F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves' q# @2 ^; q9 v9 [
M is for his pride
) F% ~+ C. p5 B5 R* oL is for visiting her lover# P/ [" }' ?% q% }
B is for money
) H7 C# r' m: _& \! s0 C+ NS is for sex
  [! L# Q, V. o9 u' K! x' ~# nexcept F, he can't get anything# T$ S) M) Q  e9 P) o; z1 ?/ ~
but he just did something wrong for friends
' D0 x, E! O4 b2 E) f4 ?0 c8 y( ftherefore, I wound like to support F
; e' J! U: E3 t$ e7 Q1 Y! l; qActually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything* [7 a# d8 |6 F

: _. s; b3 c9 t6 I5 [3 Efrom good to bad/ X7 o5 {5 N% I' w0 [/ o9 k
F >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
/ G$ Q' N# l1 B" F  o& i0 S" r準時12:00: e! k/ p( u8 u$ C/ Z- l

6 {3 `+ H( D4 J  X+ O( i- {[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
5 \$ s2 b& A. v3 C- g- l9 fI had posted my answer before, and I am in this case6 i- @5 d& N; R) Y1 L, n. H' u
/ o9 U5 E& m# U: _' @" R
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
+ k: q" Q; f; i) u' w# v+ n
& J% i  v' Q! V0 G: BI believe this is very hard to be together3 W% I2 k$ h! x# U  G2 F
but I still trust that both of them can be together