Rika

由最好排到最壞! ^; H/ H, D8 x6 X) D8 ^
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 [1 \( u: }' ?5 r& ~B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
3 H* m7 k/ X. v: AS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- l: H1 a) I4 m2 {2 tM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
) P* D$ _; x9 fL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% M& A% b& p4 U% ^* ~9 S9 I/ c; s7 `1 I- g( z
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
% @; T. b; M9 {' E4 ~8 ^+ Q0 k8 Y$ i, J
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
& f% x$ q6 e( u" f/ T5 a- S/ \; N     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 y- g* C) q  {
" p4 g" e6 s3 Y6 L2 Y/ v
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做: G6 D) O  B3 k" Q+ f( {) B- T

  S! ~. n% R' ]9 tL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( `+ q1 Z# s' @: ^+ U. _
0 m5 z1 }: J0 p0 iF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
9 l- L0 m6 ~# r; J( P; q     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. N$ l6 n# @- Q% f5 J5 f  Y  L9 E# u4 m' ?5 }9 x6 W- Q
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% a/ r2 m7 J) @3 S0 o2 h% @. }而家答多次! l/ Z. N9 I, ]) }0 v3 g/ ?
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
9 D9 R7 W+ }8 D+ d  G1 |l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  H8 j: G  m" H% a' [& `
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
+ D2 T4 S; E( q0 t! q( _4 p7 Y5 `s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.0 o5 @! B1 l! ~
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
+ P: C) m' s( `! j  ]  Y9 O/ ~8 o9 {+ z
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
& O5 k- a3 f  }! S# a) e/ b7 vF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 r6 ^2 z/ C& T% _2 H) GM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
- _. u$ r6 K- C5 PS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
& ^7 i, m9 t# u; E- \8 kB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 u( u" {' r) m( j& h3 a( v. BF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- V# t# y: O, t2 L. s3 m3 p. YS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
8 M) E' K5 T5 n# S) |4 eM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
( Z- k5 u/ c" ]L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- B% O. f8 n. O8 x5 b& zB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 W7 d. r' a) O- R, I9 t
; u% _+ P' e, J. h- W& R世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
8 j. s. x7 m" T* ]/ D6 b% aL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 v" r- K1 p4 H# @9 @( g4 x& o8 b, ^B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% t: o  U# d& H& Q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件7 m' C  u# L) ~
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方) o; B* A* E2 j0 H: u( [% U
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- t5 q( a3 ]3 [
/ I7 ^* i; @9 i) i" {! {: k. s same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( Y) q! F- Y3 L* o$ @8 ^# B  A; a/ g
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
4 J  }( G4 Q- n% B
  u0 ]' z# P- z* D/ N/ aS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )7 L9 L: ]' ?. ]4 H# B. O. a+ q- e8 p

" Z$ M4 h+ i* z0 L- iF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 8 \1 ]7 f- H# |! v. n

5 Z, O2 H3 ]) N2 \; TM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
& s. B6 q; f3 A$ J; }- E# _; @; x, D1 k
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 {) j& [7 t! A5 d1 R) T
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
/ y$ G( Q3 u8 k4 V3 e. B1 wL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: @. I+ J5 T/ w, |
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma/ l& G' v- Y0 [5 o) M5 p5 W
( ?0 m3 K, V! U6 p( }
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* }% A* b9 e) M3 e; E  Y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
# u  p( G; ]6 K) {! T" m由最好開始排起既話，
& @& j) J8 Z* OL B M F S 啦，
( Y4 F" \( G% i" e# J. ]9 ^
$ y& ~5 I; K# K其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
) B5 J* h) }3 X但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
" ]& S. H; p$ q5 {4 ]如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
" |, J+ h  m6 _( W1 @5 W/ L" K/ _又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
# |# G$ B6 Y  j3 P+ N2 L# U3 h. |
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，: \! k' b  [; Z, r: z0 i) m5 u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
& ]: t4 E" e, ]3 B明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* d' }! W, u9 |) B% C7 k- h: l' a. W' k; H
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，: l# a, g7 t/ p% B% Z- t( v: Q
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，6 Q6 ^# v0 R) s; z$ Q: J8 i
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
  t0 b! i: x5 [( j知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
- Z7 {9 b, y2 O M 都可算壞了。* e4 v$ R4 X0 z$ @: Z$ k; Y
" n3 J8 K9 w- r% w( c/ B
F 呢個人仲掂，8 n4 d$ R2 ~% E1 k
知道既唔等於要講，4 X5 K! r) r4 T" [4 X
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
! C- K* l4 k) a& _我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
7 y+ @* k5 K4 Q& J8 f, J8 @& p; ]7 P+ V2 U$ ?, @- t
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
% U$ [9 n* O5 x& A- h) O/ o始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
2 r" e. b5 a8 z0 z( w8 y, q8 u! d9 u$ v8 E3 u# y4 M" |
' a% ], {  r8 T2 j% }6 y; x2 T
: o# P) E3 Z; @3 ?' R  s
題外話：" _6 n# ?3 ^: r) o- v; |/ R
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
0 S* s  ^+ {" y" d- b/ O睇到 S 呢條友，' m/ a5 |+ S( {' G
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 `* E# e3 c3 G' S

4 J) j7 U& G. J( SS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% W# `0 ~+ D- J+ V* t$ ^( ~
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 A( ~' |) i2 t  B' W( }$ ~  _8 K- bM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她! z0 v3 @- y' K6 \$ b7 H
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( @4 s5 e" U  f8 {$ O9 Z$ A
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...