jsqaure99

true say, good example.
6 T- ^! r+ M" O$ |" Jby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.5 V) M$ e! ~2 Y, w
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.' s! j6 c- ^5 p1 p; w# m
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕: y9 g3 M( Q% n9 k# I' ~
NO OFFENCE
1 Y, X; i; ?, J$ o" X! t, J但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
5 R% r7 J9 W9 C5 p9 Q+ [0 `' S% N係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
  u0 T* }$ [, _  E# \IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
& w, [% P- m8 V" x* U  n3 @IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
# [4 Z- s( p6 s5 p. A; r7 i我唔知3 D5 Z! L9 Q5 L; h
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐- ^# y$ q* I3 }0 ~& I! j: L! Z
會唔會覺得未夠班呢1 S9 I! L  E  ^$ W2 P5 U
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
" G$ w) Q3 e/ d/ H, \但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇' ~0 X, q+ g& N# N
又點解釋
: C# {0 a: W, F  q1 V1 t7 h. i+ j( }; K/ M! m1 P
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回& d6 z/ R# I. K: P
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到% b) g* L2 k' m8 m
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
2 x& e" G2 _- ^1 u4 M7 ~, {講得好
1 d  T. V9 Q% z) m9 U" I仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
0 N' l5 ^6 X+ b5 k8 v0 m( r我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:3 l0 |8 F' L% I3 G- q' U

: a6 f( X* N# C2 \9 e
  R4 i2 o% \2 R: J9 J% B証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
8 I% D0 ?% j8 b5 S. Q
4 ~4 |2 }  M5 W6 G, W用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

2 s8 {  R1 L% G" n. i6 I, d" C. u3 c3 j. r/ e

$ K0 c/ R0 ]0 s* e唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗