
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??5 O2 @8 D4 f' |
本野出左咁耐都冇既??% E u: t; z& g! F
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:9 M( C* W2 [* Z
7 U7 F! K. v3 }7 o
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身9 f+ j& F" c ?1 M7 s
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出) C0 e" P( K. H* V- ]
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??$ g" x' O- u- P7 y8 n1 q" V
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:( U2 ] |$ x- h8 w' r, e
/ R# I, ^# Y! `5 g/ h9 R* G0 g9 ~) g
...唔係教徒不看..! R5 s1 o/ M1 u9 x
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:: Q( r% u. M s" B
5 F2 A# ?# K3 n S* _. t1 u
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:$ `- y) Q8 Q3 R# ]6 i
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
+ f6 e; I# @$ P* H9 x' `# B6 F
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:( t2 g. t& v: }$ C( Q
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:+ |$ f/ O4 F5 u! C7 ^! T6 w
; n: w* y) e9 U' a- j4 V
同意紅字哥part
0 y8 ~: d f2 f4 r1 X. i
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
# I `5 D0 g, E+ c& |; R- E
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:" v: k9 E& ]3 O; [6 d- h0 j- r
同意紅字哥part8 @3 }0 P' j( t
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
+ D3 u9 M, U* q7 u8 P; h0 N
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:! U8 {. u' V3 V. w; w
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:# B1 R* g5 _; H% o2 B
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:- V8 M3 f) ?$ h8 h& w
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
5 Y: D; d/ c+ u& Q3 @. ]% ~- o
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:- R/ g4 |3 v: `, n; }$ \5 g9 y u
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM: w0 \- Q9 K( T" I7 S" y+ B$ u
: F+ b+ p1 F* Z/ {. z; p* F4 h) m
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
3 E1 @. H0 H8 h* R9 I4 z" l6 U
* }7 J ^4 J& L
多謝讚賞 haha
3 Y6 @4 s# @ E4 p! ^
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了* a6 W7 G* e) C2 b/ n1 I
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |