娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 大家有覺得亞視兩個主持講得好唔好? ( Basketball ) [打印本頁]

作者: yanmatthew2006 時間: 2005-6-22 08:41 AM 標題: 大家有覺得亞視兩個主持講得好唔好? ( Basketball )

大家有覺得亞視兩個主持講得好唔好? ( Gaylord and Kaleb )

我個人認為 Gaylord OK , 畢竟在公牛時代之前已有講. Kaleb 就要加油啦.

雖然大家認為他們不是講得好Professional. 但點都好過有線. 而且我認為Gaylord講D題外話

或者是一D好簡單的籃球戰術是想照顧不同層面的觀眾.

What do you think?

作者: nightmare 時間: 2005-6-22 09:00 AM

但點都好過有線.....我都覺得係＝．＝”
btw,樂黎過我呢邊打波,都唔係廢架,又唔係扮野,幾好幾好...

作者: remy 時間: 2005-6-22 10:25 AM

kaleb 打波都幾勁架..上次在沙田見過佢打, 身份已經好大型, 又爆得, 又射得3分.......

作者: 科 時間: 2005-6-22 12:30 PM

以前唔鍾意

但係聽得多左.......覺得都OK啦

作者: elmo 時間: 2005-6-22 02:48 PM

最初亞視NBA的評述是徐家諾及張丕德,他們的評述不錯,很專業.
後來張丕德過了ESPN, 換來現在的蔡錦豐,就差小小了.
說話不流暢及缺乏一些籃球知識.
但是,經過這幾年的磿練,加上徐家諾的提點,現在都過得去.
但評述球賽的節奏還是差一點.還是要努力.

整體上,亞視NBA的評述不錯,很專業,不覺沈悶.但重播時間不好,
很多時候都看不到.

這幾年是看有線的ESPN,張丕德及梅志輝
他們真的不錯.

但隨住ESPN過了NOW,就要看有線體育台的NBA
雖然,他們的評述是人多,但評述得很沈悶, 搬字過紙,沒有娛樂性,
很悶

作者: 76 時間: 2005-6-22 03:04 PM

miss 姚家莉........

作者: yanmatthew2006 時間: 2005-6-22 03:06 PM

Do you think they are helping Pistons?

作者: 科 時間: 2005-6-22 03:17 PM

Originally posted by yanmatthew2006 at 2005-6-22 03:06 PM:
Do you think they are helping Pistons?

蔡錦豐一定係

徐家諾可能都係,不過沒有明顯表現出來

作者: bigfish 時間: 2005-6-22 03:23 PM

peter cheung 同 gaylord tsui 都唔錯, 最差唔駛問梗係個"主持扮評述" o既李海光la

作者: abcde1918 時間: 2005-6-22 03:26 PM

我覺得佢都OK啦

作者: stereo 時間: 2005-6-22 03:39 PM

都唔錯呀，不過都有不足之處就係佢地既聲線無乜起伏變化；好似一D快攻或者入樽既時候

可以講得激情一點，好似ESPN張丕德同梅志輝，當有快攻或者入樽時會加快語氣同加大聲

線，類似美國個邊D評述員咁；我唸咁樣會睇得投入D。

唔係好識表達,希望大家明我講乜啦。

作者: yanmatthew2006 時間: 2005-6-22 03:50 PM

科, you are a fan of which team?

作者: martinize 時間: 2005-6-22 07:17 PM

總好過大陸果 d 評既

作者: 科 時間: 2005-6-22 07:36 PM

Originally posted by yanmatthew2006 at 2005-6-22 03:50 PM:
科, you are a fan of which team?

kings la ~
but i support pistons in the finals^^

作者: yanmatthew2006 時間: 2005-6-22 07:46 PM

Originally posted by 科 at 22/6/2005 19:36:

kings la ~
but i support pistons in the finals^^

I see.
But I am a big fan of Spurs. ^^

Go Spurs Go
You Can Do

作者: 科 時間: 2005-6-22 08:01 PM

Originally posted by yanmatthew2006 at 2005-6-22 07:46 PM:

I see.
But I am a big fan of Spurs. ^^

Go Spurs Go
You Can Do

ha ha ~
u have changed your 頭像 already la ^^~b

作者: fffffa 時間: 2005-6-22 10:37 PM

ck ho

作者: laukamfai 時間: 2005-6-23 04:06 PM

好好~~~因為我聽過其他台~~~~完全差幾皮野~~~

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-6-24 11:34 AM

聽佢地講波。其實有時都幾好笑。

作者: bonzi1983 時間: 2005-6-24 12:31 PM

i think Matt Jung is better than Gaylord and kaleb la...he can really read the game and give subjective comment in the half time

作者: stone86 時間: 2005-6-24 02:20 PM

張丕德真係講得幾好架

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-6-24 02:35 PM

Originally posted by stereo at 2005-6-22 17:39:
都唔錯呀，不過都有不足之處就係佢地...

that's why I am listening to NBA on ABC.....
Al Michaels and Hubie Brown
they are much better.........
of cos, if Marv Albert + Hubie Brown/Doug Collins/Mike Faretto...
Oh great!!!

作者: bettman 時間: 2005-6-24 02:40 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-6-24 02:35 PM:

that's why I am listening to NBA on ABC.....
Al Michaels and Hubie Brown
they are much better.........
of cos, if Marv Albert + Hubie Brown/Doug Collins/Mike Faretto...
Oh great!!!

TNT嗰幾個仲好啦
不過finals俾ABC搶咗播啫....
我覺得Hubie Brown做analyst麻麻...我都識講佢講既嘢...

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-6-24 02:43 PM

Originally posted by bettman at 2005-6-24 16:40:

TNT嗰幾個仲好啦
不過finals俾ABC搶咗播啫....
我覺得Hubie Brown做analyst麻麻...我都識講佢講既嘢...

TNT are Marv Albert + Doug Collins + Steve Kerr!!!

Hubie Brown, you need to listen carefully about what his talks.. maybe he get more American voice tones....

but when they are talking about team formation, how to attack/defence....
they are great!
(of cos, they were the head coaches in NBA)

作者: Dicksonheng 時間: 2005-6-24 03:41 PM

Originally posted by 科 at 2005-6-22 03:17 PM:

蔡錦豐一定係

徐家諾可能都係,不過沒有明顯表現出來

咁咪叫專業囉
唔錯，　徐家諾夠專業
’激情’Ｄ野咪　蔡錦丰做囉

作者: 亨九利 時間: 2005-6-24 04:02 PM

Originally posted by martinize at 2005-6-22 19:17:
總好過大陸果 d 評既

你唔識聽就話人唔好? 典型的香港人......

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/)