Board logo

標題: [轉貼]Jeans變黃牌 [打印本頁]

作者: 瑞比    時間: 2005-8-15 08:40 PM     標題: [轉貼]Jeans變黃牌

Jermaine Jenas has escaped a suspension after his red card in the 2-0 defeat to Arsenal was reduced to a yellow.

The Newcastle United midfielder was sent off at Highbury on Sunday following a challenge on Gilberto Silva.

Jenas was dismissed by referee Steve Bennett for the first-half incident which had a major impact on the outcome of the game.

Newcastle played on valiantly with ten men but succumbed to two late goals from Arsenal, with Magpies boss Graeme Souness reluctant to filter-004 the issue after the game.

Bennett, who appeared unsighted when the tackle was made, has now reviewed the video of the challenge and requested the red card be reduced to a yellow.

The Football Association have confirmed the suspension has been lifted, with Newcastle revealing that Bennett has apologised for his mistake.
"Steve Bennett has been in touch via letter with manager Graeme Souness, Jermaine Jenas and the rest of the squad to apologise for his error of judgement during Sunday's game against Arsenal," read a Newcastle statement.

"He has requested that The Football Association downgrade the dismissal to a yellow card and this has been confirmed by The FA."

England international Jenas has now avoided a three-game suspension and will be available for this weekend's clash with West Ham United.

球證Steve Bennett道歉
===============
硬膠..........
作者: NaTuRaL_GiFt    時間: 2005-8-15 08:45 PM

輸左先講..
可能唔係Jenas出場,Nescastle同Arsenal有得打...
作者: 托迪仔T    時間: 2005-8-15 09:18 PM

.....yahoo 經理人大賽個分都係計紅牌..真唔抵..
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-8-15 09:50 PM

咁都得= ="
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 09:54 PM

紅牌其實都好合理..........
作者: adamjacky123    時間: 2005-8-15 09:55 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-8-15 09:54 PM:
紅牌其實都好合理..........
no....the tackle is not enough to red card ga...
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 10:01 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-15 09:55 PM:

no....the tackle is not enough to red card ga...
雲格︰贊拿斯值得紅牌

阿仙奴領隊雲格表示,球證驅逐贊拿斯離場的決定絕對正確。

雲格認為,那一記是個危險攔截,因此絕對需要判罰紅牌離場。

「我認為那一個攔截十分危險。」雲格說。

「他出了第一隻腳,然後把第二隻腳夾到基拔圖施華的重心腳。」

「因此,我認為這很明顯可以判罰紅牌,但也有機會是一個黃牌。」

「不過我不是球證,如果你們要問我有關比賽上所有判決,那可能要做一個很長的訪問。」

此外,雲格認為阿仙奴在該場比賽感到十分吃力。

「比賽十分困難,因為我們對著一支好球隊。」

「其實之前我都知道會這樣,因為他們在圖圖杯比賽時已經熱身好。」

「他們表現不俗,應該值得獲得一點回報。」
作者: adamjacky123    時間: 2005-8-15 10:02 PM

but I think that's not enough to a red card wo...
if it can be the red card,the F.A will not change it ioth yellow card la= ="
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 10:16 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-8-15 10:02 PM:
but I think that's not enough to a red card wo...
if it can be the red card,the F.A will not change it ioth yellow card la= ="
阿仙奴無意斟贊拿斯

阿仙奴領隊雲格指他無意收購紐卡素中場贊拿斯。

該名廿二歲球員在周日球隊負予阿仙奴一仗中,上半場領取紅牌離場。

「他是一個好球員,不過現階段我們無意收購。我只希望觀看他比賽。」雲格道。

周日僅為贊拿斯職業生涯首次拿取紅牌,他已承認在紐卡素並不愉快,而熱刺被傳會以現金加簡路迪換取贊拿斯加盟。

該名中場將要停賽三場,直到八月底轉會市場關閉前他都不能上陣。

期間他將缺陣紐卡素主場對韋斯咸及曼聯的比賽,以及作客保頓的賽事。
作者: 亨九利    時間: 2005-8-15 10:18 PM

比佢玩死, 叫佢賠番比我呀)))))))))))))))))))
X100000000000000
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 10:19 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-8-15 10:18 PM:
比佢玩死, 叫佢賠番比我呀)))))))))))))))))))
X100000000000000
賠咩~叫邊個............贊仔
作者: 亨九利    時間: 2005-8-15 10:20 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-8-15 22:19:

賠咩~叫邊個............贊仔
球証.......
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 10:24 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-8-15 10:20 PM:

球証.......
11個打11個~阿仙奴都未必會輸@.@
作者: wanmankit    時間: 2005-8-15 10:26 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-8-15 10:24 PM:

11個打11個~阿仙奴都未必會輸@.@
未必會輸,打和機會大d,阿記打到臨完場先入波,如果係十一打十一
我諗呢場應該係和波
作者: night    時間: 2005-8-15 10:27 PM

...on Jenas' sending off
"It looked a dangerous tackle to me. Now if you ask me have I seen people getting away with that in the English league, I would not say to you 'no'. But when he brought his right leg in, you know, and took the standing leg of the player, I don't like that. That was a very anxious moment. It looked to me a dangerous tackle, and unneeded one, but we didn't want him to be sent off."

英文version唔係咁既意思..佢都無講過值/唔值..佢只係評論件事危險,但無評論應該與否
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 10:32 PM

Originally posted by wanmankit at 2005-8-15 10:26 PM:

未必會輸,打和機會大d,阿記打到臨完場先入波,如果係十一打十一
我諗呢場應該係和波
我就話唔會啦~~~打少一個全部退縮,打9-0-1~博和局,
十一打十一就唔同講法~反而對阿記有利~
其實阿記有好幾球都久運
作者: 亨九利    時間: 2005-8-15 10:34 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-8-15 22:24:

11個打11個~阿仙奴都未必會輸@.@
我唔使紐卡素贏或和, 只要佢輸一球就掂晒.......
作者: 雷公    時間: 2005-8-15 11:25 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-8-15 22:34:

我唔使紐卡素贏或和, 只要佢輸一球就掂晒.......
原來九哥買左讓球下盤
唔掛知得
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 11:26 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-15 11:25 PM:

原來九哥買左讓球下盤
唔掛知得
唔係讓球和咩................
作者: wanmankit    時間: 2005-8-15 11:30 PM

Originally posted by pakho at 2005-8-15 10:32 PM:

我就話唔會啦~~~打少一個全部退縮,打9-0-1~博和局,
十一打十一就唔同講法~反而對阿記有利~
其實阿記有好幾球都久運
阿記呢場冇咩霸氣,攻守冇左韋拉都未適應到,
睇下遲d會點???
作者: pakho    時間: 2005-8-15 11:32 PM

Originally posted by wanmankit at 2005-8-15 11:30 PM:

阿記呢場冇咩霸氣,攻守冇左韋拉都未適應到,
睇下遲d會點???
我唔覺好差囉.............=.=
好多球員都好fit呀~~~係欠左少少運:cool:
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-8-16 12:22 AM

我覺得紅牌係嚴左少少...
但亦唔係完全唔岩...
所以e+轉返做黃牌...
都幾合理...
(無任何"金錢", "眼光", "經驗"關係...)
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-8-16 12:58 AM

應該黃牌夠喇,佢出腳向波又貼住地面去,而且又唔係從後攔截G施華,只是收唔住制隻腳夾左埋去,都唔係有心,不過最好笑潘源良竟然為左話應該紅牌,話佢係從後攔截
作者: 亨九利    時間: 2005-8-16 01:04 AM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-15 23:25:

原來九哥買左讓球下盤
唔掛知得
嫪毐....
作者: lookityourself    時間: 2005-8-16 03:30 AM

但係我覺得紅都得
因為我睇基拔圖施華隻腳都就黎x柴咁濟
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-8-16 07:17 AM

Originally posted by lookityourself at 2005-8-16 03:30 AM:
但係我覺得紅都得
因為我睇基拔圖施華隻腳都就黎x柴咁濟
我都同意,佢剷埋去果下我諗冇心既,不過太狼死喇,紅牌都可以話係抵,
因為佢真係夾到基拔圖施華隻腳應一應,再加上當時個情況下佢根本唔洗做呢個攔截動作,可以話係多餘既動作,
還好佢冇鞋底行先,否則可以同施華講聲拜拜

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-8-16 at 07:19 AM ]
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-8-16 07:18 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-8-16 12:58 AM:
應該黃牌夠喇,佢出腳向波又貼住地面去...
就算唔係從後攔截都好狼死,算係一個多餘既攔截動作,不過值唔值紅牌就見仁見智喇。

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-8-16 at 07:20 AM ]
作者: iMacc    時間: 2005-8-16 10:07 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-16 07:17 AM:

我都同意,佢剷埋去果下我諗冇心既,...
鞋底行唔行先都冇乜關係嘅....
都唔係踩親佢...係夾到啫...
其實都唔係話好嚴重...
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-8-16 10:33 AM

Originally posted by iMacc at 2005-8-16 10:07 AM:

鞋底行唔行先都冇乜關係嘅....
都唔係踩親佢...係夾到啫...
其實都唔係話好嚴重...
鞋唔鞋底行先好大分別架...
如果係用鞋底印埋去...好易同收人山架...
作者: abcde1918    時間: 2005-8-16 10:37 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-8-15 09:50 PM:
咁都得= ="
有咩唔得
作者: sonyguy    時間: 2005-8-16 10:42 AM

Originally posted by iMacc at 2005-8-16 10:07 AM:

鞋底行唔行先都冇乜關係嘅....
都唔係踩親佢...係夾到啫...
其實都唔係話好嚴重...
鞋唔鞋底行先好大分別架...
如果係用鞋底印埋去...好易同收人山架...
作者: abcde1918    時間: 2005-8-16 10:44 AM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-8-16 10:42 AM:


鞋唔鞋底行先好大分別架...
如果係用鞋底印埋去...好易同收人山架...
乜有咁大分辦
作者: iMacc    時間: 2005-8-16 11:13 AM

Originally posted by sonyguy at 2005-8-16 10:33 AM:


鞋唔鞋底行先好大分別架...
如果係用鞋底印埋去...好易同收人山架...
我當然知道啦~
不過喺jenas嗰球冇乜大分別啫~
其實jenas都唔係踢茅波嘅人~
作者: fantesticming05    時間: 2005-8-16 12:23 PM

算啦.............即場呢d野好難講...........睇錯都唔可以怪曬球證
起碼佢已經認錯.................算係咁啦 ~




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0