Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?" A2 {2 `/ n% h' l
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
1 X. b6 q& K! Q難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
" }) n# c. t* P" L, R8 w; v港台e排發生咩事呀?+ j4 }! B' z: q3 \; |" h  V: E  A
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖9 W' _! t$ o- B# O8 ?
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
+ P- r5 A3 k* K4 l3 Y9 J
, u! x% o1 N4 p' {& h, r
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:, T. X( U7 o! k" H' u7 L

) T* y3 u$ n' Q) c& s
' w6 G8 e9 j7 d, A/ o* ^  e: @$ X特首有講過要封港台嗎?
; S; K9 u4 S, d% C' y- g( P6 V8 m
0 B* G1 w( b# M5 c0 D( K+ ^/ C之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
" @% T/ n# X+ O$ K- ?  `) r; J- \& [0 w$ x
+ l1 E, V6 o8 @' c; M
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
( Z& R' E- ]9 R+ K% R

1 u, f6 w% j8 |! E( V* _/ \=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
' u$ s2 G3 l+ G9 J5 L; s4 h& g4 u8 w( N1 |$ N' ~7 ~
: ?$ w8 R) p. D% i+ ?4 S+ ~+ y+ l
=封港台?
4 n+ V$ ~, S- i' j+ o) J4 B
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
0 n+ \! }* e* D/ z0 T4 U+ q  K# g) Y. r- j  j. X- _% P$ c
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
# [+ R  Q5 C: B, Y
+ S3 Y5 |+ U; V' J5 H"如果"/ [7 J! g7 ~+ y! D% s5 u0 A0 @% E

4 O: g5 [  e4 Y- Z. Hthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
, P( `& O8 W% K- d9 M* G
* Z! m9 F5 o/ Y6 l- d# i# x4 N0 g' N0 {
/ ?" M# T% m) V' w4 ]& M! B( R9 X" z"如果"* v7 U) ^& h; x1 P# R
; U: A( {! [/ M$ t' ~. R1 P& {7 x0 O! B
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
* U5 E4 @3 l$ W! G$ }+ O- J4 E6 F想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言! A, @' o: k7 i# J2 W) r
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。6 z9 C! j9 c6 Q
6 H: w5 `% z* ]' k  Z" v( j; X
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?
5 }3 m5 b$ b' C: ?  K5 ?; z* u0 \: S1 J+ d  T
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
# G' _* z3 M9 \. I; {! ^; Q/ {, H4 g: Y& Z9 f! s; Q/ u0 O
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0