|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.% h1 i; ^/ R/ \( }
; U) M5 U, K: x6 }/ ]5 w6 l
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.4 _. W/ m4 H+ N, w, }
f/ O6 ?# U+ F8 j4 G
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,/ e0 ~4 h- } ]1 A; M. O9 N9 k6 f
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
. s# r$ ^( j0 U- [. b/ `1 J
" @& c# Y B; _* H* m6 M2 Rso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
- h* ~$ N) F. F! `' P# y; `& ~" r" O E5 N+ v( x2 ~; P& K% z
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 9 C+ X" f; J: O& G; h) J3 S4 A
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|