Rika

由最好排到最壞
' `. G% P# O9 R; U' b6 L( N$ R6 UF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
! h' B2 ], O) d0 j( i- h; `B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount5 v! O1 s2 D( Q/ t* t3 i; }  k/ r
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
5 g  I2 p/ \; ~- JM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
- o$ Q' A( j' {0 PL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
, W# a' p& V* v
% f" J9 A9 j4 T: C% pM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人. p- H8 r) x: u$ N" b  M

* |# T, R4 v( P3 m' h0 f) rS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
' S- Z2 v& x0 d7 D+ _     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!6 L0 e' y" e4 G1 x

- o, B& ^; c5 }) t1 Y5 HB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做) Z; V4 ~% T2 y
8 f; g5 f! G% Y( ?' E- ^/ [
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( o% ?1 X1 @! m. J- I8 T9 `3 Y, y  N1 m' X) t- C
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% \7 n- j; ?' O" z+ R
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
& }( X0 |# e/ \3 q) H& E% M9 J
* ~0 [! j+ d- t/ R+ k% X0 s[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
! [+ L$ L0 ?' z/ b3 G% n' _而家答多次
0 V. m% ~  o: o+ m4 Y3 bf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
* }* C2 Y3 D5 E% S- x( Xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
% Q$ E+ O2 L  D0 Ob: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
! M( [3 m, ?3 [0 K8 Es: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.+ b# a0 ]" M* h( `; S  [/ w& B+ l! p
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S0 d, f: U& I/ v+ y" H
/ s9 F) c) q+ p" H% d7 t0 ]
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) z' M& @! R6 tF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度; {. ^" s5 A. l, X
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
9 F# T: k; u( p9 t) NS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( O: t$ \* m& j# u. d$ U, y0 @' ~B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞2 s+ q* E1 S  ?
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
6 m/ s  F/ D/ O; X' C- lS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% c. w% u2 p# m, @' TM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法, Q4 w1 a6 k- H2 k3 W* w; L
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果) X# H# B( i- Y8 N
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
* b' r% s5 ]% x$ s6 ^# `, `/ P/ t+ z( I0 f2 X' g  G& ]9 I
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
5 K4 K* c; y- H/ fL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
! {1 Y( o1 Y) j) a) @6 MB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘9 X. a8 N, z$ y3 z- s
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
, N; W2 v$ v+ `5 zF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
, \' j7 L' N- fM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 W- E' e) r% T, S$ m( D. D: O) `! y! a# n0 u( {: Q$ `) K$ i
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
7 {/ V; X$ ~- R& n
/ q( d) q$ M' e: |4 j5 r# vB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  3 r  U  ^7 O1 {4 c5 r4 @

0 p) U. e" z. y1 }/ jS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
8 r: a% X7 y% L1 [( y  m& D
& Z, B0 C& E& N7 }7 LF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome . u3 N2 @. I+ X5 G4 L/ ~4 `# L3 n

. ]% O/ f' l: UM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......* @( C9 @0 V% y" B1 O; ^
% x& X# {9 q* @
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
& Y: N1 B- r0 D4 ~2 B6 mM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢; U$ u) Y; U8 T2 o6 X. N+ s$ ]
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! j+ B& Q0 c5 L! M1 ~, f& SF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 k" ?. P. m& r7 x
: y$ [' j  V0 I! n8 d! G最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
" N& A5 M' F3 D5 H) p# Q* ?* i0 k5 r有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，  s" ~5 X, T2 W2 S' l+ `
由最好開始排起既話，
' Q: ?$ X. E! Y& D0 y1 NL B M F S 啦，( O& h  z; ]1 @! B* g

# }. }, n* J( A+ Z& z& X; \2 Z其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
2 L& f8 a/ s" v4 l* h, W但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 j% A0 S2 w6 O如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
7 f) Z0 z' W1 x8 p又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ |8 Q; A% k9 B7 K
) l3 o! K) F7 P9 p+ u# `
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
% _" z3 e& e' H4 N所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，; }/ g" e" }7 V) @0 `0 \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。# r4 c0 P) ]. B/ T5 Z% X/ f
3 Z2 d7 d1 l0 ]9 X1 W8 V. L
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 ]: J& K, @" b% j8 V
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
2 ]  a$ @- S+ l+ [/ g5 m4 K2 F) A亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，. B; a+ S$ c/ [0 T% v, O0 t% X
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，. H8 @6 Y! p* }" c3 V3 E# A9 _
M 都可算壞了。
. s$ S) |5 W9 T4 M. X( w! v& {3 v  V( o$ J( _& @8 w
F 呢個人仲掂，
3 ^# I& b1 S" [* {0 K知道既唔等於要講，& J# I& [% g; z0 \
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, ^2 ~/ R! ]- r  X) Z. x; ?) X我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。% q5 d8 T% {: @- n9 S/ ^

. x7 |# e1 J8 F) X2 C0 u最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' S5 R2 W  d0 p9 Q1 u+ v/ b始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。/ r; |& ?6 \% w3 ?5 d0 o) x4 P2 P
# X1 D, ?: a# T* h0 m
; Z) C  ~& k% N

+ p% R: d) B' d% c% N題外話：
8 j, A. e. L: g" T+ r唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- ^& `! Y" a* u
睇到 S 呢條友，
: A& N7 b9 m* A0 e我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L) v4 J- @/ K  E  V" k' G
3 _8 s' ~+ c$ ~  r# c! t
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 k3 b  K) V8 p
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係6 D8 V$ [9 w; V3 R$ Z1 {
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她3 b2 M. G5 E$ Z% S8 {$ c) X2 ~& o
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
+ \4 j/ j# v; |2 G& ^1 C1 Z8 D4 \L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...