Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:6 |" i6 [/ y0 F1 V

+ ]% A$ B& D1 D- r4 U8 k8 S) x0 s6 _# Y+ E
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

8 C* d5 S/ @' k* n
. j6 X6 c2 X  A/ Z4 ?# h9 `+ Q5 Y7 X
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
- O$ ?1 }- N3 u9 C4 |& V! R6 A3 L
$ r+ `; [( S  i- X6 B6 S6 g3 p1 z' V( _0 C5 t% c; O' ^
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# M  m& w( q2 U6 g9 X; j
+ J  [, C  \5 Z; c
oh really...; ]' i) s) g6 l" L* O0 ~* Q
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"( ~  }4 A, y; W! ]7 X1 {" c
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
- d+ ?% R6 W  _- f( a! a( }: I: R( ]9 l5 c7 ?" r
當然這是個假設性問題
1 [: l8 {3 Z( C. s. l( i; Y但將人數倍大
1 u$ y3 ^1 y; g( @, N例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
4 i8 X+ q) a9 C9 Q(情況可以換作其他)
8 U! b1 D; O4 Q, _* c始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...9 t* O+ Y+ p# D
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 ^- p0 U$ ~5 q$ s6 y' D
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
9 d& X6 T1 [% u+ y7 ^* l- n絕情谷既問題..." [1 u6 q! c$ j" v! O0 R) D* b
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 }* E/ F* n( I. _& D# {8 Z
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% p8 t# e" A$ V) D7 y& e2 I% k4 r殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好6 x% e, Q+ I3 R6 X
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生1 I5 o% b6 I/ }
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩; ^9 y+ S% P0 T; l
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
/ G, h+ D# ~1 X" D1 h% r其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
* S8 [' |( K/ M! S
! j' W: y) n; t) Q# |我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
, n, o+ `3 k0 A- w不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
: J+ M5 P2 v7 D" K其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 f  U, B$ T3 W" w) I) P% F1 \
, P9 N9 T. f6 x5 ?; l8 q
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 C! d6 P) D& O' f. S; m
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....; y" n% \# ?/ \0 N6 [

$ ]1 C; m. D# v# k4 \" f$ wp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
% D, W8 x/ S6 p3 V* kyes, my reason is helping more
) G3 v2 E! E+ t' u7 r: Tfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!. k# k8 a3 \$ z! i" U/ ?) C. f
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child( X. |7 s" H8 K3 }3 E6 F. a, |) M
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
  E/ R9 W/ Y( r- a$ q6 Malso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!% k$ u; V; F7 u/ o0 h. J8 y( ^. O
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!7 {2 h( E- Q7 W
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~& V7 l, a: s% }$ l
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
+ {8 y& E, w; ]7 D我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~5 @1 v) l0 E7 R4 g9 H
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 M4 k% }  [8 W2 {5 |即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
; }" s2 B* }: T我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~$ u5 h; w7 H" R( e9 U8 [6 G
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 o" ?; L% s( Y2 [* t7 g1 y& q我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）