johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
' D& v0 o6 I* i* r2 j% P7 Z; h* u$ l6 ]$ l, B' |7 G

) [9 S# b/ }& ~+ X% r除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

$ R1 r' p' z. m- }. K6 Q0 O, V
; t/ I" |3 b0 v3 x# uThis is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.4 |1 w. k. P$ D9 H! ?: b
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:/ P- c5 q% H+ N8 R6 h  _( |
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
; Q7 I& i8 B: ?
, e/ ]5 P" ~7 u$ ?+ X$ D民事訴訟:* ]6 a) k0 a) G; i
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:! U. H) K  f+ o4 C5 j
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

" n8 l3 a  o% L: W+ v8 k2 U1 H9 K8 P  m9 Y1 d$ t; g) J
Not always... like this case.. ( C  M1 M/ X+ H( _
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:
1 C2 D, s  N1 \, y8 a2 d我想聽大家自己的觀點2 X1 |& H/ p" @0 B$ A4 Y
如果你喜歡' N2 ?, m" l8 U9 A. M4 J' |) {
您可以加入討論% n8 k2 S6 n4 h* T4 b
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
8 Q4 @  W: T& [; j, `已經代表自己的觀點" }% g6 X) j" {+ Z" K2 B
您沒有需要繼續吠* {+ @: f9 w4 V5 t
THE END

. d& i/ D8 G4 S" Z" d+ Q, u8 f2 W: H. n; s& W0 U2 J
Be careful of your wording...) f" f) W# C; j* l3 ^5 S  F3 s. J