Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: , | A) f8 M: ^! B8 }! [$ g1呀....................~~~ - E8 L! L$ v; H8 p6 c ?靚好多/\/\
7 R: }9 R: T& a% A
" A3 }* c. B+ K4 r8 y* NI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通: g0 u, P5 y: y
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...) M+ Z4 m3 n3 I* @, X1 f
$ B( o& o) k6 ]6 T% R" R a1 A+ `Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...2 L. d8 t) b1 ?: A+ ^
& [1 L( y( N. H1 O+ A
' w& Q. O6 r4 {! R3 X ^( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 P- w* } d3 v! {2 l. m$ e0 A. Z
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel... Y5 d. \1 n6 Q; v0 i- i& \
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. ( o/ z2 d N$ n. d: K1 H4 A: msorry...