
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57:, j6 e6 |& H" s) S0 u
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機......... 5 V" o- \1 b# |# v ]
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:
( l& k8 A" p6 E. k. K! d: f) {
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????

(新人除外)Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:( I& `9 X0 C: z+ T8 M, e
* L0 `: G. s3 h+ N
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.

Originally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:
0 f5 [5 P& H) h( x K U7 x# R
/ @! [( O% U) M1 U( \2 `+ U
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:2 k: C# p+ V, V% x; b A3 s
我其實有一個問題?9 {# f; U! t/ k4 B0 @
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩?? { q) w$ g' E0 }
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()


真係唔係好明
2 y. F1 e( S0 @- d$ NOriginally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:6 i( \7 C) o$ j1 |# f0 N/ V5 @
! s3 x& S8 \' w. N, _: }
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
" ?7 l4 L3 r a7 ~+ J# y
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:2 R# h O5 z9 d
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
+ ?! x8 i Z. i$ `( v
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
8 n" Q7 p5 y4 N# w: C- A
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:
( E5 V# x1 X' }4 P) N
6 E; Q0 O8 u! O) v/ D: H4 n
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...






Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM: @/ q9 ^' p( \0 Y! ^; s# b
# g8 U% `9 C+ L. a$ w' u" i
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:
# K% D5 G' s r* j
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:; x3 Y0 v; s. N* v! Y7 M
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点



; ^$ D) _0 w, I3 E

(雖然我知道自己經已答對了)Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:! x1 _/ _7 e: N5 }' m; q9 i' }
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:; C- m% b+ s- b8 Q; p3 h( O; M
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:
1 i. a% ^8 N+ ^5 V2 I2 R. u, b1 w
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...


$ s4 m$ w: Y V



Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:
哦.........原來係咁0 m M* m; K% x' A+ {+ u- L
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:
+ f# A7 s+ a! `9 ^
冇嘢![]()


! ~0 u* A% F6 }; EOriginally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:" k7 s. ^5 y& @; @: _
/ H5 ~% o* D. A: M# u+ `! B: W
5 \0 e0 c. u+ B
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=296, G7 b" \0 I w( V; ^! I
) Q: V a5 s4 a5 T
#8869
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |