if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！8 A; u O x# ~8 w% E f
2 c! v( e4 q; r4 m9 o
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 5 G/ N R& w/ [- i: [2 e# M" `3 [不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照6 q. G' x# O& U, u/ V" a
; M9 P7 m# m7 f" T/ |
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！1 T- |1 A) b2 h
5 [! O7 d* o8 }# C* Y) Z) L3 r, k[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? * |! B# [! O. v $ Y0 m8 t9 H6 W7 ~( s3 z5 q 6 {8 H1 `/ h, c4 U: y# zI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, U( E7 O& I8 d' t8 k# h8 `4 ?, y
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....; T3 L {" v! u) G' Y% I: m
, V6 o$ V% ^# l% H' y. O
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. % d9 J. |# U! [5 R" p
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.5 y, m K6 l) b
Well, just my personal comments. 7 c" d3 U g ^+ a% ]7 Y( ~9 {" c: v
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
