Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:4 y( }+ C% B8 m2 }+ o9 B
1呀....................~~~ : H: }# P" D8 |# t靚好多/\/\
9 d1 K- Z: w- C) ], @7 W2 v' }3 _
3 x8 I3 [' M, W
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 5 `2 N# I! X6 s9 g& ^, T& n0 r* E; R2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...1 R% F) i+ Z( w
( s4 ]0 S0 s1 d7 ~7 y7 q# _
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... - F& r% _6 L z4 X( Y; D( \! y n( z% S1 S8 X% `
/ ]' W1 ~6 V" z4 K* X9 K2 w( e
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 ! V P ^9 U1 R5 ]' m2 V" J第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...2 K* D9 o/ T. a7 D7 k% K
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚..2 I( T \- f: B7 D9 S( _8 f* D
sorry...