LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢8 i; ?1 x+ s  m
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權
& x: Z# q, [/ R6 ?2 u' V2 \, b1 O6 b以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
! I- e5 `- [; E- E1 W所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law5 j# j* c( n+ F- @. `0 V
+ y; |' _# k( ^( d5 s
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

9 \4 A- S6 C1 p0 l( Z7 k
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
  e  B8 r6 M0 L0 N1 z咁就好正啦...
+ R  ^' {8 U/ E% S+ J- N咁直係話個個出街攞住...

) ~  R. X$ D1 O  h: |
所以我先唔明' W, ~6 p. K3 Z1 C, [* }
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜
& h" O; N" G% x% v' K6 G" [棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
3 C- _, i+ F$ {& `! n6 E& ]這是兩回事，
7 L& d4 [7 P: F1 G8 Y3 j4 hMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
- f% B  a: R: V正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，
$ p2 n  L% [" o  Y與商品和商家無關.
7 v2 `7 i" J) C' k4 W8 o6 J; b雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......
0 ^: n1 E. E& o# j

6 K' h6 P9 ~! }% p7 x% m: G2 c
d公司全部都利字當頭1 L/ }1 @! d4 N7 ]* A* h
佢真係睬你都傻啦..8 Z* x! I6 F+ F5 W* j
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:
; F) |% h* u7 x- a+ r7 g咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

( ]9 \( L: e4 p1 E* l
我有兩部喎
8 v$ ?5 M$ S5 q  _# k* G- Q咁我咪double懲罰??