if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 4 c; d$ Z8 ]; F; E* W$ y# q6 \' J. X" W$ ^5 s
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ( \) X8 Z/ q9 a! B* z不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照. r, {( w& t1 [8 k G# u
1 j7 u* a# V; g+ Q3 E$ l
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ( e& i; _# O# z6 M# b+ L7 |9 ]) W/ Q) K3 u- V: |* m. E/ X' T0 n2 f
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ' Y t) N6 Q* }6 ^# p
. W: D2 R5 O& j" N. g 3 o9 N# ]# [, _- U8 K! [4 ?7 @: HI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 5 R7 i+ S( {5 q7 ^) band "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... ; s/ Y6 Y t1 _% T* J3 q: o# l4 [9 K7 I" m" x! I8 b. ^1 j
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. p# ^, x+ k3 Z5 n! B) \; aOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. , ^ T* b. t; `; [: pWell, just my personal comments. % a e- {, K0 z- ^" A! g$ R" T ~% r6 m9 u0 }* Y6 Y( o) }- N% ]
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
' Y t) N6 Q* }6 ^# p
