if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！' V* O# Q. I, }* |- O. m D
+ C' S: w3 J( x; f* T4 V, t( v" ^只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ) ?( j5 [5 N0 @8 x. i不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照" @+ c( ?4 L9 g9 u/ A! l% ]9 y
# k u9 [6 o/ r* N: ]6 W
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 7 T4 {' m5 | U, Z' c0 }8 E: ^ + a$ M. Y7 A5 o. K0 P[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? + h8 P. y- m+ `5 |" I* h9 s 1 G6 r- h, _& W( l- h . t2 U j, L/ n Z7 ]8 }I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, d$ T. q4 U1 w
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 3 T7 l ~& {6 f8 K5 [* { 4 e2 i, Q6 }1 e8 r iI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 7 b; P4 S, X( E1 K& D8 Z4 t
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 9 e; y; g3 U9 @Well, just my personal comments./ p- Q% }- T9 o3 b3 X6 p
1 ~& {6 L. C {* p1 h e& j+ O$ J2 [6 }
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
