jsqaure99

true say, good example.5 U; |, f! Q8 r
by the way all i wanna say is that article is very naive./ u, y) O3 ]1 Q+ K! j2 Z
trying to use our limited "smartness" to guess god's will.
* G5 j$ v; t* X* g8 h; ~no offence but i think whoever wrote it is stupid and him/her WILL SEE.

jsqaure99

TO sk﹕7 D. i/ g  {: y
NO OFFENCE
, {* \5 N; R5 M! x) W6 n但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣3 ]; L! O# f, E6 `+ D; ?
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
: I* l% k, B& ~3 ^. I! bIMAGE又係咪解DNA呢/ I( F% C; }9 X, ]5 e
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
* o9 m( n; i& \4 a& S我唔知
5 |1 z* T# j! M; r' q1 Z- ]但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐
% O+ p/ f1 M  m, Q# [1 Q會唔會覺得未夠班呢9 ~2 x' }" ?1 k% B* b1 l, p4 {7 l
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附3 l. O& d' o/ `  ?# W  q( t6 X
但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
9 S/ N- j; Y0 W9 v1 n$ @1 ]' {/ X2 x又點解釋/ }7 i1 j# A8 I  P6 }

9 {( l4 c0 p) d  }& z  [9 M% g8 l仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

jsqaure99

我就敗興而回
0 g' }6 J" n/ I  Y' F5 `以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到7 l4 S- S8 A6 m6 I
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

jsqaure99

反面教材
4 n- @+ _: s! B講得好, ^* M' K, k8 W6 G9 Q( q  w% J
仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

jsqaure99

哈哈
7 ?- _; ]- r- M# U6 `我個人比夠口臭唔好意思

jsqaure99

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
7 y% e! c! P/ w
: a5 p& K% ^& u# M0 ]7 R/ [- l4 z" G5 V# |3 ^# {' s
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據9 h5 a  ~( a. }5 p9 @8 x7 U

7 m  a* L) T3 q8 j2 P用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀!

: K4 m5 U; j9 V. \6 p
& D, o: k* a9 `4 d. N) w* u+ q$ t( w- X" v, m  T5 A
唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗