Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~
Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???G ^'^^U5L金錢可以買到公義9SAZ |/z9xX
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad: 疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。 人地講左啦~
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過}p bZ7_ @0pS
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童, c2rq T5E1qz3VvJ5y
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判
that"s all \ ?e8Y2e
l J8G d,W5\-k5w-x
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]] 寧縱勿枉 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
v#z4M.I#|5cA5s
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
;fhW a8{{N:U d(SG
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM: p!r%sERxz
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。 我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇, v p+K O dm4[ p&}
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定 h P Q7Ao WO:L y@1\D
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁 O9Sg+U~^Q
3Wap?0~1f
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。” [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:{p%r3@8N,t A ~ O
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.~j*I#A(jr#r]Y
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?8b1f#e3lD ~'K2?$k
_;AX7N/dJ$? K[0k(j
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
*vVMCI/Y#x9| C'p/|
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:-V R3W-L0s+u6A
(JJ o*ZY H
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote] ]*JF%w H4G9zY
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
V!\Zf,OrUm0C ? I
5|1["Z(Q)e S#v9G;Q
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
7tr A4o9KF/Ae o~#b
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.3p}k'EY2?
Find out the fact before you speak lar.... hello vivi, you beat me to it [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:+O_B8X!| t
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
5uo;p~9Y6FV |
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈9Wh N-W8l3}8cK ? zW
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~e,K)o5{6v%w J ~%z|.I
-];J;iO"~`M
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:B a(h1c` A!U8d
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D 刑事罪:
告人個條友= your goverment (not you)\m,|(R3Z!Y
民事訴訟: j o"ejY p&P-X2~ ? o
告人個條友 =you [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
R iV.Ra4C2E
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)7pVT#F8d4m8q
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]1v Rf2u\NK
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。:\k Yn3yq
4RJ;M UpJ r A jE
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。 thank you for your teaching 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:*sSq*x t-pa
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
Not always... like this case..
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge 我想聽大家自己的觀點S$h B c+i0v
如果你喜歡 Z(l2F BB Y_x
您可以加入討論v1O_ |KF%NnqR
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"!k l JC GEn
已經代表自己的觀點
您沒有需要繼續吠
THE END
頁:
[1]
2