娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 中大學生報班友,文又唔得,不文又唔得 [打印本頁]

作者: shehboy 時間: 2007-5-18 01:35 AM 標題: 中大學生報班友,文又唔得,不文又唔得

中大學生報話咁係為左引起人對性既討論...3 S% ?9 q; H1 ^8 D. K o
" _" F7 V( k, T1 j+ Z0 b
問題係你地寫果d野根本唔係果個水平,根本唔係出自呢個動機.
- l0 u2 z% S4 @1 D# y0 k# w+ ^
咁不如開埋馬經版, 引起大家對推廣馬術運動既討論啦.
開埋波經版, 引起大家對足球運動既討論啦!8 o. U; c* [" K5 j" f- z `
登埋明星走光相, 引起大家對電影藝術既討論啦!
5 d( \, a# O8 m# q9 {" A9 m0 {- Q
而家大學生對性既討論,駛乜你引起呀,佢地滿腦子都係啦.

你班偏萎,讀多d書先,例如睇多d黃霑既作品,人地文又得,不文又得,文學同粗口兩樣都研究,有咁既水平先再出來嘈啦.

作者: PG-13 時間: 2007-5-18 02:07 AM

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 01:35 AM:" f( Q7 j# L2 f% [$ E z
中大學生報話咁係為左引起人對性既討...

( p- Y5 i% w  v- g! K% V
- |  @" K4 I/ A* [  j( a
Hmm base on your analysis, you must be a phd of either education study or social study..." O) y7 Q/ V% |) q" y
, z, H* q8 h0 Y: w" w
Look, you mentioned that no one should say a thing unless he/she is really good at it,
and by the fact that you have made some comment on CU news, you must be some expert on that field.) W  a4 q$ O! O. E  r/ A. |

Suggestion: before you make a statement, make sure it is not contradictory

作者: shehboy 時間: 2007-5-18 03:15 AM

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 02:07 AM:/ |/ Z3 ] V1 W
% _4 B3 h' H1 e0 `! H
' |& y6 [: L' e" l, e. Y/ ~
Hmm base on your analysis, you ...

, {5 D3 }; D5 u) a: ]
* ^/ Q( Q& _) H! r/ Y0 g% Z0 S" a: j
but問題係我無話我講既野係為左引起社會對乜乜乜既討論,我既目的只係吹下水,發下牙痕,聽下好似你咁既教訓而已.; l" ^3 |* {- t6 E- D
/ `# V$ \) J/ M% d& H5 a8 r
我無講過話要有做過研究至有發表權, 而係如果講到有引起大學校園甚至社會討論呢啲咁崇高既使命, 就要抛一啲有水平既文章出黎, 才能達到目的.

作者: Ｌｕｎｇ 時間: 2007-5-18 03:21 AM

你見出黎講野果個學生d懶音去到咩地步就知中大既水平啦...野都未講掂仲代表學院

作者: slwong3 時間: 2007-5-18 06:08 AM

I just think that those university students have studied for so many years.3 Q0 g. c$ ]. Z+ Y- V
Their parents and the society have put so much money for their education, but what have they learned?- N# k8 r8 {) d3 l1 N& \& N
. {% W4 x- t) T/ D
They even thought what they did was right......

作者: PG-13 時間: 2007-5-18 07:10 AM

I have to clarify that I am not associate with CU, I dont even know a single CU student or staff.
No doubt that the CU student decision is not a smart one. If they are smart enough they wont create so much of a trouble. But I dont think you shall blame them.

My focus is not on those CU students, I am more concern about the 影視及娛樂事務管理處 3 D6 E6 J. _( G5 u. q" b
They are the one shall be blamed.( h9 l7 N9 w& W/ j, S! ]' b) p
Don't you think 影視處's decision is affected by the public a lot?( e: O3 r: r$ y/ X& p( I
影視處 is supposed to be a qusi-tribunal that has the power to judge thing. Different from other governmental department, when it involved of making judgments they shall follow a very strict rules... not from outside pressures./ Y1 s, `! P% Y; {, p1 A9 }) Q

SO, when you bitch on the CU students, you don't and should not blame them BECAUSE they are university students. You shall consider as a normal person, like you and you other friends.
That is the legal point of view and that is the view that 影視處 are supposed to have.
- T: `* w6 l2 h# S6 Z3 }: n% t* l3 b
When you look at CU's newspaper and compare to other publishers such as easyfinders or east weekly you will find that CU's newspaper is, at worse, on the same plain as those magazines." G1 D5 O2 r, K8 F! K6 l7 N
0 H6 S3 U7 P( j2 j
Last, if you really think CU students should subject to a higher moral responsibility. Then tell me, can they enjoy special right from us? or form the government?. o9 g& P2 ^9 C2 s- I; L( F

If you still think they shall have a higher moral standard, then I can understand why that QC student have an argument that he shall not get charged of indecent assault.

作者: artta 時間: 2007-5-18 12:15 PM

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 02:07 AM:0 D9 V1 [/ Y% N( \

0 a/ H5 N% ?# T0 H* `: g2 @
% D4 b4 e% [* u/ Z! Y; _$ n* i$ m* UHmm base on your analysis, you ...

0 X3 Z( o3 m2 L2 m* h
6 A+ s1 p8 ? @

Support..., ^2 E0 y' u' h. `% A( c
8 D& q8 J* @) E
Well, i think that's where the conflict come from.: K; k2 }) ]: N/ A6 y7 q
; o A& H+ Q# o" V5 q0 A3 C- r" P
I believe, because of the misunderstanding on sex topic, lead to people's complain...

作者: shehboy 時間: 2007-5-18 07:35 PM

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 07:10 AM:
7 J; k; z6 b! O' L# r9 [I have to clarify that I am not ass...

同意." t' g0 q, A: d6 J
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多人講果d,唔係講緊大學生有無"道德責任",唔好轉移話題.4 B8 B# R7 b) |$ v d/ d" O# U

而係你搞份馬經出黎,大大聲話係為左推廣馬術運動.... M* ^. g) X* z! m* y5 n a+ g
如果你搞份馬經出黎,話比人知只係為左講下貼士,吸引賭仔,咁完全無問題,2 d# @& J1 ]. ]( r$ ]9 Q
賭馬講得,馬術又講得,無問題,但要老實,如果係為左搞噱頭,就咪x講到自己咁清高!

作者: 勇勇 時間: 2007-5-18 08:20 PM

其實班大學生係得閒冇野做，忽然諗起不如搵Ｄ野搞下，佢地係度諗「有Ｄ咩野可以係大學校內出位呢」所以佢地就發表哩Ｄ言論，點知出位過籠回響過大，到最後玩大左！2 r7 F" j% X3 |0 ?; K# D7 Y
班大學生玩大左做錯野又唔認錯，連聖經都玩，好過份呀呀呀呀呀！！！！！

作者: PG-13 時間: 2007-5-18 09:12 PM

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:
1 q6 _) }5 [' |- @% `% B# M x3 F* t: y7 i. q0 @; G% r5 `& L
2 q# i$ B4 j$ Q. x6 K) m' }. G
同意.
' {9 z/ D( T) Z$ j但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...

% F$ B1 G) f; k& F3 y4 A: J

I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.* n$ E) U, l7 T! N) R+ t
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students7 J* T2 U" m$ Z
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.

1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published( U, L( F @' R- n& V+ T& Q0 h3 f
! |1 h' _) P) r P7 |$ F1 M
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply

作者: ronald001120 時間: 2007-5-18 11:50 PM

D大學生好多都低低BB
好似今次事件
識用個腦諗下
唔好死讀書* c# e. C. O! b1 Z& U- M, Q; B( Y
都知登左出來會發生咩事) \1 W) z8 F/ Z* \& N
錯左重要唔認錯
畀人見到香港D大學生有甘既質素
真係.........

作者: shehboy 時間: 2007-5-19 04:37 AM

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 09:12 PM:
) z/ A. ~7 j9 K7 \( F& F
+ M4 U. b+ K0 c0 K4 F% e @% A! h+ G X8 G
I do respect CU students' good ...

9 i. ^ w: n0 V! q( F% h- x
: a, B) Q3 F6 C. H; K
見你都好有heart寫個long ass boring reply,又不妨再boring一下. 如果係真係有所為而為,唔係搞噱頭,但做出黎既野人地完全get唔到你個message,咁個問題仲大,因為連最基本既判斷力同表達力都無.% U, ]8 L2 q1 a& R6 K$ w- j
係認真定胡鬧,細心d睇多d就呃唔到人,講亂倫人獸交,可以話係挑戰社會禁忌,fine,但問人最想係校園邊度做愛,就明顯係玩,仲學坊間報刊整埋d乜乜信箱自己黎答,仲有語文粗劣市井...
只從編輯同語文角度睇,都係好低水平好唔認真的產品,而你話其實佢地係好用心好認真咁做.你可以話我既judgement係subjective,我一樣可以話佢地既arguement係狡辯.
2 [( m8 H/ q: R6 ]. \8 k) u9 i6 f
講多樣野你知,我見過一d睇黎畫得好馬虎既圖畫,後來發覺原來係d智障小朋友畫既,咁我會相信佢地真係用心畫既,係我怪錯左佢地.

作者: PG-13 時間: 2007-5-19 07:23 AM

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-19 04:37 AM:
2 [5 _9 D5 o6 D- F5 {# V) ~
4 @; c( A( A7 T
& K+ n/ Q# m$ J: V+ A/ o) w7 {見你都好有heart寫個long ass bor...

Your last point is right into my heart.
Not that I think they are retards

Heehee
' O; W5 t$ A+ W  M4 q/ S9 ]
Maybe you have overestimated the ability of universities students. Don't put too much expectation, then you can appreciate their work. $ l) Y6 L6 \( D- _5 `
1 K4 ~5 A' W8 p+ @2 e; m& P
This time they has made a big and stupid mistake but I still bow for them. Its hard to see one who can stand out to make something different, something radical. " M0 P$ C2 J+ b+ o* B3 k- j

They are still in school, the whole idea of conducting a student newspaper is only a leaning process. I still don't think they deserve too much of a blame, people make mistake and after this incident, they will become a better person.- A1 \  G7 f4 Q5 C( y
# M1 [. V  W0 }8 v4 i# u' D/ N

- P" L) N" [3 E- m4 K5 v7 t' y+ c

Last, I do think they need some pressure from public.

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/)