F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves, s8 x5 t( O" M
M is for his pride8 Y- c+ R3 L; [/ w
L is for visiting her lover; [, K8 b- T  ~; Y
B is for money
. |" S. }+ E: S0 k9 t, _" B) fS is for sex
* r! p  O  D* y+ J( `except F, he can't get anything
# V" ]' P2 e) u  S' ^but he just did something wrong for friends
; A& h! S: u4 O' v0 W- \6 etherefore, I wound like to support F
) a# e- e7 z1 o) ~3 L* |2 iActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
* ^! T+ A% X# S5 C; x4 Q4 V4 O
+ R/ j3 h9 S1 @  n) g* `from good to bad3 M3 K. _! W# \% f5 e4 h0 E
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:  Y% D, ~& w4 `0 ~/ S6 h
準時12:00
4 d6 a0 E- n. S1 l( [3 h+ A( u
% o- A5 t) {3 K+ k; L' G' i/ O[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me" W- w1 J  ?$ v) \6 z3 o8 z7 a
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
9 {( B$ J# Y# _# `1 e
5 l) X6 y- A$ m: @2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
, y6 m) q" N# o3 j/ ]" l$ M
6 D. A& C$ J# G1 z6 vI believe this is very hard to be together- V0 E$ b, ]. V; F
but I still trust that both of them can be together