Board logo

標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦 [打印本頁]

作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-29 11:59 PM     標題: [傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦

香港法例有等如無.
1 o. ^) |' }' q7 S% x$ O$ [) z; v& Q5 @0 t
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
9 i7 a+ o; X' M; t0 G
! {+ Z# N1 Q3 r* {7 s對打人者只作出警告了事.
4 p/ ~9 W- n2 d/ y0 O% p/ ^' W7 C( a/ h2 V; }7 z
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.  E0 @* B7 K) o; j$ x9 k

% _5 O* X/ o' q; z% e1 Mhttp://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ
% U2 B$ c+ x: H* A- ?/ P: S% F* ~" T& ^  n) f
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.8 U0 U0 L' ^5 `$ e% q9 e  q

3 l6 ^# m: Y/ K! P5 P1 k請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.5 Q5 c- p% y1 ?* u7 J' y* V. o3 h; k

2 s8 ?+ a) K6 S4 w; c
+ }+ ~6 u4 d  A; v
- B5 y% _2 K. t8 ~" m% _# H個人認為.....+ k* Y- v, B2 ?% l+ G9 m2 W, P
+ I$ b# f& g5 |
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)$ m# e. `! @( k8 C9 g1 k. C
! d: {$ A3 I" J1 ^
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....

6 b4 A# N) B  A8 |! p9 {' o: |2 |* o, S6 o  s1 {
[ Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM ]
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:12 AM

have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
  t$ [0 N" d" K- cdo you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?$ t! w2 Z$ s( y6 p0 |$ a# t
are you the witness of the incident?* l2 h+ B) X* U/ j
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
0 f; ?: N9 K$ H) O( Yand better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
& h1 R4 w+ O1 H. q8 Botherwise, you could be charged as "defamation"
作者: jen01二世    時間: 2008-6-30 12:17 AM

Originally posted by Kev at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM:, o5 y, w( K" W6 [: e
have u studied law or anything rela...
4 f/ v& @. O1 A3 x  X
6 z, G: ^5 b* I8 e& y+ p. P* Y  ?黑字 : 係轉貼
# T( m' P3 a. ]
3 y- Q: j# T' I紅字 : 個人感想0 V/ C1 C5 U: V8 j6 e  S
* t1 ~! k# F" ]' ]' X+ [4 Z$ R
ok ??
作者: Kev    時間: 2008-6-30 12:25 AM

dont have to ask for my approval ' X5 o2 `7 L% X
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.
* q! E3 A# k) S: T, J9 B# Abtw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not..
5 l# R4 Q+ L$ o0 ^2 Ajust becareful even if the words arent your own words..( l) U; S/ b  g/ I
good luck and hope you could last long in this world.
作者: lastwing    時間: 2008-6-30 01:08 AM

我係甘認為
$ r8 ^2 r8 j* e3 h! W該警員明顯地想息事寧人...$ H8 Z- a% |2 S0 _" w
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得8 t, X+ }- ]- f
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間3 M- o$ Q0 y2 f' Q# ^; H% m3 m
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
3 x4 o. o- M6 v" s我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
) A8 O; r! m+ g* t- z7 g6 e- K; l該警員的處理手法絕對洽當) H; Z0 \+ U4 G
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x" G  n. Z- w# E( `
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0