 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
2 f2 y3 Z& V' ^5 c/ c" ]3 X+ u, h, h5 D, c' f3 @
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
2 {4 ^2 v: ^8 V' T5 r7 H9 [, D8 w7 w+ D" H/ c; M+ P* `+ _5 L
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
- ?; N' V! y) p$ qand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
v8 i% o" ]! \2 G+ Q/ m/ o: O
1 n/ ~6 ]: W# R* o: s9 ^0 eso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險; x4 ~! Q8 [% @. `% o
/ f3 j" V6 Q. V) v" oin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, . ^% {' \5 t$ z$ u3 V9 M
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|