娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ? [打印本頁]

作者: shehboy 時間: 2008-2-1 10:44 PM 標題: 問卷小調查: 閣下有沒有看過"慾照風波"的原圖 ?

版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.
' q3 j: w" U5 L% Z* z
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.- P; t5 F, Y& _8 | {

樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.

作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM

完全沒看過

作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM

if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man

作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM

抗議！
* {5 F2 u) ]% r+ N; a! q6 @7 j% ~
只許 谷德超 商場買翻版鹹碟
不准香港人網絡睇自拍淫照

強列要求香港警察不要選擇性執法！
2 y2 F4 ^5 p- D! x) {: \* e! S
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]

作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM

What is the definition of "原圖" ? , k' i- U0 v1 X2 n& P

I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,0 F; k( t8 h* K' h5 E! k, n/ p) M5 Q3 v
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....
4 r& C8 q' \3 O/ I1 h
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....

作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM

I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility.
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.8 Q+ G' p- V4 s0 q7 ?, l
Well, just my personal comments.

Hv a nice day.

作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM

完全沒看過~~~

作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM

未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =

作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM

我完全沒看過..., e5 C% U8 h# l% F
你信唔信ar?

作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM

暫時都未睇過 ><!

作者: chan525 時間: 2008-2-10 01:39 AM

看過少少......

作者: 大家樂1234 時間: 2008-2-10 02:56 AM

秘密~唔話你知><

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/)