Rika

由最好排到最壞
( O( S$ a6 |% o' a' ~; P3 tF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong3 G: p5 |% y) d
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
4 |4 ^0 T- h1 b( s2 QS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& I( U" f6 W+ t: I9 X: b, JM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  B3 u- e# Y2 Q! K, A4 |8 m
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 C2 [# p" j( u+ a, W' X7 I+ K. j. x* {+ ^" G" y2 j
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
+ B# m, y* Q5 q  a$ v* B' c9 L* [# Z, F! y
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)/ X9 a- @! @/ [4 [$ I& {2 N
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!' N2 c2 `3 o. `  @7 [) |" O
- j" T0 q2 y& [' P( O
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
" @6 @( b. v$ b) }6 r. z7 W. Q+ J9 I: q( w9 R
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
+ x! A2 x- w) y1 ]: w5 G$ I
+ B7 e5 p2 p- r, IF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,' a- n0 X5 @+ ^1 O
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, y) `; a5 l) V- a' j0 x$ [: ?4 @
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& W- `* m' A- @" v而家答多次
! r$ n' H4 M1 Pf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
- g7 M7 i2 x5 Q4 d! S- ul: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架. L$ @$ m! g, N8 {( X) y) V5 N
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
+ j! G5 C6 j1 t8 W3 I" ts: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 \2 G2 A5 {2 F
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
; V/ b" ~$ u4 B0 l! w2 \) e+ ]% C* N
7 q+ V, v  g3 X# i0 WL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大, s* V% K6 e0 Y6 i. x+ e, R
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度7 |8 ?3 ~& y% R
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒) Y+ n1 B8 N# Z  Z& g
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢. D4 T5 \! Z0 s8 v
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
0 a- m* ^& j$ ~( h0 D0 rF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默") c7 h1 i2 U; [: j5 }. d$ p! C
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! U- O+ f/ w# z; i5 j9 I
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
2 G5 z  u5 F! T- I7 y1 j* QL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果0 Z  T& j6 T  D  w) z& C& Z% D
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情. L& U3 v$ {, e9 _  k; O. A4 n. o- Y
: T0 Z0 J; P: u) h+ `
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:9 @! P  ?. V$ V2 I+ [. |
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己5 L; u8 K' `# `, c, q6 X
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
) m1 Q+ l$ C) G1 W& j. OS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' S6 m, `$ |% j9 Y/ [: a7 K2 B. i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 O6 Q) C: d' r6 c  r0 EM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' ?% \1 [8 m2 @% ]
! R. f5 g2 Y; T& Y" k& K
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
' z) D/ m6 a' ^, W3 n( M* o! i1 S) L9 t/ @. m- ?
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& }& ^* c8 d2 Q) |$ P$ q! z
  e8 r# D  H% d9 N5 I% iS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )4 Z6 ]' x' d) N5 V8 R$ h" B) D
' k& m$ R( w+ k1 r+ G) r
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome , _; S7 C  `1 |* e' Q
( E2 c2 K; s3 H: |8 j1 |
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
7 x. ^+ q3 {" W7 r+ F8 |8 b% R5 |* I' B/ w. J" d' s9 R; B
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
8 e" z" o. P, n: S5 n9 ]; QM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ r' g0 n2 ~3 E3 K1 rL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ ]: N: R/ E& j* G" RF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
" }9 E, Y+ M2 [5 B; m+ W! d" x( E0 w! ^
& J  v3 N% {& ^( ^) E0 W最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
' }' A* O% f4 |( j4 @有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，- o: n6 K( P* R1 @8 `" ?
由最好開始排起既話，
% E" |  D8 x" HL B M F S 啦，
% M$ v" c7 Y  e. ^6 f  U. \# {% M5 b% u  g; o
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，* {4 Z8 e. D# F1 @( X( L; X
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 B  e& R0 S% w. x3 o- X
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
/ w; q) y( H/ y. E1 }# E, q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
. X  Q, P. v/ _9 T; n% e
+ U2 ^# d5 c" o9 U  S, d# |而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，3 h! R" p$ o0 U5 J6 a
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
# f$ X8 t) I, j明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
5 U/ b9 L; V9 K! \# d; d% h1 @$ w9 ^6 l1 {
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 C# i5 i' F3 }( u  I
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 L7 l; I/ H$ U6 L4 j6 q. H
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
5 d8 P; y% l0 Z" ]- f知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
$ Z# Z1 _" ]+ z4 [9 { M 都可算壞了。
/ z0 @6 C$ r/ ~6 T0 A8 f/ h
7 S* \4 \- b. O+ y F 呢個人仲掂，
% ]! N. B( i1 Y2 r0 `4 {+ g3 q2 m知道既唔等於要講，% w. }3 a& C# }
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，) \, N, |0 ^; m* y/ C( h: w
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
8 u8 q* }$ j9 ]: T' @+ a& K( L" }+ _0 M7 X
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，" C% S% K0 ]# Q) Z6 _+ n
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。" e. G  |: U* t8 e+ t9 o- D/ w$ R

+ P, ]" j) [* |' I9 x8 F6 W: x/ E/ r) Z8 M+ p) M
+ n) Q6 Z. w+ Z
題外話：
# |0 P& n6 `" Y% |) r唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
1 j. N; D+ a- u* @, E5 G, A睇到 S 呢條友，
8 {5 |  D; \, y( k1 m我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
) k- G8 Q: k9 P8 a( s7 z9 H$ v/ m5 b! a
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. @5 T4 Q% ~+ a; J5 M
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 t  p7 T; y0 F7 c
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
3 i7 y& L* O* S2 `* {* M: k; PB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
, K2 ~# Z$ i4 `' ]3 {0 r& Q& H$ XL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...