
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:7 \0 q( f7 h4 f2 {# ]/ b+ `' T
各位brother7 Q' _1 I1 Z W$ W, X9 g' v4 P; m# H
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
4 Q3 c, `9 @' X3 i. E4 I0 N: O
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
/ `- ? z+ ^; i
好認同 !!!
good point !( D8 N7 t k, K+ O. M8 S
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
6 ~. ~# Y1 H( a$ z
& E4 I f) K9 L( _, H0 r
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?- A0 I i/ _: h# a& }
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?" @: P# h1 b' O7 y3 R8 l
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事
( B, [2 T& M' m4 K- a
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?# w- b$ }3 m, D) l
' `0 C3 f# j; D/ \' `# |
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:
7 K% G1 e. f% ~6 V
出猫并唔係刑事的) g( C% H* Q- @& \1 B9 r. `) N
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:& P0 |/ |* c. ?2 ?
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢
咁都會有個網有d會考資料
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:
( A7 u6 @6 v- p
, }% h# V) a% ?7 g& h
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出/ w( d+ y0 f- E1 p0 Q
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:5 N0 p& X2 I0 |% [
; Q) o$ m2 k5 r8 m2 E; i; G' \6 `
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪% z) s0 t3 U* l9 U
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
2 y( A: F; Y$ m) E
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格8 E: N/ K& w1 p
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限7 e7 ^+ g! M* t) Q
* }- l s' y1 R: ]
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:
刑事係要舉證的
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:
8 O# x- ?$ q- ]. Q7 B" U
! B2 X' p% u0 B, M; {, V
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事0 z' I6 |) ~/ n7 g4 p0 ]' `" I
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:4 {$ X; V/ ~, W% f( @0 ~
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve, ' u" R4 {* U, t5 ^0 Y. r
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左! U9 {" X" { {" V- t3 s
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平3 c4 e' u( X" z7 a- }4 J9 Z
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
6 x: T, c. r, w7 k: o
4 o- W) p3 R. c1 Q
, A7 P3 ^- E4 {5 P/ r% t0 f1 ~
+ e/ f5 A6 H Q% ~
取消得一係就+曬
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:
; g% p# U3 v* ]. Y$ _$ J
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
3 b: I1 j& n! N7 [! @" ]8 G. e( L
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管7 H# i) V. w4 k7 _ L+ V& e( p- R6 P
3 u, F/ S; w4 |" J( ~
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM: x; a- a) v2 v: ?6 g
0 R7 u8 D9 Y( j8 [% N; Q; h' T
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:! p* @6 T8 Q8 Z: P) @) M5 c
0 u2 q! W2 ]9 x- f% ~# N
- E* X8 G: x! q. D
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法: q2 @: `( V! C! N; _
就係冇相關的
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案4 V1 u0 c% ]6 |% K
* ]9 x# {3 B1 D1 m# T
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:! a5 h8 ^$ u* N& b/ \8 g
q* F6 S( N5 @+ o! \& C
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:
. ~! U7 f+ z' g8 D0 g
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例( K3 [# v- ~/ k" c: e7 T* f
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:
5 w5 C9 x/ W3 l6 a( }
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
% w7 `, f3 Z5 T! t2 f. N" q/ V
' F" q( ]( `; P. P$ u ~+ ~4 S+ |- E, u
) @: o4 h* F7 L
我反反問% P6 a |( V) t Q9 U
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:1 z- A- U/ Y* T( Z
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:
重唔重考唔重要, b* L& U _" r. R+ P9 v
5 V: E+ w5 a* L0 z/ y
最緊要收到成績單之後* H3 y+ ] ]& Y
唔好又走出黎話. y5 n q/ g# y6 l# I( H
唔公平要重考0 C; v# Z1 I! G7 T/ ?; U
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:- ~# y9 M& d0 r1 ~
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇; R' o, B) z# N$ L6 Z: Z
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇" h* _) Q9 T# ?# w" D3 t
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:' D9 M8 J7 Z- L' Y! B
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:- r( u9 b, L- L
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
2 b1 @% R, {9 h
$ h" J3 Y. t8 I5 X
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:2 ^: `& N4 }2 r# h
i retake this year + Z- D' i% b* k* U6 D5 r
i really dun...
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |