 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
5 \: \4 U$ ^- R$ C6 z) n+ Z& P7 D! D8 e1 m; Z5 V
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.* ], ]' p: C1 J. F- @
& z) B* T3 }+ h d) v, g
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,. E- w# K4 |+ z, ?6 f' S9 \
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
! W9 M/ h% _5 @* J% w: O- }6 [( V6 W0 t* D, q8 i" |/ V4 D. S' h
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# ?5 m9 N: x' O1 i+ x
+ {( `' S# u9 ]# n5 I
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 2 g& L( j6 r+ K! u& Z
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|