
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:) Y p3 U i% ^: I; t. K. S& p1 B$ |
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機.........
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????

(新人除外)Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:1 u& w: L/ z& I0 r* N+ S
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:5 F. A9 H- ]' b3 M9 ^
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.

Originally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:" t) A( ~/ l& G; }. ^6 E
1 `: d' b% b& k
( U H- d, u) `3 W! m( \
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
1 d% y; @6 `$ {+ s$ F
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:( W: Q& S( N* g+ C- t3 N
我其實有一個問題?
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??7 d2 x/ b8 d, v6 T5 h+ i2 R
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??$ k7 B: m+ r* Y; ?
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:
9 D$ R& c* e7 G1 P
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()


真係唔係好明
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
/ f; f$ ]* Y5 \: H( n8 T% i
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:
: C1 S) l- F) G& W
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
1 s1 E! [- d8 R5 p2 G9 m
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:
1 D5 c4 a& k8 U
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...


0 r1 r% o3 y; r3 [& d9 {- _7 o


Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:- X, R! `. l; h
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:! T% q6 [$ S& @" u/ P8 Y
+ r8 S* C( Q( Y ^
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点



7 V/ o- I+ ?% z; N

(雖然我知道自己經已答對了)Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
1 s5 h: G) u" v6 ]1 _, ^4 h
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...







Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:% P) M' F0 s# I, d* }
& B/ Y1 l/ m3 O# |
哦.........原來係咁
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:- `' f4 T$ l$ y; p% z/ y# F, t4 ~2 b& }
c, d3 o2 M, X8 D/ ]
冇嘢![]()


( ]: C% V/ j) C6 x4 q/ j; @Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:% O- j" p0 j! G
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:
1 B3 D" p y* l" a% o6 x9 B
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296
8 T& g4 k, _, X( a* V
#8869
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |