jsqaure99

true say, good example.
1 ~5 l8 h/ l# |2 _1 Yby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
) \  t! V6 E7 i0 ?trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.# \0 F  ?) g% W) X
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕& ]. y) D4 s* j; E& r- d( k$ f# x
NO OFFENCE
) |. Q& J% A& ~% B& @, Y& I但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
% i3 D! U: [9 P" ^( R8 K% O係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
# u& e& ^1 b" A8 c2 n: WIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢; M4 H( \4 Z4 Z# ~5 J
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢. y6 [; z5 j9 c# a
我唔知
! }& x8 I" Y- m2 ]  J9 }# _但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
# E& z+ j0 w4 {1 @8 ~0 E會唔會覺得未夠班呢
6 h: z% P+ N! {$ p8 l$ F. p人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
" d- f# ^9 @# I& t但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇( @. F* l: L5 B5 h
又點解釋
1 }/ h' X7 w- A3 l% p/ H! H3 x# u
6 V) }9 ^8 T% G7 L$ u仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
( ?1 d# t% y" B( s+ n以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
) u+ g# V+ {6 ^& N  ^' S家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材2 D. ]$ N( o1 g7 Y
講得好
: e: T+ ?' \) w' L* o: d仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈$ ~' m; I! L8 S; x
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
& L6 n0 p( x" B  O$ T, I, h( M8 I. w
5 g. Y- a! j- P) c( l! \9 s/ m# w3 U! f& @$ T
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
6 q4 o: x0 h) g' b3 G8 P/ }, p
# @7 V& T% l3 J6 g4 y用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

! u- d* @4 g2 S$ l$ \
* d# g* u$ [9 Z9 |

; b. G. Q8 i+ H唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗