jsqaure99

true say, good example.$ `/ H' r; R% @
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive.
/ I# z- N9 `" J, r4 L8 E. J) ctrying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
: B5 ]. b/ F) v: A6 u1 Jno offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕
: b  n7 `+ s! o1 F& s% q- vNO OFFENCE & y' N, i4 k; p) z. Q/ ~. P! ?
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣0 D$ U) W! ^) m: l* c; O
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
" o0 H. @+ s, N5 ^IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢
1 m. W( V; v' g! qIMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
2 u' X, M/ \3 t; e4 @我唔知
" B- d* ]0 w% g8 e) C# j! g  X但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐) |. F& N* B1 r3 V
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
. v- Q( I2 W$ x1 e9 a4 N  _人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附$ p4 w5 S9 e! X5 b; v
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
& d, G; o0 b9 t' a8 W7 ?3 \! C1 a又點解釋
, s! c8 r9 X0 i4 R$ `
" K' M& u1 z- Y8 }仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回- o" Z8 V# F" i% M$ ?9 M$ e1 X
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
- H% }. C* \' N# Z  m; Z家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
# r5 M3 g0 z6 {: l) d講得好: u4 |" u, A( v' M. e
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
6 C7 {, y* c- k! b& E# {- W2 a1 K! Z我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
" N6 }( K5 F+ j9 k+ p1 a- k7 d) n: O/ S+ c' x$ f6 k
) \3 @6 W6 _. w' S. e: o
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據  l$ |5 L1 O* Q3 Y+ A

( u  y7 A9 _! x/ Y' ]用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

* X3 Z3 m9 Y# D- g! c# k( r8 ^- ~  C/ R9 w4 i9 U4 f1 S
& ~4 z7 z/ `. I% K) y
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗