大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5](頁 2) - 吹水版 - 娛樂滿紛 26FUN

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)+]$T&^'X:L
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king 發表於 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]短毛[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:}7QH'i8M(V CB)X!c
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ... [/quote]
I agree you points that it could be illegal
but that is still a "gray area"
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair

anyway, I want to say that is!I6wT4\3x:RD'J*w
who is supposed to be protected by laws`8?%\uYb[ Wa%Z#d
creators?e(X`;q4F+Az
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.\/cm FTGbw([do
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those5^3m#[{.?`
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04 發表於 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]dogson009[/i] at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:;rJ7Z4}$C/IM;{.f}7H]
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.= [/quote]Y~7G!t:?t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]junob04[/i] at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:

我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!! [/quote],b-z^@+}M
唔係喎!D3K%vG"L\4vH
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!$t(U0W'JVSf
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!@f-AB6X
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234 發表於 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!4ny3AsJ kZ!C
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
if so bad, dun download la, right?o)LkK#sDD.A T
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^ R? S5a8BO'Pr&G
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correctb x#xKf8r+P}K
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society3h9{)u*baCw.o)E
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........6@&z yL'}Q-x)]V
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman 發表於 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~+o0lx#|&eB;_A K
政府想比下馬威0的人~~ A+_k#]v
錢就一定罰e,s}N&b;X
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,9aFD8~k*S"d
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?|!J7uP@
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?X.]W!ESCv$?F
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886 發表於 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@ 發表於 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:

小虫發表於 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^

老鬼X 發表於 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　

markmk 發表於 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..

人人人人人 發表於 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!

bonzi1983 發表於 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law

karenmoe 發表於 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
告得入我切!!! [/quote]
我當初都估告唔入,+ShJ7u7Vb){R
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,T0AwV:W,XdFz f
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....

timho1027 發表於 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
我希望佢冇事;)

wolfevil 發表於 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為

阿細發表於 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]EV4886[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:rT9u2Dl8ubbvb
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法) [/quote]8aM)|2@{ i
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...

頁: 1 [2] 3

娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver