娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
'L
i/Jg&Ax t:Ib 金錢可以買到公義
iCN |6dS1j+Em 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
+{3{!gSDlP&t 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過Z;FjN b,mZ{
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,:kQ9?,PLalAb+J
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判

U*^$q@4z#Vl that"s all h2|'s.}D
;y]!U7h&@_*Y
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
eruP2G.P /G!vHd^-K(@
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url],W7f ^Q I$p{
7hqcz$Oat~
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
uGaOKw?7K 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]UjJ1L
y9`
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
(U_BL^0c3c)z 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
w q"CQz-? wg | 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
/|E9o'w zi5b
3a|6}n;U }5mV 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:o"oE(Rl3T9]l;|c4C
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]']k{'h+SWW

4W`O7K J4yd N1pW 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少. ? t}:m1Z
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
j%PLEBhk*s HT"r7sEBU x&e3S
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴0Ur?"Stf.A
3a1Pl|Ce!l2Ts._p
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:+J|7@[4gi,@+C I

3u6@rY~cb 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
$]xP8L4~h.g&cP 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
_ZPI+Tnmd
3P2gip^"wN Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:z}p[5L)o"ul

Sp5l*K FyX9T K
R !WT0oTB8g2wIS
GV4^
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]WlDkC7Jo4m1o(A

r:O9KM,Ce V,x,n-w This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.y yGVH
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
D(b$H8_-}
)M/J$wZ8w5s Mm 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]3` M'i2h6kQ

T+m_c@2N~oU 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
-~(K7U`.p+` 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈9?}+OC1rB#~2i

2h'xpbw4p:S 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
:Mb6ge_ @ kJl!Fl
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:)Gh4SKhY'KAH
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]x |%]p(U
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
@7`gVY8G#} 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)mM;_ a:Ei

{ \)x:dY)H8\8]X 民事訴訟:aC@-Z m tv4X
告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
)s.L:G]E7W R
Q3OD-P'W*c'b
c(J%?o@!G9}b@ 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)*HLJDa2DH
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
wl*zA'c_&c} 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。 K#A:D&RU
$o:n2RtR/J
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
q3c IH{l 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
mr0s'p8^(U
#T9w+Q0ZXid1BJ!h Not always... like this case..
s
nw)w
qz7K!jN or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
}K3S7S.f
如果你喜歡
"G!g9X.{_)@1@~ 您可以加入討論
3qofj^8_xP*Zs sU 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"*J~,]C,_
已經代表自己的觀點
ogy c^~|E 您沒有需要繼續吠/x e.[+I8?,k
Q%g R|
THE END

查看完整版本: Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~