LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢4 w# X; q' d  V+ G% J, G% K
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權' U6 J; H/ ?7 J- s( P
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
1 o. p& D1 F* E/ u所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law3 f% B# N5 M1 e

; M: [, T, H: j2 }: E7 b- c4 ^(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

1 V- }' n7 f5 d1 r' H7 Y7 `; n但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
, x! }7 k' a7 ^+ Y' N7 \9 w7 G咁就好正啦...8 _/ ]; l- Y5 o1 b1 D
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

0 \. I5 q. [- H) ]; A, H3 D! M
所以我先唔明4 d8 z& a9 w( o# ]; S
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜
3 T6 [: d0 C) i$ _  Y棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
( z" {5 f4 d8 @3 {+ z. O這是兩回事，9 g4 U4 x' {, C4 w) L
MP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，; E3 h5 V  P* S; y
正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，4 |- T; g- i( z: ~
與商品和商家無關.) x. ~/ B% z2 d. F2 ?3 B
雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......# z2 @1 d# ^; v: d: n* g

: G- ^# v. Y1 E$ N. qd公司全部都利字當頭% E/ H! D& x  H: C- e$ g7 }; ~
佢真係睬你都傻啦..9 S+ o6 F' i4 V4 r
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:0 X8 v9 A1 x/ u0 w! o) s
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

+ \; ^( |3 K1 \* k- ]1 g  t: ~我有兩部喎
7 E. ]9 ]1 F4 f5 c7 A咁我咪double懲罰??