Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:/ j7 ?/ m. x8 N
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
) v3 u4 \! E" @0 t& Z7 S* `之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
* T2 p0 W* O  S& V# @' x難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:
4 a8 e* x. h7 r7 k' M4 W2 v4 V/ s! h# h7 O& G

& D7 K- l: x5 z+ t; f# p4 j特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
) P: v7 P: I4 _4 O! u1 i: N1 R
* k! o/ ?7 m8 ^3 l# C6 l1 w1 L) w  @3 |& `5 F
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:7 P* r, }+ b, G- @

3 l' M' Z0 p  E' c
$ f* h/ e, M) h( v# W=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:$ ^: ^+ |5 ~* G- f  o% T
8 t5 t* Z6 V) t: d5 ?
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
# S6 M8 n9 n% X7 K
. E+ P7 Y0 r$ z. s: C" o; T
5 N4 b: N0 _% t! B% H"如果"5 A# v0 I6 N' m5 {  G4 E
1 T# u6 x4 ^! c, T: s8 T+ n
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.