雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)Q#P+I6J"aYg.K#QzE
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]短毛[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:*n nP5Z-j
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ... [/quote]
I agree you points that it could be illegalSV8k/|i'O
but that is still a "gray area"S{*_WmI/H
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
E i0JM1@t%y
w
x
anyway, I want to say that is
who is supposed to be protected by laws5Ff&Zt(R4SM
creators?
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market)c'e)]'[cl6\!N
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.P!_P0vl%z'd
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those'g? P
kJ$D MF
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]dogson009[/i] at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.= [/quote]
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]junob04[/i] at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:[9V)T7{
U/l*H
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!! [/quote]lQ}W G7ZhEh)S
唔係喎!
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!+~-w,x}5H.^-qA;U
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!+k7Zr0Sv[5[s6eL}
^
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
if so bad, dun download la, right?
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society y
l2xT?2S!dc:[
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........."G*q
TzU
Y
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
罰款,冇留案底!
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~3Uz5Nv!z,F8NX\
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
錢就一定罰
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,1M{7h4gc;d3m
t0i
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
無奈!一定搞死佢
一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
告得入我切!!!
I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
告得入我切!!! [/quote]
我當初都估告唔入,
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
海關做戲給美國電影業睇XS!~TP
@kCn
我希望佢冇事;)
會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
[quote]Originally posted by [i]EV4886[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:^d$xk-x,G
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法) [/quote]
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...