F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
# ^7 W# g6 C5 p# z1 o/ s  P8 Z2 QM is for his pride' T. P5 n, ^* ]- E! x3 K0 A
L is for visiting her lover
2 x% U* p6 B6 D: JB is for money% _* P' ]* ~- ~4 X
S is for sex6 y  e& {, Y3 b( \2 D+ h
except F, he can't get anything
/ M+ r% b, M8 d0 P) J0 o; kbut he just did something wrong for friends
; C' V( T3 Z5 O" z3 H7 ]% g$ Gtherefore, I wound like to support F
8 ^6 s0 X+ s1 n7 [Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
8 b0 B/ D8 O0 {' A; o5 U$ \  z8 M  J: [9 n5 Q2 z4 o7 d' ]
from good to bad& t% _7 x9 q" A6 d! N1 _, Y& y
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:' a; ]* o9 z2 Y) C; [# N
準時12:00
. J& i) M7 Y) V4 I1 @
" s' l/ V0 J% J* ]) u[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
0 @9 Q" t$ ]2 y3 cI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case1 g' G) V! m! L8 _

" X3 J* f8 j9 T( [9 U' O$ M2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
, f  _5 u: c% X& J& j' [
# s; y0 }/ @0 V( h3 s/ UI believe this is very hard to be together
* O% b, |  F8 C# {$ T  I9 Cbut I still trust that both of them can be together