Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:8 ^6 Y( B: h! O' k, d. N- P3 R
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:5 V0 Q/ y* M; Z
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身/ k) D+ t/ @/ g5 Z4 c+ s6 s
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出 K# O( ]! _. d
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持$ c% l2 t3 f8 b. e7 [
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:! T( ?& m# J, g2 Q
點解今時今日先會有投訴??& m5 n X! _7 L/ O
本野出左咁耐都冇既??# g% W3 }* [# H, \1 S
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
* B* D. [2 t$ G# i( n
...唔係教徒不看..* `2 l* r5 `9 Y% L$ `4 t
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:, g" j5 q% b2 U* |& b: z, S
/ q Z( N8 _6 J1 U) ~
同意紅字哥part$ J0 Z0 J2 l4 W: O# V6 I4 {; o
: |! I# U% Y2 ^ T! T9 c
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
2 M+ k3 [' D! U+ Z" S6 }3 H2 n% h: l" q
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
同意紅字哥part- e# [- r" r8 n' B! g
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
同意紅字哥part+ [2 \0 ^3 P& d
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:# j8 s+ i0 e% r: U$ m
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:: g1 T2 }- ~/ A" L/ S8 s n
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:' Y. u0 ?) [/ v
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM: L( Q3 n& I! c" l. }" B
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:7 B- D# @. M6 C+ }
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:# d% Q- |( E" H7 v" o7 H! L7 Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
+ u% S/ Y. Y1 W w* B9 R) ]7 c
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:6 N* U! {$ Y8 B" L0 g9 _: E0 W/ c
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:( P, \. \) u2 M
* }! }/ P" u2 `3 O
7 X" u0 g+ X+ x- e. J; h0 Z
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
多謝讚賞 haha
, i7 _3 h4 c" M
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |