johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:5 L/ a8 Y$ W& i- e

3 `' C; v: d' h, y# Q4 L( m0 U7 J: w0 d5 g
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

3 _" K- k: R! p8 f1 T7 R7 H& \  R/ P& y1 I: I) `" H5 H1 G5 [
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
, O' l& P1 p7 S3 v8 B$ Z/ |Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:& A7 b" H. e" N. }
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)- N) M% `/ l  c  E! a4 _

, `. x; D9 D) y! I民事訴訟:
- c8 o9 ~0 J! A# m0 o% B告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:* t; Z% O; d: c+ D
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

# c: B8 |/ o# X; s: A
: J" H: Z# X+ e$ x. F. ]3 C
Not always... like this case..
3 W, W8 Z( m$ H' ^0 N/ |or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:6 P& ]4 j" V+ \# `
我想聽大家自己的觀點
% \* I6 j; k- W" F# Q7 \4 y9 q如果你喜歡
1 y2 C3 ~8 B0 _- F* E您可以加入討論/ ^0 K& a$ d, e
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"+ [4 Z/ e# o/ q, D
已經代表自己的觀點5 v8 W. R' F/ P7 d
您沒有需要繼續吠
9 }( D. i% K6 |( d% I9 tTHE END

1 p" b5 N( H$ s" V$ z. b7 x, e/ {( N  C, y) s  b0 t& E
Be careful of your wording...
+ i+ I- p& n! m8 k  g& \4 U0 q+ V8 T3 }