Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!% o' h2 U+ T1 G* ^" K
佢都係方便各網友啫!  H+ Q' @( d$ J; w3 Y: p
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
+ F4 v" _- v% P; L1 l告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
7 S2 K0 v& W; t& ^0 e: o% j我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
4 K5 e, C: [5 g' L/ l; E% Q" t班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!$ Y( S. ?3 w- A2 v  @$ ~
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
& b* A( ~& _( f& I" T$ J9 K
! {7 b& A+ l+ S  d" J/ R[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 3 P1 L+ o; b( {
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif' d2 S$ I+ ^" }# C

- k6 |% Z2 i2 _( e& d[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!, ?0 e, c+ O- `2 p9 Y& _
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?& u8 t+ k0 k0 ~. p: c
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!# e/ g3 B; b( K* M: u$ h/ R( {
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!- S% ]& D: F7 [! U8 t7 A& K# S
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!* X5 {  ?& n( Y; i8 n4 Z$ z( W
根本就荒天下之大謬!/ K- H9 u" |- u$ c& f  v' d
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!5 h0 d: i- k; Z. C3 l
根本就荒天下之大謬!- ?% @7 F) \" @7 I- {  w; [  ~8 [7 l1 Z
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.- x; f" x+ @+ q$ ]
  A4 s/ H$ w/ _: q" e0 F0 Y& y
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
9 A; U' s- V1 T
  v9 _3 {# z& D! Q# ]現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
. w# M% y% n' g: |4 V, G0 N9 l
$ R9 S" k& k) ^* T" k4 J$ A: v沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.7 z4 K: S# k8 l6 a# m/ A
+ q0 ^/ y1 V: p  ]  i$ M6 P1 t
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多8 c& ^. v; T  y- p
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
( S; {( e. b# s罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
$ |* e. o( ?2 m0 f$ J大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
, i* }1 C1 C7 A7 ~/ y; Y# Zvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! ) E) p) Z; A0 i0 K3 y( Z" c2 P9 T
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
0 X& }/ O7 P- A8 F4 W  ], O, C既牟利又侵權!
: z% z/ I, B6 O2 C但亦大行其道....., \7 R# q: T! V6 ]  {1 v  v. X* {
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
, v, l  ~, o3 B9 g0 [只係香港政府係多重標準!& V7 X( }) p$ g0 b0 ^+ f3 `8 O
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!" {1 X7 e& L# R# e& C- }* B
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
" y5 U! b" [) C. b  b8 ]所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
+ h  u' L. p& p2 U# G但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:, u% g) p7 L& L# I" b' Q9 u9 k
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
8 F" q  |4 U5 E7 A) [: j8 O4 T
I agree you points that it could be illegal7 N3 H2 z3 A) R6 ]
but that is still a "gray area"# X4 q/ Q! H; L" l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
7 C# ^& U  v: B# \' J% i
. u6 N" v( \& L8 E( r5 Vanyway, I want to say that is
7 _/ |% i2 Y3 y- _- Xwho is supposed to be protected by laws
7 f" M1 x8 R' J- Xcreators?( b, u( F2 _9 f, z4 M( B  F- Q3 t* [
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
% z' s5 P. j! d1 c% w( `let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
3 w: g6 U- y& Fwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those  k$ ?6 U$ Y1 @4 ?; j9 K4 k3 s
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:! o4 t" z. q9 k7 [! Y2 o7 `% t
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
# @2 j; w8 }7 d; S8 r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
. }& \9 O- y: l  s3 e
4 g( d3 |8 @; U1 z. M我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
' [% [1 q- w% {- ^# W5 ?唔係喎!- N6 \3 K4 f$ ^9 F+ H2 G+ [  _5 ?, S
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!/ g; r7 I1 H; K* u$ J
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" Y/ Z- O; X6 v佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
! V. i+ D- X, `% p$ o. ]7 `1 A就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事7 W1 o( n8 z+ Q% {0 _0 |: V) J
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!6 N# v- X; F' v( b) p" y, l
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......' F' ^8 E) \+ O$ G& C) q
if so bad, dun download la, right?
; E$ s6 F- ]$ a9 A9 D/ Ci am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^: ~1 k! M$ s. ?& x( p
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! H6 S  v" O$ h3 X( k/ y
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la7 j% {2 t$ \4 |2 S1 G3 @
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society. C. C6 P7 K( ]+ q+ j
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........0 x* D5 b5 [) L0 y3 I' O. ?3 ~& ^
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!+ v" K: |2 |7 `; U. F# h1 W+ `' S
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
; [* _" p: M* T7 o/ g2 }佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
1 L5 A+ M$ j. Z: }6 m( A$ y# {政府想比下馬威0的人~~, W/ r" B* }1 s0 C4 Z2 |
錢就一定罰
- o8 k5 `. H9 |  D/ S: P9 |未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,4 E: O  i2 Q" _4 g* A+ ^
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?' n# N) h9 T, C! [: j
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?9 O( N0 B* g# A3 f0 H/ R; K
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:$ g8 `9 y, L0 {- m- I9 }! J% t: S$ M
告得入我切!!!
5 W8 A. m: R2 |- K* v9 z7 V+ ~
我當初都估告唔入,' ^; j8 P- l$ `7 p. x7 D0 b
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,* F+ ~5 ^/ E/ I8 W. F- \
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇9 H3 l. E/ p  k
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
2 t& W2 e7 V6 X美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
! d- }  W0 {1 z$ ~& k. I6 P
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0