|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
1 z# j' e; c" O( ]& b. ^" { k, v3 G; }/ z& P; ]
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! G, o0 m! j1 o$ s
; d+ D- f/ U: s0 H$ c6 XIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,- V: Z8 @/ _) J G
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.7 i; m( V+ Z7 _8 a! S6 T
4 y0 \* a, c; {0 D8 U+ m7 S
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
& |! i) W, B G& }: Q2 a: _4 L0 {7 g9 p. ^
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 3 G( L+ @% E [! U* Q9 M( \5 p
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|