Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:+ M3 {6 O3 r/ z5 Z8 i" t. A+ K( O( l
) B  m! [1 B# A2 F) p9 {. J

* L+ L+ L/ M, ]! J, W6 r我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' E( s5 [* R6 L- R% T" i2 K6 m) M* [$ c8 f  O! G9 P  F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 K+ i1 @, \6 y9 p" m8 F' g
1 W' q6 ?2 t* P0 _* ]  ~; }8 O
" u, C- R6 r7 N8 S* _1 d6 P
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& S# j% Q6 }4 @0 }% `. w, l, p& q: X) k! n, h7 Z5 {
oh really...
; C7 y! p+ n: L' O1 Q$ \hahhaa, thx a lot^^"1 A: o  B- m- {$ R! U& w; y
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題/ A  d. l8 |. x6 o! C0 M
0 W! Z" e/ b+ d, ~! c
當然這是個假設性問題
- b0 ]. c$ s8 o" G$ E但將人數倍大
( W( a; {0 R1 A: @8 n# G+ w例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
: v7 M! R8 v+ F' q(情況可以換作其他)
0 F% F) I+ Z2 q3 w; u始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...; }0 Z, @% E' q+ {9 ]* u
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 N* b3 _+ [, D7 U1 B如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
* u/ s0 L; T$ B+ G3 ?3 H絕情谷既問題...9 }  v3 v- v6 m  ~+ J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...) v1 u+ M1 ]( C* `2 v
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

& e! t0 d: Z! ^5 |
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好1 n# j, T* D) y% m$ q
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生  k+ b  e8 v8 w. G- N
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
1 h& v- ^' E; C, Y8 u: V好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
8 O5 Z5 S8 I; X8 q# g+ g其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& d7 k: L- R( j; E( i

) E! ]5 |: I3 H% o! ]我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
% _0 I4 P  W5 z' O8 r* f. \+ |不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:/ m9 f9 P) N8 K# l
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  D7 u( S! g. [3 W
9 Z. M. m! c8 \3 @; khaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
5 d* t. {# |6 w% w; I- w你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
6 K3 i: T* h9 B; u9 K. ~) _& j- k2 P6 T3 v: y
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child! X2 K5 h. z+ F7 c. @
yes, my reason is helping more. b% I# \* ~% h5 k, C
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!0 \1 N0 H) }" |4 i* s' x
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child. x3 d" ^- s, \+ g) _5 ^: M
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?. m% a5 z% I6 W- u0 K% @0 S
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
8 f6 _' M1 h5 C* B1 `may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!+ a! K2 r* S$ b. v
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~6 q0 S- ?8 M) q: ?9 |8 D- }
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~% N9 P( v5 V% K) i; y
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~, }! @( W  Y) j( ]0 o
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~8 i% W& R8 S& s
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~4 `0 `# ^/ o" s# L! p" F/ t
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
2 r- k$ i: ?$ _- Y: s; g5 }但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
2 u' O9 X& |1 p& a+ h* E+ m  N7 I我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）