if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！& _4 I6 l1 R x! S6 m
( R) J, D* s* U7 F$ P
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟6 T1 f6 F" k( ~! ?$ u$ ^; [
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照, g' _& b* ~; n" A, E& o: f6 Q' n$ `
9 J3 q, o& T9 l0 o. A* R
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！- F, h4 }6 h6 C3 _8 k
" P$ j4 \" |. t; e$ y2 @
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 8 v# D$ q% o; K! q1 A \
5 a, Z; r- F. E( l" ^% m1 E7 m % N+ J ^- q( p0 a& p& K, ~$ gI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, - m8 R! S ~/ \+ s+ N7 Iand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... ' V8 B( f! r, g* l2 F% I; p% |/ q+ q9 N% s
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. $ i9 d5 t) r* m7 T+ d' k# G' YOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 8 E, Q$ U. j2 G" t z: A4 ?Well, just my personal comments. 7 L! j' O2 v+ N0 C: C # n* L- y2 y5 j. l+ ~Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...* g6 O K5 d ? y
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
8 v# D$ q% o; K! q1 A \
