娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
TKk_iV@ 金錢可以買到公義
s N7rsO*V\O 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~2R$M3DPf
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過KNE m w si h[cB
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
Y'c-K;`:pt~)z 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判
,l)T_1e&d eB$D that"s all
:Yx,xh|P2zgdO "k9K i"NnsB5x
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
$\J"C3^f5l
]1m0i-]%@)v [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]1^4_YM"l.f

,p)[u{*tK [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:o$v3]"U\%ly7y
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
EZ{}kQf AP 尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
vu8R#K#d9X} 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定:W w6d&H7H5a9O
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁'V!faM(|m3IPA&y

@rNd;B(sX Z 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:DH"W]I
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]A
hF:l$RO

E\:a tKOr 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少./d8vwW"KARn
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?f}lkO
.uU4]Mn2z} w
b
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
V!F;~H~v2i
#Kh:x9rk6w| [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
ifQ7S)k!fB'f|k~
Ck]:dp1A `D3cB 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]0[x0v*HperO
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
!~(pSAa%I(H&?@OWs 5YfO"Hu`~%Y6G
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
C._Ar1Gt@uomo
&zG,q\#KG0c
Gt.T7cl5qDXxt}] 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
~P{ qz&[J{ )M*}
LBp1Z
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
9_8XqJa^5e Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
mB?P+t
!I/L*@(F1]y"M;L&rV X-V 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
8[$u0MSr y@f
_Q
5S(C!p b1cS6b)J*RP 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)G wuFR q#Y2T9o^
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈(NH8oW7A)q:z!d

pd6Wt*|2F 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
8N iCJ[ (Rgp}!kQL"GP8R
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
!bJl6zj1^ C hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
`n:rBB3rZ(J haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
0s|H)MgMt 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
X$G Kc&Dt'_NN
ZV-G&X0{8WvL$l^M 民事訴訟:
\&\*F}S)U+W 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:!~9s+i5U-X:R0lC1w2\"C

8_W$K,n5L.Z2K $fuvD{,sz
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
.As_2F!K 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]:Z0ym!b,f
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。$c:S1V,Q Wi/b
_"B
r0qn Q.eG
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:'q?'\}2g Fhg
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]CP @!se

Q.{V]J"GK Not always... like this case..
:y0sx_aN or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
5cR'E'FuZ)x 如果你喜歡)@8n Lb5xWH
您可以加入討論
:b#Nh6E
l] 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"n$?$dT0WI1k8^
已經代表自己的觀點2qWOT"^DR+_"{
您沒有需要繼續吠
&g-a8gP"Q;h THE END

查看完整版本: Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~