F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves( Y) K( H  X: I) m1 e
M is for his pride
2 H7 E3 |8 H& y$ HL is for visiting her lover
% L7 f& ~- {! z0 qB is for money1 g$ @) Z6 U( M4 H7 M$ Q5 @. n! l
S is for sex" N$ K$ f" O& u+ z8 q  s6 E
except F, he can't get anything
. c: x9 B/ X( x; ]but he just did something wrong for friends
2 G. @* v1 J9 F) S$ D7 [: A, d% B& L% ]therefore, I wound like to support F+ b( B$ r, s! C& J, M
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
) D7 e" U" h. B) w4 F9 h0 }6 R0 Q: B; _3 o% Q
from good to bad7 @! h# L& S2 F! D' G% }8 i
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
* R# U( ]- z- g0 x8 _準時12:00! l/ L4 W: U0 J; G1 N9 a9 D0 D

; H# \: ]: Q: U+ F, k[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me5 M0 Y5 t1 o# _6 Q% ^0 F" }9 G
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case6 [1 l# J# b+ [  l* D; u
" U3 L( M4 G" K9 R5 `
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
& O) [" V' X! ]" D4 ]# N, Z" e( d9 f3 W6 Z: O+ N3 H
I believe this is very hard to be together
+ x# O, J9 p" g+ Y/ s! abut I still trust that both of them can be together