娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
#D [,V`t$Iz a4I 金錢可以買到公義7_0h4?\T;W W
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~sB,~9O9V{"lJ
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
/a4@2r#fE(e$F 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
7F7k\lk1Vg 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判;p4Wt2i9O N.Y/x%q
that"s all
*jP'_2|lx dG Btg Wn]
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~l;B x @3j QC

4F%VU |Lln z [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]5^r%y$p/EAB7w^J

8~%_3?qT/k [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM: kj lN\?*dp tu
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]0mpbB:n
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇, A+fc? b0C
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
A"\ gO0Hb,S 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
?wg$i$AJ f#h
o#wOg8m 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
S'N4]]g!u q 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]&Q9\nfU/P0OHq6@
"deo k["G/p
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.f]:H"^N1H
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
9h_$p:W%Z(^
g-sn{){N"SSo m F 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴)Y7L-x-?r$Td

JYA8n \y+{ [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
Cg!qrDi)O ~7fZd|T1i9b&G
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
(i'Z;KGa!PkA)A 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。 u*cRb o2L

(oo!\5m#y e Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
%}8[x4TukF.avpM
/UcU,Z:E9d
pF9b2z5x8hQW"mJ.M 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
p g!J\.u _0K+Mes%B
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.L }:@ Z1C7s-Mb T
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
B.qA)i&|s!kl@ :UEO4Z3y!b!t%v5@)M5MN
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
_7dOq MX'}
w|@trM qkz 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)+j)j ix5D(y\
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
d#hp9mY5D#E2x oaFi\rR
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~5R`f"j5|fQ,M$\,ah7}
"[-M|8\(c(V4s5m
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:z(}*uHoxn3D"X
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
*c5AT4UdpJ haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:V+L s5b7i r9~S/f:D
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
~5O@,\^5g} }Q
4DWcIz"x/t;s:B 民事訴訟:
MJ+rkV-}n5E4?4? ] 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
]p+v*VC
#o B P4I X/S \7s,U,d]b I&m{ vBe J)o
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
R T:e&wq1d 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
0G u9c,}'ROC}E 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。
/t~+m\ss2x :ifoFt6pq_$R
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
c-`F'O2{ `3d7u;T+? 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
Z2FX6UG7a
4@:| [5mJF,{ Not always... like this case.. $Q:o`+k"kY^
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點PHM'z8LL
如果你喜歡
5V*f8Qv3m*V 您可以加入討論 z(|.Z W"E D/Hr
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
7L }B1r.rq)h 已經代表自己的觀點u(\Ej'e
您沒有需要繼續吠
-r'U$X"GpT6E BL O THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.