Rika

由最好排到最壞) D9 v2 s5 x$ {) v" n
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 `) G' I4 G1 d: d' a3 \& MB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 n, B# x: l0 n1 n* x2 aS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 ~: v2 t7 E" L8 D8 L3 R7 bM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 N* L' q. W* \
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
; F. A6 h" R- l; E! k1 \) B
' d! k# a8 N9 h7 `/ ^1 eM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
, P& V8 e- p3 ]6 h: u$ M4 r0 p$ M+ B  v9 [  e
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
8 a) |3 F8 n. }3 b2 ?; g% U     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% p1 H4 n5 w) |& y2 N

# \$ \) Y0 J# b- u9 i2 r9 bB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
% u) X7 v8 d2 J6 s/ b1 y; n  r' m) J& r3 S3 b, D
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( y1 E: a+ s: G. \9 `1 Q4 {' V' a' b" z( v1 e
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,$ s8 l8 D2 ]1 _' ?  w" M' o
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好0 B. z+ O+ z8 A/ S; k6 Z: \0 h- z+ r
( J2 Y6 p3 T! T/ h1 W# |; f
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案8 ^/ p+ n9 y. W' g$ C+ Q
而家答多次& C# R3 ]. l/ e5 P$ [
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽% P$ c$ M' N- d: t3 c+ C
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" o+ r# {# w% `- F0 K; O% yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
6 r* R$ y; U" W7 D8 }. us: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
/ i; j) o1 K  ?m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 e. p: n! ^8 b! O! Q& _1 o5 u6 k3 \$ ^  N* }
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大* s9 d/ N# b4 S$ m, Z% q' X
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
$ r; B* {; D6 ]/ R: j" uM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 Y& k/ `) b, {5 W/ Y& c) S+ m, _1 h& [; o
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢& `8 E2 d7 Z$ V8 }% B: A
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
( m% t1 o+ f5 }" p& X) ZF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默") A. n" P4 t1 y
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 I4 p4 q$ h& b# Y- x, oM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
$ J: h( L+ s8 t- W+ P  |2 }L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果/ P' p6 q' Q2 t+ k( |3 I3 D$ n
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
( m  ^2 O# m7 N9 V3 b4 E+ c% ?: X# O! w/ L
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' j) J9 w$ G3 _L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
# e1 Q5 J: h- l1 L% MB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
; ]& B$ W5 N  `9 zS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
) y$ q5 I/ C# Q6 |6 |F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, `, z8 |5 z8 U6 L, G# E
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 I5 \# n' o6 p, K

4 o/ ^; a' V3 @0 f" Z( D4 r same choices with u , but want to add some comments . M' R5 A( ~( z4 l5 H8 l+ E
  [) N* ^) H! @" X
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
/ M  v" H; a& \3 r7 I2 S7 w8 A! {1 S) N
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )6 z/ P5 @( A' s, j2 K
5 j2 J% H+ T; n$ f; b
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome   }% y7 j- G- {6 B  a! ?% F# F

* P6 ]( n( a9 ?6 BM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  }/ `  G8 h3 X# f' P# U
) d  O) r8 R4 \" D1 m% M9 A8 ]& ^
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge& _2 ]6 J: z: ^
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
# y% L* Z, k6 [, QL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ J; |, v/ U  _! k9 y- j6 `; z2 kF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
' E- Q0 U5 r9 R  B# j8 B
5 Y7 @% S0 X. `& U  H9 S# @最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....8 k+ M6 i5 g2 T% p2 M( A- ~, V
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) j+ ?4 X* m" V/ S/ A# X
由最好開始排起既話，
. y' g( A9 p3 ^4 S8 u  W( PL B M F S 啦，
# a6 z; o2 V# F( _" v4 D  Y
, t) n$ p, Z% P- p3 I其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，/ n7 Y( @% e9 D
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
+ B" s- y& H9 d/ y+ _. {如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( N3 _5 `; P' |8 R: |5 L) d' d又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ m! @. t) C) ]5 m8 o& }! ^+ ^2 p
7 B& J9 M  b* ^3 ~& E. M& J* Q而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
3 d9 ]1 \+ E; N% ~- F所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，4 ?# a) g$ g# Z$ _5 T3 b
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。: h$ @. k. L4 c" p, o. Y0 d

/ B7 k* k9 _2 ~, b9 f! _, F而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，6 J4 B  r4 E7 j1 W2 D
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，- Z* e6 {- V1 l, |  K, R
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，' A9 M2 ?" X  b! `3 I! S9 _5 q
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
1 F& N" W" i% r2 i$ H7 b5 ]5 T M 都可算壞了。2 l) s$ u: h, _3 O6 E

+ v( A: m- M. s& U+ V) M7 I4 ~ F 呢個人仲掂，
4 F% K- H/ Y7 J6 t# V" Y7 }知道既唔等於要講，0 {; Q. o3 K) p# B, C0 R# g
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) _; T3 G4 C) Q7 q我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* s) O6 m+ O4 `4 i5 `5 a+ j5 o9 Z8 q  j8 B: H
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，; D( z- B7 B( Y% q  u! }' R5 P* e4 W
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。3 u2 y. h) U% L. I1 b. n. G
5 J" w8 E9 N( ~, V
% d& n% H1 W6 z4 e  N9 K
$ ~: z- H. I2 L$ j
題外話：/ _/ h! }; j" e& v2 j' c1 d0 f# D
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ a0 i) k# @; \* K- }
睇到 S 呢條友，3 C0 [. ]% s# S8 E
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ u) \$ |! u: I. ?* X4 B
( I. }& T! M! P/ t- g7 {' s4 v9 i
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!: V; v, c0 u+ l8 r0 T6 ^# Y
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 F: G$ M) K+ L- O" x$ \9 {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 b" r  X* p9 q" B8 G! z
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
% M( ]& \2 @0 a9 S3 z) P- ~, CL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...