F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
  c' D' {8 S: N& h) `- Z) dM is for his pride
1 v8 Q, d% z; D7 m. ^- X% B# lL is for visiting her lover& \% q6 G3 n3 [% q  }+ ?; Z
B is for money
, J# ]6 Z) ?* ~2 j/ L7 QS is for sex" g0 f, t% v: T8 y
except F, he can't get anything
5 W. g& k+ o' ]3 q1 a- q! C) l4 P* zbut he just did something wrong for friends% e3 o% D/ E: [1 W, X- X5 }: L) B
therefore, I wound like to support F
- r; E/ v- T" `7 a3 g/ ~8 y) }$ WActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything1 T: b4 \3 V. @$ z0 Q. @1 a
: o# t8 m: k* p+ Y! W
from good to bad
& ?5 ?8 a; Z  t# t" h$ GF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:' a2 t6 \0 i0 Y- Q, n
準時12:000 s( Q% m, n: }, x1 z0 n' f

& C" j, S6 N8 H4 u" d. n[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me7 `3 v1 b9 U) U( b5 e
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
4 J! S  ]' z6 S  c+ d
4 Z/ t: i/ |* S' t2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?; [" Z/ ?* B" F& E% z& P

8 O5 ~/ a) p# H1 m% Z$ O/ v# OI believe this is very hard to be together
- j$ w( h- }: Y0 O" V" U' e( pbut I still trust that both of them can be together