foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
0 g2 x  R5 f: }, |0 v+ G( i# b" ^港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?* [2 I, J3 k7 S0 p' a1 i2 Z& D
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖" I: C, c9 i- F4 _
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

# Y2 w7 \- _6 ], F+ q- C( A& A

1 s8 N7 o6 Y& s0 w特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:6 g$ e: b( f3 y0 }3 k( W
* v0 i% }- h; q+ [" G% i

6 n, L& Z& Q3 G9 ^9 F" B* k. Y之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

, P) E7 a' w- j( y7 m" L. V
% j, h$ ]' R- e% u% ~
=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:- T8 W: w/ L: P: H3 I' ~6 b
4 O0 R4 @2 f# t) L9 y0 H
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

; u  s! S* A* X, ?# \7 w( ^9 g' @
. r1 C  Z0 [. ]. ~8 @( d" U
"如果"
0 d2 o& V5 h- ]' j
4 U; E0 _2 e1 K8 ?1 t* |they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.