F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves, I2 R9 _# U3 N
M is for his pride
* z: [# K% o% U5 |' z6 pL is for visiting her lover
) f* `, f( V+ w, n' `B is for money
0 L) j2 K. Q- bS is for sex
, p; W$ }- c( c1 p* X" \. X7 z9 mexcept F, he can't get anything
/ Y( u8 b) o9 Hbut he just did something wrong for friends
" N4 v8 `3 H6 L8 v' M. dtherefore, I wound like to support F, R; y3 D- B. l
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
+ y* u& T" m; }5 j4 E9 k
- g3 {5 ]7 s8 Q$ `0 [from good to bad
6 w4 y" u% z$ {F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
2 x" t1 u8 a# a- u- s* Z0 B- h準時12:00
( f8 Y4 E+ b0 P# H0 B. a" v- O7 y: A3 V
[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
( b, ^) z. R3 `; i# \% kI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case6 P" @% V: i( r0 b3 C8 K& V' u
. O" v7 ^4 B, Y+ ?3 g
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?- O" ]6 Q7 ?- ?/ }8 u

! a0 M) C0 Z5 _: X8 j$ nI believe this is very hard to be together8 g6 d) T2 U/ t# M- }8 L$ d
but I still trust that both of them can be together