Rika

由最好排到最壞
' `7 Q: D1 `: x' jF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
: _2 y9 N( K8 N" i8 M5 L: PB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
  v% o! ^5 y; u, ^8 `3 ~2 rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her3 ?( z7 |3 |! \7 }; |  ]
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( K8 J# C, ], e8 H2 t
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:  X# S: M! A  b; L/ Z) a% }4 {

( Q5 l* o- d4 aM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人1 r/ p$ G! J% m8 ?

/ p) e$ I/ ^* I8 aS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' t; _2 L) m4 ^$ c6 z
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% p- h# h$ O! [6 Z, S
" V% v* s2 `2 |2 _
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做: m6 v  x4 i, \

2 H4 x) r, A. O# W! QL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: s  I$ a8 _& b4 |9 a' Z2 {' V3 p* ?, j8 T' u
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
3 U! k: y8 |* t# A% A; ^     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好7 K4 _- h5 e  M' F9 X
3 A9 R% Y; m) l) _/ P
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案) K# |8 O2 g4 f5 ~
而家答多次
) \3 h$ Q3 ]* ?9 @f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( g& l- v: R1 p7 U) S. U
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  q' |, x' ?4 I; d
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
% [; A& n. K; }7 l# _5 [s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 {( K0 Q2 e' D; rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S- N, X) |! j  ?. A% w3 V$ v

9 @; l* ^+ n* v! bL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# L) v( h, X$ W5 [! [! j+ oF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% \( y+ {6 Z3 c' R( SM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒  p) X% h9 q6 H  `) F
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢6 F  Q. v/ L/ q# d& C
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞8 h# I1 K/ g- W  s; l# V
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"2 j& ^) C2 B1 X, }' {9 b+ f5 Y* o
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取( A* I( `' d) ~3 b$ P* z
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
/ _- @3 u/ t; N+ j! eL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果( X$ e- V4 f3 X1 g: ]1 Y+ Q
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
( G# g* c8 Q& R7 {# v( R2 I
# \; @+ |1 c: p, j; D( v+ s世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
  h, Y9 W2 S4 @( Z' @L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
% ]# Y$ U/ E( k& Z! O. @% h0 fB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘3 O; o1 T1 }$ f' K! E
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件7 V* J, H5 g, e2 ~4 x# h
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方$ g5 E6 U+ D. l3 x" d
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ m- m- C2 A/ k7 f; U, v2 z7 ~2 q  z* t1 l8 R
same choices with u , but want to add some comments : [. r8 ]; F' o) o: `: e0 ~
0 h, d* K* c4 k1 Q4 m
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
' ?$ J$ N: H7 V$ o$ {8 h% f. Y& T: E1 R" h. x  W  o. J3 y# n# w" F+ L% J; k' r
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )5 w8 d+ a) b5 Z+ b- g; K

. L9 h" \4 d/ n8 X# X5 v7 VF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 4 k  W% u  N2 `  g# a6 U8 `0 N
6 ~' D2 v6 N8 [+ \1 u3 B0 ^2 V
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
+ y' q' @4 _& t( z' f1 |5 t' ]5 B" X$ e0 {- Y
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; V& J. b+ r6 Y
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢3 g* X* x+ h1 s1 p
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點& M$ A$ ]4 K- l
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 t3 c2 P4 ?5 f# u4 T

) x& z0 J% u! g' C最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....4 g8 ?9 j1 m7 C0 [: K; h5 @
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
1 Y& P% e% T- o/ \& p由最好開始排起既話，
3 L# N: C1 M& ^$ b( y! f, N3 nL B M F S 啦，
0 {+ a% x) D- T: I  I0 E0 E* N. I! q5 p
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，. c, P* w( u, j( t- E1 z, ^) H& B# F1 V$ w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
& K! S0 U2 i; `! K, ]如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
; G2 [  f% a0 G- @' K" t, |' }又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: v; U, O3 ~' }+ [
5 ~1 T! \1 m5 c, O2 V' x
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，5 a( u$ X; j5 W! N
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，0 Q5 J+ z+ W. ?
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。! N& o. E" S6 |% J* _6 \
8 ?+ \8 `  Q. V# J( F5 t
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 @6 Q& D! [  D  I( [" j# y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，4 t. T- p* S: }- A$ W5 E: \1 U
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，6 @- p  E+ u7 D1 T
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，# s! s& \/ n" L7 E+ v
M 都可算壞了。
$ Y/ T$ |$ s. G4 E( x7 z, P; a& N0 }
6 O8 h1 s! W' B$ ?7 W8 R F 呢個人仲掂，
: e8 }2 Q5 i# E1 q知道既唔等於要講，. i( x( L% s3 |$ f# Z) s
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, v4 k9 `5 a# _' F我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
+ {' A/ s  c& p2 E8 [! z
' m) w& }+ Z5 f& ?7 u$ t最衰個個緊係 S 啦，8 c) A/ H5 p$ ?# O
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。# a- n4 T: l" o) u% W8 n" z

% l6 S! r5 R: T4 X/ G; o+ t) {) G; d
6 ~; X2 |! R% b+ }; J1 v9 W: j) }/ G2 L. P
題外話：3 C- R0 n* Z$ n/ O
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，! Q/ }* a* @* P: O7 Z
睇到 S 呢條友，
+ Z' x, p2 K# p) @我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ `1 @& b6 V6 k6 ]; m% t; p4 ^. w  b! |
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ s. I' }9 n* U5 nF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係: r; P* ?: N: m& t0 [, \
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
5 t' K" H% {  `6 r6 r. b. Q, W( MB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
/ ~% z5 ?8 E& v) s2 R& @L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...