<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
; ~6 h/ Y4 y2 s  F; V
0 x$ S/ \" G& J+ s& S6 ?for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married1 _: B* a4 S8 @! _
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
" b! W/ Z0 H( j! m- x4 lso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
% |6 r4 |0 U  h+ X7 e5 b$ uavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!' \1 ~. M, b, Q& M+ H# n
* T  o6 C5 C" k& A
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!4 j1 D, `2 b, h9 `* v

' [; y9 @# O1 D6 H3 z: ihowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
7 \. c# o3 B, U) Mliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
# R2 i8 k5 \! H4 l2 ?easily getting worse for yr relationship9 d1 e) F7 R+ J6 p& v0 N% i
% S$ I* f  |1 J/ L, t: p. T+ b
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。