Rika

由最好排到最壞
1 w2 ^2 N# g% [+ q- aF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
  z1 u7 D7 A# j' a8 z' i) O8 CB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# E- x( T: Z" b8 \, ^& C! HS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her, E# n) o" p  i) f2 i# _9 O: O8 s
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
* W. a. w$ p/ @+ q( A: s# j3 f) D8 JL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:- O6 s( w6 \, a7 t, q. o; C
% z1 u3 }7 Y4 a" g
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人8 ?) X3 O% J$ A' M& l
: ]; b. r  F0 o$ S
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
& S# H4 Y4 {% [  z; |5 C9 Q     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
' \. Y( E% M. m" e# G8 ]$ l) ?
5 e3 A7 q- X+ ~- yB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做7 q( ]$ e+ w- O9 R

% h4 a2 H7 j3 z% \3 y- |L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
% h7 i. Q0 n, E( }! e$ f. E4 @
( u# U+ w1 {. G% d$ VF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,7 t3 e( Q5 W; Q, F$ o6 t: e( P; ]& U
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 ^& e  ?" S) t$ y6 Q" H' N
/ @( N4 m; m4 l[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案/ Z" z" A" }- v( g& N
而家答多次: R, \7 `2 ^+ n/ F( G; W
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
! G1 E# h+ Y/ V, E  sl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架1 _& h# H) k  U9 D2 Q
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
8 l* y7 t# ]6 D8 ]% ts: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 t7 z( O% g6 Y1 `# u
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S6 `3 I2 U% Q" D' f0 K& R

/ q* ^- J7 @/ O# CL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 `; ]$ M  f( K: S
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% |/ |: d( a7 c# MM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* m2 e3 ]1 |' w1 l2 GS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢8 P4 a( q) m# N( n$ k$ d0 M
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ ]; P+ l8 h7 K* o, P. sF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"$ s) A2 I  S. c
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- u. ?1 w6 p, a- F0 v) F$ NM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法" i: @0 g$ i  j! W+ R% n/ N' P
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
2 `9 Q8 l7 E1 i3 b( _B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
: V, ^, g) n$ y5 d" E: ^- [) f
: W4 ]8 b3 k. T+ Z. f世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ Z1 K, ^* N  k. K) m" ?, ]
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己1 u  R# I1 T# H/ d8 Q
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘( k5 O( Z3 H5 o8 {  e
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件. ]$ g" e- Y9 H
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
0 H7 |! G. N1 ?8 N' y& U3 z& SM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 D( f" N' ?- @3 P; r+ d- _' ]2 D2 R0 }" y; E
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
+ @$ a1 A  x+ E# Q: [' N4 Y! ~
6 J! ?" ?7 D' C7 Y) b5 R: o+ qB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
: j' D/ z( O9 r6 p+ L) B" B1 |6 ?& E7 e* w% j: A( ~
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )5 V% a1 s$ r9 ]! j' D3 p+ J" v
; o7 E/ K4 {+ ^, L$ [5 W, _
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome , M# P4 o6 ?. ?: d$ c( T

% e$ d2 t4 ?, [; w' A8 K0 J8 eM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......5 f% U9 M- L7 N9 q/ N* r- k3 g
8 G3 g& R# }& \& J
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
6 [. w1 V1 H  E, k3 ~) t* RM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢) e9 M7 A+ C0 l9 g4 `0 S
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: _# D! T" h5 I+ p: k% C% v
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma; b5 }; H3 O. P3 O
+ C( ?' s4 W# R/ {; V0 t! }
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! m! c8 p* P% p7 G有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# V1 P7 q" o% N. z8 S$ @
由最好開始排起既話，
) U5 g5 N: M" zL B M F S 啦，
7 y$ r+ B) r/ v3 X
0 x6 @4 D' o# X6 W* x; f4 g+ M( ^/ b% b其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% }: H" N/ ?! _8 x$ I但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？1 I* D% e: S! `4 H' `! x/ o$ J0 z
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？( ?3 h! s5 i& Q. }. l
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
. h  y7 D" e! t! w4 y  E
) g4 r1 i9 q2 J5 s; o6 t- C3 O7 ?而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
  p8 z' p) q; H& ~, O8 p所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
$ a5 l) D& [0 ^; W6 L明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
8 B* D: w2 c9 A* K: D) K/ ?8 |* T0 |7 C+ q" {
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，# ~0 n% D4 V' o' B# c
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
7 K6 j. K& Z) Q6 ^+ u, P亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
% Z8 ?% H! Y! x. E6 b$ d+ B知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  l$ h* b* `/ z4 s4 g
M 都可算壞了。9 k: Q! l& S/ `5 y* @% U3 p: n6 x

$ {: y. C$ x7 l  s F 呢個人仲掂，
) K, Y1 i' r7 X6 D8 e知道既唔等於要講，
; C* z. a2 k  J如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
: R* W+ {& F( F' Y0 a- I8 P我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ g' z3 g6 F  W3 B% B7 h. z, I+ D; Z8 A$ T1 y' Y2 Y
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' ~, x- W/ {4 O) }' A' l
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。) Y3 v: e/ q: |4 t2 j
5 R" j* |2 U, t) X

2 \8 E- ^/ A) S( ?/ A! _7 x6 s% Q3 Q
題外話：6 \8 S5 x8 y5 j# n
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，5 C7 b7 j) ]8 T( T5 f
睇到 S 呢條友，
3 w5 z" i, S% Z- d我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L$ S1 k! `& K; `1 r" F5 h

' b4 r+ o7 U/ y5 i/ l& hS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
8 ~( Y9 Q9 {! s: q' m( PF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ ~+ O( S4 r4 W. u# b8 g! g$ ]
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
% j- w% p1 X0 g8 Z( H) pB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害6 ]  w9 ]  }, p+ D" C) D
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...