F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves0 D, P- D8 i7 n
M is for his pride
3 j+ ?; n7 E, u  f  [L is for visiting her lover
5 e. L, n% y$ W0 n" e: |B is for money- c: y( Q; v# I# V9 F' {
S is for sex
2 E/ n0 A( q4 Z6 Q1 j" H; \$ dexcept F, he can't get anything
- o" M  ~, P7 W7 P/ I7 d( e5 q1 D" Ybut he just did something wrong for friends
: t6 R/ }. A0 A, xtherefore, I wound like to support F
9 s# d6 Q# @5 b1 N/ OActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything+ |3 D/ ?0 F4 h' m0 ?2 S: T
  z* N5 n  f7 [% I
from good to bad$ q( p6 }4 k2 h# Z5 t
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:& c6 `/ y, u% j5 w1 A
準時12:00
( U; O8 v8 S* @9 l5 [( l; b& J9 b2 ?7 j  \6 E% Z& f7 ~, k1 a
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me+ J# ?9 n. r" F) C8 O& t
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
( r) a, n& J- D% H1 i# c# \% l) C5 O* L! ?
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?6 l3 }9 N( p2 S" }% U  g: d

4 U6 w- x0 @# S. p3 S/ l9 q; hI believe this is very hard to be together
* a2 B# |( o5 ^' c2 C: Wbut I still trust that both of them can be together