jsqaure99

true say, good example.
1 D7 ^) P9 T# ~& b- H4 Gby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive./ N2 f; `6 o% y7 b2 r( D- r/ y
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
9 c+ u1 H' x* R! `no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
5 m: x1 J& ]0 H8 M4 t" }1 H0 eNO OFFENCE : M4 c; S( Y9 \% K# O
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣5 m7 K( R7 Z" k) E
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢" ~) u, N# D; e4 R  u
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
% e6 `6 a0 {1 x; u$ ]! x2 fIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢6 g% ]6 _1 q- Z7 g/ I! P
我唔知3 V* A( A, N" X* f5 M2 ^# \) T2 d
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐/ J* l9 ?; M8 D7 k5 s
會唔會覺得未夠班呢3 q2 A2 U5 e- \$ n" r- d
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附. f6 Y) v6 Q% }# g8 ~0 g; m
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇4 w- J4 I# U: j& L9 C6 h% |$ R; R
又點解釋# A8 [' t# i4 `3 V: L; v0 i
* L4 ]' z4 \6 a' t
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
/ _+ Q# m# x% r以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
8 z8 e" \' Q% r家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
- N, B# B2 U6 R6 N: h講得好5 F. T, P1 t7 W! b9 r0 x
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈' i$ z: [; x, C! L; o
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
1 |5 N! H0 O; m& R0 |2 [' s0 X; I$ D* k6 p* l( C; u

! L% C" O' g2 m# U証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
7 T* j) c, C# T
3 R- k( V0 C8 |1 r用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

6 }* I. d1 G3 o- \
1 f) g$ u* F7 u
$ o5 d/ Q) e. y) |) K" T唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗