  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
r/ j# B. a) }$ c8 {2 vCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,- i/ m5 z6 `. n: m. y1 t0 n- ~3 _
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.- e4 [2 |; B) L( G {- m& J
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
& A8 N2 q$ n4 R! @3 {% Oin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.0 _4 z/ d7 G0 F& w8 {
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.$ z6 \2 s, p' Q2 h" _5 R) I
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,/ |+ h$ l5 n! z" [
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
, b( Y. ^' {1 T) C! Geg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. ( [( |: f- o, X+ Z
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.0 C- a! K* x# L ]) N! e: Z
9 T* ~2 p1 p9 o, G e1 B
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.- |. d# I9 j0 }
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards." g# J% q9 ~. D4 o7 f
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
* ?, n" D3 D4 P0 u m8 tA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.+ T, d. t4 H) B: |/ N
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
; d, O; i* g0 I/ hbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.! P4 g4 q9 H) H* h% ] Y
: e7 q1 V2 p! J7 M* G; p7 ?3 N
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|