jsqaure99

true say, good example.( ^7 n8 c3 ]" l5 t3 [9 b
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.8 F+ m% K$ \; n2 Q
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
# j8 b( a+ j( H: s" `! Yno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕# J) {( H: K, y8 u* i
NO OFFENCE + E/ ^! v! }6 L! ~* O; T9 X
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣
; R+ w0 ?# J; X) d2 s係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
+ m: C1 y1 r' Y  q7 y5 QIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
) c' u" C; S! ^" L3 R8 G9 HIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢+ b) ?0 \. j! o7 l0 v" ~( u0 h6 L' _
我唔知0 Z* J; C* w  s( ~6 w
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
+ R; {9 r4 T9 r% e; @  Y2 ~5 H會唔會覺得未夠班呢
3 a7 `/ ~+ H$ I$ ^4 L( g0 q7 M: U人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附( @8 V( S5 J& t+ H: U2 o3 O
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇* ?) e6 k+ t$ z1 y8 ~9 j9 n4 r/ G
又點解釋3 d! `+ a2 v! Z
! ~1 K- V: T' c; S, s
仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回, K- ~7 D3 y+ \" e
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到4 J6 b7 A1 J7 |* m" T6 V
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
- P- b1 n1 X$ V; F+ W講得好- L. A  I7 L* ]
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈0 O, }4 `5 X, B/ x3 q
我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
: `, t; ^7 g. r, K/ f  R
' @# b9 X$ ^9 j/ r2 Y+ i
# b; P! V6 h  I, q証據...係要証實左既先叫証據+ g0 L( P5 J) ~0 \7 H- z: ?3 \: J

: {. H8 N/ Q2 a6 H8 z用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

8 s6 X% y& H  p- o/ v1 c+ J

9 R: v% b0 V% \2 t# v+ @' F. n9 _! Q! e2 ~
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗