娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]J1]PT1@[u'L$qu
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人 X4A.O+tf S2IU
~"`[g)P
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
!xq(dt1~g&nX !GFF*_O6o\p
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
)ghb2[s!Io9[ \_,Ax(k,e
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.9t&wA.k1q
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! h-W*l2j7zn.BLKB-{

2koQnN fHN'q!s 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
r$yu~8vj#ZA J.I
?eY-v:fYF 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
AYdO)t
p1x+RhzC 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 J&W1mK yA
E:]mB:^`ys"iiy
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, 1rI%X-F Tna!Z
#u7[2_.bZ0`
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; [email protected]?m,p_}Xu
f4wH5@9@*m&x2U-V1a3E-@
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
E6xV lyWR
iz#w4rw5T!U3P)ex 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
%S RM CZN*R$n ay ;l,@8vIv7c]]^&F
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
C)fU&C9V|:m?'v#s g7@/?(I$@,Tz%G Y
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦qo&jy5NQ@

ugVkhU#~Q 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
l}!Dv:{+A&] V4HX :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?Q-l!z`4e Q
japan has been very influential nowadays.f A O8^F2g
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
"~[+U ^'M japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]p(V Ef4o,j0{K$[HF

j#B&_)p9W-sm 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?H'kk;L/u&}
nQ,J ~?2p;R'R+WB
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
A ajA||pmrW shall we be more reasonable?
` i.{ J#{*|f;|vr.} japan has been very influential nowadays.
r0{&Z&pb*Y1l$[N| although i hate japaneses, but in UN,6b e'Y gI
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
zbT&K;L,bV @ 6N3O:UDV'Uf
l-k9v7C8m+|Y+m
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...J5PN+K Avju
日本係好強我絕對認同%mo'F+JrV.d
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...-I!W v5\(yO
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
K(J\5a-c$m^0El
(\ K!N]0D[o6t 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍), L+cI-T on

\'wtE+d7Jx 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
N3s}HZ8I +uA S$F1gN*Y
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:w w*[ |6]J7ut:w)L

^:m_!|{/G/z z]d1dmz*anqD
x6oWG"sA N~
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...d3| M-`%RB(t
日本係好強我絕對認同k/KiUb]
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...8`'@S4H4w
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]Bc4A Kb'p

^X"hD }AjR
Y7_8y7z+u4t;H
t0h;Q^`(? "k6U+Q$n9`6?
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.I5TjJD0NM:|
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.X.x%m"e_#Jmy2c
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries !^yC2?Y[tg3m:x.n
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
*X5I'a2Dy,F;u Kf4l uA.L"ZYN
$u1v)`k {&y0q P]a+@

$C0_]n)H
3k9k!r d8[]
'IT/f6g }cT &n*RI6Z \ ~j
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.T1cO\(R v;_
[/quote]/A6UHgd

kW/S Qir? 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
R&vnBr!P
9~ ah Z.T!R;Z+u/i 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
1Po.x5o&w Y o;SUG [size=6]講到強,s,qW n)xmS7_~

q|,m:aR+e:eAu 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
Or [+r _(IZtwp
O+pS mnS;A4J N 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),EV0_b(Q*^3N;e
uDPX~a8t
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]9O Hw1m jQ_

)m(G#b'C/n8a*c B&? &e#Jp |:}w
the bro knows quite much of history.
w#VtV~Y*Y$Y
/IsF3J3q Cu YG]cek UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.~V{v;` R4i
8_@j#rLhg
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.A!I_? ]2T$h\sJ~tY

0_7~F3mC)c B{m7k"g China has a right of veto否決權.
0v4CbC*Z8Sh If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
n+c iX W!s the issue will au---atically be banned
M$LO(cO2|:n!W$s Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
+V"l2_'g n%b.X4kQ
E)bG#gbgG&U 0T.BzOMm{-vl.D
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
`Q/_$F|R~7Q:v$q%E w,bWt R
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]8bh)]@V;i i-v)i0r
T!_i!o&__h
*f+_"nd0G
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
2{nf/F _N1@/J&n `;z M,A:D't x0]@8L0ie
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
v(]F8JH'\3G r/X+Lp&n Q$gq.V
why it is called "Brick"`9@ qe vQ4P)i f9K2XK

jZ }.x*?8J!O_3c!d it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
tJ6W'oC4C|
6SvL5i}T
6nD0N J&DYL'f\
D;f P5b?)M PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.