LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢* l( W! `: j3 e  k0 W% _! B& ]
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權' f2 B# e( v8 G- k& x( M. D; m
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:+ @# |( B7 X! i1 C3 u& W
所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law
5 N) u9 g$ K% d' n0 @) V" \5 O6 G5 _8 i0 I
(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

1 o2 ^& S" Q- |; b4 g( a7 W
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:! P/ ?: h; l3 _6 Y( q
咁就好正啦...  k' T0 `, }1 ?9 Z' C
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

2 x/ J4 [5 o6 O  C所以我先唔明* r: v8 x& O: `! H; p
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜; L8 L/ v* c6 D! Z& [# i
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:
4 k3 p! o; b1 x# E- k5 r- p這是兩回事，
4 I: d# C  \; [3 A/ qMP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，
6 [5 ?, m% v% g9 |" @+ k% Z% v6 F正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，3 F: _4 d% u( g) C
與商品和商家無關.
  a8 i6 x: j& w3 R雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......! d, u2 r. P3 w7 x

7 n5 J9 n% _' k3 v. c# `8 g) z- i/ vd公司全部都利字當頭4 y% y! C1 c& m' H! T% v3 n' @
佢真係睬你都傻啦..
. n6 d+ p; I: S& c唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:
! u' v0 c/ n. H5 M咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

( N7 W$ ^  X" Y" M, |* g我有兩部喎0 e. b3 E' W$ G! H
咁我咪double懲罰??