LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢' q2 E: S- B" Q" k( D: E/ w: }
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權0 ^/ c* k: R( o# D" Z4 \! O; |
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
: _5 h% [9 e4 b( ]; E: b6 u: ^7 |所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law% `9 O3 v1 f1 s) P
( Z: z3 k$ D% [" a
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

4 n. Z6 a7 b# f; Y' }  W* P
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:
" {' r- V& F5 l/ S7 Z5 k咁就好正啦...
4 l/ B( g! i3 P# j. ?( [* n咁直係話個個出街攞住...

& J6 R( D9 f7 H所以我先唔明; c8 `/ s$ {7 I1 J4 P1 k
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜
4 _2 d* P8 k) J1 f( j棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
; _$ g, t6 d" U3 H這是兩回事，# L1 w$ Q- Q* c/ u
MP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，5 O: \4 d; c; \5 N7 L6 w* y
正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，
0 X6 B- k; C& Y" b, W2 T與商品和商家無關.
. [6 T) f) ]# N  T; r雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......$ Z& G) S" O# J; _$ C& A8 i+ Z/ P

. F& q/ [9 n/ e  `+ i0 N) Nd公司全部都利字當頭1 R9 D  X8 K: t+ ?: A; ]
佢真係睬你都傻啦..; Y) x, C/ n" T6 g
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:) G# w. Z! t7 ]  U
咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

. Y, _7 V6 x, G3 w+ a我有兩部喎
; Q! [9 x7 z0 b  X9 S9 W! _咁我咪double懲罰??