
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:3 x" `! Z) \2 [* E( n
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??# _4 A% q0 ?, R& P% Q- t
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
* K* v7 c; d# F" S* z7 U! U
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出3 E" K! r0 d$ E5 N/ p X7 L' L
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持0 q% V' L8 Y9 W1 Y
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??( r4 t3 f8 d$ t% r1 J& z E
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:4 R0 P/ K* N: r4 F) }1 V' D- f* J
0 y+ C' P* W; ]% y1 T7 @
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:+ a' G, [5 D" V
4 p, B! M' I, C x4 \5 }
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:* S% P/ h5 ?/ e3 i6 ^2 Y3 M& q
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:- v- N8 c9 ~" i
同意紅字哥part
# h! q2 P4 i: k$ b
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
, h( |% i; b5 s& d& H! X" A
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:$ P( n9 [+ _% V6 N, {& j) _! j
# z1 J. \ Z0 M% B( s) W$ A, q8 F/ Q
同意紅字哥part2 r6 h, `" d0 R
* M8 h" A+ s! \" k, g: I! l5 o
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:1 f: ~) w1 K4 F
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:+ I- ?$ U1 e6 ~' G) U
0 V2 V& M1 D& l) G
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:$ u3 z1 _( k: ~; P
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:9 \6 E* s, _4 R8 a
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:1 W6 k0 o- n0 g9 J) @& B/ @
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:: H7 ^& P, a4 b. l
& k# c5 ]: y: O- Y, [, \
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。6 Z7 Z% v! A8 w- l4 b# M1 p
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
$ |! V/ l5 F( |3 L# h: M
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
; v7 I9 F. J- F# g& D6 r1 M
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:$ K! D* C9 v2 M, m
多謝讚賞 haha; S, Z8 A T6 [2 ?5 [+ ~7 D
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |