
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:* ]5 u" D4 r% M5 ]' p L) F
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:3 H% H$ u% H8 R! Z/ o8 H4 W7 I
6 J" v0 x5 A. x6 y) j1 p
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出; C4 x( d- A) W( R; C% _( m
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:5 S9 T% W' m. t: _: e
點解今時今日先會有投訴??( r0 k7 X; r& Z8 v
本野出左咁耐都冇既??) J4 b0 C* ^! `/ E
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:8 F0 b6 y0 p9 e" q5 S$ O: r
...唔係教徒不看..3 `- {" \* X* [
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM: D: b6 V# j. D, b1 @* r
) f: Q: ]& u* ?% k
同意紅字哥part H. g5 h" O. y
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:% d; E+ P1 I ^$ ]4 s; O# K6 n
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:6 p. q1 R9 y5 q1 ^7 m6 W2 v, W
1 b+ a. H" ]9 M, `6 h8 ~
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
4 ]% w% R: V6 G/ m( r
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
( \. o9 ^3 B; ?. ^1 _
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:5 z+ w Q7 a1 [* O( @
6 l9 b* ?; p5 G& \, N
同意紅字哥part5 s1 g: Z% l: z6 q; c
5 s2 L( t. d# I+ o' s
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:* F4 U4 c, Q. D! A! J
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
9 m6 ^* x2 A; f. u
7 p& {. w3 l6 r0 l7 \6 R( }- U' @7 r
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:4 O u+ r8 Y' k. ?; F5 ]
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:9 L9 w! i6 L) R/ m9 f( m
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:7 _, k& }2 L- g8 P9 X2 A6 W6 z
, k2 K2 h+ l* v) `$ m: `
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。4 M# y( K1 e3 P* p
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
! Z$ F8 M1 i& m% ^
- R3 k* _. r, }+ n5 {# p N
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM: z! ^- [6 c2 J9 u2 g2 E
多謝讚賞 haha
! g h! N* T; v2 j$ s/ _) A
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:+ F M7 x9 d6 P+ I
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了! _0 `- i* h- C& [: N
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |