
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:6 x2 |( [- W& }
點解今時今日先會有投訴??. P3 l0 u0 x% E, x4 t; b1 M/ F7 X! f" K
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:8 R7 f3 @9 q( ^. O, c3 a
* P' Z" J1 g, S2 }7 T* i, @
' [4 M' }% G- d$ U3 K0 x8 P
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身: c6 X1 Z8 R3 d, {$ ?
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出# M6 p2 v- h1 S( A7 R; @ H
現在有人帶頭發起提出
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:0 a9 }. a' [7 F) V/ ?2 D3 {- v1 _; }
...唔係教徒不看.." l/ f- n$ s2 H- B7 S, l0 P
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
x- N. Z+ [! Q2 @# \' i2 }7 }+ F8 ^5 G
R4 T3 l `8 T' c/ h
同意紅字哥part
- c; P, X+ Y7 J4 M
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:( m" W- P* m3 [/ `' f9 U' K
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
3 [6 r' ?; C' t5 Y) S- ^
* P+ Y7 b6 Q, d H
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:' @ m0 k$ ~' q* Q) b" r7 w$ m- c
" I/ I m. G" b: X
同意紅字哥part4 L: A) }( ~1 ^5 l- y; i
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
% i4 ]) x; ~# C* E) U& j0 I, B
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
5 ~. x" @+ ]/ Z4 Q
) d" k; ~) n0 T) X' ^
同意紅字哥part- V! W0 x0 T3 B# Z# _9 ]
1 B1 Z* W4 \/ ^' m! w i" _% v
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
! P Q1 i# t, U8 r5 {* W
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:$ J5 D9 }% ^$ v5 N* T
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM: w w' C& J9 a: G. @
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:0 I, M$ ^. c1 f. r: Y2 t
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:8 j2 m, N' S4 Q0 F
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
1 Y3 D3 q) P- G1 j z: s
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:# c5 F0 U6 C' H; |( [3 V- T
; x W# q! q3 E) H3 Z
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
. X7 q, a) o( W
5 h7 m, ]) z/ y& D5 ^5 d
多謝讚賞 haha. f# g3 D+ R2 a7 e/ M
0 w) i8 Q- W ]% Q9 }- u1 I6 z
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |