Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ R3 z" Z+ y& e1 D. a8 H5 F' y) @
  `; V9 ~8 y. w! C- `7 }' Y3 Z' J" t5 _5 u1 N, t1 |: _1 N6 H
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" T! t9 W5 B+ W; {
6 `' e" l9 r# o9 @3 P# |- QIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
. t% P0 U( x$ b- ?( [& a
0 f: ]: |* [+ \' ?4 x: G/ f7 ]: X6 f" h, i. A, E
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 e: ?' a0 P! u; A" Q4 W& t; r
5 z( b# W( B  Loh really...# ]! W: [; @" r8 U1 G
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
4 z# e  @' i4 b: O# Q. ~" Ci didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
8 f) `, f0 D. f5 T$ ]
$ A1 W9 Z0 k/ J& ?: U當然這是個假設性問題
7 g3 M$ V+ X6 s% _' |1 I7 g但將人數倍大( _* q, R8 Q% Y7 ]; v
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, ]9 i; ~  W) D! G- M  M3 I5 v(情況可以換作其他)
1 a8 w4 K) t- u( g: d始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...- {; k8 }: U% l: L* G7 _
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." [3 u, ~3 C6 J
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
9 }' g6 Q% V& F- ^* ~  m9 }絕情谷既問題...
3 m( t7 C$ U" h% w# ~如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 H5 H2 A" {4 ^$ i4 h/ H7 `如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: q- G) b- x  _/ {% e, I$ v
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好9 D$ [$ \# ^0 u
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& a/ O0 Q' A4 l! U但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ t" t' h% e2 s5 j- P& v% r好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢) e' P( t3 g3 e/ K1 O# z0 n
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢# c7 z3 w# p' J- v" }+ j) d6 V
% V1 `& a* A# ^' h4 G8 F8 q
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命* Q( F% C1 ]5 r) Z+ [+ r. X& a
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:' ^1 I# Y  O* x, I8 W2 [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 S; U2 j& e, f' Y5 x# N+ C

% O; v) L: E3 B6 m8 H- e0 j1 J4 ~haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣7 h( _! m) k% I& P
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了..../ L4 W! j7 u: k7 ^

8 b+ b+ i( v/ N/ Q+ s2 E2 x9 ~# I3 A; j  Yp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. v! P& K7 C' B0 D' Qyes, my reason is helping more
0 _* ~  X  H  @& O4 ]for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!: h6 p  {  X8 |- @
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child# B- I9 j: Z! r% K: S. t0 f
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 w( K2 ^  |/ t" t2 balso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
! v5 p1 m, F  s3 j$ G! Gmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
. }+ j$ L2 \; |0 ^. _under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~/ f$ {" Q3 O4 [
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 w; ?8 H- G4 q  Y7 C我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~; y* Y2 F- C2 h
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 C6 z/ Z7 M, T即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 N. U. n# Q7 l) P% C" m
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~$ V8 A5 p7 @# d) Z
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 \7 A: e" H- \; v9 t- B# `我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）