<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
0 R% Z' f8 T3 y! e+ w; [! z; l9 A; }
for my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
* R7 f" R4 d1 G  |because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
" ^# n1 q( C4 W$ S" P: `/ W5 `/ aso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not3 D$ l  i$ |) A: ^+ ]. `
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!$ w) k3 C; E8 J9 C3 D8 e
0 j9 e* K( Q% p" ?0 i7 [) \
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!6 s3 T0 Y, i5 c! @$ b) Z

0 B1 X' ]4 s+ v1 p9 Q, R/ Q/ x( Y7 Ihowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall  c4 N2 P2 B6 R3 v( e) B; Z
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point$ ?! n0 m: |7 S# t* ~, y' r
easily getting worse for yr relationship
" v7 n% e, z  k: x+ V( O; }0 m( _2 G8 k
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。