娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url].\.X!c(Sx-i!i
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
-Q6C/F,D.A3]c#D aR||0N-y
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
^{1Mp7E`H Sc
,rx lxfkU 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子z6GF#@gU
rw,OaT4|Ws
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
8v}3T1\/MZRJ3a$B,JE 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! ?Ds{ a-c9q+r`+Z
H(ay'Z:K j6N*t'A2z$L
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
Od#uu;_QQ
i3uTM2[0A-U I 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! OO\(aCb"^/lW

XeE8h xBm0`D 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 ^l x U j
&[/t'N'P:?*[_9n6V
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
,{8m td|oE!T w/~FrS
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; e:@gN!v8zZO
~8Sw%L*qA_&s
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,lU4N$qH\@c kd

M!hd[#L;t1b/K 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
fh*pWW k*J 0_"a,LVj5ZI#b
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size] n4S hKD6w7~7W
7I2n'|q0ZC O l
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦S,s9k`!i1z
\'RD:@;d4T*xlf
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
"~ k h'[x7KT P'zE :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
E5?#L3~c1`]Z japan has been very influential nowadays.
9|/kw }qd although i hate japaneses, but in UN,,A3h#rX l}BA
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
z{zj%~5x5c$_/V 0\#qg)H4L|4CT
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
zww~bbz
1C h c*SC 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
2| V)v3J8gF \ shall we be more reasonable?
r J/\Iow-Q japan has been very influential nowadays.(O%B:R h7m2R
although i hate japaneses, but in UN, l[h R{,sw
japan should occupy a place. [/quote].S rH i$RB1C;LT4i

l.XCT c V2}P iR{ +HT3q jI J
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...]1a7V-J ^C9h
日本係好強我絕對認同 lG^Ki7]'^O,F*E?
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...$Ig+p t {
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強, P Cs0t F-QR,f

Er _9o)i }3['J F d3p8\ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
d'oe#jM:P_ {
za/Tx-Q?~/[V 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),8tDH(u5p*P4_#|

5\SYd/_8U:oj'a R 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
0dF{*T;V-L}
'E%Vlg$n2U NvD SL"O `z

2{*R| Zuh 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...bS1^5IH!dr,D
日本係好強我絕對認同CR!{3t N9xvb6H*C
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
+U4A _9Q"]^d0z 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
I5LI0}a6B1F{)k
&X9lnk6g9A n+\
Ns"MA+uUW"^$U Z${Wm;[,I$s+[%n;f`
.kOJI rC n
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.l4?|N-{9Q'g q4~
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
Xt;uWf6GT a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
E{S5qbQl| G Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
p0N5q$]6hNj
'g@v QZI kt+TQ,x[

F(k |X~;Q"E[-|
B#tP4|Dk WTnU_ e`

zGo(q;] in the next 50 years, japan will decline.xU8L:K q
[/quote]
1uFA ?7G ixtF`+f#fy r1a3?
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@6U%X^}1zl*ioy

-b d/{:p8~D 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:;H L X3\:}\$`SxmH
[size=6]講到強,Y*d H$t[)UK

:G_6Ud4E4O0{+C 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),*PS.m"MbW
F zIcP!jg(a
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),d Yg/MJ F+Y`k}
Vo7q&kHJ
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote] m2Q;p6VoD7A5oQ {$B
5e t'\yZ_q[

-W }A9Qh%c? the bro knows quite much of history.
ze7Hn)zpe
.u Wf ] aM2L1uQ UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries./}4I/`.Jf:Bv4nM

M6_ cI H(p!\U1N"? Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
:? \5l9C)e,Tt"@
9r si0gE"l China has a right of veto否決權. Rbuh E9b
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
6dk0T,h@ the issue will au---atically be banned*Sr2P]K4jL*W
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
-m&t/[yZU^ 2K*J$Q&s+Z(PN
AmpyA1~
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@"nw$lxC:Az(c

${}8k!so}:]6af_ 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
M2n&mb O9I
y.Rz2wF+` Q?2j/o|QY
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.j)P7]StN#i A

+T K!l+E B4h*i One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
P&Yq A'a9`-aH
{ P:MN,| why it is called "Brick"I,vTf.N|7F

5{.z-N@,A7z)_ p.sn#| it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China;}1\j6Tm3s$g&{+p&c

3?!D9`lBio4Ygn
u*wY(I5\2[
R!YJ(x~` PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.