- 帖子
- 768
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 193
- 魅力
- 488
- 讚好
- 0
|
1#
發表於 2008-8-19 03:45 AM
| 只看該作者
徐嘉諾真係得
好少轉去亞視，Bros 唔講都唔記得有個徐嘉諾。唔係講笑，徐嘉諾真係得。
無線垃圾的話，明珠重垃圾。悶就尤自可，但個評述員永遠講唔出名，真係睇到扯火。講唔出個名都講個位置哎，又講唔出。完全唔做功課。
徐嘉諾除左識點樣去講一場波之外，籃球知識又達到水準，識分悉俾你聽個即時局面係點，人地用乜野戰術，另一方可用乜野戰術。球員的特質，打開邊隊等等。
唔似潘淦華和中國球員，無乜籃球知識。
When people are full court pressing you, you make outlet pass to bring the ball up court as soon as possible. And it is not hard to do that because when the guard got doubled by the opponenet, that means 1 of ya teammates must be wide opened at the mean time. There must be a weak side. It is a 2-sided blade man. You may make a quick 3-on-2 power run by distributing the ball up court quick as there is usually only 2 men staying under the basket for defense. It was really late to learn that from the coach's belated instruction. Also, the point guard was so stupid to run into the strong side where another man were waiting to trap him down with the man guarding the ball currently. And the helpful teammates all stayed in the front court waiting for the ball to come like normal time while just letting the point guard, the only man staying in their own half, with 2 defenders pressing on him and another 1 staying in the half court line waiting to intercept the ball. They were lucky that the Greek didn't use the full court press well enough as they shouldn't have stayed in front of the Chinese waiting for the pass at the far side. You always stay behind the men to intercept the long pass, otherwise, if they make a through pass and you will be letting the man run away easily and lose points just like soccer.
The Chinese guards are really weak. It's always the weak point of the team.
The coach of the China team maybe really good at training the players, but his on-court coaching is quite disappointing. He should've given more instructions on court. The coach should also teach the players more knowledge of different plays they may face of and how to go against these plays. The strength of the American are that they are always very systematic. The coaches in the States have a deep knowledge of various plays and tactics on hand, if they do that to the Chinese, it would be definitely more a mismatch as the Chinese players cannot respond at all when they are facing something that they never seen before. Now, this is the weakness of the Chinese team, they are lack of a drive to improve. I guess they always think it's enough to what they have right now from the experience gained in the Chinese league. Again, the world is big. Just keep training the shooting skill is not able to compete in the world stage.
潘淦華 is really disqualified to be a commentator man. He does not have as much knowledge as 徐嘉諾. I've seen him coaching several times. He never gives on-court instruction too. I've seen him just murmuring to his kid on the bench that "Player A shouldn't do this, player B shouldn't do that ma, sigh....." while his team was also in a situation which they got overrun by their opponent's full court press as well. Um...you are the coach man, you should give the instructions to the players on the floor which they should and shouldn't do and design a resolution to change the current situation. He should take some coaching courses man. If he did, then I'm sorry to say that he may not capable of coaching. Just like warriors in the past, if you are not born to be a general type of person, you are unable to become what a general should be even you fight really good.
我亦都對亞視既評術團另眼相看。完本我覺得阿樓南光不斷搭嗲好煩，點知佢之後講既一番說話實在太好啦。佢話講呢場比賽可以用另一個角度去睇架。就像佢呢d唔識籃球既人可以以問題方式同徐嘉諾互動，從而令徐嘉諾在他的講解帶出更多籃球知識給觀眾。因為未必個個觀眾都識籃球 (好似果度除左徐嘉諾之外都無人識籃球) 或未必了解得咁深入。你識打未必識策略性既play。徐嘉諾又帶出一些以前和現在術語的分別。並不是一味講邊個宜家帶緊波，邊個邊個射啦咁死版沉悶。一有機會，佢又肯主動同其他人互動。好似講經濟效益，就即刻話阿顧老闆就明啦，令顧老闆可以吹兩句。其他唔識籃球果d人又唔會因無野講，求其講埋d廢話。又唔似無線的人爭野講。真的好有團隊精神。我真的另眼相看，佢地久唔久都有d傑作。 |
-
1
評分次數
-
|
