|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.1 |. s, L% r" a9 [: N* w
u8 X- V. C) q" G
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
9 l6 ? N) X0 Y j p# j# s4 ^5 T9 ?0 o |8 m# r$ k* c
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,: j' f) A* Q- k, ?# A
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
6 K' `+ J" u% Q/ [. g
/ o" ]- E6 x# q6 O$ J) ~, _so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險' G" h! b- [" K/ H
3 X; n9 r- \2 I a6 R" vin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ' I0 m; Z' Z5 G0 `/ _$ u6 q
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|