<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
) `0 F& @/ V3 T6 L: V
  c9 a1 M( I6 P' u; g" T1 afor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married4 `4 K# T& v8 L, |6 n
because u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily
% c5 N8 G9 J+ A! J7 w: Q5 Fso that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
9 C2 _0 j1 H* O' T0 |: O) g8 Uavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!5 b7 v: ]" `5 L: }) m1 E! X: p

6 R) d5 h; q; q! k4 H3 E" Uafter comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
& J3 @. n% [) J2 h# _/ I
4 E$ a$ J4 J5 W! K" Mhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall& }  Z1 S5 f  Q* G6 _$ h6 v' O
living together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point; f* R: z* H2 \+ X# O
easily getting worse for yr relationship
/ q4 C5 J* t0 g% Q% c8 t( V) t& E! I
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。