LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢
* i9 c( ?) `) _6 p' v0 [% N因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權5 [3 R% Y' ^" T# S
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
* N6 c4 E9 P( ^/ }" T所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law! ^% u! I$ d6 g$ U# n
& P- @0 `& f5 D; \" I- G, ~$ b+ L
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

+ T8 E: A6 G# U. M" S1 X
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
' p& [: }$ d1 [咁就好正啦...
9 c1 z1 j) `, a$ e咁直係話個個出街攞住...

. M+ S" i. ~; ]7 I6 y" z9 s4 t所以我先唔明2 _+ b: o( u/ J
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜( w: A) Z0 y' S- X7 D
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
6 N0 m: Z! R  F% k* Q) t' k% p8 y' r這是兩回事，6 E5 j& h- m5 p, T, m
MP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
7 ?3 B1 S) h# L3 r% \6 A; Z正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，' A. a4 {4 `( j9 g& ^1 k, l. m
與商品和商家無關." z0 i  K) |. i1 g- `$ t
雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......
; [7 R- X4 ?+ ]9 ?! I

" Q  c$ e' C6 A& X! T
d公司全部都利字當頭+ Y; y$ W0 {2 Y" u7 B
佢真係睬你都傻啦../ J7 \6 X6 C$ k- o) K
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:8 V4 q9 m1 a7 r
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

- _, R: [* I/ |2 C% U1 K/ ^5 D; G我有兩部喎
# U% P1 Q; z# G1 w: T咁我咪double懲罰??