jsqaure99

true say, good example.) v/ O2 v5 `2 d( M; ]: p3 \7 v5 ~: M
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.+ Q, ~2 ^; d9 M: x  y0 N* S
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
- F0 Z  _7 j" V# S7 o2 t4 P  ^1 ono offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
3 K; R  w5 t  D9 o+ G9 lNO OFFENCE
2 @5 N7 p  W& ~, J( q但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
1 P* e/ }% w  C& |- P+ K. J係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢0 J; K0 o; i) L* i( Z+ F  c2 {7 ]
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
$ |% N9 R+ u$ }. V, h0 RIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢4 v0 _1 c, y( [7 c2 V. T
我唔知
- f- G3 Y+ ]! G$ G: I& @) k3 A但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐3 X$ p6 J  D( v- b' @' l: {1 X
會唔會覺得未夠班呢5 f8 ^" d/ |* m- }% \* D
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
9 F6 K9 u" }. d但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
* K( [# i  i0 i% ?) v4 t0 e又點解釋& b2 W4 H' n) H; X" s
3 h3 \  s* j% n1 h4 f& Q
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回* v. O' }" l  {4 L8 [5 j# d
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到! }% T. |1 Q1 C2 K
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材" A9 u/ u) v5 Q0 ~: t* o
講得好7 Q) }- r1 I, u0 Y! U0 B8 b
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈3 x5 s$ R4 X2 L8 m
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
/ B8 q9 y& F( A5 s1 A. o
3 K) q$ S. V' t/ t8 h
2 s" A- |. u9 ]4 \9 p, s証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
) q/ {. g6 S  \& k" S$ B
' P1 b/ n5 @8 n8 Z用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

( Z5 e. v1 h: s! S$ f
4 {7 E" D% `9 \5 P9 |6 K, V3 P' ?2 o( [- ]. [4 j9 d
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗