娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 陳易希會考12分,應唔應該俾佢入U? [打印本頁]

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2006-8-21 09:57 PM 標題: 陳易希會考12分,應唔應該俾佢入U?

我覺得發明d野唔代表一切...考得唔好就連f.6都應該無得讀

作者: zxc3201163 時間: 2006-8-21 10:00 PM

觀星都可以入到u6 z" \* w' R6 g( t. K& Y0 ^
與其日日讀書
不如日日觀星算lu~~~

作者: iknow 時間: 2006-8-21 10:10 PM

去讀IVE lor...

作者: 963258 時間: 2006-8-21 10:11 PM

Originally posted by zxc3201163 at 2006-8-21 10:00 PM:
( f. S Q" K5 c7 |" F9 [觀星都可以入到u; r2 E* l3 I8 n& Y ?& Q0 R. P# L \
與其日日讀書
# x( Y7 j3 R! P4 o不如日日觀星算lu~~~

講得好 .......

作者: babo 時間: 2006-8-21 10:12 PM

查實會唔會因為科大一早已經收左佢...# ^; X, C: x, [' E# ?
果時科大拍晒心口話收佢-- `# l/ {4 f3 }: b
搞到佢無俾心機讀呢..2 w% {" @; |4 s8 Z. l
3 C' L6 g0 t5 C
睇段news,佢都有 1B1C--會唔會係phys. B左-.-

[ Last edited by babo on 2006-8-21 at 10:21 PM ]

作者: -o- 時間: 2006-8-21 10:23 PM

佢冇料既...遲早咪又係捱唔住...
有料既就真係應該比佢入喇....

作者: 火炎 時間: 2006-8-21 10:29 PM

求學不是求分數

作者: 周衡 時間: 2006-8-21 11:02 PM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 10:29 PM:- A( i/ k& w! y% M' s" S- Q
求學不是求分數

政府真係pk5 j9 f3 v5 r( @% Z P# o
唔求分數又點繼續求學呀

作者: zxc3201163 時間: 2006-8-21 11:07 PM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 10:29 PM:
/ y9 e3 l( T5 O求學不是求分數

+ K% |! p0 d! p: N6 _" j

佢連oral都唔去考
依種態度已經唔要得la

作者: seafireson2 時間: 2006-8-21 11:24 PM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 10:29 PM:$ J3 M. e$ }7 f# ^) H
求學不是求分數

$ |, ? k& t& [3 a. M
考試冇分冇前途

作者: JerryLee 時間: 2006-8-21 11:31 PM

我會考都好過他啦同人唔同命

作者: 'nice' 時間: 2006-8-21 11:46 PM

我覺得應該的,話曬佢都得過D世界性的獎項,9 p3 W) r* M; [0 A/ I
證明佢起某方面有佢的專長,% g) W$ p$ B! d1 S
如果係果個10歲的鋼琴天才入U,大家又覺得點呢?' p' H3 @* s) F& r9 O" G/ w" F
可能陳易希成日暴光,俾人又覺得有D臭串," d- B5 F3 F3 {) u# b: d
所以才覺得佢唔應該入U吧?( Y1 ?( i( p, b- W% [# K: j4 ^, g1 d
希望佢珍惜,努力啦!

作者: 會員仔 時間: 2006-8-21 11:56 PM

好應該丫...就算十二分又點?佢既成就就算比個十A都味必做得到...如果人材係用一個咁死板同唔實際既會考制度去評核的話..咁樣既人材只不過係形式上面做得好既人材而唔係有實際作用既人材2 S/ `7 O( [! I, B
香港係大把高分~但咁又點?又有幾多個有真正經世致用之才?

作者: 16749 時間: 2006-8-22 12:03 AM

求學不是求分數，0係lee度又唔係好岩~~
6 ` d" g3 J% }5 V( T9 p
佢跟本連入大學既基本要求都做唔到，學咩人入大學~~ A' N; [7 W e1 y: Z- a# ]
佢有拎獎，咁代表唔到佢真係勁wor~~

讀大學唔係去砌積木，佢可能識砌好多野出黎，但大學要求既係點樣會砌成咁，係theory~唔上practical~( E( M3 o7 P% _+ |) j, o

同埋佢依家咁樣...好易fail course lor~~咁一樣唔駛好耐就被人quit u~~

作者: carkent 時間: 2006-8-22 12:08 AM

正所謂行行出狀元,做事最緊要夠專,最怕事事半桶水!

作者: 阿感 時間: 2006-8-22 12:26 AM

Originally posted by skjeiw at 09:57 PM:
* R+ w6 m/ y, O/ |( P' B我覺得發明d野唔代表一切...考得唔好就連f.6都應該無得讀

會考更加唔代表d乜野,有d才能唔係人人有,雖然我唔知陳易希真正o既才能去到邊,不個大學收得佢唔會話冇原因o既

作者: novenber 時間: 2006-8-22 01:30 AM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 10:29 PM:
3 T7 J- X6 t) w% g求學不是求分數

# _0 c' m% ~7 ~7 S: n9 ]
. j$ i5 ]4 H: \9 m3 r  g" h3 [
咁個會考同中六/大學入學最低要求係咩意思3 e1 |  x! L6 ]3 c8 C4 E  F6 v. D
呢d就係求學不是求分數?????: `  H1 w$ V- W. F  G: x
求學不是求分數係o岩,但係香港唔適用; [3 e# v3 N; Y
係香港你唔求分數根本冇乜機會比你求學

作者: stockman 時間: 2006-8-22 05:26 AM

This is from Aug 22's 蘋果日報:

' 本報訊】有一顆行星以其名字命名、 早前獲科技大學破格取錄 的中華基督教會譚李麗芬紀念中學應屆會考生陳易希，昨日首度公開其中學會考成績，他僅得 12 分，中、英文科不及格，同得 F 級。陳易希承認，會考期間只顧  研究，未有專心應付考試，但認為求學不是求分數，未來會惡補語文。科大指，取錄陳易希不是  眼其學術成績， 9 月會安排陳入讀準備課程，相信可提升其語文能力 '

So he knew he would go to U no matter how bad he would do in 會考, and he even admitted he didin't study hard probably because of this.

I think typical Hong Kong testing standard can't and shouldn't apply to him because he's not a typical Hong Kong student.  99.9% of u-grads will go the typical route: get in U, learn something from the books whether they are useful or not in the real world, get the degree, and find a job.  I don't think he will go this route.  科大 will try to give him a lot of guidences and resources to 'dream big' and align companies to work with him to see he can come up with practical and commercized inventions.

If he's in the U.S., he might simply drop school and go start his business with venture capital $$.  He is probably wasting his time to 'play the test' game in Hong Kong, and I'm glad he didn't have to do it.- k1 o7 c3 A" n- m1 c; I# ~& p
6 _7 W* g- k$ r! b" p* n; q# b

Originally posted by novenber at 2006-8-22 01:30 AM:% u" M4 K- M3 r4 r' S
2 [+ G4 V' k Z+ P G* U& E
: K0 n9 O' F2 a. I& p
2 t3 r0 N/ k) j2 K! ]
咁個會考同中六/大學入學最...

作者: 自由神 時間: 2006-8-22 09:36 AM

有一顆行星以其名字命名、早前獲科技大學破格取錄的中華基督教會譚李麗芬紀念中學應屆會考生陳易希，昨日首度公開其中學會考成績，他僅得 12 分，中、英文科不及格，同得 F 級。陳易希承認，會考期間只顧  研究，未有專心應付考試，但認為求學不是求分數，未來會惡補語文。科大指，取錄陳易希不是  眼其學術成績， 9 月會安排陳入讀準備課程，相信可提升其語文能力 '

  }( C3 `" H, ]' a" `0 Y) ^
只顧  研究？研究佢o個粒星呀！收皮啦！發明粒星出黎研究！; ~3 @5 _% q- ]# _& }) C
研究下點樣先完成到大學課程好過啦！

作者: 155220 時間: 2006-8-22 10:02 AM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 22:29:$ W; U4 n& |: X$ R4 e% z6 _
求學不是求分數

而是求學位

作者: 155220 時間: 2006-8-22 10:03 AM

俾佢讀都未必有用，因為佢可能無能力去完成大學課程

作者: pangpang2066 時間: 2006-8-22 10:40 AM

其實都預左佢成績唔會好. 如果係你, 有大學一早收左你, 你都會放懶啦.9 [" o3 T& Z+ b: D& x+ ^
0 a1 C% S6 J# M# L; L0 P6 ~
根據本人於該校任教的朋友所講, 佢返學就等於人地返大學做research, 佢係唔駛上0個d正規既堂, 全職去研究, 仲有lab既人做助手. 另外, 由於佢本身英文好差, 佢出d論文都係搵老師做鎗手, 唔係佢自己做.: @4 ^0 y4 q* T- ^" q8 B- U6 ]
* a$ N. d6 S& D3 V
所以可以話係佢全部香港人出錢請d老師同lab助理去谷出黎既新星.

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2006-8-22 01:14 PM

Originally posted by 阿感 at 2006-8-22 12:26 AM:7 q( [) y# w6 D3 Q0 E

6 r+ h, J( V% b! t/ i' E. ~ j: t會考更加唔代表d乜野,有d才能唔係人人有,雖然我唔知陳易希真正o既才能去到邊,不個大學收得佢唔會話冇原因o既

( q5 k, r+ f$ e7 G
) S$ i3 @! R0 t h' D
咁個個都係讀到書先有得讀大學架啦5 @6 J7 `4 a! p8 m- s/ c
佢連入中六14分都無...我理得佢其他邊樣勁

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2006-8-22 01:15 PM

Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-8-22 10:40 AM:1 R4 [ u4 | q9 U8 I/ `
其實都預左佢成績唔會好. 如果係你, ...

9 |( m( `9 R) f
都唔係中英文唔合格掛

作者: bigfish 時間: 2006-8-22 01:17 PM

我想問佢做乜咁出名o既?- T! @% t7 u8 ?, J
發明左d 咩呀?

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2006-8-22 01:22 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-8-22 01:17 PM:( y$ v' Q/ |' H
我想問佢做乜咁出名o既?0 k9 F- ^/ _1 @% I; R
發明左d 咩呀?

: z9 V+ v! b% {" [8 L
唔知發明左d乜,跟住仲有粒星用佢個名黎命名,仲比科大收左f.5之後就入大學

作者: ronald001120 時間: 2006-8-22 02:41 PM

入到u佢知味道

作者: sexysexy 時間: 2006-8-22 03:11 PM

佢咁細個發明咗智能機械人, 你地又識唔識呀, 會考囉30分又會唔會砌得出呀, 佢既學術咪係physic 囉, 佢連大學要學既電路設計, logic gate, 寫入rom 既programming language 都已經識喇, 只係差在語文方面者, 並唔係有粒星就入得u, 你估科大傻架
( ` i- _* P* F7 @' T A1 y# h
都唔明點解要話人地會考差, 就唔應該入u, 你地呢啲咪自己睇少自己囉, 仲有如果俾你地choose, 你會為咗考oral 而放棄去加州大學做research 既機會嗎, 大家知少少就係到......, 真係笑死人喇

作者: queenly 時間: 2006-8-22 06:27 PM

香港既考試根本無法反映一個學生真正既能力, 香港考試制度極度迂腐, 難度考試考得差就可以話一個學生是無能嗎？

作者: shingshing1234 時間: 2006-8-22 07:10 PM

可能小第見識少...' O/ ^) v2 d" Z) \& J" ]$ K* C
我就唔覺得給佢入 low....講真..會考30分or above no al .這個方法都算可行...但係給一個12分既中5生...一次過 jump左2年..直接去到大學....我覺得全香港又唔係得佢一個會咁既發明啊.觀星啊之類,,..點解科大會咁有信心去給佢入呢..而且個校長講...大學d course係給 d 思想成熟既人讀.....他應該想想自己係唔係夠咁既能力去應付大學既野...個人認為..應該在下面努力多一下...咁樣對自己都有幫助~人生練歷都多d 啊~咁樣上大學..我怕只係...給他更多既挫折...難切係好事 low

作者: bigfish 時間: 2006-8-23 02:10 AM

Originally posted by sexysexy at 2006-8-22 03:11 PM:( A/ o$ B8 @( Q9 N* X% j; E
佢咁細個發明咗智能機械人, 你地又識...

/ S1 y' |2 y# \& @5 q5 K, e
咩係智能機械人? 希望個 product match 返個 product name 啦

作者: samuria 時間: 2006-8-23 02:03 PM

Originally posted by queenly at 2006-8-22 06:27 PM:
2 b) }# ^1 U; _香港既考試根本無法反映一個學生真正既能力, 香港考試制度極度迂腐, 難度考試考得差就可以話一個學生是無能嗎？

Of course no exam system can prove one's ability in full picture
But now, he has no proven for his ability for entering university0 K! N8 G% `3 ~8 h6 R! T
Language subjects are all failed

How come he can communicate in depth with others in English?

作者: YingTung 時間: 2006-8-23 06:38 PM

Originally posted by sexysexy at 2006-8-22 03:11 PM:
0 Y! j% Z! |6 u! [# Y0 ^$ M佢咁細個發明咗智能機械人, 你地又識...

% a T9 [9 O: a4 S; S+ R: D& s
$ `# F7 B" V$ J2 D% V) M, i
其實好多人唔鐘意佢既原因係佢好鬼串,扮哂天才。4 M$ u3 e5 i8 q% @4 K4 D
唔知你有無睇佢本新書,佢入面張張相都真係好扮野,
o的序仲要話到自己係明星。, c" W9 }8 |+ R. `" j
書既內容仲不知所謂,左抄右抄,o的小實驗全部o係其他書搵到哂。

無可否認,佢的確對科學有一定認識,但最憎佢一樣野係佢自以為是。
會考衰左如果佢自己認錯,認唔夠努力,我地會原諒同明白。
但佢竟然白痴到搵籍口話掛住研究,好似錯不在他咁......。
呢類人真係唔值得人幫住佢。

作者: YingTung 時間: 2006-8-23 06:40 PM

再者,科大似係做下show俾人睇, j! P4 q, g5 {/ l: k0 |
證明自己比其他大學更能做到求學不是求分數。
對於陳易希...似係呢場show既棋子。

作者: pigcat 時間: 2006-8-23 10:26 PM

其實我覺得好多人都眼紅佢...
) H0 K: @2 r( Y5 Z5 J3 [# X' e
如果真係好似某d人話就咁觀下星就入到u
咁佢咪去試下做第2個陳易希lor" d8 K; d* M5 k0 f2 ~

科大咁做得就有佢ge原因. [! S0 }& N% j. N' R. N
就連科大自己都主動邀請..
其他人又眼紅黎做咩呢??5 `" c3 U* j/ x% J3 e( Q
" H6 X: J' Z0 w+ }3 @
可能呢位陳小朋友真係有才華
而既然有u賞識佢1 t" g: I$ a0 ]' n. q
點解唔可能直升上去jei??
* d& Y @* h+ G/ ~
d人成日批評香港教育制度死板...咩只係識學生死讀書# M7 l7 L: @7 l0 k8 e+ m) o
又批評會考一戰定生死等等
咁而家有個人可以唔同於正常傳統途徑入u
但係又有人唔知出於咩心態去反對% p; K: L; h- \# B5 \, i& `
呢個真係好矛盾..

作者: loklok117 時間: 2006-8-23 11:23 PM

我支持

- x T& q* g q1 P4 H
我都有考過會考
8科8A,A-LEVLE4A,5A我都見過
讀得書叻唔代表成就一定高

: Y0 Z' C- n8 [- h% s
最重要對社會在貢獻
9 ^! h* M5 r/ H: f- h F5 U4 d
老套講個例子
李嘉誠有邊個唔識5 B: D9 _0 e( Q) g' s2 L
佢既成就有目共睹
佢讀好多書咩?

- Q/ e2 Q; l- Q9 ]5 ^- P
發達前有好多大學學位?

: E" B y, @1 g% Y; d
3 ^" u) S- N/ F/ \
反觀而家好多大學生畢業後 Z( O7 t& m$ y7 v
讀完一個學位再讀一個學位! s4 a5 ?8 Q+ v. j- q
重唔知自己有咩想做,有咩目標

可能今年有份會考既考生
覺得好唔公平
但問自己一句你有咩理想?

畢業後有咩目標計劃?

升到中六,大學會唔會有佢一樣既成就貢獻

作者: stockman 時間: 2006-8-24 03:40 AM

To my surprise most people don't think 陳易希 deserves to go to U with only 12 points from the HKCEE.  I don't know how many of them are out of jealousy and how many of them truly worry about how he can handle life in U.

I wondered how many of those who objected are currently in U or have already graduated from U?  An A student in high school may help him do well in U, but an A student in U doesn't always lead to a good future when he enters the real business world.  Of course it all depends on what you studies.  You definitely need to be a good student studying Medicine or Laws to become a good doctor or lawyer.  But how about Business majors?  How about Political Science?  An A student in Marketing makes this U grad a good sales person?
! U+ w  S: k# [6 ?# |( ]
The HK government tries so hard to convince its people that learning is not about tests and scores, but the truth is scores very much determine everything.  From what I read 陳易希 has learned and achieved so much outside of the classroom and those not covered in the syllabus and exams.  This is reported in Aug 22's 蘋果日報:. w5 w* b, z; Y, p" o
; T: h( V$ m  Z3 d
'陳易希在暑假遠赴美國加州理工學院參與火星研究期間，在大學宿舍認識了一名巴基斯坦裔同房，後來得悉他妹妹曾遇上交通意外而終身癱瘓，只有一隻手指可以活動；陳易希遂與學院的同學合力發明單指操作的電腦輸入裝置，讓她可藉此與外界聯繫。陳易希昨日說，同房的妹妹現已開始使用該裝置，操作順利。他計劃把裝置運來香港展出。'

Now do you think this is a greater achievement or having 9 or 10 As for HKCEE?  Which one has a bigger impact to the society?  If going to U helps prepare a person for the future and contribute to the society, do you think what he did during the this summer is a great contribution?  How many U grad or even PhD can do what he did?
- u* q3 O$ ~( B$ x7 j/ ?, z
What I try to say is by typical standard, meaning based strictly on test results many more people are more deserving than 陳易希 to go to U.  But he's not a typical student and he has already achieved a lot in his young life.  He deserves special treatment and should be admitted to U.  In any society, special people always get special treatment -- so no need to complain 'it's not fair'.  They may be smarter or work harder and they earn the right to be treated differently.  When many students use their spare time on Karaoke, movies, playing sports, YouTube, MySpace, or even 26FUN, 陳易希 probably spent his time on his next invention and missed all that fun.  Is it fair?

From what I read I believe he'll move to U.S. to further his study in a few years.  The HK government should feel sorry to see him leave, but I think under the current environment in HK 陳易希 won't maximize his potential.  Hopefully he will return to HK after he finishes study in the U.S.

作者: cgdmzlam 時間: 2006-8-24 04:48 PM

我覺得佢未必可以應付大學既課程8 v* d3 S+ b2 `9 h; X* U) o
佢除左有小小小聰明) ~! G1 t. K ~6 d+ h( Z5 i
我覺得佢邊度勁~!~~~~~~
我覺得比果d10優既狀元直升大學都好過叫佢升大學讀~~~
唉~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 j. ^% _' N2 y* G& }2 }- s$ a

無咁大個頭就唔好帶咁大頂帽啦~~~~~~~~

作者: skjeiw 時間: 2006-8-24 07:29 PM

Originally posted by cgdmzlam at 2006-8-24 04:48 PM:
8 v$ I1 p, [. a# j我覺得佢未必可以應付大學既課程' A( M6 `! t; ]! E
佢...

科大笠落佢個頭je

作者: zxc3201163 時間: 2006-8-24 11:15 PM

Originally posted by pigcat at 2006-8-23 10:26 PM:
( J% D* y/ C9 a- `, h其實我覺得好多人都眼紅佢...% m" [9 o# T& D1 K* L& S
+ I9 x0 g% o& P, x; B8 J
如果...

2 f0 N) {5 `+ ]
& Q' J. c" i. b) |% C
如果我知觀星都會入到u ge+ }+ L/ g1 ]6 c8 \& ^4 b
我一早就做左la~~~
佢連英文口試都唔去考呀# V4 r5 u& f4 F% _$ e. U8 K
咁ge學習態度都可以比佢入u, y- W9 e: C) `# G
我真係好無言

作者: pigcat 時間: 2006-8-25 01:03 AM

Originally posted by zxc3201163 at 2006-8-24 11:15 PM:
; }6 g# l0 Z& q6 v" `1 @, s: H" V1 F$ D: y
8 n% [$ |& z1 e( d. X
# l. G( M3 F$ W3 ~8 X7 z7 S
如果我知觀星都會入到u ge
& k/ j4 y6 S# L7 g; _8 w我一早就做左la~~~
' M0 c$ [2 ?/ L% x佢連英文口試都唔去考呀
0 |7 T' ?5 g7 c# ]4 `, s3 o咁ge學習態度都可以比佢入u% G, b& t3 p a+ k {! c! j
我真係好無言

做=/= 做到

作者: newman2005 時間: 2006-8-25 01:50 AM

既然講到佢做研究咁叻, 咁佢唔駛讀u都得啦!
其實當初科大點解唔係俾個conditional offer佢而係直接收佢入u呢?
咁人地講到明收硬佢咯, 重駛乜俾心機考會考呢? (俾你都未必會啦!)

有B又有C但只係得12分?? 咁其他科真係好極有限 ... 稍為有讀吓書都唔會考成咁啦!
不過佢連中英文都可以fail的話, 佢o係大學果幾年相信都好難捱 ....

作者: fung 時間: 2006-8-25 07:26 PM

冇錯,
佢有B,C都淨係得12分! _' j. \$ H' @4 K0 n/ Z
其他科真係......
而且仲要中英文fail
0 U* n4 H) D5 N
你可以話求學不是求分數
但係呢個絕對唔係一個用黎掩飾佢連oral都唔考, 中英文都fail ge理由
(即使中文到今年都仲係重課文理解)
咁英文呢?
冇野好背la掛?即使你唔識d補習班教ge skills, 但係只要你有好basic ge英文水平
一定唔會fail
* c+ M; l4 `; f$ t1 U) d5 x$ Z
佢係識發明# K5 t7 h! I1 ~- u
冇錯係叻, 但係都唔代表佢可以連CE英文都肥, oral都唔考就入U

作者: zxc3201163 時間: 2006-8-25 10:03 PM

Originally posted by pigcat at 2006-8-25 01:03 AM:/ W" C% _ c$ ?7 C

9 u4 S0 m3 R m4 v7 B8 {$ e A做=/= 做到

: l' `8 U4 T( P, S/ d* J" E
唔做過又點知做唔到

作者: garfieldkeane 時間: 2006-8-26 04:00 AM

我覺得科大見佢o甘紅先收佢...

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-8-26 06:35 PM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 10:29 PM:
' P. k1 W; k3 |, a/ Q0 m求學不是求分數

, H# a" B% P0 }
求學只是求分數！！！求分只為求工作！！！求工只為求金錢！！！求錢只為求夢想！！！

作者: 自由神 時間: 2006-8-26 06:36 PM

Originally posted by Kian76 at 2006-8-26 06:35 PM:2 `4 S6 T* E! p8 k9 U6 }

# P( {* [9 S% E1 p求學只是求分數！！！求分只為求工作！！！求工只為求金錢！！！求錢只為求夢想！！！

# p0 C; K6 h5 n) n# u7 J
求錢只為求夢想！！！當真嗎？Kian76兄？

作者: cgdmzlam 時間: 2006-8-26 09:24 PM

一句說話講晒
有錢點都好過無錢
有錢好多時咩都得
我覺得有錢又唔駛做野~( I( H! U7 L7 E7 U0 N! X
咁樣最正~~~~~~~~~~
可以享受無憂無慮既人生~~~~~~~^^7 i( w' r6 Y& r) ^& ^1 }+ y

我日日都發夢自己可以中六合彩嫁!!. {1 n( x6 d# T e' t
呵呵~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

想到癡左!!! 家陣真係想到雙失青年啦~!

作者: cgdmzlam 時間: 2006-8-26 09:27 PM

無書讀  無野做唔單止仲無收入先最慘 !~!
希忘大家有分出分有前出前  有後出後 ! V% G7 R" V( z* ]5 s
捐d  "drink" 比細妹

作者: pigcat 時間: 2006-8-26 09:38 PM

Originally posted by zxc3201163 at 2006-8-25 10:03 PM:
* A# _* {: C P6 P/ V, t. b& V! W) Q7 T; Y

& N5 j' r' z9 z唔做過又點知做唔到

7 n# k! w+ L8 A4 s
你咪試下

做到上左電視記住
講句︰「26fun ge巴打們，我做到啦！」3 W7 c8 g. M+ u' w
0 ?5 J& ?- A% ` O
等你

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-8-26 11:33 PM

Originally posted by 自由神 at 2006-8-26 06:36 PM:# q2 Q/ p w: q5 u

* D0 p( U0 |" j5 O2 u求錢只為求夢想！！！當真嗎？Kian76兄？

' Q2 S4 c# i3 W& ~" {: d
好多夢想都係建基於金錢之上，極少數唔係。最起碼你要有令你專心夢想甚至達成夢想的金錢。
& ^1 I& n/ L$ p! t' s6 Y
夢想係乜就人人唔同，我本人就係做老板、娶靚老婆、美滿家庭。一個非常正常既夢想，但冇錢就肯定無法達成。' k3 D' B0 x9 ~- v8 k4 T' f
! C {4 M. J3 A: u3 T
就算你既夢想只係去中國旅行，一樣要用到錢呢樣野啦。
& G- W2 B6 q8 s2 b7 \
[ Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-8-26 at 11:37 PM ]

作者: 雪代緣 時間: 2006-8-27 04:45 PM

睇下今日太陽報
所謂佢發明0既機械人, \) D9 C( I- x6 p+ i. c
早在2003年出現左
應唔應該入....
就真係見仁見智啦

作者: 遊戲 時間: 2006-8-27 06:41 PM

中文都唔合格

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-8-27 07:32 PM

Originally posted by 遊戲 at 2006-8-27 06:41 PM:, \% K* F% \+ P) ^- N: X; _
中文都唔合格

% N9 W! v( Z a
唉。

作者: butbut 時間: 2006-8-28 07:39 AM

時間證明一切,大約一年之後就會知佢應唔應該入

作者: elvisfong2003 時間: 2006-8-28 09:12 PM

今日去到屯門卓爾居個時見到陳易希,真人同上鏡都差唔多姐!!近來網民對佢好多意見,話佢無資格入大學,講真,一個人係唔係單要睇一次會考成績去決定佢既前途,人地又有好多其他方面既成就,係唔係可以完全唔理?如果係單單用學術一方面去評定一個人,未免睇得太窄。既然人地係科學研究有一定既成績,點解唔可以比個機會人地?再講,我諗係會考既制度之下真係出左多死讀書既人,所以好多人至會有咁既心態!究竟網民係用客觀既態度去睇成件事定唔抵得既心態去諗多d呢??

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-8-28 09:54 PM

Originally posted by elvisfong2003 at 2006-8-28 09:12 PM:
?! j" y+ I) V2 @, o+ G今日去到屯門卓爾居個時見到陳易希,真...

7 m9 c( H3 g% F- W# P }7 |
成績係基本條件，連基本條件都末能達標，學乜人講才能？？

作者: cream 時間: 2006-8-28 10:58 PM

陳易希在暑假遠赴美國加州理工學院參與火星研究期間，在大學宿舍認識了一名巴基斯坦裔同房，後來得悉他妹妹曾遇上交通意外而終身癱瘓，只有一隻手指可以活動；陳易希遂與學院的同學合力發明單指操作的電腦輸入裝置，讓她可藉此與外界聯繫。陳易希昨日說，同房的妹妹現已開始使用該裝置，操作順利。他計劃把裝置運來香港展出。'
" Z, l7 P# q- `) C
Doubt if it is anything new. Stephen Hawking is using similar thing for a long time already!8 ]4 ~' O3 a: w* Z5 m3 c1 h. |
May just "improve" or "edit" the current design.
, W" x% Q; Z J- E
2) don't think he gets in because of astronomy..The stars is not discovered by him.
Just somebody else name it for him I think??(correct me if I am wrong)0 ~4 l! r$ q3 f/ _5 a
what he has done is made a robot.& c6 Q& O+ D& i# b; B- L/ \

3) Yes, he should be exceptional case, but there is a boundary/limit to which he should be admitted.0 `+ r- v5 u) p- k7 ]& M
He don't need to be AAA, but still a pass in language and the minimum requirement to get into F.6 (14 points) seem reasonable to ask.; @; y/ ^1 H R% v
and you need to write paper and communicate with others when doing research etc,& j) D& A2 }: i
so I would say it is too fast for him to get into u.
If you get pass in language and 14 points, then I would say yes,
but now it is a NO-NO. 4 H' U* l! ]4 H6 J0 b, w' ~

Now, it just seem to me like an inflated ego (who don't even go to oral) and a university doing SHOW business, which would probably ruin a talent at the end.

作者: 155220 時間: 2006-8-29 10:04 AM

Originally posted by 遊戲 at 2006-8-27 18:41:
. J$ W) T1 f, N# D) B中文都唔合格

5 l; _' s7 y, J0 k0 W7 ^, ^2 S; h
中文都應該幾難嫁

作者: littlenic 時間: 2006-8-29 12:34 PM

同樓上幾位朋友類似，如果因為知道已經有大學收佢，而會考就懶散，連oral都唔去考，咁ge學習態度就有D問題lor。之後仲要以掛住研究為會考成績差ge理由，我覺得咁ge態度唔係好得lor。

作者: zxc3201163 時間: 2006-8-30 02:36 AM

Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-8-29 10:04 AM:
1 U+ c" D* r* S
& H, c% n: i' c: Q0 K9 [
4 f/ v7 f* @& j) t3 s2 ?# y0 y! d中文都應該幾難嫁

0 p$ N3 u+ y( a; \
我冇溫都合格la=.=
有幾難???

作者: ＬＵ 時間: 2006-8-30 06:30 PM

我唔介意佢唔考高考都有得上ust，但ce中英文要考返pass先囉

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2006-8-30 11:15 PM

Originally posted by ＬＵ at 2006-8-30 06:30 PM:
- F; f& ?4 g- O# Y; O" G4 m我唔介意佢唔考高考都有得上ust，但ce中英文要考返pass先囉

佢果間係中中,唔強求英文啦,中文pass都好呀

作者: 路西法 時間: 2006-8-31 05:07 AM

Originally posted by loklok117 at 2006-8-23 11:23 PM:$ I* _$ r( j8 C. ]. q
我支持) l8 } D: b @( c# x
我都有考過會考# Q9 b# h+ |4 h& v2 r# x
8科8A...

請問佢貢獻左d乜野俾社會?

作者: 路西法 時間: 2006-8-31 05:13 AM

Originally posted by YUEN_LOUIS at 2006-8-30 11:15 PM:0 v9 ?5 e5 h! A3 \, K4 [3 y

3 G2 v p2 v4 t/ U- S佢果間係中中,唔強求英文啦,中文pass都好呀

% i/ ~! z' I8 w1 T4 ^0 s
佢報syllabus a ja wor...
syllabus a 都唔合格

$ }4 w6 W: q- i" M
4 g$ i# E# } D' {+ T: Y$ w
同埋都已經唔係咁簡單係學習態度0 i3 N6 V/ ]1 j7 Q) Q
而係佢gei 人生態度
會考，無錯係好差gei 考試制度，但係佢係一個中五學生gei 責任
就算考0分個d人唔讀書，至少佢都有走去center 裏面坐) _% H! A7 Q9 ?2 `8 p
但係佢話自己為左研究，而唔去考oral 的話，未而有點兒那個

作者: buengland 時間: 2006-8-31 10:29 AM

Originally posted by 火炎 at 2006-8-21 22:29:
' `' H* t0 b( {$ u9 d求學不是求分數

你學得好, 自然有好的分數
" d* x$ E) t, \2 S r6 m/ W' |
無錯吾係求分數, 但分數係一個指標, 顯示你學習得好吾好

吾通你econ 得20分會考攞f , 你夠膽講你自己精通經濟咩???????? ! U. V. o: a: G1 o. l2 M* m _
- H$ b, D6 h6 t5 ~

不過都有1-2%人係病態追分狂, 無一兩分好似要死咁, 呢啲就吾駛咁誇張,

作者: buengland 時間: 2006-8-31 10:36 AM

Originally posted by 路西法 at 2006-8-31 05:13:! f3 I% g2 a0 w) [9 V4 [( n; n

) U8 o5 n* _( }2 ], ]; u7 r佢報syllabus a ja wor...- o/ T, `8 X- W/ u3 ^: [ d
syllabu...

9 M) R( O# {, S3 `- R1 q* o) h# D; P

syllabus a 都failed??????????????????????????????????????????????+ t& R8 D5 g3 d+ _( d# F/ q9 O

咁真係好打有限, 入大學睇段書都包佢睇吾明, 無一定既語文能力, 你入到大學都好多問題
點解? 就算你係愛因斯坦, 你都要將你既見解研究著書立說, 去conference 做演講, 嚟sell 你既發現# q* ^4 o& v4 Y5 \" c) U I( M
. _3 `) [! F$ i; }7 ^3 J
如果你語文能力差到咁, 講野, 寫野言語不通, 就算你研究到日本人點解咁咸濕, 你都無能力講得明人你既研究

作者: jeff_0930 時間: 2006-8-31 10:54 AM

我覺得香港人自己根本係好矛盾, 成日話考試制度問題多多, 但陳易希一事大家又話佢based on考試制度下唔掂, 點解d人可以用一個自己都覺得有問題既基礎作標準, 如果d人係要講12分而唔應該入U, 根本係自打咀巴
另一方面, 好多人話佢為左研究唔去考試......但試問你自己可唔可以為左研究連飯都唔食呢? 你連食飯咁普通既野都放唔低, 人地就考試咁重要都可以唔考, 人地可以為研究而研究, even連而家d 大學生master doctor都係為錢而研究, 而完全忽略科學既精神, 每個人都被功利所影響, 人家仲可以保持科學既精神, 你應該感到自愧不如 (點解仲想間接地destroy科學既精神)...點解我地對住個考試制度仲要墨守成規, 仲要以責任一詞去令自己退步2 ~& ^+ f I- t) d
你可以講點解佢可以入, 其他天才唔得…其實上呢個係講luck, 冇可能每個有天分既人可以入U, 只得小部份可以…呢個係luck, 咁好彩有心遇到 (一隻好馬都需要好既trainer , 否則只係一隻普通馬)1 E. N- A- z$ j) M" H F" s; O
lastly, Paul Chu收佢係因為政治問題, 一方面係挑戰多年來係廢柴考試制度, 另一方面係挑戰尖子政策

[ Last edited by jeff_0930 on 2006-8-31 at 11:15 AM ]

作者: 路西法 時間: 2006-8-31 12:15 PM

Originally posted by jeff_0930 at 2006-8-31 10:54 AM:
T0 y% Z" L. g9 |$ }+ G; V我覺得香港人自己根本係好矛盾, 成日話考試制度問題多多, 但陳易希一事大家又話佢based on考試制度下唔掂, 點解d人可以用一個自己都覺得有問題既基礎作標準, 如果d人係要講12分而唔應該入U, 根本係自打咀巴! b4 ?0 Z- Y9 U b' t
另一方面, 好多人話佢為左研究唔去考試......但試問你自己可唔可以為左研究連飯都唔食呢? 你連食飯咁普通既野都放唔低, 人地就考試咁重要都可以唔考, 人地可以為研究而研究, even連而家d 大學生master doctor都係為錢而研究, 而完全忽略科學既精神, 每個人都被功利所影響, 人家仲可以保持科學既精神, 你應該感到自愧不如 (點解仲想間接地destroy科學既精神)...點解我地對住個考試制度仲要墨守成規, 仲要以責任一詞去令自己退步你可以講點解佢可以入, 其他天才唔得…其實上呢個係講luck, 冇可能每個有天分既人可以入U, 只得小部份可以…呢個係luck, 咁好彩有心遇到 (一隻好馬都需要好既trainer , 否則只係一隻普通馬)
+ ?5 M# D3 b$ k: Vlastly, Paul Chu收佢係因為政治問題, 一方面係挑戰多年來係廢柴考試制度, 另一方面係挑戰尖子政策 # i" ^: p8 t4 N) q7 f6 B$ G

2 ~/ h1 @9 c* O% F( B

唔受功利影響，咁就唔好應承俾人出書，楊利偉黎個陣就唔駛搞水火箭/ i$ D9 A' U/ x, N
咁你講法，即係天才可以唔駛負責任la，考你一個試要你幾耐?考一個試足以令到一個人退步起黎?之真係差個少少就搞到個研究全盤失敗? 可能我呢d 凡人了解唔到la，我都未做過研究，不過我唔似d 人無左一兩個鐘就會退步晒咁樣

作者: 路西法 時間: 2006-8-31 12:23 PM

Originally posted by buengland at 2006-8-31 10:36 AM:% O. q& e5 Z1 ^1 F4 Z+ S
k; O) Z- l7 f/ q+ P/ ^
* `$ Q0 C& f. m
syllabus a 都failed????????????...

係呀syllabus a 都failed7 {3 g9 r+ U7 N- {" C5 X
2 u, S! g6 A8 `3 r
算la，你咁講因住又俾人話la，中英水平可以提升，有乜問題呀? 做研究咪做研究lor，駛乜中英文wor?

作者: super168 時間: 2006-9-13 03:32 PM

中、英文科都不及格,大學要用英文授課,聽唔明,睇唔懂,浪費時間
6 r, X4 P; w1 D3 {1 b l
發明家唔係大曬,如果係就冇人讀書,個個學生去做發明家,做得好就有大學讀

作者: 呀俊 時間: 2006-9-15 06:54 PM

假設對白7 r3 u6 w2 t& \" V2 Q
陳易希:會考生衰十一也不用坐監,為什麼我12分不能入大學?

[ Last edited by 呀俊 on 2006-9-15 at 07:03 PM ]

作者: benson00 時間: 2006-9-16 05:15 AM

憎人富貴，厭人貧，眼紅別人成就，又何必！？
若然陳易希將來的大學成績不濟，校方會讓他畢業嗎？

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-9-16 12:55 PM

Originally posted by jeff_0930 at 2006-8-31 10:54 AM:
1 ]% c6 Y5 x- c) h我覺得香港人自己根本係好矛盾, 成日...

我為左研究女性既身體、反應、社交技巧，會考期間不斷去獵艷，結果會考(第一次)唔係好掂，雖然不致於差過佢，但都升唔倒大學，真係奇。

作者: karenmoe 時間: 2006-9-16 04:27 PM

Originally posted by Kian76 at 2006-9-16 12:55 PM:. f( q* S/ f# o s6 y5 P
- F5 l$ Z+ m7 o4 y

" r' s9 w. g8 m我為左研究女性既身體、反應、社交技巧，會考期間不斷去獵艷，結果會考(第一次)唔係好掂，雖然不致於差過佢，但都升唔倒大學，真係奇。

/ G! l; ^0 T! ]& r, `; R2 U
因為你溝唔到大學校長個女,無獎攞無成就,所以大學唔收你
但請不要放棄,將目標定為諾貝爾個女
溝到佢你就有諾貝爾獎啦

作者: Kian76 時間: 2006-9-17 11:15 AM

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2006-9-16 04:27 PM:# }- p1 E& Z7 q- R# ?( i, h) x
* Y5 k2 p, P: }( r
因為你溝唔到大學校長個女,無獎攞無成就,所以大學唔收你
9 ~( v& [9 y- X: V# ]但請不要放棄,將目標定為諾貝爾個女
1 p# A" _; K n. W溝到佢你就有諾貝爾獎啦

5 c5 s' B+ v1 y) g b8 S1 y0 I
點樣搵佢？？哈哈！！！老實講，死左末架佢？？哈哈！！

作者: 心亙 時間: 2006-10-24 01:18 PM

中英文都唔合格,憑什麼讀大學???

作者: delete 時間: 2007-3-22 01:54 AM

死好命, 畢到業先算啦

作者: 水仙 時間: 2007-3-22 04:28 PM

最緊要佢有冇讀大學既能力7 _# ~& x( s) h5 y) G; Y( u
冇既去到大學都冇用~5 u. }# U* [5 }+ x

我有個女性同學就係個例子
佢因為有D事由 ABCD (A最勁 D 最cheap) 中既C班入左去A班. Q  c6 N% z8 C) q) a
去到A班又點??佢個底根本就唔係A班底第二年未又係最 A班去返D 班2 h) R! r1 G, b( H  Q
  [9 e' r5 ~6 h$ f3 z: b
所以你有能力既讀大學應該冇咩問題既  但係我唔清楚佢啦  不過睇佢會考12分  ! B# B* f7 A9 k7 L3 d* B; A/ e
可以知道

作者: hkchanhei123 時間: 2007-3-30 09:53 AM

唔應該!!!!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/)