F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves: a& s! J+ |" f5 x* ^# k4 p3 ^
M is for his pride
+ X+ f% d  y. z# m8 PL is for visiting her lover
! q& M3 z) n( }6 U: [3 O9 c7 M/ GB is for money
% T5 b# g1 m0 J5 V& o# b& f: X# mS is for sex4 o# n7 W& U0 T* L. f! p
except F, he can't get anything
( D# q! l( Z( d. Y4 `. Abut he just did something wrong for friends
5 l  x% I, F: f6 f. E( ttherefore, I wound like to support F
) w( I# X& S5 [9 IActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything7 ~3 I) B. L6 _
% r3 }6 y8 f1 ?3 Z0 {/ ?$ O
from good to bad2 v6 {- m; s- o
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
+ F* i' |2 {# q3 i2 d準時12:00
# p9 P  h( }: B& o1 N8 l) ~
! y* {" r' v4 I% w/ w[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me9 N# n2 Q' B6 S: B$ I
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case3 }! q: N% u7 l+ O7 t; B

5 I9 i. j6 m, a  y8 m% O5 J2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
- R* \- ^9 y7 ]7 T0 A# H3 S3 Z# @1 ?% n8 b
I believe this is very hard to be together7 H! B0 h7 t. r0 b! v" d2 z9 T9 ]
but I still trust that both of them can be together