F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves) i2 I+ ~$ I/ R8 F4 n0 E* y$ Y
M is for his pride
% a* ?( I  v5 k) w& z" U' ]( xL is for visiting her lover
  C3 q8 D6 T3 |B is for money
( H* k" @0 t2 W- _- |S is for sex
; m) R. m" j# P; V/ I. |/ ~except F, he can't get anything6 S$ L: d: P9 i# t3 Y) a1 y. s3 D; X9 |
but he just did something wrong for friends
, P4 r2 L9 f" @- {$ ctherefore, I wound like to support F
" \# X) y# L2 d1 b! ?Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
" _. n: p( u& P$ y6 ]2 {
! u& L9 `* I2 T$ n2 dfrom good to bad
7 R9 ~' ~: E' p$ Y; v: J9 UF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:! H) K9 {' F" [; u' |4 g0 ^
準時12:00
- h) V" b, `) D; G) Q) ~6 p, _; S9 K* q  s
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
- Z7 x9 [' k/ f+ KI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
0 q* k3 h# p' Y- s6 w3 l! ]5 i% l
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?8 A1 a0 R5 Z% I# O, r9 @9 C

9 J2 j; k& g; e7 kI believe this is very hard to be together: p# ]# @! D& }5 b
but I still trust that both of them can be together