|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.7 j! `9 T, @& O
5 V6 }: o( O2 U. \5 J1 Z
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.9 p5 D/ u$ N" A A0 K" Y* E
, P# l$ [6 p9 i# U* W# [, eIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
( a9 a9 V3 C( T' c; Xand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
0 E X' s) r% ]1 P% e) ]9 m! N3 a. k F- X5 [8 ]
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險6 d8 X# P e$ E1 m+ s! V
/ o# H: r) x/ ~# T' [+ j4 c+ {, S
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 1 F9 O3 o. f9 g9 u- r# A8 W/ z
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|