F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves: e, L. X; _" J* Z6 z4 a
M is for his pride$ X  Y  c6 ^) h  n
L is for visiting her lover' M. Z9 O8 }3 ]$ i
B is for money
5 C( n2 j% X  |" `S is for sex3 [' s7 M1 f" [% c; m6 u+ m! S7 F
except F, he can't get anything
8 W" G9 ^/ K9 z4 O! I  ubut he just did something wrong for friends
: F& Z, K' w) S4 ctherefore, I wound like to support F1 Y: P' p8 {; n3 z  j$ ^4 G
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything3 d% z. l- L, Y/ I

: I& ^1 E7 _8 U" J1 f7 J) l2 N( Dfrom good to bad; T$ L8 r) {' w# s+ P
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:' X+ e4 R: T, D0 g8 l- n7 U1 y6 d3 L7 W
準時12:00/ R; @3 p1 @8 c8 q- n* R5 m

& T) Q4 M, }3 L- W4 N6 W+ d[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
/ t+ _/ r. l4 n1 G; N4 A& c- mI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case$ d. s! k1 W. p& s- ^+ x
, s/ b' L3 z; R
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
" W: Z: g+ S4 x% \2 i1 `0 `0 E" `9 Q/ ?8 G4 D- |% x% _, X8 C6 }
I believe this is very hard to be together) @, U; B  M) k; [& ~
but I still trust that both of them can be together