F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
8 ?2 s& b2 j' K: c% DM is for his pride
0 a. o0 i1 t1 f9 u0 U2 ]- h' qL is for visiting her lover
# {$ m8 ?+ D( }1 M4 F  LB is for money0 M; O: r! t! B$ M1 J
S is for sex
# _/ k7 a& }$ f& w' b2 a* iexcept F, he can't get anything
! U& Y  O- r$ f8 ^but he just did something wrong for friends  S1 `- ?/ z1 [7 d8 i
therefore, I wound like to support F# f7 K) d6 l# z0 F8 s  X- j4 b7 x$ u
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
  V0 F( M5 B% z8 d% @/ N7 s, n( ^- y
from good to bad
$ T1 c% `( N. s' d7 T( fF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:# n+ s& ^1 w$ u& `
準時12:00+ H5 |- z+ \4 [" t

, {8 l4 U' @+ v/ d9 R0 D1 }/ ?[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me' X5 D6 }9 s) K/ h2 W
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case, F3 A0 c+ N' M9 m! f4 M2 U2 p% `% \

0 q0 i: r2 d+ m0 H3 r2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?5 {( m) U& A+ L6 [

& k, r6 f1 n$ {; nI believe this is very hard to be together1 J* i5 A1 u/ `
but I still trust that both of them can be together