F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves' k. N' ^5 c- k
M is for his pride/ X) T. V& R$ H8 o
L is for visiting her lover
. d" t; o& k" S1 Y$ w7 N4 y: wB is for money9 C" B) _! e; U7 J
S is for sex
) l$ e- E6 J5 L7 a' Pexcept F, he can't get anything" m& _1 c( U+ S
but he just did something wrong for friends" [: u. L2 B- s) f* f1 _0 t7 [8 I
therefore, I wound like to support F. t8 `. y1 p& a: y& P2 |0 R
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
1 Z! V, U7 W) D1 ~$ x. g5 _# t1 Y, z% Q5 S7 q) \
from good to bad# F1 e6 r( r+ }# R3 s- a
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
- }4 _4 h, T1 N( n. h: ]準時12:007 S" J  W: {. W& P& e. t" c
/ Y6 d+ ^% U8 ?5 c3 I
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
& L4 w' m2 |; @' m% FI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
' N& Y+ R7 r- {
7 y( P2 S! l" x2 u2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?3 F( t- n! w7 H4 h
' Y6 d% ?8 r( L2 A3 {
I believe this is very hard to be together
5 X$ c/ J- a0 A5 s9 Mbut I still trust that both of them can be together