Rika

由最好排到最壞
6 A5 O) }1 ~) g2 HF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# A+ t1 L) _$ d( u* d4 R( z' A3 o2 E) {B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ q& X& A2 M0 k  k6 JS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her% [. i: Q, t& I) a' D+ p/ R* P( l
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
9 {" V8 x% s9 g9 Y9 y  vL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
: @1 R) y* }5 m  t$ _  N4 [" O1 p8 q! y; H- y/ `6 L2 l5 l
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人, z/ W9 |; b7 E9 C& @; u# [
$ ]+ s: t# O6 E) ?6 {
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
5 J5 ]0 g: h* O     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!$ P" n7 _6 i1 t/ ~0 }8 S/ K

. s3 E; ?9 L# ~& RB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
9 C& |& g5 X: r+ z1 z% K5 ~; T
' P' Z* i7 Q. u1 kL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志6 F2 P% R7 I+ y* u. ]" Y

; v8 D* V4 y% W3 N4 l5 z4 N" ZF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,/ i4 E( R! K, W0 O; T
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好3 q' H4 V% V5 U, O: e  @8 u$ T/ x

) @# G2 f3 S( v8 ?' G; g( g[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案. v- }5 D% t  ]
而家答多次
7 D/ Z: G6 n, g5 X' S; Z1 Hf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# @$ `0 W8 G+ a6 C; O5 }7 |# x
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
' k- J# S8 D$ y( ^8 J" F2 Y/ b& x  yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢; l; Y' g7 G# y" \8 S
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& O0 s/ P- n3 U$ B6 M$ ~9 B
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 E- A; G& @" Q; H% [  T! n) [6 ]- Q  k+ o; q
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
4 e* B% G- [# jF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度, L" P. Y( g. ^3 M& c
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
) h, v+ [( c% _8 HS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, ?0 O6 B% w, Y/ q  bB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
& e' i! m% }& F" uF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"* h, a4 ?, F4 t# ^, \
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
0 j: F* ]! z. Q+ m( nM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
" B2 S3 `2 x* p8 ]3 |; rL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
8 ~$ v9 z5 G3 a/ b. H5 GB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
' A/ Q7 W1 p, u% c6 ^) J
9 `. g; _" N/ |4 G: t) s) M! q! B世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
; S2 \3 H1 j6 Z9 A+ I. T( t& i3 ^L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己# ?" z3 \5 W# E
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
- Z; `1 [- w5 u) `7 _S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( I, K0 r( v+ ]( ]/ {9 {/ o8 XF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
1 T( x% J+ r1 `5 D. f7 kM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ |0 X0 P- m( e: A

7 j* T9 b# }/ Q9 D( I) |1 | same choices with u , but want to add some comments
  ]* c2 Z* w) [9 i8 M% N: @! e$ b
- F6 l8 e& N1 y+ `B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river    l6 {+ s5 d7 N8 f. C5 p
8 d, m* H+ t1 n% {# d
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ); g1 X0 m9 E; P# ]; N* ^: f/ C

- s: ]; S  D& M. {. \F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 9 r" A' _+ {( K  _0 g% v& W% m8 I! \! t

: G9 \& @# ~, t, GM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......% d6 m* b; l& D" [$ O0 F% G
6 U- J, ^' z' q( B  }+ K
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge! {0 l$ ]; [9 [! E
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢. s/ M, g) p! i% p! h
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! J0 S5 S' v6 X" A8 S# NF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
" B+ r0 j# x. W& C4 L' R- w1 k# r2 r" i- E4 B3 `0 y% S  Q
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
3 ]' W/ f& t) y' {+ g有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
& K1 |9 Z2 F0 J+ u& E3 M由最好開始排起既話，0 o( N6 _. b, G3 t: S, Q$ v2 L8 I
L B M F S 啦，4 b( c; p3 s5 t
% a. o1 c* j! h) F+ s7 N) X
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 c" A; \0 m. l但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？4 O( d+ X9 d- c( F" h& H
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. \% z& M* f5 k又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
8 C% f  Y, G: `  N* \8 p1 I
1 k, a) K$ p) q4 A而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
( U" y: R: r' V4 @( k8 D! P; ^所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
5 p7 R# l! ~' Q* p7 p明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
- X8 k; U* u" [3 E! s* [* b1 _2 v  B) U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，% Y" _7 P- ]- O( b
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，+ z& x" D" u3 U9 n
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
( ^( N" V; V# K0 b6 l# o3 n知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
4 H6 A; g! |% u1 j M 都可算壞了。. v1 O. [7 c* t( o) U% U

  ?4 P# A1 I) l+ [3 _ F 呢個人仲掂，
4 n  k( L: i2 J0 e3 ~% P. S8 R' v知道既唔等於要講，
1 \5 w: n  N9 \. @: t/ e7 @如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% f! I$ w0 S( Z- x7 W* p0 T1 W# N8 k! \
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。. H- R7 H1 a% b' Q! m

) h, U, b# \6 B5 i; z最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 w6 Z& \9 B, P! w
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。- E, F+ L/ k0 W( g
5 v2 B0 l2 @; u2 p
% T$ [; v' x/ B" l2 B7 |

% F3 I+ r5 [" ]2 G7 J' m) b題外話：
, g; ^3 h: H% d0 Z; f唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
) k/ |$ j2 ?6 R4 g睇到 S 呢條友，1 @4 t: _( L$ q0 _) x7 j9 F0 u* E
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L, S4 x; y/ J+ l. R! `% ^4 Y

; g. i( }6 }$ bS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!: H9 v; d2 ~  i8 p
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係* U/ {$ T. w! y6 y8 D! P" v
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
, R. S4 u7 n) S. U: f+ s; oB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害* W$ S- d% ~+ ]; z9 d; |. v
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...