foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:2 A/ s& P$ ^! x4 j/ E" x  e, [6 @
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?: f* K* G  R6 @- S! s6 U! c
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖/ F0 {; X; b, S3 J/ i+ w0 c
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

3 A4 G/ }: t2 c0 ?: h

# z+ U; ~+ |% Y2 F+ E' b* t特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
8 v4 Z, e3 @$ o6 \1 ]5 P/ M
6 _: ^3 A$ f* z. e( Q9 L  m" h  p2 u5 N' E2 @* w
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

. `1 x, p/ w" ^$ C3 R8 Q
/ O% I4 P% T  ^/ ~+ U) l4 p=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:' d, t2 T- o9 w6 b& G. Y

2 K- K$ |8 s% y+ b% U: X如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

6 v, Z! E( F) k) S5 D
. U9 t6 R9 X, t"如果"4 z/ S( W$ Q' X' g

8 p  ^2 z5 y0 }( Jthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.