F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves' b* w1 V- c" O
M is for his pride+ e( Z5 b) t/ {, Y& E
L is for visiting her lover
  L- l- `) |2 B% D0 f; ]5 BB is for money0 j$ c3 ~* ^: J6 d
S is for sex( x% W$ |+ \4 y
except F, he can't get anything
5 V" v. z8 l4 t$ @. ]8 bbut he just did something wrong for friends
& y, Z" p3 [6 e- itherefore, I wound like to support F
9 S5 I& l. r) ]. qActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything0 F( `* E# c+ `* U; M

( ]/ H, z9 V: W6 |from good to bad6 ~& S1 _2 }! H/ w: v+ }3 R: t1 ]
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:4 w! w# J6 e5 l! Q+ h
準時12:00  C" O! t1 N! Y- {
) k3 ]/ \4 j  O) W8 [: `; \* f0 W
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
$ g$ T! i1 a) D  n' J+ KI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
$ T1 c) Q) H  {
9 O" W2 k7 O/ J2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?9 Q% Y* y; T% z0 S5 ^* b) f
+ _" c  v$ b4 Y5 n; r- s5 I
I believe this is very hard to be together
% s; Y  A$ F6 T% ubut I still trust that both of them can be together