abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 10:33 PM:

例如呢?
(請不要用我以前D戰績作例,因我以前擺明搞事既~)

人地眼紅你咪會囉,一定會雞蛋裡挑骨頭

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 10:20 PM:
點解我話碧咸呢??!!!!
講真.....黑雙...

你話係皇馬要球隊就佢,但係皇馬季初打得唔好,自從比返碧咸打返右路先有返少少光彩,
唔好話佢傳幾下波就成為英雄,傳得準唔係個個做到嫁,
咁唔通佢班隊友又係盲目,西班牙班傳媒又係???盧森保高初初黎到皇馬都話碧咸廢,碧咸屎,但係最後又出返佢.....咁又係點呢???唔通又係盲目捧佢???

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 10:39 PM:

未試過喎,雞蛋裡挑骨頭都系想你好堵~

睇下係咩人既啫,唔同人有唔同人既要求同居心

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 10:42 PM:

唉~好煩,我根本冇回某人post,只系某人回我post,如果系我回某人post先而發起罵戰你ban我亦無話可說~

之前你細佬用之前我地都未ban你啦

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 10:57 PM:

唉...
講真.....
不過你又可以話...

先生,我冇話佢依家可以當選世界足球先生,我只係講返佢d野,冇話佢應該當選,如果佢當選我會覺得好低能囉
如果朴智星同碧咸比,計返全盛一定係碧咸好d,朴智星都唔可以做到場場助攻雲佬啦,罰球都唔得啦,碧咸係度既時候曼聯明顯係勁d,
我冇話你話到佢一冇是處,只不過有d野你係講得唔啱啫,碧咸係英格蘭既地位如何大家都知,我相信球壇唔會個個都係盲既,碧咸唔掂會唔會比正選佢呀,雖然佢唔係球王級,但我覺得佢係一個好球員就夠啦,平唔平庸就見仁見智,我覺得佢做到助攻,幫到球隊已經夠

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-14 11:00 PM:

好收喇真系~費事又有人話你踩breakham ar,breakham真系一個禍水,次次罵戰皆因佢而起........

講事實就唔會咁啦,hans講你又搭咀

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 11:12 PM:
老兄!
我一開波都係話"選碧咸做足球先生好可笑!"甘既意思!
我理得你有冇話佢可以做足球先生吖!
激啲講.....選既人係盲目!
你要衞護碧咸, 冇人理你! (我講佪比喻, 而家要朴智星定碧咸,你就連而家既朴智星同'以前'既碧咸你都講埋, 然後就點都一定係碧咸好.....唉......我老豆廿年前踼精工, 佢而家連我都扭唔過呀!)
唉.......討論吓啫.......唔駛啫住人啫到甘行.......
大家都有自己認為o架啦!

你一開波係咁講係我誤會你,ok?
不過討論落去就變左唔係咁,其實明眼人都知冇可能選到,講出黎都幾廢話下,
我係講緊全盛,唔係講緊依家既朴智星同以前既碧咸呀,況且依家既碧咸就算打返曼聯都未必會打得差,
最緊要佢發揮到佢個位啫,唔好又將佢放係防中就得啦,

唔係我一定要幫碧咸,係你地唔係講事實啫,你地下下當佢超級球星咁,佢傳下波幫到隊友比人讚又話佢傳兩下波就可以做英雄,咁有咩野可以再講呢???
唔係下下都係話碧咸好,我都講左n咁多次嫁啦,你地講事實絕對冇問題,我都會一齊講,你老豆廿年前踢乜關我鬼事咩,唔係下下都係我嘈先,你唔知以前發生咩事啫,知道你就唔會咁講啦,呢度d人唔係盲嫁,kobe同米尼都唔係,如果真係我嘈先,真係碧咸唔掂既話我地都唔會係度理論咁耐
唔通碧咸比人讚就係唔應該???下下話佢唔及以前,咁施丹夠唔及以前啦,又點呀???

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-14 11:17 PM:

真係唔知係真唔識定假唔識,當我蝕底d喇,拾人牙慧即係俗語跟人口水尾
原來你以前讀國際school ,唔怪得個種咁'雜'啦

係囉,唔怪得佢咁鬼醒目啦原來係讀國際學校

abc123aa

Originally posted by HansChan at 2005-10-14 11:37 PM:
你仲係黎得甘激......
你口口聲聲話"其他人講既唔係事實, 係事實就會一齊講......"
乜嘢係事實?!
响你之前講既嘢......."碧咸係好!"就係事實.....(只係總括你既語詞!)
係你"認為"...唔係"事實"!
邊有標準o架!
我"認為" "碧咸係廢物中既廢物!!! 連李健和都不如!!!"
如何???????
係我"認為"....我相信既"事實".....甘點?
(若你要話我之前一個好causal既reply講咗一句"講事實啫!"....甘我更正"講我認為既事實啫!!"
我老豆廿年前踼乜梗係唔關你事啦! 只係你之前話全盛時期既碧咸(而家唔係, 將來未發生.....甘即係以前啦!)同而家既朴智星黎簡.......甘我咪比喻我老豆廿年後既今日連我都扭唔過呀甘囉!
一句甘簡單既問題"簡朴智星定碧咸?"
你認為碧咸咪碧咸囉.....
又話乜嘢"朴智星都唔乜乜乜啦!"
甘又點呀??
問題係overview黎問......(overview, 我覺得而家朴智星係好過碧咸十倍左右!)
你既反應係要揾嘢出黎證實碧咸好呀! 朴智星都唔係下下甘好o架......
唉........又點吖?!
各人有各人喜好啦!
我之前講英格蘭對波蘭冇咗碧咸好表現好多.....
同一場波....你鍾意既可以話冇咗碧咸一池死水o架!
鍾意講咪講到夠囉!
唔好吓吓攞"事實"掛响口邊.......你講好多嘢都將你"認為"當做事實.....
又要講埋晒啲"全球球迷都係盲既咩?"證實我講既唔係事實....
唔係事實黎o架!
事實响邊啫?
我係認為大多球迷都盲目喎.....我point out咗點解喎!
甘你認為唔係咪唔係囉!
成熟啲啦!
唔駛下下都要啫到甘行.......
衝住黎既!
又話我唔知之前發生乜事所以就點點點......
我係唔知o架!但唔代表你講既嘢人人都認同嘛!(我冇話你岩定錯呀!!)
唉.......岩聽咪講多兩句......唔岩聽咪第二度講過囉!
駛乜甘啫!

我冇話過你講既唔係事實,你睇返之前既留言啦,我只係覺得你地d人當碧咸唔知係咩啫,

事實係咩???咪就係你地睇到既野囉,唔通你地睇到既就係碧咸出席活動唔落力踢波???
我重申一次,我冇話你講既唔係事實,我亦都唔係盲目捧碧咸既人,你要話我唔成熟都冇計,我的確係唔成熟,咪要同你d人指教下囉,
d球員打得好又話呢樣果樣,打得唔好又話呢樣果樣,咁有咩好講呀???

我認我將呢件事同之前清揚既夾埋一齊講,所以我先講到咁激,因為你根本唔知之前清揚講過d咩,想知就自己搵返d文章啦,
況且我唔係啫住你,我係啫住某人啫,你要話我啫住你都冇計格,我回返你d論點又話我啫住你,咁你想我點???
依家似乎係你講到咁激咋喎,我唔知你清唔清楚碧咸啦,
不過我自己都唔係咁清楚,你搵一個咁既投票去講話有人投碧咸係好好笑咁你都幾廢話下,
雖然話係討論,但係你唔通真係當佢係真既咩???

我冇將我認為同知道既野當係事實,但我講既野都係我睇到既,
如果我係盲目捧碧咸,係都要幫碧咸既話我就投碧咸票啦,你自己睇下我有冇投票啦

EF咩人都有,d人隨便入黎投下票都得啦,佢根本唔洗理你地講d咩
你成日話各人有各人喜好,呢句我好同意,因為唔會個個人都鍾意同一樣野,睇法同一樣,就係因為大家有唔同既睇法先有得討論,先有討論區既出現

一句甘簡單既問題"簡朴智星定碧咸?"
你認為碧咸咪碧咸囉.....
又話乜嘢"朴智星都唔乜乜乜啦!"
甘又點呀??
問題係overview黎問......(overview, 我覺得而家朴智星係好過碧咸十倍左右!)
你既反應係要揾嘢出黎證實碧咸好呀! 朴智星都唔係下下甘好o架......

咁我要話返比你聽我點睇嫁嘛,唔通我咩都唔只係一味話碧咸好咩???如果我係咁既話我就真係盲目捧碧咸喇,
碧咸老過朴智星,唔夠佢咁好狀態咁fit係正常,唔計佢地全盛唔通計佢地學徒果時咩???




我話比你聽呀,啫到咁行既係某人,如果以前唔係某人啫到咁行依家就唔會咁樣,詳細自己問返米尼或者kobe或者自己去搵返d文章(我唔係話某人係呢件事度有錯)
如果你知道以前發生過咩事就會知道咩叫啫到行啦

abc123aa

等你回埋之後就鎖文啦,基本上已經犯左第一條版規