[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-7-1 12:43:
好喇, 我又想問, OlXZG2gN}
C
我好地地一個後生... [/quote]rMpy0k+[n@*c
我覺得警察問你做乜冇乜問題姐1|(G$?$?6o+}1]H-V*y
好多時好多案發生之前被制止就係
D有可疑既人被警察盤下盤下
作賊心虛而東窗事發
當然我唔係話你似會犯眾既人
聽完多位朋友,不論正面或負面的意見,
本人以"有則改之,無則勉之!"的心態,
再次多謝多位朋友之寶貴意見!
#1 警民關係科!!!D[1[#s"F~
Quote: 4nIi&U4hZt z;Z
Originally posted by kerberos at 2005-7-1 10:37 AM
本人任職多年,全部時間出街巡邏(油尖旺區),..............
kerberos 兄:
莫非你係「林Sir 或 石Sir 」?
(uu6^ PWG+k
..........................................................................%j [B
Gu$Vtx!K
#5 4p]I$p/h"L
@7`0yd
Quote: 8f'W9G'HTT9wv-fwT
Originally posted by badboy119 at 2005-7-1 12:08 PM
if the police talk trash to you ... copy their number and compliant lor[x'\Yu [+GcI
no need to argue with them on the street.
未必有用,投訴警隊機制三弊病:
1. 警監會無法直接處理投訴,機制冗長:n
`,Kc3?T2p
首先投訴者要親自去錄口供,完成後投訴檔案交由(警監會)審批,再由(投訴警察課)調
查。X2b-v0E,w-_ Mt
pnIX9a$M4v
2. 自己人查自己人,不能發揮監察作用: