Rika

由最好排到最壞) y  a6 t( f$ W- n6 w
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 }1 h6 [7 m5 c. O! ~; g2 g& YB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount4 `0 x0 S/ u# x7 S- K; _) Z& j
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
: A; s  H7 t5 CM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
- n9 a3 |; z9 m$ B! b2 OL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:; A5 F! E+ j  ^+ Q

' r4 |3 N! k: E3 M4 U+ u; }M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人! Y& x6 Y! ~7 D9 q" Y
: ^- D: l5 x# Q8 u
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 k8 [$ E* |! g, O' n2 i1 e     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!( }" _: X; M. e& w

7 j  I' `- ~, ?, IB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
* a$ m3 q0 z7 K9 s5 I% f5 y0 G2 _! Q) b" J& [% h3 T$ C* F
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
6 Y7 ^8 m& M- }, f( j$ i7 f
3 Z4 \5 i& d: D; H+ ~# I( L1 N  WF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,9 m, Q, N. F6 Z- |# }& P
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, @# q2 U2 |$ G* D% J/ v! j/ E# b- Q+ H! v" F
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案. z- m: }0 v" t& `
而家答多次
6 ~, ?# q! l" E% Y- N$ ^f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
  k3 _/ \, |9 ^% @: F6 W" y- Wl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架" w* J" k( h2 P% Q
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢/ W2 s) Q  [% \' v2 o
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
1 ?1 ^" L3 R+ v6 Xm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S6 Y: `) q- ^$ K; C3 v

9 @- ~) ^9 n# @' kL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
: j) s! K3 p" n& u( {& o6 mF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度) [& N4 [4 T5 v+ x
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒3 L% q$ j/ s# B* F8 Y0 }( y. M
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢' n& e8 g+ f8 |$ R3 I7 U
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. z2 H2 x8 a* uF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默": `/ q* b$ a# Q" O
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 `3 a0 P- l% Z# mM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法0 I0 v( d7 r0 S- f+ P% P5 }
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果9 H6 |* {& E" i. J
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情  o- u% v7 L3 a
. Y' h$ ?5 D4 C* M( i! u
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 ]% c. J! r: ?( D
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% s% T2 q! Q2 ^- _5 X! D+ D* y
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
* Q  V1 {' q7 }- I  MS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
) m8 i: a1 ?% h" x0 J# c* yF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
' l6 Q/ N) o+ w' n/ H; f# VM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 ?% z  \- T9 s3 }5 A. i4 D+ g5 W
2 l, g+ \$ l" D* G+ b5 z. z) e same choices with u , but want to add some comments : I) F/ X6 E0 Q2 `9 O
/ l* u5 C0 s! ?5 [% H3 j. u
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  5 D4 t( J5 y9 ~
; s, ?# H' d( M% D% D; r- U
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
8 |, Z) k" n# j& R" r
/ e6 F$ V4 B$ G8 Y, L( K! g7 ]' HF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
4 M2 J+ U( M2 V1 O" I
8 L1 m* C: q4 ~! i- r; eM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......0 ]0 Z# X8 r2 K  ^+ _

( g( z4 U& w' m: t4 E7 u4 k[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
; u1 z+ x. X+ O0 Y" P1 d$ Z" W* w2 WM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢6 i* n6 R" W3 F' S( G/ E7 C2 D
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
% n: a! D* \1 S, sF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma* G7 X8 I4 {* J# N- O

$ s+ y2 X# V1 K最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# Y- t9 {. Z, x8 k7 T- d
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
7 W! q1 i9 h" N! Q5 Q* C9 l由最好開始排起既話，* _  K  Q+ z7 v% v) |
L B M F S 啦，
$ P9 @! e0 a8 b9 o# f9 ^
8 S# {- b8 o# D, F3 ~8 h9 u其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，: L8 Z+ ]) ]% o- {8 P  ~
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？+ A) @7 e) j; p
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
* t' b; G4 Q3 C  i, N3 Y6 j又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
, h7 a- Y4 `4 q
' v% Y; q& \. p! B而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 Y, C& ?- a& Z, c, J( O
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，/ y' P) E0 m7 `; b/ I1 h. ^5 x- n
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ Q" t5 _1 G6 |' p& {/ K
% V! y$ }% M( N) J/ E8 t
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
/ Y3 e/ p+ y/ X* S, Y0 I5 O M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，/ t9 d8 d8 D( U% [4 e9 O5 }
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: v% Q! M9 R$ ~8 L# m- V
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
* ?, q/ k  e0 ^3 h; O M 都可算壞了。
7 d( t, N- ~1 A! U/ W4 d, i# D6 T
/ a& M; i. M1 } F 呢個人仲掂，
1 y  O" s' D/ w# W$ k5 g5 @知道既唔等於要講，
3 J0 l0 S8 q! ?+ ]4 a! ?如果呢件事發生係自己身上，, b. n9 _, G. y& p1 `: E! h
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
0 a; L, {5 e1 K1 R" U
! R3 r5 P4 ^$ ^3 M4 \& e4 x0 V最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' E! a9 |* v3 s( X始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
( I- g+ F% {% M; _5 f8 [" {+ e* Y# h! i
) K3 h6 g$ x: w' D1 c; k

8 Z$ [& s5 i" d; `; \* z9 Y0 A. ]題外話：
- H3 G% a( y" y) O) w3 ~  J+ ?1 X* d8 S唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
. V9 Q+ u, I, |. o& i睇到 S 呢條友，; \$ y* A) L+ D
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L' S' e+ R. q; _2 }3 M! V

* P9 _% w; h0 w3 q  @S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
! G2 o6 ?1 ?( ^6 Z, A' f* HF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
7 e; U* I( S, {! |* B6 [M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她) k( X! i' ~- @; O
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害# Q' T2 b1 V+ k
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...