Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: 0 A5 a: }9 s% o# h6 I9 M& G& o0 }1呀....................~~~9 l6 H" N1 K I9 p% G0 B
靚好多/\/\
1 ~2 p |4 T' i+ |. ~+ J* l
- ^, Y$ Z D- ~
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通; H+ E) U* N* X: u1 |. P8 {2 l
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...: s8 F: q. _' w8 }( U
8 s+ N1 o% D( i% _
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... 3 a! M+ K- `8 d' m; i; \ $ E6 z' M) I2 I6 r! t3 V8 k x4 U. g& U; q, ?) l8 c
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 # r7 t! V' A K1 p3 Z第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...* Z/ z- S" }, k# ~- b
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚..# \' i. |+ C+ X3 O
sorry...