johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:5 m3 x1 R2 h( s' \8 Z2 e3 g0 L
8 I' g# W1 B8 X

# n# D1 z) O! I5 Q* U' L* O0 o除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

* y# i! A/ |5 d+ q
! V. l9 A. t  ?
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
# U8 A, ^; d9 T2 A- f: sFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:# e% _# U3 ^/ S/ n- D# G" F' k
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
& i* R  }6 S# H  U9 r8 K7 I: L5 P1 S1 F. v  x  ^
民事訴訟:2 T6 B6 r' k8 m
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:- o, n: W3 Y. ]7 m6 E
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

& M( M7 B0 K2 z% a1 a

7 ]% O5 X* D- z7 qNot always... like this case.. ) _/ O6 u8 w! b) w
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:
. s$ e7 g8 G  k( {9 t' S我想聽大家自己的觀點3 ~& ~3 y) I+ J9 D6 o- U
如果你喜歡
) @7 e+ A; ]( Z" v) }您可以加入討論; g; }; X' p$ N- ]
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
2 k5 [- h  J* ^4 J+ m6 X已經代表自己的觀點/ a+ x8 h6 q5 z; p3 x
您沒有需要繼續吠
/ W# ~4 I3 L! @3 aTHE END

. s! T0 e! c: {5 k9 s- _: C% M. _
Be careful of your wording...  B1 ~! Y# l, a0 h: U