|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.* U2 |) ~$ M( z9 r( U
. A' j6 h8 o6 C# \( _& yaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.. u! Y! p( c5 x, G8 D
. u& \' n. F$ v; A; }5 B" d+ G9 ]In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,4 q- y4 h! R' ?6 A+ }" l( k& o
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him./ ?8 h7 z+ S; ^$ V( r0 \
2 S! p6 t4 ^' q% Q% p+ ?& Y2 K) v
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
$ y O( \6 Y4 c! Y3 h6 ]4 R! P1 J: T+ \! W
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, % `' d2 L( F+ ]8 ~* O
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|