3 l% S F0 G. Y, O! TI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 * {: k' m' l% g. F6 m3 w2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...9 b% |% k; u$ B0 T5 Y% Z
5 E7 P: y3 i; R, J0 L8 c2 @3 ?
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... 7 {8 }* G3 w( B6 g a7 l * o4 X! h" d/ |0 s9 Q e- ^# G, X$ ?+ U* s( _4 V& q
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 + p5 x6 h9 Y& g9 N( S' G1 i第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...9 W1 N6 }, O8 Z; j. R2 t
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚..8 M1 H: B% }( F3 ?7 X" ^
sorry...