Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!! C* Y# h$ f9 t
佢都係方便各網友啫!/ p; s( T! e- x* d% g
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.+ s: Q9 [6 U6 y2 v9 e
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!1 m* |! J4 U% m" b6 P7 [; P# N
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!& w) J7 z( X' ?7 l' S4 u) S1 T7 O
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
: r: {; h8 |* g8 b/ E0 q純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!( [4 D, u1 C' z5 L
) M2 s* x/ @2 T$ ^8 }. l& z0 m; [6 d
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 + N6 Y( }4 J+ S' F. A- a$ n
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
# A: ]; ]7 |! C7 q- H& b; y9 e( Z# m* i4 u8 G
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
9 U5 v! b/ K, p, {根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?7 C8 u% }5 @+ e( F1 I
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!5 w' ?- N: V( |
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
* p2 R: M! e4 F4 B5 h8 ]- Q/ x9 G$ r; ?香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
( v' U+ W( c; }+ o( `根本就荒天下之大謬!; Y! _$ D% U2 k8 v0 i, [/ h# i6 e
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
8 p% X* S- K7 \& K4 x根本就荒天下之大謬!; _9 C2 Y+ ]- D  f5 O( L
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.$ o) G* z3 Q" Z% i  |* |, |, Y

; j* D, f" W0 a佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
6 f( d0 b0 g, s" A6 P- e4 m1 f1 H( N6 b9 F- p
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
; N4 b) p5 l+ v& e$ |* j
" A5 B7 R0 l3 V5 K沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
; N, |# L+ E3 |# W- ~/ M6 i" ~
+ W" J# c+ N6 A6 p還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
: N) h# [0 h3 U2 `% ]要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
0 y! h2 F8 [$ w1 N; D' f1 ^罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ J2 I) D$ U1 B$ I大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" F0 q+ h4 y" j' _
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 5 ]" W% @' ?4 Z. a3 P7 m7 c
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!3 j* l: b& U4 w! Y- l* S4 Y1 p
既牟利又侵權!9 F4 f; s9 U2 \. r' Z6 q. g
但亦大行其道.....
' M# K" b$ ]  U% ^% r* h) l% g唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點....../ r; Y: ~$ ^) x
只係香港政府係多重標準!3 C9 {, W" f( s( O
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!& A9 M; e, R* o' r
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
1 [/ P) Z2 F" e1 t所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
1 {3 I2 v& W1 n6 ]$ Q# ?! o% x  b但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:. D8 G% o" H& T2 I) e3 d
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ G: ]6 a8 x, ?5 r' ~I agree you points that it could be illegal5 n* P* K, \8 V. r3 y5 X) I# B
but that is still a "gray area"7 Z* ~# u1 ~2 _) d
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair7 J; }4 q$ U) _9 x7 l9 A) P4 f/ ~  ?  V
! y; T$ z) c& X% V
anyway, I want to say that is3 e, o0 D% n  E
who is supposed to be protected by laws
, S. g, T  ^1 X) Ecreators?0 A' {/ v# S0 P4 F& R
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market% I* H( w( v+ {( V
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.+ r; o1 _1 S2 t- E" Q" X" o" K7 }
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those2 h- ~9 |3 v9 f: ^# a* [, g% J
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:  k: S$ T# g) s* Z. B* I2 n3 z
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 A% R1 O% N2 N( c6 O! t
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:1 N. B& S5 t& s+ X+ J1 J

1 M2 H2 p! k$ R8 C- G1 |! C我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! E" k' |+ q( c) \% ]9 p
唔係喎!
; H( ~# U" K3 y, |! d6 s# }9 T古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
& d$ ?( M3 [! u9 C( T  y我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& H0 u& y# t9 i) ?( B佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!% E9 \6 y) A+ d4 d
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
4 |- E& r% N: ?& K一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!2 x+ m, k) t, J$ R& k
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......6 y" _6 O# U2 n0 W9 k
if so bad, dun download la, right?
6 Y: \; s% }5 p2 j: y3 zi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^( j. e3 P4 z- B5 t' t1 L
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! }. x4 R. w% n0 b' x3 `9 Yno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la8 a/ ^& v3 i3 c+ W
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society! n& b/ C- a1 `: ?
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
2 v. ]9 V" G" A1 b4 Cwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!; P/ t( B% I/ A. a
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!! h6 }. K: D0 _: d1 n! d3 ^5 F
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
; M8 F0 @  s: o1 Z  J政府想比下馬威0的人~~0 o; {- n% O" ]/ t
錢就一定罰
7 b. _9 U- ]! D& @( K8 f3 q5 f未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
$ r- Q+ h  |" M, }) Z唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
1 g8 r. j" \- w2 Q* g. u佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?9 Z7 f0 R+ N. O
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
9 E) f* w  Q7 T* |- P  r: }告得入我切!!!
3 Z/ F( I4 {: B( O! Z' t
我當初都估告唔入," Q: K, I3 p- W8 f0 y
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀," v- _/ s" R' p0 L  X
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇! X+ M. o$ M4 _  g3 i
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
& z2 M2 f  l2 e- c6 V% t美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
3 X8 Q' t7 V9 z" G" U
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0