Rika

由最好排到最壞7 d; k; u9 J$ Y
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
8 t2 ~+ x0 p5 v' ?B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
; t9 g4 T5 _+ g6 R/ ^- v4 o: dS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her* ?, q6 |9 Z+ L  p" |& _
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: I1 U, Y# j/ t: |L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:: n- d: }$ u$ {4 W8 B' Q5 E

2 v# {0 N3 e! P/ c9 |" [M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人& K0 d% z( |# ?9 s, J$ z6 d8 n# G- w% O

) Q7 ~1 p& l: k) W9 nS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
" T+ V) j! _0 d     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
0 q4 ]. H* A3 Q' R$ j9 B+ P8 e1 [3 l4 b
4 O6 Z% X% {1 f3 f; r8 Y/ K' EB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
1 q7 U- }$ S- Y9 n9 Y0 y  W# U, S6 I" Z
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
& \' g3 M9 E* ~5 e* p) r) h$ |' a0 r* l3 j8 P) U: t: C  \
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,# v; W  x5 U3 M; ?
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
( m6 g' s( g  A; m# l- h* ~* J  A+ J' B
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案! p$ z9 M7 K3 v9 S( R/ ~
而家答多次6 k) V  h1 \3 G
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽3 @; T( s/ {$ }8 U; Q; v; ]
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架% z9 {" ]$ a" a  T. B
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢; H5 j" a* P$ b. W5 b7 y  r# _8 G% Y
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.+ q. w! E; R& n  {
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  ]; d, c3 s/ \9 F. _  I( E# v
: G/ w  S; u/ t: `% A1 K
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大8 O% D. S5 h4 \& {
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 Z& M( Y% ~: S4 G$ L+ C( o
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒. t3 ^; B% I" z+ S
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 R) O; \* v5 M) J4 k- C0 _
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞$ W/ i1 B( m: P' n" e
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  Z4 f* V; S! i& ?# _" o( o( Z6 [0 @7 ~S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取6 h* |. |: z- a7 \4 t  R
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 F4 S' c1 h2 M8 W# L$ F9 i
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果( t. Z* ^7 Q( h2 Y0 T' |
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, ^6 E# g0 h: P' G4 s  n

4 x7 i& y: x' f世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:; _- p+ {3 x! d+ t9 _
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
8 T3 `) C$ D7 V: A2 q1 qB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! v0 m0 g1 R9 C( h) `6 H8 Q. |8 ^8 RS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
6 T6 s  y' O9 Y. n3 e# ~F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方8 e  M9 k+ A" H9 @) V
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 P! |7 M( i- v1 R. O

) n7 D3 X; G$ Y same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) f1 `7 M  [+ J* N( `6 m
) y$ k' [* [, d2 h  aB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
/ H0 m- n/ E- w
- e& N1 j9 q) ^' n5 kS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
2 j$ v+ z) L5 n9 _1 t& t9 `& q' L3 g% J% a( K
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 9 D4 U$ D3 t# G
2 a# S0 p1 q8 M$ J+ _
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 ^! E3 @+ ^; e; a. }
; N8 W3 {3 \+ H' K& h. p) N
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge3 o2 c/ Z9 d% O1 ^$ J
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢' s) D+ M5 o* [3 E0 c- F6 v
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點+ A3 `0 z% G: n
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma1 c/ K" A  q6 Y1 y5 N
9 W( o1 u6 i; n' ?8 g, F7 E
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....) ?, z& X; b& [9 B) H
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) Z1 I. B* d5 d" F, Z! I
由最好開始排起既話，
1 @6 [! s" V( G+ R0 n) h* g8 hL B M F S 啦，
) J# @. x/ C# T- m7 p' x$ D. |9 J4 x+ S6 y  z: L2 X2 D, K& o. w7 I
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，# _* {; ?! O2 a3 |! A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？  F2 C( ^, t% K! L* [2 q: \) q6 ]7 ?
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？1 z& t) w( W; d3 F2 E) j" t* B
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 t) s3 X# O8 D. N; ^8 l( V* Z% Y. b
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，7 U4 C& a' E$ A
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，' @* g6 L' D( `$ H4 f
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  s4 p" f7 J7 Z0 |/ K1 b: S' V0 ^' c/ \+ Y& q$ L* n
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，+ _- B) t& \5 l! k) S
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 u! H& T, _! L: T
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，) u* v! X' d: O, ^( t; R$ k
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
- C; U. [& }- k M 都可算壞了。$ i, F1 L! X$ k; `% B+ g

# U& }( n' R5 y9 Z% t* q F 呢個人仲掂，
- S, k+ L6 h7 ]2 ^9 O知道既唔等於要講，
! ~; s; c0 p! k4 U2 H" K. G. g" g% }如果呢件事發生係自己身上，* `! O. J( W- Y; ~% c
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ q; u- P+ I2 U
1 L; ]: H8 L. ~, n- Q最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! u! J& A. X! }/ ^# X
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 b: j, t( @5 T. L# z
- D: G+ q3 [1 S; r! d3 C* f

+ U5 C6 S2 M/ {- I% g# T4 B
! o7 T$ V' H/ a2 f/ J& l" q題外話：+ Y. }4 B2 k. ~: [& l
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
7 X# [( R) j% {睇到 S 呢條友，8 h5 I5 k# _2 t: l' o5 Z
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
2 i( w3 ]8 y# b- ?, Y5 z
- J) L9 w, b/ i: h+ W* z0 o1 E. mS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
! O8 V$ ^( D" OF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
* f0 T7 G4 d. VM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
) W0 k: A5 ^7 {* Y  |7 H* Z: [" OB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
$ b' [9 H3 T; y* A+ j  \& k& KL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...