
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:% y. N8 r* o( R! _- R9 d' H/ r3 b2 X
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:8 k. t5 P5 C% x }$ ~4 E' V
各位brother6 k' k, o; J5 N6 L$ M
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:* D, m* N5 g8 S2 e% l' P
一個市場有幾多個廁格?( D' I! o; |4 v q
1 g. h" M) c1 _3 Q
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:8 h- M1 w% D0 ^$ P# @- e; \
' i( y7 C1 e* X5 X3 H5 J7 U
好認同 !!!$ G& O- V) m- f$ m1 u+ I
good point !; N/ T* h, g5 }& y
! ~ [ i* o- N% e
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
$ n1 L. a. F* Q. F
! D: V u8 y1 N" z
一個市場有幾多個廁格?% g7 }6 R, K4 H4 I: q
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:+ [# @* D- x5 h: [/ }
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
! r* k/ ~$ ~! }
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?; m6 Q. c8 e/ y! C* a) p6 h
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?2 t7 {! _4 M7 y$ {# _* K
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事
7 I+ ^ \' K: T1 U7 f& L
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?9 @0 ?% ]# q% g- @$ V! D" p1 D
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:
5 ^* z6 }8 L% {3 W( b; \
: k7 J3 b, N% S% L) h
出猫并唔係刑事的
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:; N8 U1 p# ~1 D# q& T# O
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦7 k7 H# j9 Z8 P# J* i( T+ s
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格7 t- W2 a& o* ]( O" a
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢6 ?2 P8 C% v- n3 \1 i
咁都會有個網有d會考資料: ^% T# i w" `2 P6 m3 U
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:6 ~" t, a# U" V, I$ _* |
( O8 R2 R* Y2 v4 I% [. \
* _- \* P( p9 \
# r5 q( Q# g! P
考題係抄個網的9 W8 D0 t9 ?+ j, @
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪, p9 d* R) O+ [: P4 X/ H H9 T; J9 R
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
7 {3 M5 r# a; Z6 {8 F/ u3 \4 \
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格, I! e: ?( q3 M. z) v
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:
刑事係要舉證的( ^- B c0 ^, y* T
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:7 {! ^7 U$ A- @$ r, P9 @
1 W7 T6 P. N5 M9 Y$ H
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:% t* G" A0 U$ V+ y$ W, e5 @3 Y) w
你當香港冇王管咩7 [' L+ T4 \" c( M6 _7 Q
唔係刑事/ t; L0 S. j }2 p
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野0 R2 Z. s7 ]2 L+ e( {% {% h
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:) t: J0 M5 Q# c
$ s4 n9 F1 }" Y- x
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左* g0 \# t& U" f$ m8 p
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:1 i S% Z5 G7 R
8 h `* T; K2 n9 I& H* @7 l, P
) q6 [) T f( t d% K
取消得一係就+曬
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:- ?. n( Y( M4 A
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪5 [! c9 z) L; d6 Y0 x
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
1 E, _ {2 E& E9 J$ a
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分2 L! ?( J; d/ D+ n0 }
3 F' A% I3 d& z6 g5 |2 E6 D! J3 e
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:
% p- j2 c6 y, O/ O( k
- p( { i7 j9 G V! t
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪- I* x i' C5 c+ _1 z' V, e+ W
- E% V- |* ` u5 S( ]3 ?2 b
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法
就係冇相關的
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案9 d A" N2 A) }+ A
) J" _ w9 a9 ]+ r
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:
7 [+ r0 j) `! P0 `2 V/ o* F
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:, {& G4 c: l1 t1 J( r9 F/ Z# i
, ]5 B- y) p8 I
" R: t# y; v; Q, c5 G1 f
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例% u+ X ]: \' l4 g1 U5 J
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法 r" E9 z! V. H- k6 J$ T- Z5 W: {
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:* |7 \6 k# V+ L1 n, |( V4 \
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:1 I" R; F2 o4 u$ R' u8 @
我反反問3 w( S; W ]/ n% H0 \8 J
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:- h1 M. Z/ f+ H8 e. m7 n3 t8 h. a8 @ j
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:# y2 \9 r' f& [ j! o6 f
重唔重考唔重要
; e% q1 y4 {2 x$ g' v2 x' Q; m1 i
最緊要收到成績單之後
唔好又走出黎話
唔公平要重考
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇5 k# ~2 o1 M) ~
有左對策+ C7 r1 M. f; e) d0 x2 E
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:, c+ v5 i& [* ?/ J: t
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策5 B1 i/ [% `/ ]
各位brother睇睇$ R7 k' ~2 n8 q7 U. f3 H7 b! u
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:0 D* z& U- X2 C o
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:/ o7 e* g8 a c% k9 @& g
3 _( G& x4 e1 ]) Y1 S) D1 N
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:+ k2 F3 [* B/ d% Q3 }9 f9 }' O
i retake this year
5 N( n% _/ H" J9 }1 T; {, r
i really dun...
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |