Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
' \6 M! L1 h* t2 v港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?4 f% V1 C! J4 f& O( @7 v& z, |
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
% ~9 h8 S' P9 z7 R2 ]- c難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:+ j, u2 V, w3 w. U
7 ?% z6 v) X2 `& o2 ]7 V" _, w$ @/ n

; v4 t$ X& w# E9 J% W- Q特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
9 {7 i! J% h5 T
0 v8 x5 k9 y) {* u& b: x
' T8 Q: U5 z  w" c: ^* L% `之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
3 g7 u- k, v) a
) ]+ c" x9 a7 [. g! I
- G! ~: h: x$ u: O=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:/ H- c' z3 x( }" f1 Z* K% w9 E

6 K: n/ p: X6 @如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:: a* @# T) B5 e" v6 ?/ [, |6 a
/ C9 O1 _2 S9 _; W! R" H

3 P4 E7 X: b  M"如果"& k$ g3 g* j) H+ _) e
+ b# k0 M  ~7 T, h3 Y2 B
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.