Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:- o6 P2 {" t) a( j* i/ L

( @  p" y, [4 W& p+ ]$ n' P
- n! j  r$ j4 \% d) r我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! ?8 ?" c% h: ]
9 g9 a& `" K0 r" q, O. d
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:! d: h. m) i2 y& b' u* Z; V
) ^' g1 p/ ?, T- J$ L
$ b( s+ T2 r% D0 h5 v" x0 j
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

4 S; W! D& T7 b4 R* z) H. }! I3 g
' R" [- g" a4 h+ V0 D8 E' z/ Roh really...
3 o, I" f7 ]6 D+ ^' xhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
6 {- ~4 j* Z5 vi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
2 v2 Q+ }; t/ z* x! e3 Q
; S6 m# _6 N  ]- d/ ]- [當然這是個假設性問題  E3 b. K/ N: l" @. B. [, w
但將人數倍大# [. N+ D8 t& g  N
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
# C8 K( ^+ Q3 U(情況可以換作其他)
* L+ O: U. K& C" x7 m& h始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 n7 c9 {# j( t如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...9 v6 R; Y& O. N6 A" T
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:0 |/ ?. X% ^/ Q% q8 q
絕情谷既問題...
9 i6 c. \, q  A- _4 ]如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...3 U$ B. d, q5 i( E6 }' ]& n
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 m2 A, h. X0 v" K/ {
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, V% W- c8 r3 O, e; n5 J3 L# [於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生  _' Q2 o3 X% k
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
0 c3 Y1 u/ p4 [! v, J好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢2 i+ L& q. B! y4 C; o. }& H5 ]
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! P# Y, T6 ]3 U, u: v
2 K% q! ^2 ^# Y) |: U- a我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命" E  K# h( p# `& s! }, m
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; w" E  k% }4 t6 u# J6 Z) y
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 n4 Z5 t+ l" K+ ?! e! C# k+ G6 `
7 C; D  E6 O% D% Q
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' Z, S  r4 P% A# {: w
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
3 Z0 i! z, W2 A7 M* o( F
: [( ~* Y$ G6 w2 j1 R: V, Q7 Ap.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child% T2 v4 u7 G) ]: f5 ~; \9 ^
yes, my reason is helping more
0 g* [2 O" T- D+ P, M* Ffor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!$ q' z9 N/ D% x, o; Q0 b- v
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child( }6 y" x- A+ A" k8 _
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?' c$ ~) d0 N" z1 P" g
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
# l, i$ z3 C4 w& o- @7 s! ^may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!4 E$ l/ o- s; c0 |# T7 M/ J8 ?
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
% u. ]/ s+ u& w7 ~當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~5 E; Q7 b" c7 [5 [, W+ j  r3 j
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~) y' q( {  Y' i+ M. Z! l! ]
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~  _, X, ?) Y6 A: o
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  P6 a( d" J% B7 r& S/ }
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
( M: G$ e0 D+ }$ }' T! i& X但如果o係當時o既情況中~~' K. j. k% }% i0 H" j
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）