jsqaure99

true say, good example.) d) a6 W5 X  c2 l+ E
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.0 q  n9 A- Y2 t$ I" W% x+ `6 v
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.3 z, y4 I: _0 M: p: ]
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕0 |& Y. V* G* y/ I4 ]# o
NO OFFENCE
4 {4 I+ p( w" u( G4 q( j4 H但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
; w1 w0 Y% L. k# S係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢! r% |# f4 B7 S) H1 L
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
. ?  |& D; Z5 C1 C  [9 rIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢- O9 f  m4 z% T* }" Z
我唔知1 R2 G+ q3 x& B; X5 f2 k6 j
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐! E. p+ Y) k5 i% c
會唔會覺得未夠班呢* s8 }3 j) |2 b$ J- B8 r" t
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
$ Z" S2 Z. A; c4 W0 m1 P但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
1 n/ J& G7 L) P) x3 @又點解釋: B$ ?- n# Z; c$ n; d( O
5 x6 c8 ~6 ~4 }6 {- ~# i& P. e
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
& C' u: L0 D7 ~. Z以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
, a: z0 M4 L$ `. n家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
& Q$ E1 v/ P3 z5 N# C, E2 U1 ]9 E講得好1 D1 h! V5 {+ {5 n4 q+ j8 }; y
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
9 F4 d: v' U* ?% g我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:0 t3 h* }/ m1 y6 ]3 e

( ~1 U6 o( D6 L- l6 q7 k0 s8 q
& a& F$ i9 C/ j# j証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
- j1 t: J, M$ N3 o+ M6 }/ i5 n$ c0 F# D6 b! ]1 y3 C
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

+ g3 p, N; h) _) _- I
% i: D  v# o) \! c6 d% ~" v: `) ~- N% f5 r- L9 Z1 ^6 ?
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗