jsqaure99

true say, good example.
. ]: P5 H0 S- T+ E: r( s. ]$ Hby the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.5 g$ Z- d# @9 m; j" o
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
5 \8 O0 P5 B5 }- Z* {no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕, Q& F* G9 ^( l4 e
NO OFFENCE
+ s( A: k, V3 C) D但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
% R; w# `" A3 L' D& p4 z係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
' u8 Y; U; V/ nIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢& o# K+ d: f& U8 I  A$ T- P! x
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
+ v5 p8 z' A" |我唔知( f6 Y2 J8 @* H: Q$ C0 T
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐; X" w! J8 V- N. c% q2 i( c
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
' L3 l  @+ ~; k人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
% I% d$ a5 s) M7 s0 T- h2 v6 N* h但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇* D  k5 T% [+ |) t
又點解釋. u- P+ C* I" m& k- M
# ~7 K- P( ^/ P* D1 t6 k1 y) ?+ v
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回! @7 p" n( ]( v; N2 G% g( n1 u* v0 t
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
3 M/ K! j/ x1 a* `5 f家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材, q) L! T$ H" M& o3 l
講得好" T6 `6 y6 I2 _2 e
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈  ]! X# ]) f6 y1 ]
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:$ [0 W0 \7 a" [& }

& x( R+ h/ E" t, z2 h& D9 s# ]3 x1 s) n" u2 k0 c8 D
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據
0 ?1 Q* _- h$ i: w$ _
" O) q1 {! j( O! h用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

7 V( k4 N; b% M: U
  R+ O" }5 U4 Y7 P
0 D% s) W. ^! h: E! N- m! ^
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗