Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: x. {5 T; ]3 z/ K6 e
1呀....................~~~/ b/ K0 n R6 L4 z: a; M
靚好多/\/\
. v& c" U& V* y. h, [6 }7 c& R
5 [9 _! a$ M/ M, G
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通0 S: F( | Z: v
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...+ \: |9 l' J" w! |9 g1 b* `2 `6 B, D
" W8 {2 [3 z" O+ f4 d3 E$ ISecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... 8 @$ M# q+ I5 v4 ?7 z' T. C$ H7 T" w% |
+ R. j$ ^" p; R
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地7 E4 k' l! ]1 g" c
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...' m, j* K3 @2 r0 e
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. % Z! W) d, A1 ~( z0 E5 _+ E, T# f2 xsorry...