Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) b/ h' A/ ?0 }
) }) _; d3 L$ N% v) J: f7 _2 Q# V$ c7 o
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

5 m5 |2 P, K8 ~( `& H# g  z2 @
& ~# k2 p3 ~: SIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:& T& m5 `" P5 n5 ?) c( k
4 p& R% q2 h" ]: y! H5 g
# D) l$ ^# e8 F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

* ~8 @% C5 I! }& z2 k7 O2 h0 P! O) l+ \: P& r) i; z/ Q
oh really...5 o% ~, _) t0 Q9 d$ e
hahhaa, thx a lot^^": V& [0 B' L' i0 |+ a
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題6 [5 ?/ s/ B6 x5 Z
! o/ f  K: O& H1 y  A3 q! f
當然這是個假設性問題
# k! R4 y  m/ a3 t9 ], W  W; ]但將人數倍大; q' b( i2 o! p- c/ w8 M
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個& G6 K/ B  _, a" E# ^# |: Z4 |
(情況可以換作其他)
( V5 l" o. M8 g8 e始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
; ~+ D2 @3 C5 P$ z8 N' }+ Z* s5 u  `如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ P$ c6 d& Q! M' v! m9 h& M
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% Z& X2 ~+ c) ]4 e9 ]1 ]+ u絕情谷既問題...
  P, {. A$ x* ?9 {2 Y; [. L- O如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 p# z% G, i1 J) x8 E
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

5 R& @5 A+ P7 }' w% l2 u3 r殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好$ `& l5 L( Y' G! s7 @
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. E2 w+ G# E4 X. p& p1 X
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
2 D- U; J3 ]8 {好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
( w2 R1 J" N: v7 ?% b! g, T其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! g" h3 o5 X6 w( r. L2 `' M9 t! B# l+ O7 @( c9 L2 Z% p' `8 ?1 V$ I9 f  ^
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
) P% C9 B3 w. x1 [; S* p. B不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 s  z: [6 f' |# G/ {6 Z
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 ?. Z$ U/ B; n  W7 `' {/ j6 K: X4 v4 n3 c6 R
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣7 Y' D( t* O$ |3 F* [0 p6 a" I
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
0 w' ?: Y/ h: M( B5 ]& S9 E
  s# p7 T. z3 Y8 K/ w" sp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child  F: [# J! A$ g" D8 S* q. `6 X, @7 R
yes, my reason is helping more
9 H: ~, S+ T) ^8 q% dfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!6 A  T, B- N1 V& P/ l, W. p
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
3 G( q! Q1 k$ P3 o  i( s( Fbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?" w, G2 ?5 i! h# ]- F5 C( h" D
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
+ r/ f4 G' l3 [0 D7 A$ {1 ?may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
3 x) c2 P8 W, T( u- Junder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~- D) F6 {; J9 ^, R8 O
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
/ t9 a; T+ ^7 b+ B2 ^( m, d我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~% G% h8 @' T7 ]+ s# ]7 y) q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~% s4 ^4 K6 q# n5 i4 V
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  [8 C: {$ z: l& F6 e. m
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
' C) s1 r9 t/ U9 `( i5 [! k但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
! t$ d1 [; o% S5 m我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）