Chenjinnan

no, the theory is correct. it just find out the "x" point of the 2 lines --- "invest" and "reward". no one say that the "x" point is a must win point, its only a point where the investment is minimal with the biggest chance of winning. the point, if you buy mark six in old fashion, you have actually no chance of winning and 100% chance of total loss. with this method, you have a higher chance of break even, higher chance of partial loss, and somewhat chance of winning.

Chenjinnan

Originally posted by 金魚佬 at 2005-10-10 01:53 PM:
. _9 j) I) O+ P% w8 S+ f用千幾蚊投資博20蚊？
6 f7 k9 ~; E1 \# g' S, }; z
( H6 o" k) a8 h重係指派彩20蚊，個1100蚊本無得收番個隻喎。
5 h3 t6 R" S) U. N! j, {) W  P
0 L3 V, O  g5 j% `1 \& {) I[ Last edited by 金魚佬 on 2005-10-10 at 01:58 PM ]

+ x' i5 `) q  W1 z% F( `! s
" q; n# q/ D( _; P. M" |& U
that's the bottom line. among 230 bets there is 1 must win 20$ back. for the rest 229 bets, you will still have chance to win special, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and the $20 prize.
7 P, w7 S. X) a0 u4 W* O/ c: N0 Y
7 k9 _, h4 }+ w% Utho I know about the theory, but I did not buying any mark six for 20 years.