Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
" |8 G& E5 [* e/ _9 z7 O! g& h) O' n7 e( p/ _  `, U' |

3 [! X) D8 `. K2 A& Y2 }我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 ~/ G& F9 R; \9 V& N: ]5 B: a+ C" n, ]
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:2 j6 L$ A8 N6 {5 T$ _4 K+ u/ S
) j1 c& u& B3 U, m! o
/ t9 O. L* w; q" _9 f, l
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# B. I. }) Z- Z+ j1 g9 j0 |) ~3 S+ D1 ^+ w1 f0 q1 J9 a; g
oh really...
2 @: L+ w% c+ [# I) q+ `1 whahhaa, thx a lot^^"6 e7 u/ p) o& p
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題: w* |$ t  Z( B7 j& ~

( L& Q* P( [- h! ?當然這是個假設性問題
0 R% Y: A4 B# `, L  a但將人數倍大7 \) X# {% j: I% L# }
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 j. F/ w/ p* m, Y* b1 n(情況可以換作其他)
9 W& m/ i. J5 N8 Y8 Z. Y# ~7 M3 O始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
) F4 n3 k) W4 r, |) y% m如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 m9 @+ G1 v5 O如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
& b  H4 v7 _8 Z% M2 H! d2 l- B絕情谷既問題...& }* ~- f8 R* h6 L' \$ @
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
  Y: z* ?- z9 B6 p! U& f5 ^如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

' J/ S1 \% `) a: s/ F8 ~
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
6 V0 B2 j1 u9 |% Z! {* l於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生- c( `- ~( Q. E% f, T5 r
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- ]  d- C( P) P9 {  m: m4 c好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢+ i, O* S  l. z! _$ \: x5 b
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
$ b+ R" W2 Q1 I: ~- }2 a$ N: t! n4 b- G% ~2 q5 j
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
+ C4 v5 ^0 T+ B& x# F5 c" r不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:3 h9 B/ j- o" e
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 b2 O) S( C( {: F$ X. h. b& e" I" ]' c4 _
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' x6 E7 y# A' I2 c
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
) q- I6 ], P/ I( w
! ]4 \5 ]% n6 V3 T+ Y$ M8 o1 }p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
+ S1 z" b  V- s2 m- qyes, my reason is helping more
$ |% q; s- h1 R/ O. U8 Bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!7 T1 ~9 b7 H& ?9 W. U- M
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child' @' y3 {5 S) E, u- c
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?% b' [* Y* J( ^) H: A4 }
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
% f0 `/ m0 H6 d3 Vmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!4 c8 b) U- `4 D1 q) G# F% r
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~2 |: V; P: z, c( {* A: v" m
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~# H# G: u( `5 ^) F) k9 b: Y
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
$ [& M$ T, [, k" L正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~. W, ]  p9 f9 i$ c8 }$ ~+ W8 e
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~( x8 m; t; V* Z( j. e
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 j' |/ u" {) s
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~5 M' a: B+ s- V9 [1 s5 r  z
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）