 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.1 M; ]5 b9 y v( j0 y
- f6 z3 s. {0 K
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.7 g- [; N8 R- ?6 X
2 p$ M# p+ P, g+ T7 J4 {0 h
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
& v2 O# j; V2 R E/ {and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.# q" E- J9 B( j; A8 s, B: L
3 R. V* p ]$ F4 |4 @9 }3 }so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險& z+ s* T9 i* M! r- _2 ]
: R7 Q% x% K0 Q& ` e1 Ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, % W+ L$ q. k- p$ f4 | @, U6 n
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|