slwong3

真可憐但冇法
+ L5 S$ N! M0 a5 D諗下有朝一日有條傻仔真係吞左棋盤吞瓜左時米又有人鬧爆
8 x% m/ P/ \% r- X, U要怪就怪加陣太多怪獸加長訓練出一批智障兒童+ y' m7 {4 \( X" }4 |  W4 O
高智能低智商8 q: ~. V+ T, D/ ]! k2 g
咩聞所未聞既刀可以發生出黎) _& k% A7 e& o  F
早年刀有單話有個細路係個水到腳瓜既池浸瓜左拉
  t6 o; f/ Z# w. W/ h所以加 ...% ~9 v: h1 Q/ b1 H. V
mnbvc 發表於 2011-11-10 06:22 PM

) R/ T' l, r& N# {5 @+ i
+ Q' x2 F$ q" p
Well, to be honest, I think this case and the charge don't make any sense.
" Q5 y( [3 M+ g, W: C7 v& N  }0 R5 e4 X
If you're saying the kids will eat the paper chess board....then the kids may also eat a piece of eraser, paper or even put tissue in the mouth.7 s' Z6 x: [  c' g5 z
There is possiblity that a kid will eat anything.% Q" m$ q/ L8 [- R9 j& q
You can't use the reason that the (paper is too thin) to charge the retail store.
" g! a7 c& e9 {7 L/ I! L7 s8 I- `
Besiders, the store owner is right, he didn't make this kind of chess board.$ z9 G" m) X/ q" H+ v9 s
6 j5 V9 Q0 o( g, a# S, N% v$ @
Eg. For example, if there is importing food that is infected or posioned, will they charge and punish the retail seller or the manufacturer?( c3 j  i5 t. E5 Z
The worst case is to ask the retail seller to stop selling such products and return them back to the manufacturer.