
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:3 h: d# T( t' K9 r
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:
各位brother3 z" C. W; C* i6 d8 z
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
- K. B' B- g% w3 G" J6 k
一個市場有幾多個廁格?$ ^! z0 v0 G5 Z/ ?, l
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:) O! {: J# g- m* Z: y6 b2 ~2 V
$ A$ _, |" W% R6 }1 ^8 Y. `
好認同 !!!* R- L& ]* {8 u ]
good point !
. r( a( I: A4 l# N2 k' Q9 b
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
& l& S7 u g( S5 |1 H+ d7 [% K' } `
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
3 h( P o, {* s+ K# n7 g; n
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事; R1 {; o4 ~" m
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?- f! u# \! p1 P. \
: [* @8 ?& {7 w. a; Z
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:% _. h; \' U# D# d
V# i) D. ?- x1 B7 _" F: c: _
' X. z# m' N, k6 g: d
出猫并唔係刑事的" r" |2 |% v/ t6 I5 t, M% T) E
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦; o" c0 N" F, H& u; S" _. X
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格/ J* ?1 W* A! Z0 L" B0 }9 z% |. B/ ~ r, C
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim' H) y, G0 R9 s/ G, l5 m
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢
咁都會有個網有d會考資料& I5 {4 ^ f& \7 J/ c
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:% B/ k2 c9 Y# X
& p: ~) U Z: w' j
5 {; a! Q/ I3 ^ O8 U; H; g' s
考題係抄個網的/ _- H5 V8 c* x4 i M
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:8 V7 V: ^6 w; C) \4 Y# Z: d
0 W1 \# k* W' |3 Q/ ~, W* \1 m
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格! b* q" S( `8 s7 V2 u1 j
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限3 {2 Q5 A( ?. q
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:7 B) J* `8 z6 R* J" F/ f4 h
刑事係要舉證的9 |( \& e& Q& L0 S" l/ {7 o
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
& p8 j: w9 o. h4 ?
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:
0 k8 Z6 `' P* u* I! ^" k
- g! S3 ~1 I8 ]4 T
2 J0 ~8 B, h% g; m& {. B
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度, Q2 I" r3 I) V/ m
要查IP呢D野" d+ M9 H4 F3 F$ c2 S5 M
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
- w) [ O d+ N2 u3 X$ h
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平" o# u9 `$ `1 r
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:9 r: Z. [+ M0 \7 M
" z9 i. \ W5 L2 z* \4 J
2 u" S0 W, w0 F1 _% P6 j9 a
2 M/ ^9 E6 w+ G) `$ O" p! n' B
取消得一係就+曬- E2 n* {, [- C
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:
- [, C. Q( |8 ?9 d
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪5 N1 X+ K, {4 B6 X+ ?% A( Q: R
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管4 U- t: d3 P, n7 x( h" p
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??( M4 w& I( H% y# n; C. {0 o
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
8 q3 a$ S3 p) @: g/ y* m
$ i# Y# W& N8 L! @: l2 x- R
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:* ]) B( |) ^0 W
5 `- g p; [ h
1 J1 g" E( d; E9 [0 c1 _
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
) p8 Z% l) ]3 n V. a# T7 r7 \
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法
就係冇相關的1 Z0 ~6 \/ Y/ C7 A
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案- i# m2 O7 Z9 D% ?. }& d5 T
2 i9 @0 C8 U2 O3 Y- A) o' `
" _1 `7 T ^: ~
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:* c% y% t2 B; A9 u
) T6 d7 X4 X# U6 e {3 b
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:: M/ [. x6 O& v
; G* @ j A' E8 {. s9 D2 Q! [5 b4 A
* J3 f* v6 [& f8 P& {
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法
9 P% D4 ]5 f N
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:
0 X2 Y: a9 [0 Y1 F; O+ A2 C
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:4 C- x/ @! {7 A y
我反反問& w! p; o3 k; t, N; h! k
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM: r3 \. s& }8 n4 U5 c' ?' t
重唔重考唔重要
最緊要收到成績單之後
唔好又走出黎話
唔公平要重考
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策) G1 ]- L, P- \8 s2 n
各位brother睇睇, |' o) v# A5 b: j
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:+ t; p9 {2 O$ k, c! e2 i$ W9 [- D
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:' O6 r( S- f3 Q& e, H$ r/ K; X+ v
0 U% b% `& x. E' ~0 _
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:! Q: C7 |* o/ t/ i" S6 ?7 x8 V3 l) j
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:, w! S G8 {5 N
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
- m8 I% _5 @# K: X2 W
! \9 y5 v" ], L
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:
i retake this year
$ k7 t: e3 Z: s E0 h/ x
i really dun...
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |