Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:* \: N& t$ L4 y* E
; l& z. m) K6 ?

, n. ?( y; V4 D# Y& T% q2 `3 |% x我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% i2 \' u% G) r/ \
7 [3 {- k- I% z! a6 y' A
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
1 K; n: e% r' _* x6 n  ]+ \2 m. s: `# q# R

& n- [4 g/ v7 g" T+ Q. {In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& D0 L5 P! x4 ?) V. z7 P
6 J9 E7 c. t4 j2 F. N
oh really...0 Z% h% V7 s" n- h6 z
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"* Q" E1 K! y7 Y6 s/ t  s& j# k6 c
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題% P5 Z' O) _$ v* G0 g! P

! Y1 [9 @$ V- h+ ~3 ?2 f3 U當然這是個假設性問題7 Q: k+ P- \2 J* V: n$ B9 \* ~8 J
但將人數倍大
  L; V( R/ }1 \& r/ h( Z例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. b" j1 A7 M+ \1 Y3 a3 B# {(情況可以換作其他)
* g! s$ h' Y  ]' _始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
. C8 i# I8 k! G7 j* M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 q9 P) y1 K+ A) M$ h$ p% Z9 b/ W3 k如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:6 K; z) p8 \$ i: \& I" S
絕情谷既問題...
. O0 N& v3 l4 J如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 ]! ]% }" r' U* {# t  |7 `如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 N* o) u( w& ^# n: w0 ~# k) Z
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好- I) F8 H; Z$ ]! y, W( B
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
- ?* s; k1 b6 P  q4 |但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
" Z' I7 f% S; o2 P' n" m9 D好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢' L$ N5 A% i: N# r
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
) t4 J- p$ q% e( ]
; u6 f0 Z4 d- k+ @% C- G0 F; V我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命$ D3 S9 d- A6 i- K) l' r
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:& T# N2 E1 w5 m# \
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

" B" x8 m. F7 ~! C& H5 |% c3 p( q. ^3 d! }" r( }
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
& a( K7 L' y) E* m" \4 X7 E+ o* x7 W你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
) b( w' ~4 t1 }% l
" J* B  Y6 `- {( v% a' qp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child* y9 [! o6 n$ G0 O
yes, my reason is helping more; T2 I  f, I/ M  K9 h
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!: \! w6 f/ p' L/ v' g0 ?. I
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child. {4 Q' n4 ~8 P4 O
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?( s( q2 N, v9 R6 A
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!4 x, {, G7 @6 j" K! Q; C
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!9 X! Q& [. B( v$ I6 f$ R
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
$ l8 K# `4 V% p% o6 H當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~% C) a+ P! W) g& y' |& u' m
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
+ T. U9 p) y1 X/ r$ A# `! e正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~- c" O- O% \2 H$ B/ I* @
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
" r/ C4 v8 ]+ j+ O我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
# ^2 O) j6 y  J7 k. r* o但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
) D3 U- y1 s" c  j8 p我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）