if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 0 A: N' ?: {3 T9 s! C b , y4 k6 \% _0 w; `只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 0 }9 z b+ D% c6 l4 b V不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照1 U# ?7 V* `' m V4 R: X' c
4 S- R5 Z. D/ v) L" s1 e& R. [
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ - }' f( D, I( `- ^" ~" p; W& d. n7 _ $ Y4 s! e7 m1 ^" d# O[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? - ~$ `: F4 w# S s2 w( P 9 B, G$ |! R5 s5 X4 w2 [1 W# A6 ^' L( R7 G6 ?1 L
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,8 n7 } B0 e# U/ e3 P
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... ( X, v0 M6 @: \, F& {. S# J( w& [9 p: L I# s9 ~: v, e
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. _; H! f' J! y6 P- ]8 R
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 7 |( Y& h3 q7 Z7 w( L7 P& ZWell, just my personal comments.. @7 U/ i! l9 U5 h5 {
$ x- Y7 {+ N- m, w" @3 IHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...+ t% x1 M ~; {4 V$ F
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
