F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves7 J1 Y4 D8 B- e% s' N
M is for his pride# ?+ t5 z& g0 [2 X5 {
L is for visiting her lover0 y' K+ Q- j5 \  y: S7 a7 K
B is for money: z: L* R# b& F9 }2 R- A
S is for sex' I, c. b0 W4 k% N4 ~
except F, he can't get anything5 T$ j3 C3 p4 T. l7 o+ N5 S- d
but he just did something wrong for friends2 A+ P; P0 m& R& i( c- x
therefore, I wound like to support F4 x7 f8 r- e8 f: A  I% [
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything; R# d1 b5 M( R: j, @

3 y4 Z9 y3 g  p( f8 Wfrom good to bad% e: Z7 g0 E0 L5 {+ z( B
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
6 I. f+ u9 R/ a) J" }準時12:00
3 k4 L- U2 p, D& |, O: n  F
5 [7 b5 A+ R- Y* @3 h[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
7 Z6 ~2 r) Z4 V" O: X" AI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
$ B' w0 ?1 c, y8 J. ]$ M: c, J8 w/ S- T) F: C7 Q% \4 W) q
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
$ j% X" w' [+ }- c( H' a) e, \: ~1 ]: C) X
I believe this is very hard to be together0 h/ E" Y6 U# e0 q. R& C! M: ^) P! Q
but I still trust that both of them can be together