vivienna

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

vivienna

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

vivienna

Originally posted by spector.R at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:: h  @: ?7 G. s3 s! Z+ F
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~

+ V% T7 F8 Z' B% X, Z
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

vivienna

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:! |; _7 A9 X* k8 |8 W

4 K9 P- u) o) ?, }" V除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

7 f1 X, f! ^, x, ~; e
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。& {/ _6 T3 i6 p& q0 g- \( H& \

( |; m4 H0 F) l+ z( A8 c0 A% FCivil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

vivienna

Originally posted by johnwu at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:, _' N% ]( L6 `& c6 r; y. O: M7 \  i
hello vivi, you beat me to it

  _# D& i" ]3 O! _, }3 Xhaha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.

vivienna

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
+ e* i6 ?) M# d" i) G1 v# Y( p& O' Y& {: g% H) D$ M+ ]3 J4 h& h
* o5 n" X# J2 m% O% @! E1 R9 g
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢?
5 b' ?: c* y- D' W4 n% b如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈

% c" D% ?* Y+ _大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。" E+ [: h% e6 O$ L' J% n, P' Y

) ^8 y! T8 k! |4 q5 s答番你個問題﹐告人個條友唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

vivienna

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。