Rika

由最好排到最壞
1 o0 g0 `0 e' P. A* }, q: JF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong% k) }" {1 K& n1 i
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
7 x. Y1 x) b7 v' P) ?/ _9 N3 \S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ O( @/ A" V  w- o* |) }0 G  d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
1 B2 b& s$ ^" B- f- w. mL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
2 c/ {6 p! \2 N& R' @- p. @& h* s/ Y6 }0 r  L) h' X
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 T7 I6 i0 `0 P2 }' U4 S! _) v+ l- r* j! i1 a7 m) T
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)% @& F; Q( R" J9 V1 M) Q. M
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 b6 S- C2 }% j8 y" N8 [. C

1 G+ d; S, `8 e( F: Y( I! o) K9 xB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做% ?& k5 G( C- t  q- a1 ?" t

$ l4 b8 \. X1 T; J/ o" jL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* w  u- R0 ?. P3 l$ a

( n! F" p6 X3 s) g% L  @F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁," ~, ]$ M3 T" P. Q, c$ O6 Z: r
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, ~2 R& s2 u1 H0 u( l
6 p  d; t% I: O4 |$ Y[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案# h0 T2 ]( A1 s( P" G8 T
而家答多次
( k5 j8 f5 ]( e) j* l+ z4 cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
+ d: v( x( B, n! A1 Dl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架' u! @/ I6 ]/ m/ o* r$ g8 ?- K; J* i" M
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 ^- v0 C" _. s* r. z  {
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
9 |& q( q/ i1 t8 E8 e6 ~0 r3 Mm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
& `4 c9 R; {9 Z6 G- P6 G/ r) |( t! l4 O7 t" I8 f& V
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大, X' U2 O/ ~+ }4 a! v
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 w2 ~, C  M7 z* Q' YM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
$ X- t9 Q8 w9 o# U1 L* xS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢8 i; {, |( G3 @4 \
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞( i2 m' A* n: ?7 ^2 B' E
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 m  x" c" j# Y. x' O1 U  ?
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 s$ u0 Z2 K* {. d7 M. B* ~M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法1 p  d+ x. y1 R  f
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
( T, }# F0 o9 {! a, @B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 S( v, E. _. {/ s; r* n7 S& C3 e% K& Q' y
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:( L, n* b! I4 N* z! h% R. k' _. y
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己2 I. D  u4 a& U4 D
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
% z+ d) F8 {& R$ \: r6 s7 W6 |S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: g  V( B* U8 \F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方. F* Z" V1 D! R  \# i: Q; u
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  s3 D7 f3 ~' B7 M1 u
; k2 b9 h9 v2 ], h2 R# m+ o! Q same choices with u , but want to add some comments : i' {: V- T( S1 j+ _% ^

2 N& k  J3 U5 A: wB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  6 W& D+ E& p0 a: n' d* Y

' }& [0 ^! q5 OS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# E- Q0 ?$ m1 r( g8 ?9 p
& Z, V9 L. K3 w( C1 x& k" V" mF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
7 i' a0 X8 f5 {, h. g
: o  N; c8 v, U/ ^+ ?1 l6 LM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
: b, X- }4 n2 ~0 G/ }: Q$ T0 s* T( l4 q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
2 a2 V4 x* N0 P: xM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
: h2 ~, F9 }' u& d: y+ {4 F% ZL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點/ f& z1 ?1 x6 m: `3 ~
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
3 ^9 B# O' h: `) O9 z( r9 Y" ^& ~, v  o3 |
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 z" F/ W8 P3 x* U, _有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，( q4 ^) o& b9 q( S% A2 Q
由最好開始排起既話，
- B% O, X9 ?7 {6 z- I+ K; r$ v# F1 {  PL B M F S 啦，
  T8 f7 h) ?" i: n+ n* T3 ^' \* r5 c. C
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- ~# r% Y. d8 \* O# p) b
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？. ?" C, y3 W1 S$ x, _9 v8 \
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( V9 a. T* v; B5 _" e又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。' g$ }8 |8 r+ ]; W& ~
. I+ M6 S, S* B* d) W: F5 K3 V
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
1 L" p: G* J+ P5 j7 o所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，4 ~7 e; W( ^8 t4 B
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
3 r4 P9 ?. q/ @. u: w
/ \; ?4 S7 c& K, |( p8 T而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，3 Z! F- ~' v! l* }& z# M0 Z/ }
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! d- g0 v- Z; v& @
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，  ^6 @  b; W6 p) M* c  h: M
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
. e; `" e4 p* W6 l; G M 都可算壞了。
! e4 v  l/ y& I2 }+ r
4 K, s4 j  D: J* N; d, M7 y/ z  r F 呢個人仲掂，4 r9 t6 a1 ]4 A* m: L2 u
知道既唔等於要講，- [7 _5 u" U  R! H2 C, @
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
2 h; T: }& O; I" i" M( Y" R我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
, u! D  |! h+ M0 K- f
( ]0 N$ l# E; Y# e最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
$ z' M' R$ b0 C7 d' q始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  y3 |* B1 J, Y2 e' m4 X6 _! }- Z. j( G
6 d: e, k& S# }7 ]1 I

$ Z$ i3 k- }- z+ I. Y/ Q題外話：8 |) X/ Z9 @" l' e7 S( m# T
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，' W* d! m' _9 u) c
睇到 S 呢條友，
- t8 A7 k$ f  `我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
  ~! L7 L; V3 N% X1 _% ?, F. c+ B6 @
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
& U- _: Q  e8 FF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係' A& n2 z- K- n0 j  N, p
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 l$ q8 f3 f* K' \B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
: I, ^( q+ a' PL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...