Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!4 [  ^6 L' `! {8 z) v0 d2 t6 F$ K
佢都係方便各網友啫!
9 O! a. `1 ~5 H/ Z之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
: n& J" U. w5 R, }% {4 I告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
$ @5 a$ H' s) c& r: B我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!: l6 c* \+ r  H. o( T! `+ Z
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!1 p0 L% n6 p, Q- B6 d9 |4 \! R
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!; b2 W8 i# Q0 `* d+ _+ q
: ?  a  ~! d2 W3 L9 |$ S# c% N5 R
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
5 i3 ?: E( Z3 e! u  lhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif7 _& `3 s# s  Q; I* u" K3 ?
4 a6 y* R5 h( t' ^- j$ B
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
$ n0 P& p" B4 m' a根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
. T+ r$ N# F" H  b"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!3 d" E  b3 E1 R. ^
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
# F( L3 f' {2 Y9 v  J, s4 l香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
% V8 L. |% ?$ R. A& J4 @根本就荒天下之大謬!
) G& Q$ k. _/ s: F; U+ C不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!  P6 ?* y- R7 J
根本就荒天下之大謬!
2 }( v) k  ?2 }) V8 u不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
6 O" O8 H0 x+ x( Q% a2 N
8 a8 J" R9 p- v- S* M7 O& I佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.! z- W7 Y1 v0 A, S1 w

4 r1 A+ y$ f* }' k+ D! S. ]現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.! U1 Y1 B/ e3 A* C+ F

) u; ^0 g. f/ W2 ^% ~6 x沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.0 w( V- l- j' \5 ^0 y9 C
0 u8 Y. |5 n! ~3 w
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多2 j& j8 n; V& ~
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人* o: x) ]- a9 k3 a) [0 G- h% k
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:! S( O  D: x+ Q
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% z+ `# }$ |) Q' y7 D% B/ p
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
, a! H- u# S- t% f% T. x( u( T然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
+ P) s' s# F' j9 _$ A# x# x既牟利又侵權!
4 u# m$ x. l, U1 d+ O. y但亦大行其道.....
# s& @  x, ?1 ^* F$ {唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
. [7 S8 U4 Z8 F9 X9 o1 Y. N* \只係香港政府係多重標準!
" z* ~2 t! Z* G) x4 F* R/ N7 k1 i' h9 s同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!, |6 W3 L6 X) ~- t  o
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
/ J+ k5 [& x7 o) v所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
/ K3 {% N- L3 W& S! Q& L但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:+ g8 T* Z/ u2 o' U6 [* J
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. D' _$ N& m1 Z/ B/ rI agree you points that it could be illegal+ \# |2 j' Q# E& M: w  \* ~
but that is still a "gray area"
* k) _/ \. {' {; ?, L: _whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair3 g: |  p* V, ?" R0 f
7 k/ F9 E" Y( ^6 N) R: k1 O
anyway, I want to say that is
' [/ f! W! S: Q2 d; Zwho is supposed to be protected by laws$ |& z2 F/ \" G' P. K5 }
creators?2 u5 Z4 b- ~( W$ g3 b! J1 M4 _
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market& W2 ]9 {2 z# N& Y. P6 q& x
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money./ @7 v: Q9 P% H+ `# ^- E
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
; R* ?7 X; x  iWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:, N2 I& N5 ]: G) [+ Q. ?. g7 K
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
5 g2 P  \: A( m, j+ Q! F3 [我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:( b8 e, F& R- |6 p/ J0 |4 A

$ J) E/ _  r) |, g% ?  `+ I我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
, p+ O" ?. y3 [6 Z: I
唔係喎!
) B/ G! z! g9 _: }% N古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 `3 _/ g+ `$ S% Q/ o9 d我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!5 F5 Q0 N9 ^' _' Z
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
! N" c( q2 f$ F. j就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
2 P6 W- U9 ~& g% X一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
0 c" ?9 o  p1 b& a/ v6 r! K) j( ydun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
' A7 T+ T" m+ P& H! w- ~if so bad, dun download la, right?, O" x$ f8 L9 M
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^7 I- i; V: [7 V! _6 N
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct1 W6 `* j8 M  G, W
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
1 V2 {7 r3 F. o) v" l, `$ fso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
3 I$ ]  T3 g, f0 s6 V- G! Susing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
4 y# E* E9 I( g2 v5 p, Uwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
5 x% @9 ~5 p' S7 xso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
  y% v6 _; ~3 R佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
" M: R3 r7 D2 U3 ^5 C$ M) s政府想比下馬威0的人~~2 [, V' Z$ o9 H1 k
錢就一定罰& R2 y, H& c- z9 G, f" q) X: e  G
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,: O0 U" d! D" t% W# E
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?. W+ J: l& @* N6 {: r+ S+ r
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?9 H$ a! P2 H& }! Y: P
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
0 n  R' n5 C. V4 J告得入我切!!!
( c: ~3 I8 L; [+ z+ D6 _9 f我當初都估告唔入,
& w& }5 E0 k. H# W* r不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
& v( ]7 e9 N" w# Q& x; ]& _+ \. q+ ~真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
# S- q% M$ s: W0 a: u" p我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:- X3 O7 O+ [7 r" _* J1 E) f
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
7 a$ p5 h3 S! Y9 L2 S
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0