|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
& T% j! D; S# u" c! H0 o# {& y- j- ^# D
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.7 ~/ o7 S& v' P7 n
5 p0 }' L& o/ ?( q3 R z
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
& [# q* q# t+ I% G$ [# Gand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
/ @; \$ q) U9 A' C3 M1 B/ z; s! f1 `: Y/ {/ Z5 A
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險 K5 ^. O+ f2 o2 M. Z+ ^
) a0 N7 j% _- t3 Yin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
% b$ B8 b) T9 j, Jat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|