Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: 3 E0 S3 z1 M: g" C. x+ Y, R1呀....................~~~( p1 H2 Z( x) X. t
靚好多/\/\
, B9 G9 ?5 |: b0 D1 d) v: x# V$ a6 J s4 b B
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通$ ? R8 @. c; E/ e5 w' v7 f
2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...& D/ m/ Y' s6 W5 z j1 Q
; E) h- D5 W5 i* [Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...7 e, T) G: K* @9 R& L* z8 v& n
8 \+ S7 X& z" W! b; Y: k- I3 z/ h
" o: T$ Y. H6 _. `3 |( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 ! Y b; u' p9 v/ j第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel... 9 u5 ^* F) N2 M( k1 Q第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚..) O+ X' e3 p' s
sorry...