F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
) K) R: ~" D6 M9 A# OM is for his pride* {7 w4 L, h8 c* ^0 ]2 W6 q
L is for visiting her lover6 A! e4 l% j4 M0 s, q
B is for money% x; b) C# d8 I& O
S is for sex6 c/ n2 i4 \# p" f( I2 q
except F, he can't get anything4 k! t6 f/ ~3 a! V
but he just did something wrong for friends
6 q* o5 f1 V; S& _9 D% c  f" j2 `therefore, I wound like to support F
  A  Y) T8 H9 g9 w6 V7 z2 kActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
; \7 W$ [5 S4 Y4 g) ^1 Y5 F
0 N. @' L' Z" O( x, ufrom good to bad7 e( ^7 z, c' D. r5 H
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
; h' P; |/ y; C1 v  C3 c) r7 Z. x準時12:00
) C" S- i: L6 B3 W; X1 \! o, N
* N+ T7 X# O; L/ }2 q% {+ i[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me' k, _8 P) F+ c8 ~) ]
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
6 m4 I9 U5 A& {/ O* o% q; ^& y& Y$ Z) ?5 {
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?* h: p! d! p9 |7 W7 {: w* O
, v, }9 S* R; E# l9 ~# V
I believe this is very hard to be together3 a+ w/ a- t3 B" B3 x! r, @
but I still trust that both of them can be together