC-_-o X:C6w|
]f8X k \r"Lo2Z 9n'J)}*qi

4_ qQUE!trm$i in the next 50 years, japan will decline.9JI@)J9r*V?R
[/quote]kfVZ|/N4K+w5G%g'V b

,}'PO:M+v4t3F 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@8c8[^l@'G_"H CZ
r4BvIm
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:I b3tBEh5vv
[size=6]講到強,x!}*Cc.~
^k eU-\x'^6T-hB
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),{ Pn H:|N cT pcf
3H]!~:Ql*?7t5H
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
(U)I/[u^5G 1i%@8R M-}j7{
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote] f \z t"O^U&O
$jY4^m2wDgz
1iAz-`(k;U4_r
the bro knows quite much of history.
d/J ?g2oZK %e.IdHI(A.Gl&r
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
pZ:v"t%U
zW!Et(dg{5S Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.1@iA\;Dc%tCL

:Y mF|*P$ubB China has a right of veto否決權.
2r&X)skHII'j/Y$g If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,b'^|^t4G|
the issue will au---atically be banned
_"u+C9Pch Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:+uE3@+Uvm
&E\'d.LF&\E

*?r)l7D3yKzH1h 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@}F2w"b+J W

d/J8mr }3`? rP 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
s%OB k4|"z*{#g_*zO
w[0?7qY 's/NTF S[
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
|V6e#zs\ +E.q {8HZqCrlb#|f
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首sj'}j/Lb\ wG-s

&wW9t\f4s\mz why it is called "Brick"
4s;H$UI+YPc*H4c-?D
StDx uW it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaX%zrF9K~ t$~ E:cv

v5_z(x5La\ WS7Si
F:}%]XvP 9v+@1k?1G:d"R9a`~| s
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.