F.king

M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves, K% V1 T: a' l6 v0 J
M is for his pride9 g  D& o9 }3 U% h' Z7 s0 d
L is for visiting her lover; }. ]( p0 Z( k5 C: v8 h9 X' s
B is for money
3 B# h# S6 k! D" e$ G" O: A2 o' ]S is for sex6 @1 ]* q9 v6 I% {+ M7 L
except F, he can't get anything
+ `7 c; f8 _- [but he just did something wrong for friends: H/ a: v9 d1 }: ]4 u$ R
therefore, I wound like to support F  c- p7 q# }& x  m' P2 }. Q
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything' d# g! A, v% k0 o( D
- x' l1 c: E# @9 o6 A2 e, d
from good to bad
7 K* C5 r. m5 K: \. f! MF >L> B> S>M

F.king

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
+ U% g7 `! B7 K/ a+ U( T7 v準時12:003 t0 i: Y8 j% @3 O/ C

( Q+ Z* N' m: n5 j8 N[colo ...

Well, the analysis is quite suit to me# t) v1 q1 D% M, Q# ~, I! p* p& V
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
/ E0 B; ^7 b, w
( j8 Y+ t) t5 {, A4 D" ~2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
# X+ I2 T8 C3 P8 h
8 R( g! n% O9 G, Z4 `( R# N' tI believe this is very hard to be together
1 J" c. a. K4 }9 a9 A/ c/ mbut I still trust that both of them can be together