foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
4 \# r" R$ s9 K- u港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?$ g9 d5 [" F2 B# O3 f
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖% ?& C6 m$ p+ v
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

0 C3 s. J1 p0 c" X0 ?; \1 a+ i8 J

, W3 M3 W; ], W. n7 n特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:% v5 a  _- L1 a5 J$ s* U
+ \- w4 B4 @7 c5 Y/ v# T

# S5 @; `. w' w, a6 ]% p3 m1 S# T之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

# G& O9 ^; v$ x2 U9 M0 K8 H$ r8 {5 Z0 [- m( R1 D/ v: z
=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
1 T& @' Z2 }1 o3 X
2 X; Q/ ?5 V4 v7 r3 E; r" n' c7 F如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

8 F: u5 q$ V3 N, ~# O& Z# M+ w
% u7 K! V  z! b* @1 @" R
"如果"/ e; X! z0 w0 i+ g. s: B. y

( M3 y/ M7 ?# B, Y+ n& bthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.