Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!6 g" {6 z& K- ]
佢都係方便各網友啫!
* d" Q  \, u4 j% y之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.9 G" Y6 o7 S1 X8 D
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!7 z8 Y& i3 y1 w( r7 K
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
- v0 F' z# Y% V3 X# @班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!" E  P5 U1 M# V4 Q+ ?
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!. h6 R0 F! E1 Y# ~+ [, i# C

: }+ [! Y( k6 q+ A( [[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 7 [! n# F& a/ Z0 |, L8 A
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
; a; W( c; N' A# c. X! x' q
0 L" a) b: p/ I/ c[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!9 z3 z: g" J- B# \
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?0 l% Z, V/ V- ?7 b  R
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
1 O- \1 ^) M2 ^' U講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
& Z8 b8 l( v+ y+ n3 T# Z( y3 r- X香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
/ N7 B/ N) ]$ u. ~$ z* }根本就荒天下之大謬!# `6 g) _6 u: [# U
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!3 _' w5 ~0 g( Q- C
根本就荒天下之大謬!
' x* @2 H3 G" G; V% _不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
; w8 c: o% H; D1 D$ j+ y
, J! K2 l. l) N/ u佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.0 Q# o" s2 c* L9 n: \
% X8 h8 l: _! ?- ]; N! [4 Y. y
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.0 d7 F9 q' D8 Z: T6 x3 F
5 m8 F) P) F3 [5 d
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.1 ^7 ~9 U9 ^: L" ]9 w) \0 F: S) G" T
0 k, ?- I! }$ [, h; |4 _
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多% i: i: J0 I$ ^6 m1 F5 ]  ^. `5 U
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人# N2 C1 X; m: p3 I7 c, u+ |2 G( n
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
  A9 C: p; v1 T' N9 S2 p2 B大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
5 N+ n, V6 b. M/ ]1 c' }0 j: a
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! $ U' j8 V' t) ~
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!4 y$ }  c6 {3 R7 i" S) a8 |$ O) f
既牟利又侵權!
4 A) J8 k* K4 z9 ?6 ~但亦大行其道.....  d( b- q) E/ S$ S
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
/ J8 I7 o$ E1 Q只係香港政府係多重標準!7 _; k$ k$ |: @4 S' f- C& S( M% f
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
: A1 k2 V5 i4 L# C4 `( W; V) f難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
' e' }- g" x9 k7 z6 Z- y3 g所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
+ ?! a1 T- R7 Q- x7 ?3 H0 D. f但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
) t" _, b( h: o2 C* l  N" c$ U* X大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
2 I( c0 L* ^. i; |4 U, TI agree you points that it could be illegal
+ D; D& {0 C. g3 t9 P" @- Pbut that is still a "gray area"
# t/ {; k% Q' F) Y$ M/ P$ i' c2 Owhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
6 s7 T" \$ T& L5 p, g
0 J& S& T" |: |( canyway, I want to say that is8 r- a7 ]: ?( S, o/ I" K, _
who is supposed to be protected by laws  w' o- P0 Q! Z) \, i3 q+ @
creators?! G& `8 Y8 w: X. t# Z
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market4 R& u. N' x0 M6 [4 K# v
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ |0 [2 B( q; K( Ewhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those) B. i) ^  d- s( k) Y6 q
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
; W% M! a1 H& [7 o8 i其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
( `' x2 ^- t$ z& d+ ~+ L我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
+ e" `# J5 _! }5 b2 W
3 u7 e# l: O5 P8 G% z9 q4 f我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
- \" R$ A4 {2 G) O: }
唔係喎!- y% x$ e3 j. C/ _% K2 `( c! A
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!! \0 V5 Q* ^; Q' [5 s. t$ a
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!) O' p3 T5 v1 p2 E
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
% O9 s5 j- `: k" V就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事, v9 l( c* A2 {( V" ^: m4 d  L
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
8 e) i+ ]7 T4 M* q; rdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." U6 f/ }7 k- u9 D8 k, J
if so bad, dun download la, right?
" S( N: i5 A; I  I& u8 J* Gi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
9 [2 L4 R' P5 j: N- X, ]but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct: V' e" p+ m, ^+ j" p, m
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la( K" t% i8 h$ d
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
0 ?# U! f: e0 q+ Cusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........." u% y% R* @: [- h# n
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!0 K! I' a( U7 ]3 U- c
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
% o" [5 X# b/ v2 A( u佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
1 d, M* [9 f" K4 h7 O! w+ Y政府想比下馬威0的人~~
, p" A; r$ V# x9 ~; P# u; N" n% m錢就一定罰
4 f2 I; A. q" R3 J( L未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
/ {3 V% y+ ]/ s( [" w唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?: s% r7 X5 i5 I, {1 z' K  G& J
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
- c  H3 D5 {: E7 v到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
- W3 N# T* E9 @; C" V( F  q告得入我切!!!
# _; V" W/ a5 }  c8 M
我當初都估告唔入,% ?6 i' h/ B  a  ]* e; h' s* V
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,: H3 i2 z) ~' N+ U. `
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
; A5 x' o* R# A0 @! J我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:+ V0 M8 v. i4 c1 L7 `4 m7 h
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
% I) h! E1 }) D+ J8 Z因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0