F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
. }5 e* a3 ^0 ?. j1 r: U/ |M is for his pride. {+ u5 t8 z( z6 H4 M  \% p7 D1 e! L
L is for visiting her lover
; K1 Q0 k1 {2 y- A- T9 iB is for money0 N4 U4 }/ j7 ^  `& X' N
S is for sex
7 E4 j1 R7 l4 B$ h2 M2 E! Zexcept F, he can't get anything
' w' x9 e5 g: e% o: jbut he just did something wrong for friends! s2 N" k* v1 T3 D
therefore, I wound like to support F
9 }9 ^3 B) b+ B& A; b& c) C. ]Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything5 Y, g/ Z" ^9 Q. v4 O  m

# ~9 |( J3 o, j' \$ j! v; xfrom good to bad
3 y: ^/ E3 n4 F% U* bF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
; a' R1 h0 f9 R+ u& G/ O5 u準時12:00" z2 E" a3 x+ l* Y; N) j2 v

9 D6 g# b+ _8 G/ _: n0 s[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
) ^2 A) v# [- L) m7 j8 T5 ?I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
8 d3 [( g( ~" G6 q
* x3 C4 ?3 \+ r2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?+ z% @  ~4 i; U' r# S* o* ~: z; U

# `* h9 W2 ~" @4 e5 A( v$ Q+ ?* wI believe this is very hard to be together
) X5 a" T) h; M0 y' ]but I still trust that both of them can be together