Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:' @/ E( h6 n1 e+ v( O/ X
+ u0 D& A, n0 t% j0 h( p

0 y+ ~% R3 [! P( K  \我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

& ]: B. i% W* Z

" ^! n/ _/ F. l) iIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
: ?$ S0 t  k' R1 J- c3 B6 I
, t) c- A- m  ~+ Z0 s
# L: n, z+ A$ pIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% q/ G' ^+ ?3 c, E$ k" W

8 M6 h- |) w4 \3 o- H8 O/ @oh really...
  D. q* o' E0 |0 o: i, \' rhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
8 S6 l/ ]; w# G0 ]6 Wi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
; [  x9 N( _  ], n) ]+ v% K0 I- K/ X4 H; ?4 W+ l8 V3 b
當然這是個假設性問題6 c1 r8 S1 x/ K( p" |- R
但將人數倍大3 N& q4 ^& @1 V. b( P% z5 h
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個- k- t3 m) w% I9 p+ K: }; O
(情況可以換作其他)" q: C2 S5 |: g% N  E
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...- F6 M1 B$ q" F2 T( D8 l
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( Y( q/ @# J3 V- W; k- J如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
6 I8 ^4 Y' W5 c  f* v絕情谷既問題...
% s# F* R6 Q/ Z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 n7 J7 G2 m8 l2 E- O' V0 X+ F& L
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

# N" N0 W5 U9 R$ y7 `2 y殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好3 f7 H+ m9 U9 k8 i; w9 s1 N
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生/ w) j$ ?- W5 P* t* a5 X
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩8 g9 ~" Y, ?0 D( Y9 a8 X
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
( ~4 h$ j: W. g( V0 a3 ~( J( g! i1 \' Q其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢8 g9 J3 ]% k0 Y" D. e& q$ w
1 P- w4 `7 N' L7 O
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
1 `7 h5 Z; B( n4 r% G不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:6 e. \5 m1 x4 e# `& Q
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. Y2 ~! Z6 G3 H7 ?/ T8 u

. Y0 {, t) F/ S& t" Q$ F4 `. ihaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
( w9 K8 S9 q5 c' k) d, D你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...." l. S, O& K* S% O6 j( P7 r

0 g2 p5 q7 ?) ]: B' [: Sp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child3 z+ m7 `0 A3 g# W. K8 k
yes, my reason is helping more; v& g: g5 f: J' |# F" c
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
- k4 }( g0 c  u+ n. ~2 ^if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
" ~; A) }3 l1 n$ ?# C9 B1 p/ g$ gbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
1 V; c" B! p5 U! j7 Lalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
2 F4 x- j# N8 M; q, ^may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!6 a; G3 L. n& V- i1 x
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
& N* j; n+ m% |) L當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~0 C8 s5 g; y! M0 E5 r
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
4 M* n* d% |6 z4 Y' Z' D正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~8 c8 o8 H3 ^; X! O0 u8 H6 h& \
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
; t! x5 k4 ~1 Y" P& Y我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
1 Z! Z7 s# j1 q# I6 U# a$ A但如果o係當時o既情況中~~' {, m) x# p1 n4 T+ T
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）