Rika

由最好排到最壞& I3 D1 G6 i! A5 `4 P! s8 C1 A
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
8 J* G. `# K' U6 J+ `B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
, o# C) |! J' a- M/ N% a) uS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
* Y: \6 J5 E& N" u( L" TM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure2 n1 A- \* w# O; G% C6 C
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
6 J( V& s: T7 l: R3 q8 V6 c# o6 t& t: Z* t
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
' `9 |3 `! v! ^8 U$ z& l) ~$ V* A8 Y4 K" g! |( b
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
5 g' y7 n; }+ r     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!" h3 [8 V2 S4 D
) U* H7 A4 J) Q2 f. u
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
/ O, @$ f/ m& S  e) K0 `# t9 [! g/ h2 `$ H6 _, G" |+ y( A# o: D/ y
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( R+ }+ I1 J% {( x6 G; M" J2 |, ?- P: a" N' j
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
! a  N$ z' m/ P     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好" m- f/ x- D1 Q5 U

6 K$ Z: x! o. {$ L[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案/ x: ?8 P4 _" Z2 a" n7 P% k
而家答多次
6 t( L2 A3 c  Z0 Mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽" U' i, ]' ^$ N! U* ?3 V( [8 m
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
) E( r7 W  F* p1 Q$ d2 Nb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
9 [6 @5 n2 M( a) [8 Gs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
/ [. a0 m" `: ?: }8 em: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: o! s: s1 g5 b+ T7 a2 y' D
2 s* n6 U9 N( h. @4 D# Q0 o' eL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
: R* N2 P2 T5 o% K1 N% @4 e+ V! V; KF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度+ @& Q, f. |% H7 ?- K! L
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; ^) k* Q$ X  {0 t2 I- m
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
6 k* W9 {( l% j! `5 f  s  HB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# _% _; t7 G" BF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. H" [" o4 ?2 I% s' s' uS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
+ @% l/ \2 z9 N8 a8 Z. HM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- `- t* B3 A/ \1 @. W
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
4 g7 @" v/ m5 Q% t1 z& r8 x4 O" s3 wB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
) Q+ j* b- c+ K8 B7 ]7 |" l' b; N7 v8 A# t( K1 K0 v+ k
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
! _* G; c6 F: I; k/ ^$ Y& KL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
7 [5 ]. C9 e. b- G4 c( Y$ \; C' K5 C* dB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘2 P3 f2 \6 \. N0 l
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
4 ]. s8 B0 q- s: }1 c% PF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
. X/ `- ^6 s4 MM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ y! Q* ^7 s& w! d5 t% H: z9 {, ~+ `& w/ f% q* G- C
same choices with u , but want to add some comments $ v8 y9 J: x% X$ D
# d. E5 j+ ?0 y' b  W7 O1 n
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  6 S/ U  j: ]! P( p1 w

6 R0 `8 \5 }3 s+ M1 ~S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )1 K0 D! Z# v! Q/ H# S: J# D. j

4 @/ u5 M$ a$ a4 N" }F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
# _) Y; ~8 H! L: N7 u5 X# C+ Q
$ c* J, `6 A0 EM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....../ j; E, p7 q- Z

0 e# r6 V7 A, \% ^4 g! x3 m1 ][ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
( M& }3 M) P5 i5 h- eM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
# O! q- w( F) S, JL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
( H1 }; P7 h* Y. g  i: `F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: r9 C' s5 M8 k* t! y. G. R, Y

5 N' V4 i* ~. ]: m2 @最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....) f5 m; l; n. p3 l3 Q& Y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
6 T2 m) y% p4 T4 n2 j3 b由最好開始排起既話，
3 l" s1 e8 D# O5 D9 U! iL B M F S 啦，
2 N' f/ {" J* z2 k, i" E7 `( P0 s) M3 N, v& F- O- Z; E
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，& L+ l' j+ O+ M% k% Y, Y2 S/ c
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. q, }4 d/ S' Z: t如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？! g0 i, e# V2 C7 t, ]" @3 W7 j
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。0 J& s# Y/ W) X7 c# z$ w- Z% ]
1 y. X( q) i1 k
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
. M$ t$ ^# {( _! ?* Y/ `5 n' K$ T所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
6 M( @; A! |3 W6 k9 E" L明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。6 K+ U) b7 r9 |% R: W0 ^5 q2 h

: m& B2 l6 R, e: C4 I6 M" y而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，, s4 ]! `* ~* G4 `7 G& |5 S
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 j+ r/ B# V, y亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 d+ G* i8 s1 Q0 |0 u
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 ^/ D3 w" h% K
M 都可算壞了。
# I, m, `9 }4 h  j# K; L
. Q/ L5 g; T7 n& J F 呢個人仲掂，
  e" [0 X8 ?2 ^  M知道既唔等於要講，2 j2 q) Z, w& e  ~1 S0 B2 N% W! X& G& `
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，3 G- s% w. C. `- \# h
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。2 f3 Q; V' f7 x/ ?$ `' m( J( C

/ q+ L7 y; [  U( C1 G( G2 W; m% I  v最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, x! n7 o% |9 |& \, i4 Y3 _/ G2 T% d: r0 a
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。9 s" K' k- [8 I2 ?0 h

8 @# e5 d' c# p) E+ F' d8 f9 t2 k$ z" }' V4 U3 q- ~+ I
: v  f* j, s9 l* [. a
題外話：
7 S5 q! V9 Q4 g6 i唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，6 S. Q2 I6 D* f! a2 V
睇到 S 呢條友，' ^1 f6 A  v0 r0 g
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L+ \; t$ x6 t% H+ W

& L: r& s: o6 r: K) rS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* g9 ~; L2 ^, I" o
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
  h& [+ ^. G$ H( rM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她" v. I3 C) B( w1 T3 u; Q8 s
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
& S0 _8 G! w! D/ k  UL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...