F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves) I8 c! p) }9 L  A4 ]
M is for his pride5 ^  X2 N' }' E) s
L is for visiting her lover
! y3 L6 D4 X9 ]* s- |B is for money  D( x3 B( E* f8 C
S is for sex
  K& ^  E5 ~! J5 o- e& j7 Cexcept F, he can't get anything
3 h9 }$ ]7 D- Dbut he just did something wrong for friends- f( L  z) i" f, Y
therefore, I wound like to support F
6 p  W  ]: q( c2 }; R1 UActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
; E* V3 k/ w3 q! V" F& e) W$ {3 p
; v# j! |- G/ ?- }. c# ^/ Afrom good to bad
. z! i3 ^8 _* V- ~4 qF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
! G% x2 f0 e( Z8 |準時12:00
% G8 P, N4 |% E# t; m# D" w. i; h! z1 K* O6 u
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me0 A; O# r9 W! V, ^& n6 z
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
/ j1 J, F. R9 U; G5 c
' j2 ^. U3 o  m. l! m# _1 f, b* v. G2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
2 k# T/ J; c5 `" {- S, B$ p
* m3 D5 Q( X+ G! D7 y5 w: oI believe this is very hard to be together2 x* X5 q# I3 w2 c+ c2 [- E& k
but I still trust that both of them can be together