jsqaure99

true say, good example.
6 O& }% P- c% w( \6 M' Qby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
! ~, |" |  f% S0 w; q4 ctrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will." a8 i4 o5 m+ x, Z) l$ A7 m
no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕; m& S) n) J. S7 k; p, S( o
NO OFFENCE
" q7 ]  K& I- t& m8 e但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
( |- G2 k  Y/ z3 c$ \1 M係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
$ B- G$ ~2 O2 C8 f8 q  ]; iIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢& b" F" N$ O. v$ i
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
8 B8 c$ P. l% s+ ?( E" K5 N, a我唔知
4 q5 n7 I+ k6 e/ l但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
8 k. B( b$ K4 n# E. h會唔會覺得未夠班呢
( {3 w1 L- {' T+ u人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附& C& `! c* Y: t7 ?* a
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
6 @( E- p$ ~) i5 O又點解釋& S5 s; B$ q) z( m

( ]6 Z3 @. |0 @" Q仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
2 P/ b- L6 I. d, o以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到4 U8 i; C4 P  o- }; n
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
: R7 e( p1 E: Y) N& z講得好! ?8 X7 \- e" W1 e4 G% Y$ C
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈' ?# A" _. |& l% q2 v# r
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
# l' {; ^) B3 W  m& X1 p4 p6 p% ~* e! ~

; }# {; f: {$ M3 I: g& i証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
3 h& G) U1 T. O7 w; s) f* d+ I, I8 O$ m
用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

! j& E' n0 r$ s$ m4 H5 u
$ y/ K' ^& G, l2 {1 k
/ h! R: P! }/ i# E" h) _: _, G* V唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗