娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
d8g,yk e{sg"x] 但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king 發表於 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]短毛[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:&P_&hyei
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ... [/quote]A1If4C6HF{
I agree you points that it could be illegal
'`%O]-Ot T but that is still a "gray area"
L'xm&O5j!y1A8]-zkD whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair+w"t$ho)V3l,l!s^Bd
/SX[AU
C
anyway, I want to say that is\8N(t&\`;j
who is supposed to be protected by laws$UNA&r/s5p
creators?zauFIJ2_}+|[3]0]
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market4XX)RWCg
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.dm? z[0V!^(kF
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue thoseYZMP4]l"yQjU
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04 發表於 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]dogson009[/i] at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
Ly/{&m
i#s 其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.= [/quote]"A4e%h@3cz
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]junob04[/i] at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:]+x/dPR?
#~3X/QS` p4~4{
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!! [/quote]
1_i:^Z'\*[ @ k 唔係喎!j*kiK;O:LX5G5L
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
r\+ddz i
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!1vK6O)c&N
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
i w `[@9[/Sj 就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234 發表於 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事_|&m4M%Fm6]8cc
一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!@*a9m!q u3}il
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
nB8OvzT&R if so bad, dun download la, right?
'V]7? P&U_0i:B i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^.u+s+B\lyn(C
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
S qP
p1T'VlJ no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
n4?H#S;ZL so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech societypCRX'k A3m"X
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2]_
C:P,I
|*d why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
@^"Jt#{Q so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman 發表於 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
;Y1?-uAv_ 佢又唔係殺人放火~~~7c+T,c"dW"Y c]
政府想比下馬威0的人~~TQ.d/UF!^1[[
錢就一定罰
$`e{~8R1Onb 未必要坐牢~~

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,bt ]K,W:bN
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
PB F6_#Xv-F 佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
W5GsW*o 到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886 發表於 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@ 發表於 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:

小虫 發表於 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^

老鬼X 發表於 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　

markmk 發表於 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..

人人人人人 發表於 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!

bonzi1983 發表於 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law

karenmoe 發表於 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:.?
~Z;c0m};L
告得入我切!!! [/quote]
hVO}Ak 我當初都估告唔入,*qT5w.TT m~d
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
f)b7c f!^ 真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....

timho1027 發表於 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇e&U!L!@7Au
我希望佢冇事;)

wolfevil 發表於 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為

阿細 發表於 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]EV4886[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:;z(Wu5\[xU6R
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法) [/quote]
rDo/FK+MY#K 因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...

查看完整版本: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]