Rika

由最好排到最壞9 E! r& _9 D5 w, |, W! Y  J" W
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong: o2 B2 U# }/ r7 K2 w8 `- ~
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount8 g/ w: g2 n2 ~& n$ ?' Z
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 R  F- V2 l* j. }1 wM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure) F# Y7 t% F7 j# m
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. X( T+ p' f5 v) P: U7 b0 p

9 i2 W1 }3 s4 A& W5 MM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
; q, m- Q% S# P( ?* s, T6 \+ V- H% \4 F  S7 Z7 P9 f4 t, D' e5 o* g
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
" v" E! W) K+ K  d     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!; }8 d( k, U5 D$ K0 l
! Z' i5 m" A7 J! W! H* t
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
" z* f2 c; I# Q6 M2 G2 ?$ W# X. I. h, [
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志$ q% N* ~3 v4 N. A" h, k9 R3 d

: B9 g5 |1 g9 L8 `) _5 A1 X. FF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
, A& N: [+ ~+ M. k+ G2 }& o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. _+ L+ |" ?5 w0 q
3 w( b- Z$ |: T  q! H* b[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 i( N/ }; k* p$ t而家答多次
: I; [6 U. r# y) Q( [2 R' L. a( f3 jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽  c! S. v' Z9 h! I' Q" ?. u
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架/ z$ g# T6 {9 c( d1 x
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
7 E- V$ S+ C3 U+ Z* `3 ]1 As: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願., R7 Q. r: D* ~; y6 @& s
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S* T5 S' @' o& L" {) X
/ @  t7 j( E6 Y( z; k4 x3 j
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ f$ X, K$ |6 M6 h* y! bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
) ?1 ?' J8 I1 L  Y* aM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* f8 @6 d$ Y: s2 n% z' DS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, ]4 C  c0 o5 tB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ Y  D1 P; T& `, Z( z1 c7 e' \, l. zF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默") Z8 Q, d+ {) z$ n. f! y
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 U8 G# Z& t$ Q9 Q5 t# ?  H+ qM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法$ Y9 t' C1 Q7 m/ O3 }( E) e$ b
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
2 S" i# q; W* Z1 fB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
) o, Q. n# b7 l4 ?3 E8 @+ H( y  a' E+ g( v
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
2 i2 j( x& ^, D9 p4 JL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己: B/ a* O, f  m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! L; f/ f) A9 F( wS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件, J% p) ]$ @0 d2 d8 N4 Z5 |
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方9 H2 G! ]- I$ C- H( E
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

( ]. a' q) s' `1 Z- j$ k. F; W  `( H

; R9 O" J" D- F same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) O* g1 [/ M. f" \9 e$ H8 G
2 Y7 E8 W3 q# ]: y' `4 iB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
4 u% s- q: k: ?; d: D- }
% b$ V3 p4 N9 JS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ): m5 E: X! {" b. i

7 b/ c, M; h4 m5 z4 d9 FF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 B1 R4 c0 q( C- ?* p
9 }/ }6 V( h$ M" Q/ [& Y- C
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; [: I8 _+ Q- g* e* V& {4 v  E# F

1 f+ ]7 Y# V/ ~( V2 o" t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
6 s6 ~, |! a( H' k2 sM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢) B: z, q  t- d6 p: Q) d
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點/ L1 @/ }4 V( P* p: M3 T4 i: p
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma! T# c  b# e- L' _% L! v" V
6 n- l/ K2 u" H8 c
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
. `) H8 ?' G9 a+ t5 M有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，: _1 r5 d& W. G& K0 H* ~
由最好開始排起既話，
3 R) S! j9 \* ?9 c+ x, @) tL B M F S 啦，% R" N0 q. ?- c

  _: G4 A; _0 G0 C  _其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
$ H0 e9 t9 m" e! y& Z* K* R1 V但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？8 ]- g. h/ b4 b! j% b0 B
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( O5 y6 M! V9 |1 R: [, C# ]又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
4 Z. z$ s! |% u, s$ N2 }* ?9 R; l" m# N/ ^# W- x
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，' }5 B9 p! \! a. ~9 n
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，6 z2 f! \/ e; H! {+ X
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
$ |: l2 Y7 }+ g# ~; R" _7 L* }
* w  j7 A8 A3 Y而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，" S7 I% x8 K5 o, |% F+ `4 E& M
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 A) s" h- g$ ~2 Z! k9 }. l% o亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
' s) O6 ?9 p; i9 F) ^& b知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，+ [  B- C# P) R9 w
M 都可算壞了。
$ M; a: j( b4 \
, P/ j; R4 X1 @: ] F 呢個人仲掂，
9 y! s1 R& T, P知道既唔等於要講，
( E: g' R0 u/ ^& |$ S3 B% Z9 E* u如果呢件事發生係自己身上，: P7 F, U$ f7 C& H& M/ @8 s; k
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
8 [( U% a6 {: @$ c; ^8 N! L5 E3 B# }% G- x+ J. X, W
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
# T, ~# y! k5 R; Y+ X. i* [  N始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
4 h3 [+ I  p1 P9 g0 d
) r) ~2 c0 J; C; U) z6 x4 H5 x9 F$ n: ?' @& k
+ `1 h3 F! \$ i( d, D" ^: ]: M
題外話：4 e# ^: i7 M" }1 ~. v. l3 u
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
" c& ^+ c1 F) Y睇到 S 呢條友，0 y" U' g: L8 b" [, m( E
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
/ `" b) l9 E6 \$ K8 U+ d9 \6 s$ u  }0 \' h( u0 a
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!# M- h  A8 f0 ~1 b, @/ K) r3 \
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係7 l+ C* C2 |% _, A
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她$ S0 }3 Y6 J8 V, X7 D) Q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
% R- }8 r) ^4 u) v3 IL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...