Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?
9 A* ?9 d+ ]% q% C: S之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
+ A$ R. v* n( m; F! B: _難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
$ G# |9 U4 H% w- i) i* A! Q港台e排發生咩事呀?0 d: d/ ^* I3 p/ m0 }. T# ?
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
8 ~. ]* ^& x+ U* y1 [; S難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
) ]) ?, \  u" e: U5 l- g3 v

" Y4 i. g- _; C' ]. R2 ?特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:$ O- w( G% Q1 l1 {
9 J: p, w4 k1 K4 f! l5 L6 H7 E: C- u
6 k* q- b; y# D: a- ]1 ?
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
. u; I4 \- Z0 p

  n3 R4 l/ G& y, `8 \3 P之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:- \8 K2 `3 E4 ~

8 ^# ~! M: V7 d  |$ J/ B, K& G; Q9 Q; @: |% p: v/ s! m9 G, L' }
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
6 U0 q: R) \% o5 w3 ?

- R7 v6 s/ y% N( y- A7 n" {=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:( b; I* s9 e, w) y7 w1 A; g0 a" t

# V) r0 P1 A0 }4 ~0 E+ A- d
& G$ d1 j* F' r: }=封港台?
0 F/ b  s5 \" B7 [
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
: }: G, H1 S& X4 |: M- f9 W+ }
& ^2 x; l3 T" N9 ?, K如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
" c8 b9 S' o1 O) O0 d* |! Y. Q) B; l/ A- ]$ o+ V
"如果"/ j* ^* L( l# |
$ c' j% `1 C/ O7 I1 e# {: R8 F- d* f
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
+ J4 Q+ Y/ D  r7 g; Z# r2 `! G$ L4 W* {
: @4 T3 ]1 W$ b4 i& s' |: C
"如果"
6 {7 l. K' t0 S) W1 Y4 C  _4 t7 `; N; ]9 ^/ S+ u8 ?. z. p
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
3 L" k4 u9 e' C' E. n" `9 l
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言. G& U) o+ ]' M4 w) w' o) p9 r
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。+ U7 K" I0 g1 ~
( a/ u6 p8 S: Z, e1 B1 a! X7 l
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?. @/ j5 I& @. [, |( V- P
5 H, c/ Q7 J2 ~: v2 a* L) l& M
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
1 d- D+ m3 {. r& u5 s& `" N- `( H6 e5 P  O$ c5 w: Y  O: M
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0