 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.1 f9 Q8 ] j: G0 T
$ q& t1 _1 ~# c5 B* T3 x9 v0 B% Paccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
* j. r) S2 _5 r3 }8 z. V, F4 o( r7 G. C
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
* P2 H7 W6 J: c& \. q, ^; n7 q$ p+ ?and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.( l( m3 W! q' r
$ h' E4 r" ~( P g) M2 f* L: P0 jso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
- l1 M! a4 d5 |6 m9 W+ b+ O0 d
3 x a) P+ ?7 O, Vin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
( V' p1 |$ T4 G6 |* \; dat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|