娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

SEEK 發表於 2005-10-14 01:16 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

herothree 發表於 2005-10-14 01:55 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 12:16 PM:
%@"Gp O pr]f [b][size=5][color=Blue]Sports討論版算唔算係最旺?[/color][/size][/b] [/quote]+{%y]1Q b] T"R+K$g

Ez!p#j^Q*dC O haha
M(G/r Msi[ i guess so, sport is pretty active
ju7|osc#k}Q*qO
qL"D e.`h*v i remember when bright and i first join sporto k8k&a(yF
no one speaks at sports as well0M\'\zU
then later we got honoured into 名人堂 (later, bro bright became 版主)
O4|#P$G.{4b6a*n all the sudden everyone's in for sports
-j3V(b~6pq nz8|HPX
but later on those pts betting game and my injury drove mei away from EF
WJ^ EKVm&en 3X J D\[7x
now we're back tho4v_C,q/g%@aMy
it is pretty bored sometimes
5M3r\t#x S5r i can only speak for sports, coz that's where i mainly spend time at
h#}`Rl u t6J)S sport is mainly soccer9C2AKdc
there's no room for other sportsu~m0e*Bm"jd
i post sth...but b4 anyone could see it...it's pushed down all the way to the 2nd page#n/ZD(}}mwgg
it's tough*U@WV#w
but i'll still try to bring more than just basketball and soccer here

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 02:12 AM

05 年前注冊你就知 e 度以前好輪多野睇
c9[2hf8a.}-B Y2S v7\x er\oP

o!{}l6ZJ:DQ 而家言論受打壓, 又要分,真係幾 sh it

jameshohk 發表於 2005-10-14 03:02 AM

咁應該點改革?

ALWIN_WONG 發表於 2005-10-14 06:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-10-14 12:33 AM:
pu8? e%|+l 原來都有人有同感覺......Rt ~x6rt7s
我都少參與左啦......Y*_G6V)s6d'@ W
一來很忙,二來上來頗悶.......+ZM3B/F'u-xZ
我最鍾意留連既"戀愛區",版主都放手由得它荒廢啦~~ [/quote]
#I?cU't ^Z?Sy!o
R0S&`gR
^lPJR ey;z9K 好 似 不 止 單 單 "戀愛區" 以 經 荒 廢, e/h&]m-l M^&T3n J p
如 果 你 地 有 留 意 既 話 會 發 現 好 多 區
?;kVcx#D0eP 既 版 主 都 開 始 進 入 “ 冬 眠 ” 既 狀 態 ...

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:27 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-14 08:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2005-10-14 06:27 AM:
2_{B o e9cjQ"E;c
-v+gE3H^7R(Y 睇我由極度敢言,變成e+成隻狗咁,就知啦! [/quote]V2z'S q,x)QP
!b'S*BqAfP$d u
M._2xZ1T!Qp Q0sVF
:D:D

亨九利 發表於 2005-10-14 10:56 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:01 PM

點解冇版主入黎回應吓!!

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:01 PM:
B6MDOajo)@G3uu R 點解冇版主入黎回應吓!! [/quote]
_iIZM,oLk2c&O3] 有邊段有需要回應呢?

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:06 PM:
+Q ALw5uzk0g(Lm&e
G6oBIf.g@2L)wl sr 有邊段有需要回應呢? [/quote]e,f Y[!v;L
對現時EF的睇法.

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:14 PM:
mT?\3^'X(_udx
Y Jao[e!q 對現時EF的睇法. [/quote]&{+Fr0S3d*[!^K
版主想知會員有咩睇法.

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:57 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:21 PM:8T A1L9xB

.r+T)S\[)N 版主想知會員有咩睇法. [/quote]T7e ~2dC"L%_zT A&N"s
我覺得EF而家好商業化,搞個《頻寬-用者自付計劃》但都知綱主經營ga難處...
8J,O9v9j*i+W 可能係咁ga原因,有d會員不停出post為左攞分睇相,但忽略左post的質量.:o:o

lettwan 發表於 2005-10-14 02:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 09:48 PM:'z'{.j fQM#k
[b][size=5][color=Blue]板規太多![/color][/size][/b] [/quote]AD1b9Ktxp
唔準打粗口係死因之一:mad:

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:14 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-14 03:17 PM

其實我覺得有關方面真係要林林計解決問題。的確26FUN人流少左,分享又少左。

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:30 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 04:32 PM

以前26fun 根本就係一個好麻甩既咸網,
wA:]A&na 現在要轉型,
&huZ'A1P,P
\ _,[!N0J!Ebv9s 所以就係要強制一班麻甩佬著西裝,唔去雞竇去大會堂,咁你話悶唔悶

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:15 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

nkt1000 發表於 2005-10-14 06:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-10-14 03:30 PM:
6[&f@A i!g g G.q2v1S%C,D |o.IM

Fx)w&rF2` BLTcm(l
我都同意rI*h(b"C$D J
衣家俾人的感覺係貼... [/quote]9R*N-TB?ET? d
同意!!!

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.