<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
+ ?$ ]& H, T1 u9 j) M# U
" C3 u0 e, f! e0 Tfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
0 Y# o0 f% A  H' o7 l. F) ]8 u( Fbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily% S% @$ K6 Y! V/ c7 a
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
0 L# L  ~: ~6 D6 p- g+ {8 l! _avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!* G! B, m5 z, c% L

6 U4 }# A: t8 p9 l0 qafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!% V7 ~" ]7 D1 [8 |7 w

9 f0 @  f! _& S) R6 K" m* V# }however for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall" K( Z; [) ?, L4 F
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point5 H% B+ Q  ?) D7 U
easily getting worse for yr relationship7 J; ~5 d# I- \' Z9 C# M' B  E8 s: l
- d: T9 U. V2 P) I: z
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。